The Impact of Brexit on Employment Law

Similar documents
EMPLOYMENT LAW IMPLICATIONS OF A BREXIT

Information note on the UK referendum decision and its potential implications

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 18 March 2004 *

Information Note: United Kingdom (UK) referendum on membership of the European Union (EU) and the Human Rights issues

Overview of the existing EU legislation on gender equality and definitions of key concepts

BREXIT. Employment law consequences of Brexit

An introduction to Community Legislation on Equal Treatment and the Novelties of the Recast Directive

In or Out: the EU referendum

International Employee Mobility after Brexit

IMMIGRATION AND SOCIAL SECURITY CO-ORDINATION (EU WITHDRAWAL) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

Joint Select Committee on Human Rights Inquiry into the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill. The Law Society of Scotland s Response

Brexit Implications on the Life Sciences Sector

The Burden of Proof in Discrimination Cases. Her Honour Judge Stacey Circuit Judge Crown Court, County Court and Employment Appeal Tribunal

Options Paper. Simplification and improvement of legislation in the area of equal treatment between men and women

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill House of Commons Report stage. Tuesday 16 January 2018

2018 No. xxxx EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL PROCEEDINGS EVIDENCE FAMILY PROCEEDINGS. The Service of Documents and Taking of Evidence in Civil and

Providing a crossborder. cooperation framework A FUTURE PARTNERSHIP PAPER

The Burden of Proof in Sex Discrimination Cases

GENDER EQUALITY IN EMPLOYMENT IN THE EU AND MALTA: AN OVERVIEW BY THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF WOMEN

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

How will Brexit affect employment rights and obligations?

The consequences of Brexit

Official Journal of the European Communities

The EFTA Court: Providing Safe Anchorage to the Single Market

DELEGATED POWERS MEMORANDUM BY THE DEPARTMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE

Guidance Note on the transposition and implementation of the EU Asylum Acquis. February 2014

Healing the divisions: A positive vision for equality and human rights in Britain

BRITAIN S BARGAINING STRENGTH REGARDING POST-BREXIT JURISDICTION ARRANGEMENTS. David Wolfson Q.C. Society of Conservative Lawyers

Rt Hon David Davis MP Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union 9 Downing Street SW1A 2AG

BREXIT Seven alternatives to EU membership. Dr David Rees

Introduction to Gender Equality law

Decision of the European Banking Authority adopting the Rules of Procedure for the non-binding mediation between competent authorities

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Brexit Paper 4: Civil Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments

The Equality Act abroad:

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Brexit Seminar : Emergent Understandings of Consequences and Impacts: The Potential Impact of Brexit on Scotland and UK

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 27 February 2014 (*)

Brexit Briefing THOMPSONS SOLICITORS TRADE UNION LAW GROUP BRIEFING

THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

PROVING DISCRIMINATION: THE SHIFT OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF AND ACCESS TO EVIDENCE. Tom Brown

Commentary on the Joint Report A Constitutional Conundrums: Northern Ireland, the EU and Human Rights Project Report

Scottish Universities Legal Network on Europe

BREXIT POTENTIAL ISSUES FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LAW LITIGATION IN NORTHERN IRELAND. or How to Survive Without EU Law As We Know It

Scottish Universities Legal Network on Europe

BAR COUNCIL PARLIAMENTARY BRIEFING EU (WITHDRAWAL) BILL FOR THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL Wahl delivered on 12 December 2013 (1) Case C-507/12. Jessy Saint Prix v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill

Securing designated Special Status for the north within the EU April 2017

JUDGMENT. P (Appellant) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent)

EQUALITY COMMISSION FOR NORTHERN IRELAND. Equality law and EU membership. April 2016

UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Legal Continuity) (Scotland) Bill [AS AMENDED AT STAGE 2]

TREE.2 EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 14 March 2019 (OR. en) 2018/0298 (COD) PE-CONS 13/19 MAR 13 PREP-BXT 19 CODEC 172

GENDER EQUALITY LAW IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Legal Continuity) (Scotland) Bill [AS PASSED]

LEGISLATING FOR THE UK'S WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EU

Infringement Proceedings & References to the Court of Justice of the EU. Adam Weiss The AIRE Centre

What Will Happen to Workers Rights after Brexit?

EU Notice To Stakeholders Is Accurate, But Misleading

List of topics for papers

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill House of Lords Report stage 23 April 2018

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 11 October 2007 *

The Burden of Proof. Tom Brown

PROVING DISCRIMINATION: THE SHIFT OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF AND ACCESS TO EVIDENCE. Dee Masters, Barrister

The international legal implications of a unilateral withdrawal by the United Kingdom from the European Union

(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Information session on Brexit for EU/EEA Staff

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

EU (Withdrawal) Bill- Committee stage

THE AIRE CENTRE Advice on Individual Rights in Europe

Information Note on Trafficking

Brexit Paper 20: The Impact of No Deal

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS EEA/BREXIT INFORMATION SESSION

Herbert Smith Freehills Insights membership, each of which provide to a greater or

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Agreement on arrangements regarding citizens rights between Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway and the United Kingdom

Access to the Legal Services Market Post-Brexit

BILL. Repeal the European Communities Act 1972 and make other provision in connection with the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU.

Social assistance and the right to reside at the European Court of Justice Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig

The EU Legal Framework on Equality

What effect will Brexit have on law in England? IOSH November John Mitchell, Partner, Regulatory Risk & Compliance

CM1903 Note on the Position of UK nationals living in the EU in the case of a No Deal Brexit

SUPPLEMENTARY MEMORANDUM CONCERNING THE DELEGATED POWERS IN THE BILL FOR THE DELEGATED POWERS AND REGULATORY REFORM COMMITTEE

Why this model WON T work for the UK after Brexit EFTA 4 UK Briefing paper 06/11/2018

OUTCOME OF THE COUNCIL MEETING. 3542nd Council meeting. General Affairs. (Art. 50) Brussels, 22 May 2017 PRESS

The Impact of Brexit on Equality Law

Where Next for UK Employment Rights?

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 19 April 2012 (*)

The EU Legal Framework on Equality

THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN SEX DISCRIMINATION CASES ERA TRIER

2017 No. 114 AGRICULTURE LAND DRAINAGE WATER

The EU (Withdrawal) Bill and the Rule of Law Expert Working Group

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2010/18/EU

Direction made by the PRA under Part 7 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019

Brexit and Immigration: An update on citizens rights. Withdrawal Agreement; Settlement Scheme; Future Immigration System

Bar Council response to the Review of the Balance of Competences: Social and Employment consultation paper

Transcription:

1

The Impact of Brexit on Employment Law Summary The UK has played a central role in bringing about law reform at an EU level in the area of equality and employment rights. Currently, principles of CJEU jurisprudence prevent individual EU member states from overriding these rights with their own laws; protection which will fall away for UK workers in the event of a Brexit, and which the WTO rules will not replace. This is particularly the case for rights arising from UK secondary legislation, and in CJEU case law. The effect of this for individual rights is set out in the table contained within this paper. Specifically, compensation for discrimination, maternity and pregnancy rights, working time and holiday pay, and agency workers rights are areas of particular risk. We therefore urge the Government to guarantee employment and equality rights in any bilateral treaty with the EU. Post-Brexit, the acquis (body of EU law) must be given an enhanced status in the interpretation of UK employment law. Particular regard should be given to the acquis in the context of: compensation for discrimination, maternity and pregnancy rights, and working time. Finally, we urge the Government to retain existing domestic legislation which relates to agency workers. 2

The Impact of Brexit on Employment Law Current position: How are EU workers rights guaranteed at present? 1. Employment and equality rights in the UK which derive from EU law are currently protected by the ECA 1972, while principles of CJEU case law stop conflicting national law trumping such rights. Once the ECA 1972 itself is repealed, Parliament will be able to remove or legislate contrary to working and equality rights which are currently guaranteed by EU Treaties, directives and regulations and which comprise a minimum floor under which the UK cannot sink. 1 How could workers rights be guaranteed outside the EU/EEA? EFTA or a bespoke Bilateral Agreement 2. If the UK is neither a member of the EEA nor the EU, it will be under no obligation to adhere to EU law on employment (or any other) matters a priori. The UK may opt for a Swiss model: European Free Trade Association (EFTA) membership without EEA membership, or a new agreement model with the EU. The UK may decide to enter into bilateral agreements which incorporate an obligation to give effect to EU social law, including EU employment and equality rights. It is worth noting that a trade deal under World Trade Organisation rules will not guarantee employment rights whatsoever as WTO rules are silent on social rights. Through domestic legislation: The Great Repeal Bill (the Bill ) 3. The aim of the Bill is to repeal the 1972 EU Communities Act and to incorporate existing EU law (the acquis ) into domestic law. The acquis has been important in the development of key concepts concerning equality and workers rights in English Law. How could rights presently guaranteed by EU Law be changed post Brexit? Primary Legislation 4. Rights bestowed by primary legislation, such as prohibitions on discrimination provided by the and rights protecting employees and workers under the Employment Rights Act 1996, will not require modification by new Acts of Parliament since such already form part of English Law. Secondary Legislation 1 This long established constitutional principle was nonetheless encapsulated in s 18 European Union Act 2011: Directly applicable or directly effective EU law (that is, the rights, powers, liabilities, obligations, restrictions, remedies and procedures referred to in section 2(1) of the European Communities Act 1972) falls to be recognised and available in law in the United Kingdom only by virtue of that Act or where it is required to be recognised and available in law by virtue of any other Act. 3

5. Secondary legislation made under Acts other than the ECA (such as the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 made under the Employment Rights Act 1999) can be changed by other secondary legislation. Secondary legislation made under the ECA 1972 will cease to have effect when the ECA is repealed, unless such secondary legislation is saved by provisions in primary legislation or by provisions in the Bill. CJEU Case Law 6. Pre-Brexit: Up to the point of Brexit, pre-brexit employment rights will continue to be interpreted by the courts in light of the acquis by virtue of the Bill. 7. Post-Brexit: There is no certainty that the acquis will be afforded a particularly protected status with regard to the interpretation of UK employment law. This may impact on the development of UK law particularly in relation to the protection of workers rights and in the context of equality law. 8. The table below exemplifies the effect that removing the current status of CJEU judgments may have on some aspects of UK employment law: Case Act Effect of removal Working Time Regulations 1998 Stringer v HMRC C- 520/06 Marshalls Clay v Coulfield C-131/04 Williams v British Airways C- 155/10 Dekker C-177/88 Tele Danmark A/S v Handels C-109/00 Chez Razpredelenie Bulgaria C-83/14 Webb v EMO C-32/93 Working Time Regulations 1998 Working Time Regulations 1998 Right for annual pay to accrue during sick leave may no longer apply. Employers could designate part of the pay that a worker receives for work already done as holiday pay. Employers may only be required to provide workers with their basic pay for the purposes of holiday pay. Discrimination on grounds of pregnancy may not also be on grounds of sex. Employers may not have to assume the risk of the economic and organisational consequences of the pregnancy of employees. The concept of direct discrimination by association may be narrowed again and may not apply to claims of indirect discrimination as well as those of direct discrimination. It may be permissible to compare the situation of a woman who finds herself incapable, by reason of pregnancy, of performing the task for which she was recruited with that of a man similarly incapable for medical or other reasons. 4

Enderby Frenchay HA C-127/92 Equal Pay Act 1970 Where statistics show an appreciable difference in pay between men and women between jobs of equal value, the burden may no longer pass to the employer to objectively justify the disparity. Employment rights susceptible to change post Brexit Compensation for discrimination 9. The principle, derived from EU law, that financial compensation must be adequate in order to achieve equality (set out in Marshall No (2) 2 means that, at present, compensation is potentially unlimited. However, this principle may be vulnerable post-brexit and the limit on compensation for discrimination may be capped. Maternity and Pregnancy Rights 10. EU law has developed important principles in this area such as the importance of substantive equality between men and women and the protection of the special relationship between mother and child. These principles may be vulnerable to erosion post-brexit. Working Time 11. The common law provides very little to workers with respect to working time and holiday pay. If ECJ decisions are no longer binding post-brexit, workers will be left with weak protection. For instance, Claimants will no longer be able to rely on the principles set out by the CJEU in Williams v British Airways PLC, 3 followed in Bear Scotland v Fulton, 4 that calculations of holiday pay must include particular types of overtime in the definition of normal pay. 12. UK employees could also lose the EU-derived ability to take annual leave accrued during sick leave and maternity leave outside those periods: see Merino Gomez v Continental Industrias del Caucho SA (C342/01) [2004] E.C.R. I-2605 and Stringer v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (C-520/06) [2009] All E.R. (EC) 906. Agency Workers Rights 13. Agency workers may not be able to rely on the equal treatment rights contained in the Temporary Agency Work Directive (2008/104/EC) if the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 are removed. Recommendations Any post-brexit arrangement with the EU should, at the very least: 2 C-271/91, [1993] ECR 1-4367 [1994] QB 126 3 (C-155/10) [2012] ICR 847 4 [2015] ICR 221 5

(1) Guarantee employment and equality rights in any bilateral treaty with the EU; (2) Give the post-brexit acquis an enhanced status in the interpretation of UK employment law; (3) Have particular regard to the pre and post-brexit acquis in the context of: compensation for discrimination, maternity and pregnancy rights, and working time; and (4) Retain domestic legislation regarding agency workers. Employment Law Bar Association February 2017 6