IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv TWT Document 3 Filed 03/24/2009 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Georgia Gainesville Division BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT WAUKESHA COUNTY. Case Classification Declaratory Judgment. Complaint

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA

Case 3:10-cv ECR-RAM Document 1 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. The Plaintiff filed this Declaratory Judgment Action and Motion for Interlocutory

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv JTN Doc #16 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 22 Page ID#81

STATE OF GEORGIA. OSWALD THOMPSON, JR., individually and on behalf of all CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 2015CV268206

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 3:11-cv JPB Document 3 Filed 01/24/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv SM-JCW Document 1 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA * *

Case 1:09-cv TWT Document 21-2 Filed 07/27/2009 Page 1 of 17

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/11/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

In the Supreme Court of Georgia. GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC., JAMES CHRENCIK, MICHAEL NYDEN, AND JEFFREY HUONG, Appellants

Case 4:08-cv SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/24/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

)(

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 1:06-cv CAP Document 47 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:16-at Document 1 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 9

In the United States District Court for the District of Colorado

Case 2:10-cv TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

Civil Liberties & the Rights of the Accused CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMMODITAS GEORGIA, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Brunswick Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 5:08-cv GTS-GJD Document 1 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 1 of 15

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA. GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC., et.al.,) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. A19A0862 ) THOMAS C. BORDEAUX, JR.

Case: 3:17-cv GFVT Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/31/17 Page: 1 of 9 - Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA. GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC.,et.al.,) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. S15A1632 ) TOM CALDWELL, et.al.

Case 1:19-cv JGD Document 1 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case3:10-cv SI Document25 Filed02/25/10 Page1 of 8

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

case 2:14-cv PPS-JEM document 15 filed 09/21/14 page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Brooklyn in which he was serving out the last months of his prison sentence to a

2:15-cv PDB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv BBM Document 39-2 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

S10A1267. JOINER et al. v. GLENN. Glenn filed suit against Joiner, the Mayor of Jefferson, Georgia, the

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:18-at Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 12

By and through his counsel, Michael H. Sussman, plaintiff hereby states and alleges against defendants:

2:10-cv SB-BM Date Filed 10/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 17

Case 4:08-cv HLM Document 33 Filed 07/30/2009 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv MCE -GGH Document 9 Filed 11/02/11 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT. Jurisdiction

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/09/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Brunswick Division

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC. ) And ) TIMOTHY BEARDEN ) ) Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. ) v. ) ) ) CITY OF ATLANTA, ) HARTSFIELD-JACKSON ) ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL ) AIRPORT, ) SHIRLEY FRANKLIN, in her ) Official capacity as Mayor of the City ) Of Atlanta, Georgia, ) And ) BENJAMIN DECOSTA, ) In his official capacity as Aviation ) General Manager of the City of ) Atlanta, ) ) Defendants. ) COMPLAINT 1

I. INTRODUCTION 1. This action, under 42 U.S.C. 1983, seeks a declaratory judgment that the threatened detention, search, arrest and prosecution by Defendants of people carrying firearms within the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport ( Airport ) violates the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Militia Clause of the Constitution of the United States, the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, together with an appropriate injunction. Plaintiffs bring related state law claims that form the same controversy. II. JURISDICTION & VENUE 2. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 28 U.S.C. 1343. This Court has jurisdiction under the related state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367. 3. Venue is proper because Defendants all are located in this District and in this Division, Plaintiff GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. resides in this District, and Plaintiff Timothy Bearden resides in this District. 2

III. PARTIES 4. Plaintiff GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. ( GCO ) is a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of the state of Georgia, whose mission is to foster the rights of its members to keep and bear arms. 5. Plaintiff Timothy Bearden is a resident of the State of Georgia and a citizen of the United States. 6. Plaintiff Bearden is a member of the Georgia House of Representatives and a member of GCO. 7. Defendant City of Atlanta is a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Georgia. 8. Defendant Airport is a public airport owned and operated by the City of Atlanta. 9. Defendant Shirley Franklin is the Mayor of the City of Atlanta. 10. Defendant Benjamin DeCosta is the Aviation General Manager of the City of Atlanta. 3

IV. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 11. Until July 1, 2008, O.C.G.A. 16-12-122 through 16-12-127 generally prohibited carrying a firearm in the Airport, with a penalty of up to 20 years in prison and a $15,000 fine. 12. Beginning July 1, 2008, the law in Georgia was changed by House Bill 89, an act of the General Assembly signed by the Governor, permitting people to whom a Georgia firearms license ( GFL ) has been issued to carry a firearm in public transportation, notwithstanding the provisions of O.C.G.A. 16-12- 122 through 16-12-127. 13. On June 30, 2008, Defendants Franklin and DeCosta issued a media advisory stating Atlanta Mayor, Airport GM Declare Airport Gun-Free Zone. 14. Plaintiff Bearden, a holder of a validly issued GFL, is the author and lead sponsor of House Bill 89. 15. On June 30, 2008, in response to being told that Plaintiff Bearden intended to visit the Airport on July 1, 2008 while armed with a firearm, Defendant DeCosta stated that if Plaintiff Bearden were seen legally armed at the Airport, Plaintiff Bearden would be (falsely) arrested. 4

16. On July 1, 2008, Defendant DeCosta was quoted in the Atlanta Journal- Constitution (p. A1, col. 1) as saying, I can identify [Rep. Bearden], and I ll have him arrested. We re not fooling around. This is a post-terrorism environment. 17. Defendants Franklin and DeCosta scheduled a press conference for July 1, 2008, at which they would announce the policy of Defendant City of Atlanta and Defendant Airport to arrest and prosecute anyone legally carrying a firearm at the Airport. 18. Defendants Franklin and DeCosta have established policies to (illegally) detain, arrest, search and prosecute people for legally carrying firearms in the Airport, in reckless disregard and indifference to such peoples rights. 19. Plaintiff Bearden is a visitor and user of the Airport facilities. He would like to exercise his right to carry a firearm while in the nonsterile areas of the Airport, but he is in fear of detention, search, arrest, and prosecution for doing so. 20. Plaintiff Bearden intended to visit the Airport on July 1, 2008 while legally armed, but he was deterred from doing so by Defendant DeCosta s specifically targeting Plaintiff Bearden for arrest. 21. Bearden is an able-bodied man between the ages of 18 and 45. 5

22. Plaintiff GCO has over 1,600 members, many of whom use the Airport, have validly issued GFLs, and wish to exercise their rights to carry firearms while visiting the Airport, but who are afraid to do so for fear of detention, search, arrest, and prosecution by Defendants. 23. A valid GFL is property in the hands of the licensee. 24. O.C.G.A. 16-11-173 expressly prohibits Defendants from regulating the carrying of firearms in any manner. 25. The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms. 26. The Militia Clause of the Constitution of the United States provides that Congress shall have the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia. 27. The Militia as used in the Militia Clause means all able bodied men. 28. The individual right to bear arms existed at common law prior to the passage of the Second Amendment. 29. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides that the right of the people to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated. 6

30. The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides that No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Count 1 Violation of O.C.G.A. 16-11-173 31. Declaring the Airport to be a Gun-Free Zone, and threatening to arrest and prosecute Plaintiff Bearden and other GCO members for legally carrying firearms in the Airport, constitutes regulation of the carrying of firearms by Defendants, in violation of O.C.G.A. 16-11-173. Count 2 Violations of Militia Clause of the Constitution of the United States 32. By threatening to arrest Plaintiff Bearden and other GCO members for legally carrying firearms in the Airport, Defendants have threatened to interfere with Plaintiffs rights under the Militia Clause of the Constitution of the United States. Count 3 Violations of Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States 33. By threatening to arrest Plaintiff Bearden and other GCO members for legally carrying firearms in the Airport, Defendants have violated Plaintiffs rights to 7

bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Count 4 Violations of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States 34. By threatening to arrest Plaintiff Bearden and other GCO members for legally carrying firearms in the Airport, Defendants have violated Plaintiffs rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. Count 5 Violations of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States 35. By threatening to arrest Plaintiff Bearden and other GCO members for legally carrying firearms in the Airport, Defendants have violated Plaintiffs rights to bear arms that existed prior to the passage of the Second Amendment, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 36. By threatening to arrest Plaintiff Bearden and other GCO members for legally carrying firearms in the Airport, Defendants have deprived Plaintiffs of a portion of their property interest in their GFLs without due process, in 8

violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Prayer for Relief Plaintiffs demand the following relief: 37. A declaration that Defendants policies of detaining, arresting, searching and prosecuting people for legally carrying firearms in the Airport violates O.C.G.A. 16-11-173, and the Militia Clause, the Second Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 38. An injunction prohibiting Defendant from detaining, arresting, and searching people for legally carrying firearms in the Airport, including conducting a Terry stop in the absence of reasonable suspicion of criminal wrongdoing. 39. Costs of bringing and maintaining this action, including reasonable attorney s fees. 40. Any other relief the Court deems proper. JOHN R. MONROE, 9

/s/ John R. Monroe John R. Monroe Attorney at Law 9640 Coleman Road Roswell, GA 30075 Telephone: (678) 362-7650 Facsimile: (770) 552-9318 john.monroe1@earthlink.net ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS 10