FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

Similar documents
FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR KOCHHAR

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE TRANSFER OF JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR TO THE HIGH COURT OF PATNA

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF HON BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA DELIVERED ON G. ROHINI CHIEF JUSTICE

Shri Rajeev Khosla, President, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Shri Jatan Singh, Vice-President, Delhi High Court Bar Association,

FAREWELL SPEECH DELIVERED BY JUSTICE GITA MITTAL IN THE FULL COURT REFERENCE ON THE RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE G. ROHINI, CJ

FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN DELIVERED ON G. ROHINI CHIEF JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONTRACT ACT. Judgment reserved on : October 15, Judgment delivered on : November 04, 2008

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Judgment delivered on:

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI

Through: Versus. Through: 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. Date of Reserve: January 14, Date of Order: January 21, 2009

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI. The Roster of Sitting of Hon ble Judges of this Court effective from 2 nd January, 2018 is as under:- Division Benches

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 20 OF Vs. DEVAS MULTIMEDIA P. LTD...

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar Srivastava, Advocate. C.M(M) No. 211/2013. Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar Srivastava, Advocate.

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI. The Roster of Sitting of Hon ble Judges of this Court effective from 1 st July, 2018 is as under:- Division Benches

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + RFA No.522/2017 and C.M. No.19306/2017(stay) % 7th August, versus

.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004

CS no. 26/15 M/s Simulax SMT Solutions Vs. M/s Quad. Sh. Dheeraj Bhidhudi counsel for plaintiff. None for defendant.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.

versus Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State with SI Ravi Kumar. Mr. Surender Singh, Adv. for R-2.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Decision: 11 th March, 2010

Privacy Issues and RTI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. AA No.396/2007. Date of decision: December 3, Vs.

$~9. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % RSA 228/2015 and C.M. No.12883/2015. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

NO COMPENDSATION FOR DELAY IN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER ARB P. 180/2003. Judgment delivered on: versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 4 th August, I.A. No.16571/2012 & I.A. No.16572/2012 in CS (OS) 2527/2009

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 16 th February, Versus

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:11 th December, Through: Mr Rajat Aneja, Advocate. Versus AND. CM (M)No.

Criminal Revn No. 4(SH) of 2009.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. CCP 55/2000, 1141/99 and 82/1999 IN CS (OS) 635/1992. Judgment delivered on:

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on: 27 th January, ARB. P. No.373/2015. versus

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus

POLICY MANUAL PART ONE INTRODUCTION AND INTERPRETATION OF POLICY. The interpretation of the Code of Conduct will be at the discretion of the Council.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 997/2014. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 297 OF 2004 IN EXECUTION PETITION NO.

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 15 th February, CS(OS) 3324/2014

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Delhi Rent Control Act R.C.REV.29/2012 Date of Decision: Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Manoj MisraVs. Delhi Development Authority &Ors.

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Sewa Singh Dhiman. Sh. Mukesh Singh, AR of the DH in person. Sh. Varinder Singh, advocate for JD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.11249/2018 [Arising out of SLP (CIVIL) No.

Through Mr.Prabhjit Jauhar Adv. with Ms.Anupama Kaul, Adv.

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI. The Roster of Sitting of Hon ble Judges of this Court effective from 25 th August, 2018 is as.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P. (C) No. 135/1997 Reserved on: 18th July, 2012 Decided on: 23rd July, 2012

HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI

Hon'ble Chief Justice Sh. Dipak Misra, my brother and sister. colleagues on the Bench, my brother and sister colleagues at the Bar,

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO(OS) No.534/2010 & CM Nos /2010. versus. % Date of Hearing : August 25, 2010

LLB MODEL QUESTION PAPER 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, CM(M) 374/2008 with CM Nos. 4286/2008 and 13305/2008

M/S UTC FIRE & SECURITY INDIA LTD Through: Ms Jasleen K. Oberoi and Ms Surbhi Mehta, Advs.

+ W.P.(C) 7127/2015, CM APPL. No /2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 483 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.

ICSI-CCGRT. ICSI-CCGRT GEETA SAAR A Brief of Premier on Company Law. Registered Office of a company (Sec 12)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Application No. 06 of Manoj Mishra Vs. Union of India & Ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014 BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, OMP No.356/2004. Date of decision : 30th November, 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT. Date of decision: 8th March, 2013 EFA(OS) 34/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PROPERTY DISPUTE. LPA of Date of decision:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB. P. 537/2016. versus J U D G M E NT

Order Delhi State Association Page 1 of 8

1. Issue notice. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Defendant No.1;

Bar & Bench (

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 33 of Alongwith Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 34 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. RFA Nos. 601/2007 and 606/2007. DATE OF DECISION 10th February, 2012.

OH! WHAT S IN THE NAME? By Subash Agarwal, Advocate

1899 CONVENTION FOR THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES

M/S. SAIPEM TRIUNE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. Plaintiff. - versus - INDIAN OIL PETRONAS PVT. LTD.

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Execution Application No. 154 of Tuesday, the 21 st day August, 2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + OMP Nos. 495/2007, 496/2007 & 497/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:

October 05, The Bombay Stock Exchange Limited Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers Dalal Street Mumbai Fax No /1919/3027/2039/2061/2041

$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on:10 th September, 2015

INFORMATION UNDER RTI ACT, 2005 ABOUT NCLAT

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Decided on: versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 76/2015, C.M. APPL.2566/2015. versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 129/2013 (CZ)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN ARBITRATION ACT, Date of Decision : 3rd March 2009

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CS(OS) No.1180/2011 & connected matters % 15 th February, 2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) NO.835 OF 2017 VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY C.M.P. NO.178/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No of 2014

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. + I.A. Nos /2007 & 5651/2009 in CS(OS) No. 829/2002

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA 689/1998 DATE OF DECISION : MAY 16, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.

(in short RSKA) for the Electoral College of AKFI O R D E R. Rajasthan State Kabaddi Association (RSKA) affiliated to AKFI was invited to

SURESH PRASAD alias HARI KISHAN... Appellant Through: Mr.B.D.Sharma, Mr.S.K.Rout, Ms.Sukhda Dhamija and Mr.B.K.Routray, Advocates

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl.M.C. 3710/2007. Date of decision: February 06, 2009.

COURT FOR WHICH CANDIDATE APPLIES: LABOUR APPEAL COURT. 1. The candidate s appropriate qualifications

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE. THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI. WRIT PETITION No.37514/2017 (T-RES)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Judgment reserved on Judgment delivered on

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 ARB.P. 63/2012 Date of Decision : December 06, 2012

Govt. of India National Commission for Minorities Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi-3

Transcription:

Justice Deepa Sharma FAREWELL SPEECH ON THE RETIREMENT OF JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA 25.05.2018 My esteemed sister and brother colleagues, Smt. Maninder Acharya, Additional Solicitor General of India, Sh. Kirti Uppal, President, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Sh. J.P. Sengh, Vice- President, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Sh. Amit Sharma, Secretary, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Sh. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel (Civil), Govt. of NCT Delhi, Sh. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal), Govt. of NCT Delhi, Other Standing Counsels of the Central and State Government, Executive Members of the Delhi High Court Bar Association, Justice Gita Mittal, Acting Chief Justice Presidents, Secretary & Office Bearers of all Bar Associations of Delhi, Presidents, Secretary & Office Bearers of Bar Council of Delhi, Senior Advocates, Learned Members of the Bar, Family members of Justice Deepa Sharma, And everyone present ***

1. We have assembled here to bid farewell to Justice Deepa Sharma upon her retirement from an illustrious career. 2. Born on 28 th May, 1956, Justice Deepa Sharma graduated in Bachelor of Science and thereafter obtained her LLB Degree from the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi in 1978 3. After a short, two-year stint, at the Bar, she cleared the prestigious Delhi Judicial Services Examination and joined as a Civil Judge in September, 1980. 4. In her noteworthy journey as an officer of the DJS and the DHJS, apart from regular criminal and civil courts, her most important posting has been as the First Principal Judge of the Family Courts in Delhi. In this capacity, she is duly credited with setting up of Family Courts across different districts of Delhi. We can therefore, safely say that Justice Deepa Sharma has been at the helm of establishing the special sensitive culture of these courts and the streamlining of the processes in these courts. 5. We also recognize Justice Sharma for her work as a trained mediator and trainer with the District Court Mediation Centres. 6. She has also presided over as Special Judge in several critical jurisdictions including NDPS, MACT, Labour Courts and ITP Act and

ably discharged all assigned taskss. 7. On 1 st November, 2012 Justice Deepa Sharma was appointed as District Judge, Dwarka Courts. Justice Sharma was elevated to the Bench of the Delhi High Court on the 17 th of April, 2013 as an Additional Judge. She was made a permanent judge on 18 th March, 2015. 8. Justice Deepa Sharma has been recognized for being a pleasant personality, on the bench as well as off the bench. Behind this amiable personality, is a judge known for giving a patient hearing to everyone. Her persona has resulted in admiration, abounding affection and respect from the members of the Bar. 9. On the administrative side, Justice Deepa Sharma served as a Member of several committees of the Delhi High Court including amongst others the Mediation and Conciliation Committee, the Protocol Committee, the Building Maintenance Committee of the Family Courts, the Building Maintenance Committee of the Rouse Avenue Court Complex, the Environment Committee, the Monitoring Committee to oversee the functioning of All District court Mediation Centres, as well as the Juvenile Justice Committee. 10. Justice Deepa Sharma has, since the start of her judicial career, shown constant and resolute commitment to institutional development

on the administrative side of the courts. 11. On the judicial side, Justice Deepa Sharma dealt with several sensitive questions of law, which came to be the subject of well-crafted judgments by her. 12. In Antrix Corporation v. Devas Multimedia P Ltd., (SB) she held that once the arbitrator has been appointed following the procedure agreed upon by the parties, the jurisdiction of the court under Section 11(6) of the enactment cannot be invoked. 13. In Indure Pvt. Ltd v. Heidelberg Cement Ltd., (SB) she held that when a bank guarantee is unequivocal or unconditional, the banks are under obligation to honour it. 14. In Anirudh Kumar Pandey v. Management of Modern Public School, (DB) while speaking for a Division Bench of this Court, she held that it was the duty of every School to provide a safe and healthy atmosphere for the psychological, cognitive and behavioural development of the children. She further held that it was incumbent upon the Management of the School to ensure that the adults who work in the School do not pose a risk to children. 15. In Indovax v. Merck Animal Health, (SB) Justice Sharma propounded on the territorial jurisdiction of this court for institution of

suits and held that in cases where the goods of the defendants are not available for sale within the jurisdiction of this Court, it cannot be said that an ordinary person is likely to buy the goods of the defendants believing that they are buying the goods of the plaintiff. In such cases, it cannot be said that the cause of action for infringement and passing off had arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court. 16. In Manju Panwar v. VPS Panwar, (DB) it was held that the consistent behaviour of a spouse exhibiting lack of respect, understanding and faith, which intended to cause pain, discomfort or brought disrespect or disrepute to the other spouse constituted cruelty. 17. In Sunil Kumar v. DDA, (DB) while disposing of 41 matters vide a common judgment on behalf of a Division Bench of this court, Justice Sharma ordered vacation of government land by the unauthorized occupants. 18. In Syndicate Bank v. SSP Tradex Private Ltd, (DB) Justice Deepa Sharma deprecated the practice on behalf of a public sector bank holding that they did not come to equity with clean hands and were therefore disentitled for any equitable relief. She further noted that the actions of the bank in not complying with orders of this court tantamount to abuse of process and imposed costs of rupees 2 lacs on it.

19. While Justice Sharma has authored several judgments in arbitration jurisdiction, her pronouncement in NHAI v. BSCPL is noteworthy inasmuch as it notes the settled tenets on which an award can be challenged under Section 34 of the enactment. 20. The judgments authored by Justice Deepa Sharma in diverse jurisdictions, show her clarity on legal principles and the manner with which she discharged her constitutional duty while remaining conscious of the social realities. 21. Justice Sharma, with whom I also had occasion to share the bench, has always exhibited immense fairness, respect and dignity to the people who come before it. 22. Justice Deepa Sharma has rendered yeomans service to the institution and ably discharged her constitutional obligations. She will be remembered for her positive support in all court related activities. 23. As she prepares to depart from this court, I have to say that we will remember Justice Deepa Sharma with fondness. 24. We wish Justice Deepa Sharma good health and deep contentment with her accomplishments. As she parts from our Bench, on behalf of my colleagues and myself, I convey our best wishes to Justice Deepa Sharma. Thank you. ***