) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

)

Case 6:10-cv TC Document 1 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

Case 9:06-cv RHC Document 1 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 1 of 7

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintitl, Defendants. COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 4:05-cv CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR~A I FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINO~ STRA~ E EASTERN DIVISION 0~U ) ) tl0v 1 0 7_604 ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6


Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

Case 1:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

Courthouse News Service

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

Case 1:13-cv KMW Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2013 Page 1 of 22

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

Case 5:16-cv RWS-CMC Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Transcription:

1 A. LUIS LUCERO, JR. BARBARAJ. STANDAL 2 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 909 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 400 3 SEATTLE, WA 98104 TEl: (206 220-6896 4 ORIGINAL.' --,., >: i;:;,', -.!,-. --r, 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO 9 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 10 COMMISSION, II 12 v. Plaintiff, 13 THE AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY LLC, 14 15 Defendants. 16 17 NATURE OF THE ACTION I ClV 9 8 - a 3 7 8 - S - BUN CIVIL ACTION NO. COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMAND 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil 19 Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of national origin and 20 to provide appropriate relief to Baltazar Garza, Alfonso Baez, Sergio Hernandez, Pioquinto 21 Gomez and Felix Gonzalez who were adversely affected by such practices. The Equal 22 Employment Opportunity Commission alleges the defendant, The Amalgamated Sugar Company 23 LLC, violated Title VII by failing to hire or rehire Garza, Baez, Hernandez, Gomez and 24 Gonzalez, based on their national origin, Hispanic. 25 COMPLAINT - PAGE 1 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 909 First Avenue. Suite 400 Telephone: (206 220-6883 Facsimile: (206 220-6911 TOO: (206 220-6882 \.

I JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2 1. Jurisdiction of this court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 451, 1331, 1337, 3 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 706(t(1 and (3 of 4 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(t(I and (3 and 5 Section 102 of Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981a. 6 2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were and are now being 7 committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for Idaho. 8 PARTIES 9 3. Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission", is 10 the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and II enforcement of Title VII, and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 706(t(1 12 and (3 oftitle VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(t(1 and (3. 13 4. At all relevant times, defendant, The Amalgamated Sugar Company LLC, has 14 continuously been a corporation doing business in the State ofidaho and has continuously had at 15 least 15 employees. 16 5. At all relevant times, defendant has continuously been an employer engaged in an 17 industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701(b, (g and (h 18 oftitle VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e (b, (g and (h. 19 STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 20 6. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Baltazar Garza filed a 21 charge alleging violations of Title VII by defendant, The Amalgamated Sugar Company LLC. 22 All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. 23 7. On or about September 19,1996, defendant engaged in unlawful employment 24 practices at its facilities in Nampa, Idaho, in violation of Section 703 (a of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 25 2000-2(a. These practices included failure to hire or rehire Baltazar Garza, Alfonso Baez, COMPLAINT - PAGE 2 Telephone: {206 220 6883 Facsimile: (206 220-6911 TOO: (206 220-6882

1 Sergio Hernandez, Pioquinto Gomez and Felix Gonzalez as seasonal, general laborers because 2 they spoke Spanish and were not proficient in English. The defendant excluded the above- 3 named five Hispanic workers who had worked as seasonal laborers successfully at defendant's 4 plant in the past. 5 8. The effect of the practice complained of in paragraph 7 has been to deprive 6 Baltazar Garza, Alfonso Baez, Sergio Hernandez, Pioquinto Gomez and Felix Gonzalez of equal 7 employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect their status as employees, and their 8 terms and conditions of employment because of their national origin. 9 9. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 7 were 10 intentional. 11 10. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 7 above were 12 done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Baltazar Garza, 13 Alfonso Baez, Sergio Hernandez, Pioquinto Gomez and Felix Gonzalez. 14 PRAYER FOR RELIEF 15 Wherefore, the Commission respectfully requests that this court: 16 A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining defendant, The Amalgamated Sugar 17 Company LLC, its officers, agents, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or 18 participation with it, from engaging in any other employment practice which discriminates on the 19 basis of national origin. 20 B. Order defendant to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which 21 provide equal employment opportunities for Hispanic employees and eradicate the effects of its 22 past and present unlawful employment practices. 23 C. Order defendant to make whole Baltazar Garza, Alfonso Baez, Sergio Hernandez, 24 Pioquinto Gomez, and Felix Gonzalez, by providing appropriate back pay with prejudgment 25 interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other equitable and affirmative relief necessary COMPLAINT - PAGE 3 SeaHle District Office Telephone: (206 220-6883 Facsimile: (20B 220-6911 TOO: (206 220-6882

I to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices. 2 D. Order defendant, The Amalgamated Sugar Company LLC, to make whole 3 Baltazar Garza, Alfonso Baez, Sergio Hernandez, Pioquinto Gomez and Felix Gonzalez, by 4 providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful 5 employment practices described in paragraph 7 above, including past and future out-of-pocket 6 expenses, in amounts to be determined at trial. 7 E. Order defendant to make whole Baltazar Garza, Alfonso Baez, Sergio Hernandez, 8 Pioquinto Gomez and Felix Gonzalez by providing compensation for past and future 9 nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful practices complained of in paragraph 7 above, 10 including without limitation to emotional pain, suffering, mental anguish and loss of enjoyment 11 of life, in amounts to be determined at trial. 12 F. Order defendant to pay Baltazar Garza, Alfonso Baez, Sergio Hernandez, 13 Pioquinto Gomez and Felix Gonzalez punitive damages for its malicious or reckless conduct 14 described in paragraph 7 above, in amounts to be determined at trial. 15 G. Grant such further relief as the court deems necessary and proper in the public 16 interest. 17 H. Award the Commission its costs of this action. 18 II 19 II 20 II 21 II 22 II 23 II 24 II 25 II COMPLAINT - PAGE 4 Telephone: (206 220-6883 Facsimile: (206 220-6911 TOO; (206 220-6882

1 JURY TRIAL DEMANP 2 The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its complaint. 3 DATED this~ day of ~, 1998. 4 A. LUIS LUCERO, JR. 5 Regional Attorney 6 BARBARAJ. STANDAL 7 Trial At o~. 11 By:~~~~~-2f~~~ 8 EQUALEMPLO ENT OPPORTUNITY 9 COMMISSION 10 Seattle, Washington 98104 11 Telephone (206 220-6896 C. Gregory Stewart General Counsel Gwendolyn Young Reams Associate General Counsel Office ofthe General Counsel 1801 "L" Street, NW Washington DC 20507 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 COMPLAINT - PAGE 5 u.s. EaUAl EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Telephone; (Z06 220-6883 Facsimile: (206 220-6911 TOD: (206 220-6882