Town of Newmarket Agenda Council Workshop

Similar documents
FoNTRA Forum on OMB Reform

THE PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT AND MUNICIPAL STAFF REPORT: WHAT WILL THEY LOOK LIKE UNDER BILL 139

Land Use Planning Reforms Under Bill 139

Environmental Review Tribunal Oak Ridges Moraine Hearings

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD: JURISDICTION UNDER THE PLANNING ACT Prepared by Dennis H. Wood and Sharmini Mahadevan, Wood Bull LLP

R e g i o n a l U s e O n l y Regional File No. Date Received Date Deemed Complete Application

Instructions. Municipal/Approval Authority Submission

2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 139

Toronto Local Appeal Body Public Guide

The Planning Act: What s New, What Remains, What You Should Know. Zoning By-laws After Bill 51. by: Mary Bull. June 2006

BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING No. BOD Friday, June 24, Bayview Parkway, Newmarket, ON MINUTES

Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016 (S.O. 2016, c. 12, Sched. 1).


The Regional Municipality of Halton. Regional Chair and Members of Regional Council

Barristers and Solicitors. Leo F. Longo Direct: February 1, 2017 Our File No

Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Sample Procedural Order

Corporation of the City of St. Thomas. Consultation Process

0281 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario

NIAGARA ESCARPMENT HEARING OFFICE

This document contains a draft ROPA based on Option 6 and the Triangle Lands.

Consultation on TLAB Rules of Practice and Procedures and Related Documents

The Planning Act: Bill 51 What s New, What Remains, What You Must Know Part II. Introduction Dennis Wood

Instructions for Official Plan Amendment Application

Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario

And whereas, Council has also considered the Supplemental Presentation made by staff to Council on July 21, 2016;

Instructions for preparing and submitting the Appellant Form (A1)

S.O. 2015, CHAPTER 24

For further information into the expanded analysis developed from the initial table and the broader findings of the research, please refer to:

Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario

15 Source Protection Committee Membership and Alternate Risk Management Official Appointment

COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE LOCAL PLANNING APPEAL TRIBUNAL

ONTARIO REGULATION 197/96 CONSENT APPLICATIONS

Communicating With City Council Guide Letters, Public Meetings, Deputations, Presentations, Open Delegations at Reference Committees

THE APPROVAL PROCESS. Exemption from Draft Approval. Early Consultation. Complete Application. Notice of Complete Application. Application Review

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. and

Jeffrey J. Wilker SENT BY and Overnight Courier August 1, 2014

SPECIAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING NO. BOD Friday, January 17, Bayview Parkway, Newmarket, ON MINUTES

FEB Z: Keele Street, Unit 12

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SAANICH BYLAW NO TO REGULATE THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COUNCIL AND COUNCIL COMMITTEES

The Guide to the Assessment Review Board (ARB)

Part I The PREAMBLE, which does not constitute part of the Official Plan;

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT

Tribunals, Courts and the Handling of Fresh Evidence: Ontario Limited v. The County of Simcoe and the Township of Oro-Medonte

Getting ready for Ontario s new Construction Act. Understanding the key changes and how to prepare for them. Howard Krupat

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT

Chapter Two ADMINISTRATION 2.1. GENERAL Purpose

Toward Better Accountability

MEMORANDUM THE NEW OMB ACT BILL 139. Overview

to:

NO COUNCIL BYLAW A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF VICTORIA

chapter 22 An Act to protect existing and future sources of drinking water and to make complementary and other amendments to other Acts

Case Name: AAA Professional Self Storage Inc. v. Midland (Town)

Faculty Association of Northern Lakes College. Constitution. Compiled December 20, 2008

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD

In January 2007, Bill 51, Planning and Conservation Land Statute Law Amendment Act,

Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario

Development Charges Act, 1997 S.O. 1997, CHAPTER 27

REZONING. Introduction. What is Zoning? Who is involved in the Rezoning process? When is Rezoning required?

Planning and Intermunicipal Appeals

The Planning and Development Act, 2007

Ottawa developer ordered by LPAT to complete a Phase-I environmental site assessment

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TRIBUNAL

October 4,2013 PL PL110517

REVISED AGENDA TRANSPORTATION AND WORKS COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING

The Corporation of the County of Peterborough. By-law No

JAMES A. COON LOCAL GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL SERIES. Guidelines for Applicants To the Zoning Board of Appeals

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: INTERIM PLACE AND OPSEU GRIEVANCE OF L. REYES BEFORE: SUSAN L. STEWART ARBITRATOR APPEARANCES

BYLAW NO. 19/001 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY STANDARDS APPEAL COMMITTEE

Act relating to the Courts of Justice of 13 August 1915 No. 5 (Courts of Justice Act)

Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario

Board of Directors Policy Handbook - Regulation # 3 Hearing Procedures

CITY OF VAUGHAN COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA

Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Tribunal d appel de l aménagement local

Class Environmental Assessment for Minor Transmission Facilities. November 16, 2016

Municipal Government Act Subdivision and Development and Forms Regulations. Discussion Guide

Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Tribunal d appel de l aménagement local

Taking Your Complaint to a Human Rights Tribunal. A handout for complainants with carriage

Licensing and Standards Committee Item LS23.1, adopted as amended, by City of Toronto Council on December 5, 6, 7 and 8, 2017 CITY OF TORONTO

Disputes bringing cases to the First-tier Property Tribunal and alternatives

Source Protection Plan Bulletin Overview of Requirements for Plan and Assessment Report Amendments under s.34 and s.35 of the Clean Water Act

STATEMENT OF DEFENCE

CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW COMMUNITY STANDARDS AND LICENCE APPEAL COMMITTEE BYLAW (CONSOLIDATED ON JULY 12, 2016)

ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE

The Planning and Development Act, 2007

RPT-G6. Mobile Homes guidance

Lands & Waters Aggregate & Petroleum Resources March 15, 2006

Director s Order No. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT ORDER PURSANT TO SECTION 136, 196

Code of Procedure for Matters under the Personal Health

Definitions 1. In this Act,

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT CARNWATH, KITELEY AND SWINTON JJ. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JUNE 25, 2014, 7:00 PM

Research Papers. Contents

NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR VARIANCE/PERMISSION (Section 45 of the Planning Act)

Most Frequently Asked Questions

THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY and is a consolidation of the following:

SPECIAL MEETING OF COUNCIL AGENDA

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 30, 2014, 7:00 PM

The Blue Mountains Council Meeting. THAT the Agenda of November 27, 2017 be approved as circulated, including any items added to the Agenda.

IN THE MATTER OF THE Municipal Government Act being Chapter M-26 of the Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 (Act).

Ontario Swimming Coaches Committee Disciplinary and Complaints Procedures

Transcription:

Town of Newmarket Agenda Council Workshop Date: Thursday, December 6, 2018 Time: 9:00 AM Location: Council Chambers Municipal Offices 395 Mulock Drive Newmarket, ON L3Y 4X7 Pages 1. Notice In accordance with the Town's Procedure By-law, no decisions are to be made but rather this meeting is an opportunity for Council to have informal discussion regarding various matters. 2. Declarations of Pecuniary Interest 3. Items 3.1 9:00 AM - Council Orientation re: Council & Municipal Administration and Overview of Various Legislation Note: John Mascarin of Aird & Berlis LLP will be in attendance to present on this matter. Presentation to be distributed at the meeting. 3.2 1:00 PM - Council Orientation re: Local Planning Appeal Tribunal 2 4. Adjournment Note: Kim Mullin of Wood Bull LLP will be in attendance to present on this matter.

1

2 Kim Mullin, Wood Bull LLP 6 December 2018 Wood Bull LLP, 65 Queen Street West, Suite 1400, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2M5 Phone: 416-203-7160 E-mail: info@woodbull.ca

3 Land use planning refresher Overview of Bill 139 New structure LPAT Local Planning Appeal Support Centre Appeals New test for appeals New LPAT Process What is no longer appealable Other changes Transition 2

4 Planning one of Council s key roles Legislative framework in Planning Act Provides basis for: Considering Provincial interests Processes and tools for controlling development Ensuring public participation in planning decisions Allowing appeals of planning decisions 3

5 Provincial policy led system Policy set out in various documents: Section 2 of Planning Act Matters of provincial interest Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) Provincial plans Growth Plan Greenbelt Plan Oak Ridges Moraine Plan Niagara Escarpment Plan Decisions must be consistent with/conform to Provincial policy 4

6 Planning Ac tools for controlling development: Official plans Broad statement of planning policy Provides overall direction for planning in municipality Public works and by-laws must conform to OP Zoning by-laws Detailed land use regulation Site plan control Detailed regulation of development on site Plans of subdivision Regulation of land division 5

7 Public process Statutory public meeting/open house Notice requirements set out in Regulations Opportunity to comment orally and in writing Role of upper-tier and lower-tier Upper tier often approval authority Lower tier OP & ZB must conform to upper tier OP Changes to planning documents OP, ZB may be amended by municipality May also be amended by private application Minor variances may be granted to ZB Consents to sever land without plan of subdivision 6

8 When making planning decisions, Council performs a legislative function Not judicial or quasi-judicial But required to act fairly and provide fair opportunity for input Planning Act s. 61 Notice of decision must also explain effect submissions had on decision E.g. Planning Act s. 17(23.1) 7

9 Appeals to OMB from decisions of Council, approval authority, Committee of Adjustment Also appeals of failure to make decision Hearing de novo Record not limited Oral evidence from witnesses Cross-examination OMB stood in shoes of decision maker Could do anything decision maker could do OMB decision final 8

10 Municipal Decision / Non-Decision Appeal to OMB OMB Decision - Approve - Refuse - Modify 9

11 Building Better Communities and Protecting Watersheds Act In force as of 3 April 2018 Replaces OMB with Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) Eliminates de novo hearings relating to OPs, zoning bylaws and non-decisions on plans of subdivision New test for appeals Limitations on oral hearings 10

12 LPAT replaces OMB OMB continued as LPAT Same members and appointment process Appointed by Lieutenant Governor in Council No statutory term limit But 10-year cap in policy No prescribed qualifications 11

13 Independent agency at 700 Bay St. 12 th floor, Toronto Mandate to help public understand and navigate process Understanding proposal and policy framework Understanding how to participate Assistance with appeal documents Preparation for CMC, mediations, hearings, motions Involved in mediations already Brochures and posters available for municipalities Include information about LPASC in notice of decision 12

14 13

15 Two-step appeal process for OPs and ZBs Mandatory case management early in process New appeal standard of review applies Consistency with PPS, conformity with provincial plans and official plans Two-part test for OPAs and ZBAs: must demonstrate existing instrument isn t consistent/doesn t conform and proposed amendment is consistent/conforms 14

16 1 st Appeal to LPAT LPAT Decision Re Meets New Tests for Appeal Appeal Dismissed: Municipal Decision Upheld no yes Municipal Decision 2 nd Municipal Consideration Municipal Non- Decision No Appeal Appeal Appeal LPAT Decision - Approve - Refuse - Modify 15

17 Preliminary screening On receiving appeal LPAT must determine validity of appeal Must dismiss if notice of appeal doesn t explain how test is met Case management Mandatory case management conference Appellant must file appeal record and case synopsis First appeal Hearing may be written or oral, but no examination of witnesses Parties limited to 75 minutes of submissions Record limited to what was before municipality If appeal successful, matter is returned to municipality/approval authority to make decision within 90 days 16

18 Second appeal If municipality or approval authority fails to make a new decision or new decision fails to meet standard of review Can be a full hearing with witnesses LPAT decision binding Limits on parties On OP, OPA, ZB, ZBA and subdivision non-decision appeals only appellant and municipality are automatically parties Others must make submission to LPAT 30 days before case management conference 17

19 LPAT required to decide every appeal within specified time limits: 12, 10 or 6 months Only LPAT can call evidence from witnesses Paper-intensive Enhanced municipal record Appeal record & case synopsis (argument) Responding record & case synopsis 18

20 Provincial whole-plan approvals of OP Conformity exercises to Provincial plans (incl. OPAs) Minister s amendments to Minister s zoning orders Referral at discretion of Minister Interim control by-laws within first year OP policies/zb provisions supporting development around protected major transit station areas Areas surrounding and including a planned higher order transit station/stop Transit that operates in dedicated right-of-way 19

21 Provincial plans and policy statements Provincial plans include policies under Lake Simcoe Protection Act, Great Lakes Protection Act and designated Great Lakes policy or significant threat policy under Clean Water Act Statements under s. 31.1 of Metrolinx Act and section 11 of Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act are deemed to be policy statements 20

22 Local appeal bodies Can be empowered to deal with site plan appeals Official plans Must include policies relating to climate change May identify higher-order transit stations and areas Non-decision of approval authority appealable after 210 days Official plan amendments No request to amend secondary plan within 2 years of adoption unless council approves No amendment to major transit station area policies unless council approves Non-decision appealable after 210 days 21

23 Zoning by-laws Non-decisions appealable after 150 days (210 days if combined with OP) No appeal re permitted uses or heights/densities within major transit station areas Holding by-laws Non-decision appealable after 150 days 22

24 Appeals of draft plan approvals Appeals of non-decision by approval authority on adopted OPA Refusal/non-decision on subdivision Minor variances Consents Site plan Old appeal process applies Heritage Expropriation Development charges 23

25 Appeals If appeal filed before 3 April 2018 and application before 12 December 2017 old appeal process applies If appeal filed before 3 April 2018 but appeal relates to OPA/ZBA application made after 12 December 2017 new appeal process applies If appeal filed before 3 April 2018 but appeal relates to OP adopted after 12 December 2017 new appeal process applies 24

26 Application of Planning Act changes 2-year moratorium on request to amend secondary plan does not apply to request received before 3 April 2020 unless any part of secondary plan in effect on or after 3 April 2018 Restriction on appeals of ICB does not apply to ICB passed before 3 April 2018 Restriction on appealing Minister s OP approval does not apply if notice of approval complete before 3 April 2018 Restriction on referral of request to amend Minister s zoning order does not apply if request made before 3 April 2018 Old timeline to appeal approval authority decision applies if OP adopted before 3 April 2018 Old timelines to appeal non-decisions of OPA, ZBA, holding by-law removal if application before 12 December 2017 25

27 Front loaded applications Planning and technical reports will be evidence Need for peer review? Recommendation report must address tests as well as good planning Implications of fixed record What if Council disagrees with recommendation? Increase in submissions? Change in deputation process? 26

28

29 Kim Mullin: kmullin@woodbull.ca 416-203-5633 28