CONSERVATIVES SWING INTO LEAD IDEA OF COALITION GOVERNMENT REMAINS POPULAR EVERYWHERE OUTSIDE CONSERVATIVE

Similar documents
RACE NARROWING AGAIN: LIBERAL PARTY REBOUNDS, NOW TIED WITH CONSERVATIVES WHO ARE IN DANGER OF

LANDSCAPE FROZEN AS WE ENTER ELECTION YEAR

POLITICAL LANDSCAPE REMAINS DEADLOCKED: TAX PROPOSALS NOT HURTING GOVERNMENT, MAY WELL HELP

IT IS NECK AND NECK AS WE HEAD INTO ELECTION YEAR

CONSERVATIVES SLIDE SLIGHTLY: IS THE TERROR CARD LOSING FORCE?

OVERNIGHT SENSATION GUERGIS EFFECT DISAPPEARS

ONTARIO PCS ENJOY CLEAR LEAD: ONTARIO LIBERALS IN 2 ND AND NDP WELL BACK IN 3 RD

Deadlock Broken, Liberals Surging: SENIORS MOVE BACK TO LIBERALS IN A BIG WAY

CONSERVATIVES EDGE INTO LEAD, LIBERALS SLUMP

Military intervention vs. humanitarian aid

TORIES CLAW BACK SMALL LEAD DEFECTING UNIVERSITY EDUCATED VOTERS PROPEL GRITS INTO A MUCH MORE COMPETITIVE RACE

LIBERALS RETAIN NARROW NATIONAL LEAD

CONSERVATIVES OPEN UP THEIR LEAD CANADIANS SAY THEY ARE MORE INTERESTED IN PARTY PLATFORMS THAN CANDIDATES OR

WISE CROWDS AND THE FUTURE

CANADIANS WANT MAJORITY GOVERNMENT

CONSERVATIVES PULLING AWAY FROM MORIBUND LIBERALS SOME NOTABLE CHANGES IN BROADER OUTLOOK

POTENTIAL TROUBLE BREWING FOR CONSERVATIVES AS CANADIANS ARE ACCEPTING THE COLVIN ACCOUNT BROAD DISSATISFACTION WITH FEDERAL TRANSPARENCY

TORIES ENJOY CLEAR BUT MODEST LEAD AS ELECTION LOOMS UNDERSTANDING WHERE VOTERS ARE COMING AND GOING

CANADIANS ENDORSE GOVERNMENT ACTION ON HAITI TORY VOTERS MORE SKEPTICAL ABOUT LOOSENING IMMIGRATION RULES

EKOS PREDICTS PC MAJORITY: ORDERED POPULISM PLANTS A FLAG IN CANADA

POLITICAL LANDSCAPE TURNING BLEAK FOR STEPHEN HARPER S CONSERVATIVES

NDP FADING AT CRITICAL POINT IN OTHERWISE UNCLEAR ONTARIO POLITICAL LANDSCAPE WYNNE SHOWING SURPRISING RESILIENCE IN FACE OF CURRENT CHALLENGES

LIBERALS PADDING LEAD IN ADVANCE OF DEBATES

CANADIANS SUPPORT DECRIMINALIZATION OF MINOR POT

NOT SO FAST, MARK CARNEY

LIBERALS WIDEN LEAD ON EVE OF THRONE SPEECH

NDP maintains strong lead

NDP leads in first post-writ poll

Liberals open up lead, Conservatives lag

ATTITUDES TO IMMIGRATION AND VISIBLE MINORITIES A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

POLL EMBARGOED UNTIL 14TH NOVEMBER 2018, 6 AM EST. Canada - National UltraPoll 14th November 2018

NDP on track for majority government

POSITION AS UNHAPPINESS WITH DIRECTION OF COUNTRY OUTSTRIPS HAPPINESS

SHIFTING POLITICAL PROSPECTS FOR STEPHEN HARPER: SHOULD HE STAY OR SHOULD HE GO?

Harper numerically surpasses Trudeau in preferred PM on Nanos tracking for first time in four months (Released 11/12/2014)

Federal Liberals score highest on Nanos Party Power Index Trudeau and Harper trending up on qualities of a good leader (Released 08/27/2014)

EKOS/CBC Poll. The Federal Landscape and Liberal Leadership. January 19 th, 2003

STEPHEN HARPER PLUMBING RECORD LOWS ON TRUST, DIRECTION, AND APPROVAL FAR MORE CANADIANS BELIEVE DUFFY THAN HARPER

Liberals With Half the Vote

Harper numerically surpasses Trudeau in weekly Nanos tracking for first time since early June (Released 07/16/2014)

Ideas powered by world-class data

PCs Lead in Ontario FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE. MEDIA INQUIRIES: Lorne Bozinoff, President

35% 34% 34% 32% METHODOLOGY:

Attack of the Clones? Eerie Similarities with 04 Despite Volatility.

AN OVERVIEW OF THE CAMPAIGN AND A REASONED GUESS

Electoral Reform Questionnaire Field Dates: October 12-18, 2016

Press Release. The Canadian Political Scene

MODEST LISTING IN WYNNE S SHIP SEEMS TO HAVE CORRECTED ONTARIO LIBERAL PARTY SEEMS CHARTED FOR WIN

A survey of 1,005 Canadians Conducted on February 23, 2011 Released: February 24,

Election 2015: Conservatives edge forward leaving NDP and Liberals in second-place tie

Liberals lead across GTA, Toronto

A survey of 1,361 Canadians Conducted from December 3 to 6, 2010 Released: December 7,

One Term Wonder? The Chances for a Second Trudeau Government

THE TRUST DEFICIT: WHAT DOES IT MEAN? BY FRANK GRAVES

Update on the Federal Political Landscape

General Election Opinion Poll. May 2018

THE RETURN OF IDEOLOGY? A STARKLY DIVIDED CANADA

Poll Results: Electoral Reform & Political Cooperation

At a glance. Ottawa: (613) x 237

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Negative Views of New Congress Cross Party Lines

Trudeau approval soars

CONSERVATIVES DOMINATE ENGLISH CANADA; DOGFIGHT IN QUEBEC

Most think Trudeau resume ad will prompt liberal votes

Asylum Seekers Should Enter the Country Legally: Plurality

NANOS. Gap between Liberals and Conservatives narrows to seven points in Nanos tracking

EKOS 25 th Anniversary Poll. November 12,

Lessons from the 2015 Canadian Federal Election The Magic Wand that Wasn t: Banning the Niqab from Citizenship Ceremonies

Martin vs. Chrétien: Spectacle, Sympathy & Resilience

FEDERAL VOTING PREFERENCES IN MANITOBA

Election 2015: Race narrows to Conservative-Liberal contest with NDP in third place; soft voters still cause for volatility

Obama Maintains Approval Advantage, But GOP Runs Even on Key Issues

PCs with solid lead on provincial Liberals

Election 2015: Liberals edge Conservatives as volatile electorate mulls final choice before last campaign weekend

Scheer s delight? If an election were held tomorrow, CPC could have a shot at majority government

Belief in climate change eroding

Politics in Newfoundland and Labrador

Opposition to Syrian Airstrikes Surges

Little Support for U.S. Intervention in Syrian Conflict

Still, the vast majority of Canadians 65% now say that they believe the Conservatives will win, regardless of their own voting intentions.

NANOS. Liberals 35, Conservatives 34, NDP 20, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 37, Conservatives 33, NDP 19, Green 7 in latest Nanos federal tracking

Any Court Health Care Decision Unlikely to Please

NANOS. Liberals 38, Conservatives 35, NDP 17, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

Public Remains Opposed to Arming Syrian Rebels

NANOS. Liberals 35, Conservatives 33, NDP 22, Green 5 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 37, Conservatives 33, NDP 20, Green 5 in latest Nanos federal tracking

Supreme Court s Favorability Edges Below 50%

Tories Keep Lead, But Liberal-NDP Merger Could Change Status Quo

NANOS. Ideas powered by world-class data. Liberals 41, Conservatives 31, NDP 15, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17 AT 12:30 PM

NANOS. Liberals 38, Conservatives 34, NDP 17, Green 6 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NANOS. Liberals 40, Conservatives 31, NDP 17, Green 7 in latest Nanos federal tracking

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, October, 2015, On Immigration Policy, Wider Partisan Divide Over Border Fence Than Path to Legal Status

NANOS. Ideas powered by world-class data. Conservatives 35, Liberals 34, NDP 16, Green 8, People s 1 in latest Nanos federal tracking

Canadians divided along political lines over whether to accept thousands of refugees in current crisis

The 2011 Federal Election: Lessons Learned for Public Opinion Researchers

NANOS. Liberals 37, Conservatives 35, NDP 18, Green 7 in latest Nanos federal tracking

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE AUGUST 25, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

General Election Opinion Poll. November 2017

Transcription:

CONSERVATIVES SWING INTO LEAD IDEA OF COALITION GOVERNMENT REMAINS POPULAR EVERYWHERE OUTSIDE CONSERVATIVE BASE This survey was sponsored by La Presse. The full article is available on their website at: http://goo.gl/9ax5du [Ottawa September 24, 2015] In the span of one week, what was a three-way race has become a Conservative lead with the Liberals and NDP trailing. Whether these movements are the result of the government s handling of the Syrian refugee crisis, the announcement of a budget surplus, Harper s debate performance, his challenging of the Niqab ruling, or something else is unclear, but the party is recovering the constituencies that were key to its majority victory in 2011. Federal vote intention Q.If a federal election were held tomorrow, which party would you vote for? National Results (Change over September 9-15 poll below) 26.3 35.4 24.5 7.7 4.22-1.1 +5.8-5.4 +0.1 +0.5 2011 Election Results 18.9 39.6 30.6 3.9 6.0 1 30 20 10 0 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Other Note: These figures are based on decided and leaning voters only; 6.1% of respondents say they are undecided and 6.5% are ineligible to vote / skipped the question. No reproduction without permission BASE: Canadians; September 17-22, 2015 (n=2,343), MOE +/- 2.0%, 19 times out of 20. No reproduction without permission. Page 1

Vote intention by region/demographics Q.If a federal election were held tomorrow, which party would you vote for? 60 50 30 20 10 0 50 35 29 23 24 BC 13 57 13 Gender 13 41 41 37 5 6 30 30 24 19 Alberta Sask.* Manitoba* Ontario Quebec Atlantic 39 20 15 11 10 Age 39 33 33 3 18 22 44 5 30 20 37 34 26 27 24 25 33 34 34 29 29 27 24 25 22 28 19 10 0 50 8 7 3 5 Men Women 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ 43 9 Education 37 8 8 4 5 5 5 3 30 20 26 20 23 24 29 29 28 10 6 3 8 9 6 4 0 High School College University 26.3 35.4 24.5 7.7 4.22 No reproduction without permission Other BASE: Canadians; September 17-22, 2015 (n=2,343), MOE +/- 2.0%, 19 times out of 20. No reproduction without permission. Page 2

The Conservative Party is doing much better in Alberta and Ontario and, interestingly, they re showing some renewed signs of life in Quebec. Indeed, the party is now back in a position where we would expect them to capture some seats, namely in the Quebec City area (we suspect this rise is linked to the refugee and Niqab issues). More importantly, however, their current elevation has been greatly assisted by their ownership of the senior vote; in 2011, nothing was more important to the party that this constituency. Nevertheless, the public have not yet caught up with these shifts. While a plurality thinks the Conservatives will win on October 19 th (a finding that has remained stable since the beginning of the summer), there has been a sharp rise in percentage of Canadians who see the NDP winning. The Liberals are seen as less likely to win, despite their recovery since the start of the campaign. Predicted election outcome Q.Regardless of your current choice, who do you think will win thenext election? 38 37 38 35 30 38 34 35 33 35 29 28 29 20 20 21 24 10 8 9 7 8 10 10 8 9 7 0 10-Feb-15 10-Mar-15 07-Apr-15 05-May-15 02-Jun-15 30-Jun-15 28-Jul-15 25-Aug-15 22-Sep-15 No reproduction without permission 24 35 29 7 Liberal Party Conservative Party NDP Other BASE: Canadians; September 17-22, 2015 (n=2,343), MOE +/- 2.0%, 19 times out of 20. No reproduction without permission. Page 3

Coalitions popular everywhere outside Conservative base Coalitions remain a popular choice, particularly outside of Conservative supporters. Indeed, among progressive voters, it really doesn t matter if one is a Liberal supporter or an NDP supporter or whether the question is framed in the context of a Trudeau-led coalition or a Mulcair-led coalition; support for a coalition is very high and certainly much higher than in 2011. Support for coalition government Q.If you were forced to choose between a Conservative minority government led by Stephen Harper and a coalition government made up of Liberalsand New Democrats/New Democrats and Liberals and led by Liberal leader Justin Trudeau/NDP leader Thomas Mulcair, which would you prefer? 60 59 57 50 41 43 30 20 Trudeau-led coalition Mulcair-led coalition No reproduction without permission Conservative minority government Note: Figures adjusted to exclude those who skipped the question Coalition government BASE: Canadians (half-sample); September 17-22, 2015 (n=1,181/1,162), MOE +/- 2.9%, 19 times out of 20 Canadians are dead split on the merits of a minority government. Conservative supporters are far less likely to favour a minority government, while progressive voters lean more towards to a minority government. These differences are not entirely surprising since both Mr. Mulcair and Mr. Trudeau have stated that they will not support a Harper-led government and any Conservative minority would therefore have a short shelf life. Turning to the preferred lifespan of a coalition government, there is a clear preference for something long-term. Indeed, if we take Conservative supporters (who are dead-set against the idea of a coalition) out of the equation, we see a lean to a full four-year term.. No reproduction without permission. Page 4

Impact of a minority government Q.Do you believe that the election of a minority government would be good for Canada or detrimental to Canada? Overall 46 48 7 44 54 2 58 2 45 51 4 34 39 65 56 6 1 Detrimental to Canada Good for Canada DK/NR No reproduction without permission BASE: Canadians; September 17-22, 2015 (n=2,343), MOE +/- 2.0%, 19 times out of 20 Preferred lifespan of a coalition government Q.In the event that the NDP and the Liberal Party form a coalitiongovernment, would you like to see this government stay in power for less than a year, at least one year or a full four-year term? Less than a year 29 At least one year 26 A full four-year term Don t know / No response 6 0 10 20 30 50 No reproduction without permission BASE: Canadians; September 17-22, 2015 (n=2,343), MOE +/- 2.0%, 19 times out of 20. No reproduction without permission. Page 5

Canadians receptive to constitutional talks as long as it s not about Quebec Finally, there is strong majority support for opening up the constitution, particularly when it comes to Senate reform. NDP and Conservative supporters are particularly enthusiastic about opening up a dialogue on the future of the Senate, while Liberal supporters are a bit more hesitant. Support for opening up the constitution to address Aboriginal claims is also very strong (outside of the Conservative base, that is). Receptivity to opening up the constitution Q.Would you support the next government convening the provinces for a new round of constitutional talks to decide the future of the Senate? 9 22 69 n=781, MOE +/- 3.5%, 19 times out of 20 respond to Aboriginal claims? 8 35 57 n=788, MOE +/- 3.5%, 19 times out of 20 secure Quebec s ratification of the constitution? 11 53 36 DK/NR No Yes n=774, MOE +/- 3.5%, 19 times out of 20 No reproduction without permission BASE: Canadians (third-sample each); September 17-22, 2015 Securing Quebec s ratification of the constitution, meanwhile, is a clear non-starter (although Quebeckers themselves are more open to the idea). Indeed, despite some of the national unity issues being tossed back and forth between Mr. Mulcair and Mr. Trudeau, revisiting this issue doesn t seem to be a particularly high priority for voters at this time.. No reproduction without permission. Page 6

Quebec vs. Rest of Canada Q.Would you support the next government convening the provinces for a new round of constitutional talks to secure Quebec s ratification of the constitution? Quebec 8 33 59 Rest of Canada 12 59 29 DK/NR No Yes No reproduction without permission BASE: Canadians (third-sample); September 17-22, 2015 (n=774), MOE +/- 3.5%, 19 times out of 20. No reproduction without permission. Page 7

Tracking support for coalitions Support for Trudeau-led coalition Q.If you were forced to choose between a Conservative minority government led by Stephen Harper and a coalition government made up of Liberalsand New Democrats and led by Liberal leader Justin Trudeau*, which would you prefer? 70 60 50 54 46 51 49 51 51 50 50 49 49 51 49 60 626262 59 59 41 41 38 3838 30 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 No reproduction without permission Coalition government Conservative government Note: Figures adjusted to exclude those who did not provide a valid response. *Prior to the 2011 federal election, respondents were asked abouta coalition government led by then-liberal leader Michael Ignatieff. BASE: Canadians (half-sample); September 17-22, 2015 (n=1,181), MOE +/- 2.9%, 19 times out of 20 Support for Mulcair-led coalition Q.If you were forced to choose between a Conservative minority government led by Stephen Harper and a coalition government made of up New Democrats and Liberals and led by NDP leader Thomas Mulcair, which would you prefer? 70 60 57 65 60 63 57 50 43 37 35 30 26-May 09-Jun 23-Jun 07-Jul 21-Jul 04-Aug 18-Aug 01-Sep 15-Sep No reproduction without permission Coalition government Conservative government Note: Figures adjusted to exclude those who skipped the question BASE: Canadians (half-sample); September 17-22, 2015 (n=1,162), MOE +/- 2.9%, 19 times out of 20 43. No reproduction without permission. Page 8

Detailed Tables: National Federal Vote Intention (decided and leaning voters only) Q. If a federal election were held tomorrow, which party would you vote for? [If undecided] Even if you do not have a firm idea, are you leaning towards a party? [If yes] As it stands, towards which party are you leaning? Liberal Party Conservative Party NDP Green Party Bloc Québécois Other Sample Size Margin of Error (+/-) NATIONALLY 26.3% 35.4% 24.5% 7.7% 4.2% 1.9% 2104 2.1 REGION British Columbia 23.4% 34.5% 28.5% 12.5% 1.1% 351 5.2 Alberta 23.9% 56.7% 12.6% 4.5% 2.3% 211 6.8 Saskatchewan 12.8%.9% 36.9% 5.9% 3.5% 112 9.3 Manitoba 29.8%.7% 15.4% 11.1% 3.0% 94 10.1 Ontario 30.3% 38.7% 19.9% 10.0% 1.1% 528 4.3 Quebec 19.3% 23.7% 32.8% 3.3% 17.5% 3.5% 621 3.9 Atlantic Canada 39.2% 22.0% 32.8% 5.1% 0.8% 181 7.3 GENDER Male 25.7% 36.8% 24.2% 8.1% 3.4% 1.7% 10 3.0 Female 26.8% 34.1% 24.9% 7.1% 5.0% 2.2% 1050 3.0 AGE <35 29.4% 32.7% 21.5% 9.2% 3.6% 3.5% 166 7.6 35-49 23.5% 33.7% 29.2% 7.6% 4.8% 1.1% 1 4.9 50-64 24.6% 34.1% 27.1% 7.8% 5.2% 1.3% 769 3.5 65+ 28.3% 43.5% 18.7% 5.1% 2.6% 1.7% 756 3.6 EDUCATION High school or less 26.4% 42.6% 20.1% 6.2% 3.0% 1.7% 9 4.9 College or CEGEP 22.9% 37.1% 24.1% 8.1% 5.6% 2.2% 699 3.7 University or higher 28.8% 29.0% 28.1% 8.5% 3.8% 1.8% 979 3.1. No reproduction without permission. Page 9

Support for Trudeau-Led Coalition Q. If you were forced to choose between a Conservative minority government led by Stephen Harper and a coalition government made of up Liberals and New Democrats and led by Liberal leader Justin Trudeau, which would you prefer? A Conservative government A coalition government Skip Sample Size Margin of Error (+/-) NATIONALLY 37.6% 55.1% 7.3% 1181 2.9 REGION British Columbia 33.1% 57.4% 9.5% 205 6.8 Alberta 58.8% 34.2% 7.0% 106 9.5 Saskatchewan 42.7% 42.2% 15.1% 61 12.6 Manitoba 35.1% 56.7% 8.2% 57 13.0 Ontario 41.2% 51.6% 7.2% 289 5.8 Quebec 31.7% 62.3% 6.0% 358 5.2 Atlantic Canada 19.2% 74.4% 6.4% 100 9.8 GENDER Male.2% 56.4% 3.3% 572 4.1 Female 37.1% 56.5% 6.4% 570 4.1 AGE <35 30.1% 59.7% 10.1% 107 9.5 35-49 41.2% 55.5% 3.3% 228 6.5 50-64 39.4% 57.6% 2.9% 399 4.9 65+ 46.9% 50.1% 3.0% 415 4.8 EDUCATION High school or less 44.2% 49.9% 5.8% 222 6.6 College or CEGEP 41.6% 52.2% 6.2% 384 5.0 University or higher 30.7% 65.5% 3.8% 537 4.2 CURRENT VOTE INTENTION Liberal Party 4.7% 94.6% 0.8% 259 6.1 Conservative Party 95.2% 4.2% 0.6% 364 5.1 NDP 10.9% 87.0% 2.1% 271 6.0 Green Party 9.3% 84.6% 6.1% 68 11.9 Bloc Québécois 36.4% 56.5% 7.1% 48 14.1. No reproduction without permission. Page 10

Support for Mulcair-Led Coalition Q. If you were forced to choose between a Conservative minority government led by Stephen Harper and a coalition government made of up New Democrats and Liberals and led by NDP leader Thomas Mulcair, which would you prefer? A Conservative government A coalition government Skip Sample Size Margin of Error (+/-) NATIONALLY.5% 53.5% 6.0% 1162 2.9 REGION British Columbia 34.4% 57.6% 8.0% 195 7.0 Alberta 58.1% 35.8% 6.1% 126 8.7 Saskatchewan 31.0% 55.9% 13.1% 65 12.2 Manitoba 52.5% 39.8% 7.7% 48 14.1 Ontario 44.1% 50.5% 5.4% 286 5.8 Quebec 31.4% 64.0% 4.6% 322 5.5 Atlantic Canada 33.5% 60.7% 5.7% 117 9.1 GENDER Male 39.8% 54.1% 6.1% 549 4.2 Female 42.8% 54.9% 2.3% 583 4.1 AGE <35 35.6% 56.9% 7.4% 83 10.8 35-49 39.9% 56.7% 3.4% 220 6.6 50-64 41.4% 56.7% 1.9% 424 4.8 65+ 50.9% 44.7% 4.3% 6 4.9 EDUCATION High school or less 52.7% 41.3% 5.9% 246 6.3 College or CEGEP 42.2% 54.7% 3.1% 377 5.1 University or higher 31.3% 66.2% 2.5% 507 4.4 CURRENT VOTE INTENTION Liberal Party 15.1% 81.8% 3.2% 264 6.0 Conservative Party 95.3% 3.8% 0.9% 353 5.2 NDP 9.1% 90.1% 0.8% 278 5.9 Green Party 12.9% 85.4% 1.7% 75 11.3 Bloc Québécois 21.0% 79.0% 0.0% 55 13.2. No reproduction without permission. Page 11

Perceived Impact of a Minority Government Q. Do you believe that the election of a minority government would be good for Canada or detrimental to Canada? Good for Canada Detrimental to Canada Skip Sample Size Margin of Error (+/-) NATIONALLY 47.6% 45.9% 6.5% 2343 2.0 REGION British Columbia 44.2% 47.1% 8.7% 0 4.9 Alberta 53.2% 41.2% 5.6% 232 6.4 Saskatchewan 36.6% 51.0% 12.4% 126 8.7 Manitoba 37.9% 53.0% 9.0% 105 9.6 Ontario 50.7% 43.4% 5.9% 575 4.1 Quebec 43.1% 51.1% 5.8% 680 3.8 Atlantic Canada 51.7% 41.7% 6.5% 217 6.7 GENDER Male 50.4% 46.5% 3.1% 1121 2.9 Female 47.2% 47.2% 5.5% 1153 2.9 AGE <35 47.9% 45.5% 6.6% 190 7.1 35-49 45.5% 50.1% 4.4% 448 4.6 50-64 50.2% 46.4% 3.4% 823 3.4 65+ 52.6% 44.7% 2.7% 821 3.4 EDUCATION High school or less 49.8% 45.7% 4.5% 468 4.5 College or CEGEP 45.5% 51.0% 3.6% 761 3.6 University or higher 50.6% 44.3% 5.2% 1044 3.0 CURRENT VOTE INTENTION Liberal Party 54.0% 43.7% 2.3% 523 4.3 Conservative Party.1% 57.7% 2.2% 717 3.7 NDP 51.2% 45.3% 3.5% 549 4.2 Green Party 65.1% 33.6% 1.3% 143 8.2 Bloc Québécois 55.7% 38.5% 5.8% 103 9.7. No reproduction without permission. Page 12

Preferred Lifespan of a Coalition Government Q. In the event that the NDP and the Liberal Party form a coalition government, would you like to see this government stay in power for less than a year, at least one year or a full four-year term? Less than a year At least one year A full fouryear term Skip Sample Size Margin of Error (+/-) NATIONALLY 28.8% 25.8% 39.5% 5.9% 2343 2.0 REGION British Columbia 24.4% 27.6% 39.7% 8.4% 0 4.9 Alberta 47.0% 22.6% 25.5% 5.0% 232 6.4 Saskatchewan 32.0% 16.6%.2% 11.3% 126 8.7 Manitoba 43.3% 20.5% 29.7% 6.5% 105 9.6 Ontario 29.7% 26.2% 38.6% 5.6% 575 4.1 Quebec 22.2% 28.1% 44.7% 4.9% 680 3.8 Atlantic Canada 20.9% 25.3% 48.4% 5.4% 217 6.7 GENDER Male 30.2% 24.4% 41.9% 3.5% 1121 2.9 Female 28.7% 28.1% 39.0% 4.1% 1153 2.9 AGE <35 25.3% 30.3% 38.2% 6.2% 190 7.1 35-49 27.6% 26.6% 41.7% 4.0% 448 4.6 50-64 30.6% 24.2% 43.4% 1.7% 823 3.4 65+ 36.7% 23.0% 36.9% 3.4% 821 3.4 EDUCATION High school or less 32.8% 28.6% 34.2% 4.4% 468 4.5 College or CEGEP 32.1% 28.5% 36.1% 3.3% 761 3.6 University or higher 24.3% 23.1% 49.5% 3.2% 1044 3.0 CURRENT VOTE INTENTION Liberal Party 9.3% 30.8% 58.3% 1.6% 523 4.3 Conservative Party 68.7% 15.2% 15.2% 1.0% 717 3.7 NDP 4.3% 32.3% 62.1% 1.3% 549 4.2 Green Party 15.2% 38.8% 44.6% 1.3% 143 8.2 Bloc Québécois 17.6% 29.1% 49.7% 3.6% 103 9.7. No reproduction without permission. Page 13

Predicted Election Outcome Q. Regardless of your current choice, who do you think will win the next election? Liberal Party Conservative Party New Democratic Party Other Skip Sample Size Margin of Error (+/-) NATIONALLY 23.9% 34.7% 29.0% 6.5% 5.8% 2343 2.0 REGION British Columbia 23.7% 31.0% 29.8% 5.9% 9.6% 0 4.9 Alberta 12.6% 50.2% 25.0% 5.6% 6.7% 232 6.4 Saskatchewan 6.8% 42.8% 30.6% 7.8% 12.1% 126 8.7 Manitoba 21.6% 50.3% 16.7% 5.4% 6.0% 105 9.6 Ontario 27.8% 37.8% 24.3% 5.5% 4.7% 575 4.1 Quebec 20.5% 26.8%.6% 8.0% 4.2% 680 3.8 Atlantic Canada 38.5% 20.5% 27.0% 7.4% 6.6% 217 6.7 GENDER Male 23.2% 36.8% 31.1% 6.4% 2.5% 1121 2.9 Female 25.7% 34.4% 28.3% 6.7% 4.8% 1153 2.9 AGE <35 26.2% 30.3% 30.8% 7.7% 5.0% 190 7.1 35-49 24.9% 36.0% 30.4% 5.6% 3.0% 448 4.6 50-64 23.4% 35.6% 31.2% 6.4% 3.4% 823 3.4 65+ 23.3% 42.7% 24.0% 6.5% 3.5% 821 3.4 EDUCATION High school or less 26.3% 37.6% 22.1% 8.9% 5.1% 468 4.5 College or CEGEP 22.2% 38.2% 30.5% 6.0% 3.1% 761 3.6 University or higher 25.4% 31.7% 34.8% 4.9% 3.3% 1044 3.0 CURRENT VOTE INTENTION Liberal Party 58.2% 13.0% 23.8% 3.3% 1.7% 523 4.3 Conservative Party 8.9% 76.8% 9.0% 2.5% 2.9% 717 3.7 NDP 9.9% 13.2% 73.5% 1.8% 1.7% 549 4.2 Green Party 32.1% 22.2% 25.3% 18.0% 2.4% 143 8.2 Bloc Québécois 21.4% 19.6%.1% 18.9% 0.0% 103 9.7. No reproduction without permission. Page 14

Support for Opening Constitutional Talks: Future of the Senate Q. Would you support the next government convening the provinces for a new round of constitutional talks to decide the future of the Senate? Yes No Skip Sample Size Margin of Error (+/-) NATIONALLY 68.7% 22.1% 9.2% 781 3.5 REGION British Columbia 66.2% 22.4% 11.4% 135 8.4 Alberta 69.8% 19.8% 10.4% 72 11.6 Saskatchewan 55.7% 18.3% 26.0% 41 15.3 Manitoba 63.8% 18.1% 18.0% 34 16.8 Ontario 68.7% 23.1% 8.2% 205 6.8 Quebec 70.2% 21.1% 8.8% 219 6.6 Atlantic Canada 73.6% 25.7% 0.6% 74 11.4 GENDER Male 67.0% 27.0% 6.1% 379 5.0 Female 71.9% 18.4% 9.7% 384 5.0 AGE <35 58.8% 21.6% 19.6% 62 12.5 35-49 74.1% 21.8% 4.1% 161 7.7 50-64 72.6% 25.2% 2.2% 278 5.9 65+ 75.2% 21.6% 3.1% 263 6.0 EDUCATION High school or less 62.4% 27.5% 10.1% 153 7.9 College or CEGEP 73.2% 19.9% 6.8% 277 5.9 University or higher 72.3% 20.8% 6.9% 331 5.4 CURRENT VOTE INTENTION Liberal Party 76.8% 19.2% 4.0% 167 7.6 Conservative Party 66.8% 23.3% 10.0% 243 6.3 NDP 82.5% 16.0% 1.5% 178 7.4 Green Party 68.9% 31.1% 0.0% 51 13.7 Bloc Québécois 56.7% 30.2% 13.1% 39 15.7. No reproduction without permission. Page 15

Support for Opening Constitutional Talks: Quebec s Ratification of the Constitution Q. Would you support the next government convening the provinces for a new round of constitutional talks to secure Quebec s ratification of the constitution? Yes No Skip Sample Size Margin of Error (+/-) NATIONALLY 35.7% 53.0% 11.4% 774 3.5 REGION British Columbia 33.6% 52.0% 14.4% 130 8.6 Alberta 22.4% 65.0% 12.7% 82 10.8 Saskatchewan 35.0% 49.7% 15.3% 35 16.6 Manitoba 48.7% 46.9% 4.5% 38 15.9 Ontario 25.2% 63.6% 11.1% 197 7.0 Quebec 58.6% 33.4% 8.0% 214 6.7 Atlantic Canada 37.4% 44.6% 18.0% 73 11.5 GENDER Male.2% 55.3% 4.5% 367 5.1 Female 33.0% 53.7% 13.2% 383 5.0 AGE <35 33.2% 55.5% 11.3% 52 13.6 35-49 36.2% 50.6% 13.2% 139 8.3 50-64 35.7% 58.0% 6.3% 276 5.9 65+ 42.2% 52.4% 5.3% 286 5.8 EDUCATION High school or less 34.4% 60.5% 5.1% 153 7.9 College or CEGEP 31.4% 56.9% 11.7% 248 6.2 University or higher 42.7% 47.6% 9.7% 348 5.3 CURRENT VOTE INTENTION Liberal Party 38.3% 54.5% 7.2% 179 7.3 Conservative Party 28.4% 62.4% 9.2% 2 6.3 NDP 49.7% 44.4% 5.9% 172 7.5 Green Party 37.1% 56.5% 6.5% 52 13.6 Bloc Québécois 67.5% 32.5% 0.0% 29 18.2. No reproduction without permission. Page 16

Support for Opening Constitutional Talks: Aboriginal Claims Q. Would you support the next government convening the provinces for a new round of constitutional talks to respond to Aboriginal claims? Yes No Skip Sample Size Margin of Error (+/-) NATIONALLY 57.2% 35.2% 7.6% 788 3.5 REGION British Columbia 63.1% 23.7% 13.2% 135 8.4 Alberta 47.5% 49.5% 2.9% 78 11.1 Saskatchewan 57.7% 36.4% 5.9% 50 13.9 Manitoba 35.5% 53.5% 11.0% 33 17.1 Ontario 60.9% 33.0% 6.1% 173 7.5 Quebec 52.8% 38.8% 8.4% 247 6.2 Atlantic Canada 58.6% 33.5% 7.9% 70 11.7 GENDER Male 52.5% 42.3% 5.2% 375 5.1 Female 65.0% 30.6% 4.3% 386 5.0 AGE <35 53.3% 38.7% 8.0% 76 11.2 35-49 57.7% 38.3% 3.9% 148 8.1 50-64 62.4% 34.9% 2.7% 269 6.0 65+ 64.0% 31.2% 4.8% 272 5.9 EDUCATION High school or less 57.1% 36.3% 6.6% 162 7.7 College or CEGEP 61.2% 35.5% 3.3% 236 6.4 University or higher 59.0% 36.3% 4.7% 365 5.1 CURRENT VOTE INTENTION Liberal Party 63.1% 34.7% 2.2% 177 7.4 Conservative Party 49.7% 47.6% 2.7% 234 6.4 NDP 76.5% 20.9% 2.6% 199 7.0 Green Party 68.0% 27.5% 4.4% 15.5 Bloc Québécois 57.2% 42.8% 0.0% 35 16.6. No reproduction without permission. Page 17

Methodology: This study was conducted using High Definition Interactive Voice Response (HD-IVR ) technology, which allows respondents to enter their preferences by punching the keypad on their phone, rather than telling them to an operator. In an effort to reduce the coverage bias of landline only RDD, we created a dual landline/cell phone RDD sampling frame for this research. As a result, we are able to reach those with a landline and cell phone, as well as cell phone only households and landline only households. The field dates for this survey are September 17-22, 2015. In total, a random sample of 2,343 Canadian adults aged 18 and over responded to the survey. The margin of error associated with the total sample is +/- 2.0 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. Please note that the margin of error increases when the results are sub-divided (i.e., error margins for sub-groups such as region, sex, age, education). All the data have been statistically weighted by age, gender, region, and educational attainment to ensure the sample s composition reflects that of the actual population of Canada according to Census data.. No reproduction without permission. Page 18