UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 1:12-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. 1. This is an action for direct patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v. COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Complaint for Patent Infringement

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/15/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:07-cv TJW Document 54 Filed 01/25/2008 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Jonathan E. Singer (pro hac vice to be filed) 60 South 6 th Street, Suite 3200 Minneapolis, MN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:99-mc Document 689 Filed 12/01/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 391 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) vs. ) ) PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC. ) ) Defendant.

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WI-LAN USA, INC. and WI-LAN INC., v. Plaintiffs, Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; and TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants. Plaintiffs Wi-LAN USA, Inc. and Wi-LAN Inc., by and through their attorneys, bring this action for patent infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,359,654 and 7,034,889 (collectively Patents-in-Suit ) and allege as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Wi-LAN USA, Inc. is a corporation formed under the laws of the State of Florida with its principal place of business at 175 S.W. 7 th Street, No. 1803, Miami, Florida 33130. Plaintiff Wi-LAN Inc. is a corporation formed under the laws of the country of Canada with its principal place of business at 11 Holland Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4S1. Wi-LAN USA, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wi-LAN Inc. (collectively Wi-LAN ). Wi-LAN is a leading technology innovation and licensing business actively engaged in research, development, and licensing of new technologies. 1

2. Defendant Toshiba Corporation ( Toshiba Japan ) is a corporation formed under the laws of the country of Japan, with its principal place of business at 1-1, Shibaura 1-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8001, Japan. 3. Defendant Toshiba America, Inc. ( Toshiba America ) is a corporation formed under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at 1251 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 4110, New York, New York 10020. 4. Defendant Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. ( Toshiba America Electronic ) is a corporation formed under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 19900 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 400, Irvine, California 92612. 5. Defendant Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. ( Toshiba America Information ) is a corporation formed under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at 9740 Irvine Boulevard, Irvine, California 92618-1697. Toshiba America Information is authorized to do business in the State of Florida and has been assigned Document No. P23738 by the Secretary of State. 6. Toshiba Japan, Toshiba America, Toshiba America Electronic, and Toshiba America Information (collectively Toshiba ) acted in concert with regard to the allegations set forth in this complaint, and therefore the conduct described herein is fairly attributable to either or all entities. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 7. Wi-LAN brings this civil action for patent infringement pursuant to the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et. seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b). Upon information and belief, Toshiba conducts business in this 2

district, offers for sale and sells products in this district, and has a registered agent for service of process in the State of Florida. CAUSE OF ACTION The Patents 8. On March 19, 2002, United States Patent No. 6,359,654, titled Methods and Systems for Displaying Interlaced Video on Non-Interlaced Monitors, was duly and legally issued to Stephen G. Glennon, David A. G. Wilson, Michael J. Brunolli, and Benjamin Edwin Felts, III (the 654 Patent ). A true and correct copy of the 654 Patent is attached as Exhibit A to this Complaint. 9. On April 25, 2006, United States Patent No. 7,034,889, titled Signal Processing Unit and Method for a Digital TV System with an Increased Frame Rate Video Signal, was duly and legally issued to Bernd Burchard and Ralf Schwendt (the 889 Patent ). A true and correct copy of the 889 Patent is attached as Exhibit B to this Complaint. 10. By assignment, Wi-LAN Inc. owns all right, title, and interest in and to the Patents-in-Suit, and Wi-LAN USA, Inc. is the exclusive licensee of the Patents-in-Suit with exclusive rights, including but not limited to the right to enforce the Patents-in-Suit and collect damages for past and future infringements. Count One (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,359,654) 11. Wi-LAN incorporates herein by reference each and every allegation in the preceding paragraphs. 12. Toshiba is making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or importing into the United States products, including but not limited to the L6200 series of flat panel televisions depicted in the attached Exhibit C, that infringe one or more claims of the 654 Patent. 3

13. Toshiba is inducing direct infringement of the 654 Patent by actively instructing, assisting, and/or encouraging others to practice the inventions claimed in one or more claims of the 654 Patent in relation to its flat panel televisions, including but not limited to the L6200 series of flat panel televisions. this Court. 14. The infringement of the 654 Patent by Toshiba will continue unless enjoined by 15. The infringing activities by Toshiba have caused and will continue to cause irreparable injury to Wi-LAN for which there exists no adequate remedy at law. Count Two (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,034,889) 16. Wi-LAN incorporates herein by reference each and every allegation in the preceding paragraphs. 17. Toshiba is making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or importing into the United States products, including but not limited to, the L6200 series of flat panel televisions depicted in the attached Exhibit C, that infringe at least one or more claims of the 889 Patent. 18. Toshiba is inducing direct infringement of the 889 patent by actively instructing, assisting, and/or encouraging others to practice the inventions claimed in one or more claims of the 889 Patent in relation to its flat panel televisions, including but not limited to the L6200 series of flat panel televisions. this Court. 19. The infringement of the 889 Patent by Toshiba will continue unless enjoined by 20. The infringing activities by Toshiba have caused and will continue to cause irreparable injury to Wi-LAN for which there exists no adequate remedy at law. 4

DEMAND WHEREFORE, Wi-LAN requests that judgment be entered in its favor and against Toshiba as follows: A. Declaring that Toshiba has infringed the Patents-in-Suit; B. Issuing temporary, preliminary, and permanent injunctions enjoining Toshiba, its officers, agents, subsidiaries and employees, and those in privity or in active concert with it, from further activities that constitute infringement of the Patents-in-Suit both within the State of Florida and across the United States; C. Ordering that an accounting be had for profits, reasonable royalties and/or other damages arising out of Toshiba s infringement of the Patents-in-Suit, together with costs, prejudgment, and post-judgment interest; and D. Awarding Wi-LAN such other costs and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Wi-LAN demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. 5

Attorneys for the Plaintiffs: CARLSON & LEWITTES, P.A. By: s/curtis Carlson Curtis Carlson, Fla.Bar. No. 236640 1200 Suntrust International Center One Southeast Third Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: 305.372.9700 Facsimile: 305.372.8265 E-mail: carlson@carlson-law.net OF COUNSEL KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP David E. Sipiora Charles A. Pannell Kent T. Dallow 1400 Wewatta St., Suite 600 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 571-4000 6