COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date:

Similar documents
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

A G E N D A Council Update Training Room January 8, :45 p.m.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

ORDINANCE NO NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO:

ORDINANCE NO. 867 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 OF THE DACONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SITE PLANS AND USES IN THE C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICT

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Agenda Item: Agenda Location: Work Plan # Legal Review: 1 st Reading 2 nd Reading

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

ORDINANCE NO. 14. An Ordinance entitled Maywood Park Noise Control Ordinance.

Amending Ordinance Administrative Citations

****************************************************************************** BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYTOWN, TEXAS:

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Chapter 46, Article II of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clute, as amended,

CHAPTER 45. NOISE. Declaration of policy; failure to conform declared public nuisance.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: Agenda Item : Agenda Location: Goal(s): Legal Review:

Sec General Provisions. 1. Scope. This Section applies to the control of all sound and noise within

Alhambra, California Code of Ordinances TITLE XVIII: COMMUNITY NOISE AND VIBRATION CONTROL CHAPTER 18.02: NOISE AND VIBRATION CONTROL REGULATIONS

ORDINANCE NO EAST BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

ORDINANCE NO Town of Rising Sun. Cecil County, Maryland

MECKLENBURG COUNTY NOISE ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 189 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF REHOBOTH BEACH, DELAWARE, 2001, RELATING TO NOISE.

ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF WELLINGTON, COLORADO THAT:

ORDINANCE NO

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1082

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 189 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF REHOBOTH BEACH, DELAWARE, 2001, RELATING TO NOISE.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

ORDINANCE NO ~

Town of Holly Springs

CITY OF MELISSA, TEXAS

Business zone: Those areas so designated under business zone of the zoning ordinances of the City of New Britain.

It is determined that certain sound levels are detrimental to the public health, welfare and safety, and contrary to public interest.

ORDINANCE NO

City of Boston Municipal Code

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO. 2645

City Attorney's Synopsis

REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION rct Avenue NE, Woodinville, WA WWW,CI. WOODINVILLE:. WA. US

PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.

HARVEY CEDARS, NJ Friday, September 2, 2016

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

TITLE 18 NOISE ABATEMENT

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER OF THE MONTEREY COUNTY CODE RELATING TO NOISE CONTRO

ORDINANCE 11-O-14 { }{

TOWNSHIP OF LOWER MERION Building and Planning Committee Issue Briefing. Prepared By: Robert Duncan, Assistant Township Manager

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. AMENDMENT No. 252 BUILDING HEIGHT

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, TEXAS, ADOPTING THE THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS", AS

Item 8C 1 of 17

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Snohomish, Washington ORDINANCE 1858

TOWN OF OAK GROVE ORDINANCE NO

PLUMBING CODE ORDINANCE NO

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Agenda Location: Goal(s): Legal Review:

Statement of Vision. Statement of Values

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

APPENDIX TO CODE OF ORDINANCES USE AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES

Noise Control Bylaw No. 4404, Consolidated for Convenience Only

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

DRAFT DOCUMENT -- REVISIONS MAY OCCUR BEFORE POSTED TO COUNCIL AGENDA ORDINANCE NO.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT ENACTED AND ORDAINED

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF YPSILANTI NOTICE OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 1281

LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT

Noise Control Bylaw No. 4404, Consolidated for Convenience Only

CITY of NOVI CITY COUNCIL

City of Calistoga Staff Report

Chapter 146, NOISE Purpose; objectives Definitions.

Commission Memorandum

FRANCONIA TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE #383

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF OSHTEMO KALAMAZOO COUNTY, MICHIGAN NOTICE OF ORDINANCE ADOPTION

ANSI. American National Standards Institute or its successor organization.

SOUTH WHITEHALL TOWNSHIP LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO Duly Adopted December 19, 2018)

Laguna Niguel Nuisance Animals

Chapter 8.05 NOISE REGULATIONS

Chapter 109 NOISE Regulated Activities; responsibility of owner or lessee.

ORDINANCE 474. WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that timely inspections are the most efficient method of minimizing such hazards; and

public health and safety and are in violation of the laws of the State of Florida and of Liberty County;

Authority: Item 8, Planning Committee Report (PED10115(a)) CM: November 30, 2011

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

Amended Bill No. 26, Ordinance No. 26, Session 2012 ARTICLE 1701 BOCA National Building Code

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DISTRICT TIME SOUND LEVEL DECIBELS

Accessory Buildings (Portion pulled from Town Code Updated 2015)

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR THE CITY OF WINDSOR HEIGHTS, IOWA, BY AMENDING CHAPTER 50 NUISANCES

LOWER SAUCON TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO

BILL ORDINANCE 10003

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEHMAN TOWNSHIP LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO (RR)

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, pursuant to the Second Class Township Code, 53 P.S and 66529,

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, on May 12, 2005, the City Council of Dunes City adopted Ordinance No. 176, amending Ordinance No. 108 in various ways; and

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. 62-A TOWNSHIP OF WHITEFORD, COUNTY OF MONROE, STATE OF MICHIGAN NOISE ORDINANCE

WAUKESHA COUNTY VILLAGE OF OCONOMOWOC LAKE STATE OF WISCONSIN ORDINANCE NO. 173 (as amended by ordinance 241)

ORDINANCE NO. 730 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA AMENDING THE CALISTOGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8

(O-90-43) ORDINANCE NUMBER O (NEW SERIES) ADOPTED ON OCTOBER 2, 1989

, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION , CURFEW, FOR THE VILLAGE OF NEW LENOX, WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS

BOROUGH NORTHVALE County of Bergen State of New Jersey ORDINANCE #

The Los Angeles Daily Journal. 2 3 An ordinance amending the Los Angeles Municipal Code

AUGUSTA CHARTER TOWNSHIP WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO Noise Ordinance

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK ORDINANCE #

Transcription:

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Agenda Location: Work Plan # Legal Review: _X_ 1 April 25, 2017 Action Item st Reading 2 nd Reading Subject: An ordinance amending Section 38-441 of the Thornton City Code to expand the authorized hours for construction activities and the use of domestic and commercial power equipment in certain limited circumstances. Recommended by: Jason O Shea Approved by: Jeff Coder Ordinance previously Presenter(s): Robin Brown, Code Compliance Supervisor introduced by: SYNOPSIS: This ordinance expands the authorized hours for construction activities and the operation of power equipment for projects of economic significance in certain limited circumstances. The current City Code restricts such activities to the hours of 6 a.m. to 9 p.m., except for industrial districts. The proposed changes would allow construction activities and the use of power equipment regardless of the time of day, provided the activities/usage occurs at least 400 feet from an occupied residential dwelling. Construction activities must still comply with the maximum decibel levels specified in the Code. Sound from power equipment may not exceed 88 decibels, which is the existing maximum level authorized during the day in all zoning districts, except industrial. The proposed changes will provide flexibility for unforeseen construction delays, such as weather, and by allowing work related to a project of economic significance to continue at night if the specified requirements are met. Several neighboring jurisdictions offer similar options via a permitting process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, approval of the ordinance as drafted. BUDGET/STAFF IMPLICATIONS: No budgetary or staff implications are anticipated. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the ordinance as drafted. 2. Approve the ordinance with changes directed by Council. 3. Do not approve the ordinance. BACKGROUND (ANALYSIS/NEXT STEPS/HISTORY): City Council discussed this item at a Council Update on March 28, 2017 and directed staff to prepare an ordinance for their formal consideration. Section 18-58 of the City Code authorizes administrative development review for projects of economic significance. This process shortens the development timeline for primary employment and other approved projects, ensuring that businesses can be constructed/reconstructed and thus open more quickly. Qualifications for the administrative development review process include:

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PAGE 2 1. Automatic designation of land uses such as an industrial business, convention center, hospital, general office facility, multilevel parking garage, office showroom/warehouse, and warehouse. Applications may also be considered for other nonresidential developments and for mixed use developments where at least 50 percent of the development is nonresidential. 2. The application does not require a zone change. If a zone change is required, a concurrent application for administrative review may be submitted. 3. The application meets the requirements for the zoning district in which it is located. 4. The use will not be a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare. 5. The use will significantly increase sales, use, or property taxes or other revenue to the city; or significantly increase employment; or advance the redevelopment of property; or provide other significant benefits as determined by the City Council. Staff reviewed the noise regulations for neighboring jurisdictions as they relate to construction activities and power equipment. Arvada, Aurora, Brighton, and Northglenn have permitting options that would allow a variation from the code standards for noise. Broomfield, Commerce City, Federal Heights, and Westminster do not have a variance/permitting process, so the maximum decibel level of construction activities or power equipment must comply with the existing standards in their codes.

INTRODUCED BY: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 38-441 OF THE THORNTON CITY CODE TO EXPAND THE AUTHORIZED HOURS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND THE USE OF DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL POWER EQUIPMENT IN CERTAIN LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES. WHEREAS, the City currently regulates nuisances in Chapter 38 Article X of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Code currently prohibits construction activities and the use of domestic or commercial power equipment between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. except for industrial districts; and WHEREAS, Section 18-58 of the Code specifies circumstances under which a development can be designated as a project of economic significance and can therefore proceed under administrative development review; and WHEREAS, the City desires to expand the authorized hours for construction activities and the use of domestic and commercial power equipment for uses authorized for administrative development review and therefore amendments to Section 38-441 of the Code are necessary; and WHEREAS, the City finds these Code amendments are necessary to promote the public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THORNTON, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: 1. Subsections 38-441(c)(5) and (c)(7) of the Thornton City Code are hereby amended by the addition of the words double-underlined and the deletion of the words stricken to read as follows: Sec. 38-441. - Noise disturbances prohibited. (c) Noise sound level standards. (1) Sound pressure levels shall be measured at the approximate location of the property line or, for motor vehicles, at least 25 feet from the motor vehicle, at a height of at least four feet above the immediate surrounding grade, on a sound level meter of standard design and operated on the A network. (2) The maximum permissible sound pressure levels of any continuous source of sound is given in subsection (c), Table A, Sound Pressure Level Limits. Sound pressure levels in excess of the limits for the district in which the source is located are considered an unreasonable noise and are prohibited.

Table A. Sound Pressure Level Limits District db(a) During the Day, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. db(a) During the Night, 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. All Residential Districts 55 50 Nonresidential Districts Except Industrial 60 55 Industrial Districts 80 75 (3) The repairing, rebuilding or testing of any type of motor vehicle and the operation of machinery, equipment, pump, air conditioning apparatus or similar mechanical device shall be subject to the maximum permissible sound pressure levels in subsection (c), Table A, for the district in which the source is located. (4) The standards in subsection (c), Table A, do not apply to any sources of sound that have their own set of standards in this section. (5) Construction activities as defined in Section 38-1 are subject to the following requirements: a. Construction activities are prohibited within any zoning district between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. unless specifically authorized in paragraph (5)c or (5)d, below. b. Construction activities occurring between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. shall comply with the sound pressure level limits for industrial districts given in subsection (c), Table A. c. Construction activities in industrial districts are allowed at all times of the day, subject to the sound pressure level limits for that district in subsection (c), Table A. d. Construction activities associated with the development of property that has been authorized for administrative development review in Section 18-58 of the Code, and which are located at least 400 feet from an occupied dwelling unit, may occur at any time of day and shall comply with the sound pressure level limits in subsection (c), Table A. prohibited within any zoning district, except an industrial district, between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. At all other times, construction activities are subject to sound pressure level limits for industrial districts given in subsection (c), Table A. (6) Within enclosed places of public entertainment, when individuals are subject to sound levels and exposure durations exceeding those shown in subsection (c), Table B, all feasible administrative or engineering controls shall be utilized to protect against the effects of such noise exposure. 2

Table B Exposure Duration Per Day (hours) Sound Level db(a) Slow Response 8 90 6 92 4 95 3 97 2 100 1.5 102 1 105 0.5 110 0.25 or less 115 (7) No person or entity shallit shall be unlawful to operate or permit to be operated on private property or in the public right-of-way any domestic or commercial power equipment unless in compliance with the following standards within any zoning district, except for an industrial district: a. The operation of Ddomestic or commercial power equipment is prohibited between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., unless authorized in paragraph (7)d or (7)e, below.; or b. The operation of Aany commercial power equipment which exceeds a sound pressure level of 88 db(a) between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. is prohibited.; or c. The operation of Aany domestic power equipment which exceeds a sound pressure level of 80 db(a) between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. is prohibited. d. The operation of domestic or commercial power equipment is allowed at all times of the day in industrial districts. e. The operation of domestic or commercial power equipment is allowed at all times of the day when associated with the development of property that has been authorized for administrative development review in Section 18-58 of the Code, when the sound pressure level does not exceed 88 db(a), and when the operation of the equipment occurs at least 400 feet from an occupied dwelling unit. 2. If any portion of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the constitutionality or validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each part hereof irrespective of the fact that any one part be declared unconstitutional or invalid. 3

3. All other ordinances or portions thereof inconsistent or conflicting with this ordinance or any portions hereof are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. 4. The repeal or amendment of any provision of the Code by this ordinance shall not release, extinguish, alter, modify, or change in whole or in part any penalty, forfeiture, or liability, either civil or criminal, which shall have been incurred under such provision, and each provision shall be treated and held as still remaining in force for the purpose of sustaining any and all proper actions, suits, proceedings, and prosecutions for the enforcement of the penalty, forfeiture, or liability, as well as for the purpose of sustaining any judgment, decree, or order which can or may be rendered, entered, or made in such actions, suits, proceedings, or prosecutions. 5. This ordinance shall take effect upon final passage. INTRODUCED, READ, PASSED on first reading, ordered posted in full, and title ordered published by the City Council of the City of Thornton, Colorado, on, 2017. PASSED AND ADOPTED on second and final reading on, 2017. CITY OF THORNTON, COLORADO ATTEST: Heidi K. Williams, Mayor Kristen N. Rosenbaum, City Clerk 4

THIS ORDINANCE IS ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERK S OFFICE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Luis A. Corchado, City Attorney PUBLICATION: Posted in six (6) public places after first and second readings. Published in the Northglenn-Thornton Sentinel after first reading on, 2017, and after second and final reading on, 2017. 5