College Voting in the 2018 Midterms: A Survey of US College Students. (Medium)

Similar documents
Survey Overview. Survey date = September 29 October 1, Sample Size = 780 likely voters. Margin of Error = ± 3.51% Confidence level = 95%

Subject: Pinellas County Congressional Election Survey

HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 2/15/2018 (UPDATE)

LIKELY REP PRIMARY VOTERS... POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY Tea CONSERVATIVE Mod/ COLLEGE DEG Tot Party Very Smwht Lib Men Wom Yes No

SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE SURVEY CENTER FEBRUARY 2019 POLL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Polling Center: The Institute of Government Jackson State University Internal 2016 Presidential Poll Captures Interest, Participation, and Hope

CLINTON NARROWLY LEADS TRUMP IN FLORIDA -- GOP THIRD PARTY DEFECTIONS & HISPANIC VOTERS CREATING THE CURRENT GAP

Toplines November 2018 University of Massachusetts Amherst Post-Midterm Election Poll of Registered Voters

PRRI/The Atlantic April 2016 Survey Total = 2,033 (813 Landline, 1,220 Cell phone) March 30 April 3, 2016

THE GOVERNOR, THE PRESIDENT, AND SANDY GOOD NUMBERS IN THE DAYS AFTER THE STORM

STAR TRIBUNE MINNESOTA POLL. April 25-27, Presidential race

HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 9/24/2018 (UPDATE)

Nevada Poll Results Tarkanian 39%, Heller 31% (31% undecided) 31% would renominate Heller (51% want someone else, 18% undecided)

Subject: Florida Statewide Republican Primary Election survey conducted for FloridaPolitics.com

Release #2475 Release Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 WHILE CALIFORNIANS ARE DISSATISFIED

For immediate release Monday, March 7 Contact: Dan Cassino ;

OHIO: CLINTON HOLDS SMALL EDGE; PORTMAN LEADS FOR SENATE

Survey Instrument. Florida

PENNSYLVANIA: DEMOCRATS LEAD FOR BOTH PRESIDENT AND SENATE

NEVADA: TRUMP OVERTAKES CLINTON

NEVADA: CLINTON LEADS TRUMP IN TIGHT RACE

PUBLIC SAYS IT S ILLEGAL TO TARGET AMERICANS ABROAD AS SOME QUESTION CIA DRONE ATTACKS

POLL: CLINTON MAINTAINS BIG LEAD OVER TRUMP IN BAY STATE. As early voting nears, Democrat holds 32-point advantage in presidential race

1. SCREENING. 1. IF CELL PHONE: Are you in a safe place where you can take a survey? YES 100

VIRGINIA: TIGHT RACE IN CD07

Tulane University Post-Election Survey November 8-18, Executive Summary

Illustrating voter behavior and sentiments of registered Muslim voters in the swing states of Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.

Akron Buckeye Poll: Ohio Presidential Politics. Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics University of Akron. Executive Summary

VP PICKS FAVORED MORE THAN TRUMP AND CLINTON IN FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL; RESULTS PUT CLINTON OVER TRUMP BY DOUBLE DIGITS

Alabama Republican Presidential Primary Poll 2/26/16. None

Opinion about North Carolina Political Leaders: One Year after Election 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Voters Divided Over Who Will Win Second Debate

OHIO: TIGHT RACE FOR PREZ; PORTMAN WIDENS SENATE LEAD

GenForward March 2019 Toplines

CRUZ & KASICH RUN STRONGER AGAINST CLINTON THAN TRUMP TRUMP GOP CANDIDACY COULD FLIP MISSISSIPPI FROM RED TO BLUE

Trump and Sanders Have Big Leads in MetroNews West Virginia Poll

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2017, Partisan Identification Is Sticky, but About 10% Switched Parties Over the Past Year

CHRISTIE AND BOOKER FARE WELL IN BLUE JERSEY; NJ REPUBS LIKE CHRISTIE IN

Florida Republican Presidential Primary Poll 3/14/16. Fox 13 Tampa Bay Fox 35 Orlando Florida Times-Union

NATIONAL: CLINTON LEAD SHRINKS While non-candidate Biden makes gains

ADDING RYAN TO TICKET DOES LITTLE FOR ROMNEY IN NEW JERSEY. Rutgers-Eagleton Poll finds more than half of likely voters not influenced by choice

Women Boost Obama, Pan Republicans

A SURVEY OF FLORIDA VOTERS ONE YEAR BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY. March 2019

Respondents: Likely 2020 Democratic Primary Voters/Caucusers Nationwide with 250 oversample for African Americans, and 300 oversample for Latinos.

IMMEDIATE RELEASE DECEMBER 22, 2014

WISCONSIN: CLINTON STAYS AHEAD; FEINGOLD WITH SMALLER LEAD

VOTERS AGAINST CASINO EXPANSION, SUPPORT TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND AMENDMENT

Children's Referendum Poll

Emerson Poll: With No Joe, Clinton Leads Sanders By Wide Margin. Trump Solidifies Support in GOP Field. Carson and Rubio Pull Away From Pack.

PRRI/The Atlantic 2016 Post- election White Working Class Survey Total = 1,162 (540 Landline, 622 Cell phone) November 9 20, 2016

Presidential Race. Virginia Illinois Maine. Published Nov 1 Oct 13 Nov 1 Sept 22 Oct 31 Sept 7. Hillary Clinton 49% 46% 53% 45% 46% 44%

PENNSYLVANIA: CD01 INCUMBENT POPULAR, BUT RACE IS CLOSE

Clinton Lead Cut to 8% in Michigan (Clinton 49% - Trump 41%- Johnson 3% - Stein 1%)

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Red Oak Strategic Presidential Poll

HOT WATER FOR MENENDEZ? OR NJ VOTERS SAY MENENDEZ IS GUILTY; GOOD NEWS IS EVERYONE ELSE IS TOO

Georgia Democratic Presidential Primary Poll 2/23/16. Fox 5 Atlanta

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE AUGUST 26, 2016 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

Eagleton Institute of Politics Rutgers University New Brunswick 191 Ryders Lane New Brunswick, New Jersey

Likely Iowa Caucus Voters Attitudes Toward Social Security

GW POLITICS POLL 2018 MIDTERM ELECTION WAVE 1

NEW JERSEY: TIGHT RACE IN CD03

The Cook Political Report / LSU Manship School Midterm Election Poll

These are the highlights of the latest Field Poll completed among a random sample of 997 California registered voters.

VIRGINIA: GOP TRAILING IN CD10

STATE GIVES THUMBS UP TO GOVERNOR CHALLENGERS FACE AN UPHILL BATTLE IN 2013

NH Statewide Horserace Poll

Heading into the Conventions: A Tied Race July 8-12, 2016

FAU Poll: Hispanics backing Clinton in Key Battleground States of Ohio, Colorado Nevada, North Carolina and Florida.

Likely New Hampshire Primary Voters Attitudes Toward Social Security

HYPOTHETICAL 2016 MATCH-UPS: CHRISTIE BEATS OTHER REPUBLICANS AGAINST CLINTON STABILITY REMAINS FOR CHRISTIE A YEAR AFTER LANE CLOSURES

NATIONAL: CLINTON HOLDS POST-DEBATE LEAD Dem voters still have some interest in a Biden run

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2016, In Clinton s March to Nomination, Many Democrats Changed Their Minds

BOOKER V. RIVERA AND THE POWER OF CABLE NEWS OBAMA APPROVAL DOWN SLIGHTLY

CLINTON TRUMPS TRUMP WITH MAJORITY SUPPORT IN FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY PUBLICMIND POLL, BUT VOTERS DIVIDED OVER TRUMP S LOCKER ROOM TALK

PPIC Statewide Survey Methodology

Ipsos Poll conducted for Reuters, May 5-9, 2011 NOTE: all results shown are percentages unless otherwise labeled.

For immediate release Thursday, January 10, pp. Contact: Krista Jenkins ;

HILLARY CLINTON LEADS 2016 DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULS; REPUBLICANS WITHOUT A CLEAR FRONTRUNNER

U.S. Catholics split between intent to vote for Kerry and Bush.

Pennsylvania Republican Presidential Primary Poll 4/25/16. Sponsor(s) Fox 29 Philadelphia WTXF. Target Population

CALIFORNIA: CD48 REMAINS TIGHT

NBC News/WSJ/Marist Poll

FOR RELEASE AUGUST 16, 2018

PENNSYLVANIA: DEM GAINS IN CD18 SPECIAL

REGISTERED VOTERS October 30, 2016 October 13, 2016 Approve Disapprove Unsure 7 6 Total

St. Pete Pier Committee Members,

OHIO: GAP NARROWS IN CD12 SPECIAL

IOWA: TRUMP HAS SLIGHT EDGE OVER CLINTON

On Eve of Foreign Debate, Growing Pessimism about Arab Spring Aftermath

PENNSYLVANIA: SMALL GOP LEAD IN CD01

Thinking back to the Presidential Election in 2016, do you recall if you supported ROTATE FIRST TWO, or someone else?

NEW JERSEY: DEM HAS SLIGHT EDGE IN CD11

REPORT TO PROPRIETARY RESULTS FROM THE 48 TH PAN ATLANTIC SMS GROUP. THE BENCHMARK OF MAINE PUBLIC OPINION Issued May, 2011

Tony Licciardi Department of Political Science

Source institution: The Florida Southern College Center for Polling and Policy Research.

IN POLITICS, WHAT YOU KNOW IS LESS IMPORTANT THAN WHAT YOU D LIKE TO BELIEVE

THE FIELD POLL. UCB Contact

Report for the Associated Press: Illinois and Georgia Election Studies in November 2014

NEW JERSEY: DEM TILT IN CD07

Transcription:

College Voting in the 2018 Midterms: A Survey of US College Students (Medium) 1

Overview: An online survey of 3,633 current college students was conducted using College Reaction s national polling infrastructure from September 20 th to September 25 th. College Reaction implements a custom approach to offer all members of a college's population an equal opportunity to be surveyed. Samples are aimed to represent the US college student population and include both weighted and unweighted results to best capture the geographic, political and ethnic variation within the college demographic. Key Findings: Ø 49.54% of college students report they will definitely vote in the 2018 midterms (compared to 18% turnout in 2014) Ø 77.16% report they are registered to vote Ø 57.01% of Democrats reported they will definitely vote in the 2018 midterms Ø 40.53% of student Republicans reported they will definitely vote in the 2018 midterms Ø 28.10% of students report they would most likely vote for Joe Biden for President Ø 27.15% of students report they would most likely vote for Bernie Sanders for President Ø 48.83% of students identify as Democrat, 24.19% as Independent and 21.27% as Republican 2

College Voting in the 2018 Midterms: A Survey of US College Students Table of Contents: I. Graphics 4 II. Data Tables 6 III. Methodology 12 3

I. Graphics 1. Will you vote in the 2018 midterm elections? Unlikely 14% Definitely 50% Maybe 36% 2. Are you registered to vote? No 23% Yes 77% 4

3. Who would you most likely support for President? Cory Booker 3% 3rd Party Cand. 8% Mitt Romney 7% Joe Biden 28% Jeff Flake 0% Elizabeth Warren 6% John Kasich 7% Donald Trump 13% Bernie Sanders 27% 4. Political Identification 5

II. Data Tables 1. General Results N = 3,633 September 20 th 25th Number Percentage (unweighted) Percentage (weighted) Are you registered to vote? Total 3633 100.00% 100.00% Who would you most likely support for President? Will you vote in the 2018 midterm elections? Yes 2779 76.49% 77.16% No 854 23.51% 22.60% Total 3633 100.00% 100.00% Joe Biden 1009 27.77% 27.99% Donald Trump 493 13.57% 13.30% Bernie Sanders 949 26.12% 27.15% John Kasich 268 7.38% 7.06% Elizabeth Warren 250 6.88% 6.28% Jeff Flake 19 0.52% 0.42% Cory Booker 96 2.64% 2.81% Mitt Romney 246 6.77% 6.71% Third Party Candidate 303 8.34% 8.28% Total 3633 100.00% 100.00% Definitely 1737 47.81% 49.54% Maybe 1322 36.39% 36.00% Unlikely 574 15.80% 14.46% Gender Total 3633 100.00% - Male 1460 40.19% - Female 2157 59.37% - Other 16 0.44% - Race Total 3633 100.00% - White 2238 61.60% - Black 176 4.84% - Hispanic 301 8.29% - Asian 679 18.69% - American Indian 7 0.19% - Two or more races 232 6.39% - Political Identification Total 3633 100.00% 100.00% Democrat 1763 48.53% 48.83% Republican 797 21.94% 21.27% Independent 881 24.25% 24.19% Libertarian 151 4.16% 4.05% Green 41 1.13% 1.24% 6

2. Percentage of college students who will vote in the 2018 midterms (segmented by race, gender, party etc.) Ex: 58.62% of registered college voters will definitely vote in the 2018 midterms 7

3. Percentage of college students who prefer each prospective presidential candidate (segmented by race, gender, party etc.) Ex: 27.60% of registered students would most likely support Joe Biden 8

4. Percentage of college students who identify with each political party (segmented by race, gender, party etc.) Ex: 49.91% of registered college voters are Democrats. 9

5. Percentage of college students of each race (segmented by race, gender, party etc.) Ex: 65.82% of registered college voters are white. 10

6. Percentage of college students of each gender (segmented by race, gender, party etc.) Ex: 39.40% of registered college voters are Male. 11

III. Methodology Methodology General: College Reaction utilizes multiple measures throughout the polling process to maximize accuracy, ensure internal and external validity, and provide reliable information. Sampling: College Reaction has a customized approach to get the most accurate randomized sample of students at each college. Samples are aimed to represent the specific population of each college, demographic trends, and the national student population at large. Depending on the availability of public information and resources available to us, we have a non-probability sample of recruited students who have opted-in to participate in our surveys in exchange for a monetary incentive. We have focused our efforts to minimize biases in our recruitment process through different randomizing processes. College Reaction utilizes publicly available information and contacts a randomized group of students with an offer to opt-in for receiving our polls in exchange for an incentive. College E-mail Address: We utilize students college email addresses to prevent multiple responses. We collect demographic information from students. We compare this data to each school s demographic trends and the national student demographic information to ensure that our sample of students are representative of the target population. This data is also utilized in weighting responses for accurate results. 12

Survey process: College Reaction sends the survey designed by the client to the requested sample of students via email. The email asks the respondent to complete the attached survey. Student typically have 24 hours, or in case of long surveys certain number of days, to fill out the given survey. There are a few factors that might impact accuracy of the question process or introduce biases, such as question design, order, and whether or not the respondent can be identified. Question design: The response accuracy could be influenced by the subject of the poll and the wording of the questions. The responsibility of designing questions and the potential biases that it introduces to the outcomes falls on the client. College Reaction is willing and able to provide assistance in survey design. College Reaction takes active measures in the design of its polls to mitigate introduction of any biases Weighting: The proportions have been weighted by gender and race according to each respondent's self-identified response. The weights were generated by comparing the sample proportion of each combination of gender and race to the corresponding true proportion of college students in the fall of 2015. The true proportion was found on the National Center for Education Statistics website under the total fall enrollment for 2015. Our model projects the true college voting rate in the 2018 midterms to fall between 47.9% to 51.2% at a 95% confidence interval. The purpose of weighting the results is to provide a distribution of results that most closely resembles the distribution had the entire population of college students been surveyed. By weighting, the new results are based on a population that, percentage wise, matches the demographics of college students across the nation. When weighting is not conducted, certain demographics are vulnerable to underrepresentation or overrepresentation. Respondent anonymity: Identifiable responses introduce biases and lower response rate. College Reaction utilizes an anonymous and de-identified survey approach. Results: The responses to our polls are monitored for multiple responses and accuracy of answers through tracking time spent on the survey, email address, and other traceable web identifiers. External Validity: Our goal is to provide information to our clients that are generalizable to the larger target population, whether it is an individual college, 13

students within a state or region, or the national college student population. We utilize measures during the recruitment, polling, and weighting process to give weight to different factors that impact the external validity of our polls. Why conventional sampling methods fail on the college level? To obtain a randomized sample of an entire population, polling organization commonly utilize random digit dialing which contacts a random sample of landline and cellphone number in the United States. Although this process has some biases and drawbacks, it provides a good sample of the US population. However, students enrolled in degree-granting postsecondary institutions make up around 6% of the larger US population. What adds to the difficulty of surveying is the response rate; reputable organizations have below 10% response rates. This means that using the traditional method, each 1000 calls would yield to less than 5 responses. A typical poll of 1,500 respondents would require approximately 300,000 phone calls. It could take roughly 2 years to conduct a single randomizes digit dialing poll. That is why College Reaction has started to utilize modern scientific methods to understand the college population. We have a customized approach for every school, to find the most representative set of students that can be obtained to answer questions regarding various topics. Our approach utilizes a scientific approach with swift modern technology to bring our clients polls as quickly as a day, while keeping accuracy at the focus of our polling. What s different about College Reaction s sample? Some services provide a panel of student to conduct research about college students. However, these services consist of a mix of panel without a centralized recruitment or an intentional sample of students. At College Reaction, we recruit students intentionally and scientifically. We generate our respondent panel from reaching out to a large section of each campus to participate, rather than relying on a snowball effect, which could introduce bias. We know who our participants are and how they were recruited. For instance, we allow our clients to specify which lists of schools they would like to include in their survey, whereas other services simply include demographic tags like Age 18-24 or College student. Our ability to offer in-depth and customizable insights into the college demographic and the diverse segments within it set us apart. 14

15