Report Special Committee Q94

Similar documents
A I P P I ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE POUR LA PROTECTION DE LA PROPRIETE INTELLECTUELLE

The Future of TRIPS issues in the Doha Round

STANDING COMMITTEE ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NATIONAL GROUPS

MODULE X CURRENT TRIPS ISSUES*

( ) Page: 1/10 MINUTES OF MEETING HELD IN THE CENTRE WILLIAM RAPPARD ON 1-2 MARCH Chairperson: Ambassador Alfredo Suescum (Panama)

Intellectual Property and Seed: Concerns & Caveats

A I P P I ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE POUR LA PROTECTION DE LA PROPRIETE INTELLECTUELLE

Standing Committee on

Intellectual Property in WTO Dispute Settlement

STANDING COMMITTEE ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NATIONAL GROUPS

SUMMARY. Geneva, Switzerland

ExCo Berlin, Germany

International Regulation: Lessons from the IP Experience for the Internet

Q233 Grace Period for Patents

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

11 th Session of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues

( ) Page: 1/67 MINUTES OF MEETING HELD IN THE CENTRE WILLIAM RAPPARD ON FEBRUARY Chairperson: Ambassador Mothusi Palai (Botswana)

EXCO Lisbon 2002 REPORT

Chapter 2 Beyond the CBD and the Nagoya Protocol: Other Instruments that Affect ABS and Intellectual Property

3. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY & LEGAL FRAMEWORK

STATE GOVT S - WTO & FTA ISSUES CENTRE FOR WTO STUDIES, IIFT AUGUST 2012

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

Trademark Rights; Overview of Provisions in the Paris Convention and the TRIPS Agreement

The Trans-Pacific Partnership

Terms of Reference. Trade Negotiations and Emerging Trade Issues. Head of Section, International Trade Policy, Trade

From the outset, Zimbabwe wishes to align itself with the statement made by Nigeria on behalf of the African Group.

TRIPS, from the WTO to. Presented by: Catherine Mateu

SINER-GI Meeting Parma, June 2005

Geographical Indications - Where now after Cancún?

The Protection of Traditional Knowledge:

Concept of IPRs International Protection and Enforcement in EU Trade Agreements

LL.M. in International Legal Studies WTO LAW

WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON THE PROTECTION OF TRADEMARKS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

CRS Report for Congress

UNITED STATES. Association Internationale pour la Protection de la Propriete Intellectuelle U.S. Group. Background and Membership Benefits

How can Japan and the EU work together in the era of Mega FTAs? Toward establishing Global Value Chain Governance. Michitaka Nakatomi

Protection of Traditional Knowledge (TK) in Latin America

Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization. (Signed at Stockholm on July 14, 1967 and As amended on September 28, 1979)

GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THE OBLIGATION TO DISCLOSE THE ORIGIN OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS: IS A COMPROMISE POSSIBLE UNDER TRIPS?

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND GENETIC RESOURCES, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE (IGC)

Geographical Indications: Implications for Africa. By Catherine Grant For the Trade Law Centre of Southern Africa

Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO

WIPO Seminar, Geneva, 23 June

March 27, Dear Member of AIPPI-US:

ANNEX XVII REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 5 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS

Informal Brief. The Treatment Of Intellectual Property In The Ministerial Declaration: Mandated Negotiations And Reviews

ECTA ACTIVITY REPORT June 2016 June 2017

STANDING COMMITTEE ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NATIONAL GROUPS

MODULE. Conclusion. ESTIMATED TIME: 3 hours

SUMMARIES OF CONVENTIONS, TREATIES AND AGREEMENTS ADMINISTERED BY WIPO I2006

GENEVA INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND GENETIC RESOURCES, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

Report (1996) of the Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights*

The (Non)Use of Treaty Object and Purpose in IP Disputes in the WTO Henning Grosse Ruse - Khan

STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

The International Law Relation Between TRIPS and Subsequent TRIPS-plus Free Trade Agreements Towards Safeguarding TRIPS Flexibilities?

,QIRUPDWLRQQRWHWRWKH&RPPLVVLRQ IURP&RPPLVVLRQHUV/DP\DQG)LVFKOHU

The Principle of Integration in WTO/TRIPS Jurisprudence Henning Grosse Ruse - Khan

The latest development at WIPO

Geographical Indications in the WTO

Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization

Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore

AIPPI Special Committee Q94 WTO/TRIPS

GENEVA INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND GENETIC RESOURCES, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE

RESTRICTED MTN.GNG/NG11/19 28 March 1990 Special Distribution MEETING OF NEGOTIATING GROUP OF 6 AND 9 MARCH 1990

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Organisation des nations unies pour l'éducation, la science et la culture

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

WIPO - STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS (SCT)

WIPO IGC Seminar 26 May Susan H. Bragdon, Representative, Food & Sustainability, Quaker United Nations Office

This document gives a brief summary of the patent application process. The attached chart shows the most common patent protection routes.

Geographical Indications and the Obligation to Disclose the Origin of Biological Materials: Is a Compromise Possible under Trips?

Ninth Session of the Advisory Committee on Enforcement. Topic Preliminary Alternative Dispute Resolution

WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING

Agreements, Conventions and Legal Issues

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

CBD. Distr. GENERAL. UNEP/CBD/NP/COP-MOP/2/10 * 3 February 2016 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INTELLECTUAL AND REAL PROPERTY: FREE PRIOR INFORMED CONSENT

Protection of GIs through their International Registration - how well advanced is the work in WIPO on the conclusion of a treaty?

FCCC/CP/2015/1. United Nations. Provisional agenda and annotations. I. Provisional agenda

The relevance of traditional knowledge to intellectual property law

2015: a snapshot 12. Our year 14. Spotlight: Nairobi Ministerial Conference 20

Trademarks FIGURE 8 FIGURE 9. Highlights. Figure 8 Trademark applications worldwide. Figure 9 Trademark application class counts worldwide

WIPO General Assembly

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

Colombia. Information on the filing of Patents, Designs and Trademarks in Colombia. COMANAS CORP IP Management Service Group

Lecture 4 Multilateralism and Regionalism. Hyun-Hoon Lee Professor Kangwon National University

BEST PRACTICES FOR EFFICIENT DOCKETING OF ROUTINE FORMALITIES: PART 1

Foreign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker

ANNEX V REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 23 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Summary Report. Question Q191. Relationship between trademarks and geographical indications

European Union Studies Association Asia Pacific l Annual Conference 2-2 July, 2017 Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo A

Questionnaire 2. HCCH Judgments Project

ANNEX VI REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 24 PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

MATTERS CONCERNING THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND GENETIC RESOURCES, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE (IGC)

JOB(03)/ July Preparations for the Fifth Session of the Ministerial Conference. Draft Cancún Ministerial Text

SWEDISH NATIONAL GROUP OF AIPPI Activity Report 2009

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA

WTO Plus Commitments in RTAs. Presented By: Shailja Singh Assistant Professor Centre for WTO Studies New Delhi

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Transcription:

A I P P I ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONALE POUR LA PROTECTION DE LA PROPRIETE INTELLECTUELLE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INTERNATIONALE VEREINIGUNG FÜR DEN SCHUTZ DES GEISTIGEN EIGENTUMS ExCo Hyderabad October 13 to 19, 2011 Report Special Committee Q94 WTO / TRIPS

Report Q94 WTO TRIPS Names and Functions of Committee Members Chairman Ivan Hjertman (Sweden) Co-Chairman Gustavo Leonardos (Brazil) Manoj G. Menda (India) Secretary Melanie Jose (Australia) Members Konrad Becker (Switzerland) Danming Jiang (China) Sun Ryung Kim (South Korea) Takashi Ishida (Japan) Thomas F. Smegal (United States of America) Russell A. Bagnall (South Africa) Luis C. Schmidt (Mexico) Responsible Reporter Kazuhiko Yoshida (Japan) 1. Title Annual report of Special Committee Q94 for the AIPPI Hyderabad Executive Committee meeting October 13-18, 2011 2. Summary: 2.1. Current and future issues: The main tasks of the Committee, as listed in its Terms of Reference, are - to monitor and advise the Bureau and AIPPI members on developments relating to the WTO/TRIPS Agreement and its implementation - to study and advise the Bureau and AIPPI members on proposed amendments of or additions to the TRIPS Agreement - to formulate and, with the approval of the Bureau, to submit and represent the standpoint of AIPPI vis-à-vis WTO/TRIPS - to monitor international developments which impact on the WTO position/negotiations on TRIPS - to monitor activities of other international and regional bodies (GOs and NGOs) in relation to WTO/TRIPS The Committee also has the task to advise the Bureau on 1

- developments in the IP field rendering intervention of AIPPI desirable - specific TRIPS-related issues meriting further study - information and instruction to AIPPI representatives at GO meetings on TRIPS-related issues - possibilities of cooperation with other NGOs and GOs in the IP field The Committee has, in addition, the special instructions - to coordinate its activities in regard to WTO/TRIPS-related aspects of Traditional Knowledge, Genetic Resources and Folklore with Special Committee Q166, and - to inform, in addition to the Bureau, the Chair and the members of the Programme Committee and the Committee Officers and members of other AIPPI Committees of relevant Q94 activities and seek, if necessary, their advice and cooperation in formulating the views and reports of the Committee Q94. 2.2. Deadline for any action November 4, 2011, midnight GMT: time limit for request for registration for the WTO eighth Ministerial Conference, Geneva December 15-17, 2011 2.3. Action recommended Bureau approval for attendance of AIPPI as NGO at the WTO 8 th Ministerial Conference, with Special Committee Q94 represented in the AIPPI delegation 3. Introduction 3.1 Working methods Internally within Q94: - regular internal meetings to coincide with AIPPI Executive Committee meetings and Congresses - exchange of information by email correspondence - monitoring activities, debates and work of WTO, the TRIPS Council and the WTO Intellectual Property Division, below named the TRIPS Council Secretariat, to identify new issues and developments and to inform AIPPI - to collect WTO/TRIPS documents for assessment of relevance to AIPPI With the TRIPS Council Secretariat: - regular meetings, arranged to coincide with AIPPI Congresses and Executive Committee meetings, with the WTO/TRIPS Council representative attending such those meetings on invitation from the Bureau - regular meetings, on an annual basis, of the Chair and other Committee members as available, at the WTO premises in Geneva with the TRIPS Council Secretariat - exchange of information with the TRIPS Secretariat, e.g. survey reports, AIPPI resolutions. 4. Report of Committee s activities since the Report dated September 6, 2010, for the Paris Congress 4.1 Meetings with the TRIPS Council Secretariat Two meetings have been held: 2

September 20, 2010: meeting at the WTO, Geneva, between AIPPI/Q94 and the TRIPS Council Secretariat October 4, 2010: meeting jointly with Special Committee Q166 in the context of the Paris Congress with the TRIPS Council Secretariat representative attending the Congress One meeting is planned to be held: September 26, 2011, at the WTO in Geneva 4.1.1 Matters taken up at the meeting September 20, 2010, included - outlook in regard to the Doha Round negotiations and the related TRIPS/CBD/GI issues - the outcomes of the AIPPI Q94/Q166 Questionnaire 2010 on national legislative situations regarding special disclosure requirements for patent applications involving genetic resources - requests from WTO members for technical assistance and capacity building, and possible AIPPI assistance - needs assessments of LDCs to help with their TRIPS implementation, and possible AIPPI assistance - making better use of the information and updates that continuously is provided to the WTO by notifications of national/regional IP law amendments - climate change and IP - IP and public health, access to medicines, and the TRIPS amendment on the Paragraph 6 system - border measures, including the WTO disputes India/EU and Brazil/EU over customs seizures of goods in transit - the issues concerning geographical indications - cross-retaliation under TRIPS 4.1.2 Matters taken up at the meeting October 4, 2010, included Much the same issues were taken up as at the September 20, 2010 meeting, especially - the negotiations and discussions concerning geographical indications, GIs - the status of the ongoing discussions at the WTO on the TRIPS/CBD issue, including the issue of special disclosure obligations for patent applications involving genetic resources and how present systems work Also discussed was possible areas where AIPPI might provide input, including by undertaking studies. An increasing move to discussions on practicalities can be noted. This applies especially to LDCs. AIPPI could assist by providing practitioners views and experience. For example: - in the GI area, a question is how trademark offices take into account GI registration in another jurisdiction. - in regard to source disclosure, what does a disclosure system mean in practice? Many countries have the system. How have the systems worked? - in regard to the matter of Most Favoured Nation, MFN, which is a complex issue involving not only TRIPS but also other WTO agreements, AIPPI could do research through a questionnaire to national groups concerning the process of notification and registration of bilateral agreements. 4.2 Internal Committee meeting October 4, 2010 3

In regard to the work program on issues in addition to the normal monitoring function of the Committee, items discussed included the following: - a fact finding survey/questionnaire in relation to MFN issues - to involve the Communications Committee how to disseminate the Q94/Q166 survey results - Committee members to report internally in the Committee on goods in transit decisions/cases/issues/determinations in their countries - to consider a fact finding questionnaire for the national groups with respect to data protection and unfair commercial use 4.2.1 Post meeting notes in regard to the internal meeting October 4, 2010 MFN remains as a topic to be taken up. It was agreed that this would as a first step be discussed with the TRIPS Council Secretariat. The committee s next meeting with the TRIPS Council Secretariat is scheduled for September 26, 2011. It is intended to discuss at the Q94 Committee meeting in Hyderabad, whether some follow-up of the Q94/166 Questionnaire 2010 should be made. As it seems, now that the Nagoya Protocol is decided and the Doha Round seems not to lead to any agreement, the issue appears focussed on the WIPO IGC. It is intended to take up this development at the Committee meeting in Hyderabad. By then, it will also be known what was decided in regard to the WIPO IGC at the WIPO General Assemblies in September 2011. The type of information that AIPPI can obtain, especially in regard to experiences of existing legislation, is something that seems to be very little discussed, and yet is a significant element in the discussion. With respect to reporting from our Committee membership on cases on goods in transit decisions/cases, no information on such cases has been distributed in our Committee, as at the date of this report. The topic of data protection and unfair commercial use remains quite a hot one in several countries, as well as in various FTA negotiations. The Committee intends to discuss in Hyderabad to revive the topic. 5. Recommendations Issues followed by Special Committee Q94 tend to become increasingly politicized. Considering this ongoing development, the Q94 Committee has in ist Reports for the last several Executive Committee meetings and Congresses reiterated a number of general recommendations for possible future action by AIPPI. In the view of the Committee, these recommendations remain valid and are repeated below. Special Committee Q94 has been pleased to see part of these recommendations materialise in AIPPI work. However, as the Committee sees it, more needs to be done. Special Committee Q94 stands ready to assist in this work. Recommendation 1: In light of the global aspect/wider significance that IP issues have assumed in the last decade, especially an increasing politicization of IP issues, AIPPI should resolve to confirm that its activity extends beyond strictly defined 'scientific work'. Recommendation 2: AIPPI should play a more dynamic role as an NGO in international debates and developments affecting IP, including closer co-operation with other NGOs in the area of IP. Recommendation 3: AIPPI should expand and intensify its collaboration and interaction with WTO and WIPO. 4

Recommendation 4: AIPPI should consider the possibility of preparing information documents addressing IP, particularly WTO-related IP, focussing on the role and value of IP and technology transfer in different economies for general dissemination. Recommendation 5: AIPPI should expand its activities and exposure in developing countries and collaborate with bodies in those countries which are active in the area of IP. September 5, 2011 Ivan Hjertman Melanie Jose Gustavo Leonardos Manoj Menda 5