PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

Similar documents
INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

If you have questions, please or call

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

2016 us election results

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings

Congressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)

Immigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008

January 17, 2017 Women in State Legislatures 2017

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

/mediation.htm s/adr.html rograms/adr/

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

Exhibit A. Anti-Advance Waiver Of Lien Rights Statutes in the 50 States and DC

Political Contributions Report. Introduction POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs

Sunlight State By State After Citizens United

A Nation Divides. TIME: 2-3 hours. This may be an all-day simulation, or broken daily stages for a week.

Instructions for Completing the Trustee Certification/Affidavit for a Securities-Backed Line of Credit

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

APPENDIX D STATE PERPETUITIES STATUTES

APPENDIX C STATE UNIFORM TRUST CODE STATUTES

Graduation and Retention Rates of Nonresidents by State

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

STANDARDIZED PROCEDURES FOR FINGERPRINT CARDS (see attachment 1 for sample card)

Briefing ELECTION REFORM. Ready for Reform? After a day of chaos, a month of uncertainty and nearly two years of INSIDE. electionline.

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

Section 4. Table of State Court Authorities Governing Judicial Adjuncts and Comparison Between State Rules and Fed. R. Civ. P. 53

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

States Adopt Emancipation Day Deadline for Individual Returns; Some Opt Against Allowing Delay for Corporate Returns in 2012

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

State Legislative Competition in 2012: Redistricting and Party Polarization Drive Decrease In Competition

THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

Fundamentals of the U.S. Transportation Construction Market

Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

Understanding UCC Article 9 Foreclosures. CEU Information

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2019

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

Ballot Questions in Michigan. Selma Tucker and Ken Sikkema

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

Now is the time to pay attention

Franklin D. Roosevelt. Pertaining to the. Campaign of 1928

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

Sample file. 2. Read about the war and do the activities to put into your mini-lapbook.

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance

Name Change Laws. Current as of February 23, 2017

Accountability-Sanctions

Background Information on Redistricting

Gun Laws Matter. A Comparison of State Firearms Laws and Statistics

America s Deficient Bridges: A State-by-State Comparison

SMART GROWTH, IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Statutes of Limitations for the 50 States (and the District of Columbia)

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

Economic Nexus Standards in State Taxation. CEU Information

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

Voice of America s Private Schools.

Before They Were States. Finding and Using Territorial Records by Jack Butler

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2008

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin

State Complaint Information

28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

Survey of State Civil Shoplifting Statutes

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

HAVA Implementation in the 50 States: A Summary of State Implementation Plans

ANTI-POVERTY DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD STAMP PROGRAM BENEFITS: A PROFILE OF 1975 FEDERAL PROGRAM OUTLAYS* Marilyn G. Kletke

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

State Campaign Finance Disclosure Requirements Election Cycle

VOTER WHERE TO MAIL VOTER REGISTRATION FORM. Office of the Secretary of State P.O. Box 5616 Montgomery, AL

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

arxiv: v3 [stat.ap] 14 Mar 2018

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

State Prescription Monitoring Program Statutes and Regulations List

2010 Immigration-Related Bills and Resolutions in the States

Background Checks and Ban the Box Legislation. November 8, 2017

States Permitting Or Prohibiting Mutual July respondent in the same action.

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008

Official Voter Information for General Election Statute Titles

COMPARISON OF ABA MODEL RULE FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION WITH STATE VERSIONS AND AMENDMENTS SINCE AUGUST 2002

The Impact of Wages on Highway Construction Costs

Governance State Boards/Chiefs/Agencies

State P3 Legislation Matrix 1

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug

Transcription:

PREVIEW 08 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION Emboldened by the politics of hate and fear spewed by the Trump-Pence administration, state legislators across the nation have threatened continued attacks on the rights of LGBTQ people. As we begin the 08 legislative season across the country, there is a great deal at stake for LGBTQ Americans and their families with state and local lawmakers considering measures that would impact their daily lives for better and for worse. Despite broad-based support for LGBTQ equality and the historic national win on marriage equality, some state lawmakers have continued to advance an anti-lgbtq agenda. As lawmakers in most states enter the second year of their two-year 07/08 sessions and with another high-profile case on LGBTQ equality before the U.S. Supreme Court, we are bracing for continued legislative attacks on the LGBTQ community. In 07, legislators in 0 states filed 9 bills designed to restrict the rights of LGBTQ individuals and their families. A significant number of those posed real threat of becoming law. After public outcry from the business community, grassroots mobilization by HRC members in tandem with our in-state and national partners, and countless local community members making their voices heard, only bills were enacted a passage rate of less than 0 percent. + 0+90+M % BILLS INTRODUCED ENACTED 07 ANTI-LGBTQ LEGISLATION: LESS THAN

07 WRAP-UP The economic and political fallout from passage of North Carolina s discriminatory HB in 06 undoubtedly influenced the quantity and type of anti-lgbtq legislation considered in 07, but it didn t stop some lawmakers from peddling hateful bills. In general, anti-lgbtq lawmakers were more likely to introduce narrower, single-issue bills in 07 as opposed to sweeping multi-part anti-lgbtq bills like HB. We continued to see a focus on anti-transgender bills, but we also saw an increase in discriminatory legislation targeting youth, schools, and child welfare, including bills to allow anti-lgbtq discrimination by adoption and foster care agencies. While narrower in scope, these more-targeted bills still have devastating consequences for LGBTQ people. Number of Anti-LGBTQ Bills Introduced in 07 Legislative Sessions CA OR WA NV ID UT AZ MT WY CO NM ND SD NE KS OK 7 MN 4 IA MO AR 9 WI MI IN IL KY TN OH MS AL GA 6 PA WV VA 4 NC SC VT NH NY ME MA RI CT NJ DE DC MD AK TX LA FL HI States with Anti-LGBTQ Legislation

While we continued to see anti-lgbtq bills introduced and enacted in 07, there were also many bright spots. Lawmakers introduced more than 0 pro-equality bills, with becoming law, including new prohibitions on so-called conversion therapy practices in Connecticut, Nevada, New Mexico, and Rhode Island. Now, eleven states ban this dangerous practice which is condemned by every major medical and mental health organization, including the American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, and American Medical Association because research has clearly shown that rather than change a person s sexual orientation or gender identity, these practices instead pose devastating health risks for LGBTQ young people such as depression, decreased self-esteem, substance abuse, homelessness, and even suicidal behavior. For more details on bills introduced in 07 state legislatures, check out HRC s State Equality Index. 0+ PRO-EQUALITY BILLS FILED PRO-EQUALITY BILLS PASSED NATIONWIDE 08 PREVIEW Thanks to the work of advocates in states from coast to coast, of the more than anti-lgbtq bills introduced during the 07 state legislative session, only twelve became law. However, defeating discriminatory legislation required tremendous efforts from the LGBTQ community and pro-equality allies. We anticipate that 08 will be similar, with significant challenges across an array of states. There are several reasons to be concerned, including that 08 is both an election year and the second year of a two-year legislative session in most states, because the 06 elections flipped several state legislatures from split control to Republican control, because matters of LGBTQ equality continue to be present in public conversation including in the courts and because we know that state legislators continue to support these discriminatory measures even though their constituents do not.

State and Legislative Partisan Composition Legislative Governor s Party State Legislative Governor s Party State Alabama Montana Alaska Nebraska Arizona Nevada Arkansas New Hampshire California New Jersey Colorado New Mexico Connecticut New York Delaware North Carolina Florida North Dakota Georgia Ohio Hawaii Oklahoma Idaho Oregon Illinois Pennsylvania Indiana Rhode Island Iowa South Carolina Kansas South Dakota Kentucky Tennessee Louisiana Texas Maine Utah Maryland Vermont Massachusetts Virginia Michigan Washington Minnesota West Virginia Mississippi Wisconsin Missouri Wyoming Republican Democrat Independent Split / Divided Nebraska has a non-partisan legislature ANTI-EQUALITY EFFORTS 4 Against the will of most Americans, the surge of anti-lgbtq legislation in state legislatures is anticipated to continue in 08, with many of these bills seeking to erode progress achieved in previous years. We are likely to continue to see a sustained attack on transgender people, particularly in the areas of public accommodations and health care, as well as relentless pressure from opponents of equality to carve out special licenses to discriminate for people who justify their discrimination as a matter of faith or expression.

As more Americans become familiar with the transgender people who are their friends, families and neighbors, it has become a political liability to attack this vulnerable population. And yet, anti- LGBTQ legislators are likely to propose bills that prevent transgender people from using public facilities that accord with their gender identity, prevent or effectively prevent transgender people from accessing medically-necessary health care or other services, and make gender and name changes on identification documents more onerous. We may also see additional legislation that would harm transgender youth by prohibiting the recognition of their gender identity in school sports and activities. As in 07, anti-lgbtq lawmakers in many states will likely introduce bills that allow individuals and businesses to discriminate against LGBTQ people based on their religious or moral objections. We anticipate that such bills will be more sector-specific than the sweeping licenses to discriminate that we have seen in the past. Legislators attempting to enshrine discrimination may instead look to laws passed in 07 in Texas, Alabama, South Dakota, Florida and Kentucky which create licenses to discriminate in a specific field (child welfare services like adoption and foster care in the case of the first three states, and in education in the latter two). In addition to these sector-specific license to discriminate bills, we may see lawmakers revisit the issue of service refusals in places of public accommodation, particularly as the question of wedding-related services is in the news with the Masterpiece case at the U.S. Supreme Court. Bills aiming to create new licenses to discriminate may be combined with or supplemented by municipal preemption bills, such as North Carolina s HB and HB4, that override parts of or altogether prohibit local governments from banning discrimination at the local level. ADVANCING LGBTQ EQUALITY Efforts to secure fundamental protections against discrimination for LGBTQ Americans in employment, housing, and places of public accommodation will continue full force in state legislatures across the nation. Lawmakers in more than a dozen states have pledged to work to advance a full range of protections against anti-lgbtq discrimination, including in Florida, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. In states with pro-equality legislative majorities and existing non-discrimination protections for LGBTQ citizens, legislatures may next tackle critical measures to strengthen bullying protections in schools, protect youth from the harmful and discredited practice of conversion therapy, simplify the process of name and gender marker changes on identity documents, and require LGBTQ cultural competency training for medical and social service providers. BALLOT MEASURES Already, opponents of equality have placed on the ballot two measures to repeal or undermine laws protecting transgender people from discrimination. Voters in Anchorage, Alaska, will consider a measure in April, and Massachusetts will vote in November on a possible repeal of existing protections against discrimination in places of public accommodation like stores and restaurants. Broad coalitions of local, state, and national civil rights organizations have already formed to fight these dangerous efforts.

Addendum: 08 Legislative Sessions Jan. Feb. March April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Alabama Jan 9 - Apr 4 Alaska Jan 6 - Apr 6 Arizona Jan 8 - Apr Arkansas Feb - Mar 4 California Dec - Nov 0 Colorado Jan 0 - May 9 Connecticut Feb 7 - May 9 Delaware District of Columbia Jan 9 - Jan 7, 09 Jan - Dec Florida Jan 9 - Mar 9 Georgia Jan 8 - Mar Hawaii Jan 7 - May Idaho Jan 8 - Mar Illinois Jan 0 - Jan 8, 09 Indiana Jan 9 - Mar Iowa Jan 8 - Apr 7 Kansas Jan 8 - Apr 7 Kentucky Jan - Apr Louisiana Mar - Jun 4 Maine Jan - Apr 8 Maryland Jan 0 - Apr 9 Massachusetts Jan - Jan, 09 Michigan Jan 0 - Dec 6 Minnesota Mississippi Jan - Apr Feb 0 - May

Jan. Feb. March April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Missouri Jan - May 0 Montana No regular 08 session Nebraska Jan - Apr Nevada No regular 08 session New Hampshire Jan - Jan, 09 New Jersey Jan 9 - Jan 8, 09 New Mexico Jan 6 - Feb New York Jan - Jan 9, 09 North Carolina Apr - Jul 6 North Dakota No regular 08 session Ohio Jan - Dec Oklahoma Feb - May Oregon Feb - Mar Pennsylvania Jan - Nov 0 Rhode Island Jan - Dec South Carolina Jan 9 - Jun 7 South Dakota Jan 9 - Mar 6 Tennessee Jan 9 - Apr 6 Texas No regular 08 session Utah Jan - Mar 8 Vermont Jan - May 4 Virginia Jan 0 - Mar 0 Washington Jan 8 - Mar 8 West Virginia Jan 0 - Mar 0 Wisconsin Jan 6 - Jan 7, 09 7 Wyoming Feb 0 - Mar 9