GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff S.P., a fictitious name

Similar documents
GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff

STOECKEL, JAMES MOORE, JIMMY D. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2017

LAW DIVISION: MORRIS COUNTY DOCKET NO.: MRS-L CIVIL ACTION. Plaintiff, Richard Balestrino, residing in Vernon, Sussex

Plaintiff, Fernando Almeida, Jr., ( plaintiff or. Mr. Almeida ), residing at 45 East Midland Avenue, Kearny,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN COUNTY LAW DIVISION DOCKET NO.: CIVIL ACTION THEODORE WELLS, EDWIN E. WOOD, III, JAMES KEHOE,

Plaintiff, MARK JOHNSON, currently incarcerated at Bayside State. Prison, 4293 Route 47, P.O. Box F-2, in the Town of Leesburg, County of

:MONMOUTH COUNTY :LAW DIVISION Plaintiff(s), :DOCKET NO. MON-L

Plaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

Courthouse News Service

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON, A CORPORATION SOLE; JOSEPH FLYNN; J. KEVIN MCANDREWS, Defendants

Shore. Plaintiff, Bunny Shore, residing at 100 Berkley Square Condo Apartment

Chapter 2. Initial Pleadings

.JAh : Plaintiff Salah Williams, residir,g at 129 Chancellor Avenue in the City of Newark,

:Docket No. :Civil Action. illegal activity as a conscientious employee. Plaintiff, with more particularity, says: TILE PARTIES

Case 2:15-cv LFR Document 1 Filed 11/11/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11. Deadline

JOSEPH AMANIERA :SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY Plaintiff :LAW DIVISION, OCEAN COUNTY. :Docket No. I-- /1 THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 4:11-cv GAF Document 1 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 13

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Civil Division General Docket

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff Sharolynn L. Griffiths, by and through her undersigned counsel, by way of JURISDICTION

DOCKET NO. the City of Millville, County of Cumberland and State of New Jersey, by way of FIRST COUNT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL BRANCH -- UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

FACTS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10

Courthouse News Service

Attorney for the Plaintiffs, Anthony Pace, Sr. Sr, and Diane Pace, his his wire, wite.:, :..,'C' 2.-- ~:\' -;, 7 ':

ALFRED CISTARO, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION MONMOUTH COUNTY DOCKET NO. 1_40, 61- CIVIL ACTION

Case 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

Case 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12

Plaintiff, for his cause of action against Defendants, alleges that: PARTIES

following in the above-referenced cause of action : COMMON ALLEGATIONS times material herein was a resident of Polk County, Iowa.

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

2:18-cv PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO.

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:17-cv JCB Document 1 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

EFiled: Jan :11AM EST Transaction ID Case No. S19C ESB IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv JCB Document 5 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO.

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

FILED JUL SUPERIOR OOUHT BERGEN COUNTY. 1. Plaintiff was an "employee" of Defendant Bergen Community College.

Plaintiffs, SHANNON HYMAN TORRES, JOSEPH M. RENDINA and. ROBERT L. AUMACK, by way of Complaint against Defendants, LORENE

CIVIL ACTION. Defendant Jeff Carter, by and through his counsel Law Offices of Walter M. Luers, by

Case 1:15-cv NRB Document 17 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 15. Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT. Defendants.

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, for his causes of action against Defendant, allege that: PARTIES

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:10-cv WOB-JGW Document 1 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY PASSAIC COUNTY, LAW DIVISION CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO.: COMPLAINT & JURY DEMAND

Case 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

Courthouse News Service

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF OCONEE C.A. NO.: 2017-CP-10- Jane Doe, Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.

KENNETH CAREY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION CAPE MAY COUNTY. Plaintiff(s) DOCKET NO.: CPM-L- 3-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Case 3:12-cv MAS-LHG Document 29 Filed 03/26/13 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 227 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Attorneys at Law "*".1 Monmouth Shores Corporate Park H N 1305 Campus Parkway, Suite 200 Wall Township, NJ

Case 4:12-cv Y Document 28 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 179

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege

Plaintiff, Willie Nevius, a resident of North Carolina, by way of complaint against the

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, DEANNA HALLIDAY, by and through her undersigned counsel, brings this

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

Case 1:18-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 20

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA CASE NO CP-23- COUNTY OF GREENVILLE. Sylvia Lockaby, Plaintiff, vs.

Filing # E-Filed 01/09/ :13:29 PM

Case 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS - LAW DIVISION. v. No.: COMPLAINT AT LAW

Case 3:08-cv VLB Document 57 Filed 07/09/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

86zt-lI. 1. Plaintiff, Jose River4 residing in Roselle Park, New Jersey, was employed by

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT COVINGTON

CASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:17-cv UN4 Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT

SUMMONS ON A THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT

Case Case 1:07-cv RMB-JS 1:33-av Document Document Filed Filed 01/10/2007 Page Page 2 of 2 7 of 7 4. Defendants, Sergeant Gerard S

4:15-cv SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 COMPLAINT. 1. This is an action for money damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/ :56 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.

Transcription:

POMPELIO, FOREMAN & GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff S.P., a fictitious name S. P., a fictitious name, vs. Plaintiff, RICHARD GRIGORIO, INDIVIDUALLY, URBAN GROOVE OF PARAMUS, L.L.C., a Limited Liability Company of New Jersey SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: BERGEN COUNTY Docket No.: MRS-L- Civil Action COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Defendants. Plaintiff, S. P. a fictitious, by way of complaint against the defendants, says: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff is an adult female who at the time of the filing of this complaint resided in the Town of Maywood, Bergen County, New Jersey. 2. At all times referred to herein defendant Urban Groove of Paramus, L.L.C. (hereinafter, Urban Groove ) was a limited liability company organized and operating under the laws of the State of New Jersey with principal offices at 1005 Paramus Park, Dock 3, Paramus, New Jersey 07652. The Registered Agent for said defendant as filed with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey is National Registered Agents, Inc. of NJ, 100 Canal Pointe Blvd., Suite 108, Princeton, NJ 08540. 3. At all times referred to herein defendant, Richard Grigorio was an agent, servant and employee of defendant, Urban Groove, serving in a supervisory capacity over all other employees. -1-

FACTS 4. On or about September 3, 2008, plaintiff was hired by defendant Urban Groove for the position of cashier and floor clerk at its retail establishment opened to the public located at 1005 Paramus Park, Dock 3, Paramus, New Jersey. At the time of her hiring, defendant Richard Grigorio represented to plaintiff that he was the manager and supervisor of the retail establishment. 5. During the course of plaintiff s employment between September 3, 2008 and September 9, 2008, defendant Richard Grigorio, acting individually and in his supervisory capacity as agent for defendant Urban Groove, engaged in the following conduct towards plaintiff: a. Without warning defendant placed his finger in plaintiff s mouth and when plaintiff objected, defendant responded with a sexually explicit comment that caused plaintiff a great deal of fear, apprehension and embarrassment. b. Defendant made sexual advances towards plaintiff, and aggressively bragged about the details of his sexual experiences with other women, knowing that plaintiff was aware that defendant was married with children and grandchildren. Defendant boasted to plaintiff that he engaged in extramarital affairs with other women, and in an attempt to convince plaintiff to accept his sexual advances, he described to plaintiff the explicit and offensive details of his sexual activities with other women.. c. On several occasions, and despite plaintiff s constant rebuffs and requests to defendant to refrain from engaging in offensive conduct, he nevertheless, boasted of his sexual prowess and physical attributes in an attempt to seduce plaintiff. d. On one occasion, defendant approached plaintiff and shocked her with the question, Are you one of those horny girls when you get your period? Plaintiff visibly -2-

demonstrated her upset over his conduct, nevertheless defendant pressed on with his offensive and embarrassing comments to plaintiff. e. Plaintiff advised defendant, as her supervisor, that she would be required to take a medical leave from work in the future because a medical examination of her had shown pre-cancerous cells in her cervical area. Defendant s response to plaintiff was that I ll get latex gloves and check it out myself. You don t have to go to a doctor. f. Defendant engaged in further conduct of a sexually explicit nature including asking plaintiff in a vile and disgusting way if she had a preference for a certain type of sexual activity. g. Defendant was aware that it was common knowledge at the business premises that he had acted in a similar manner towards other former female employees who had been forced to leave in order to escape defendant s conduct. As a warning to plaintiff, that she would be required to accept this type of sexually offensive conduct if she wished to keep her job, defendant was told that she could expect this type of conduct on a continuous basis. h. On or about September 9, 2008 plaintiff was forced to leave her employment as a result of the conduct of defendant and fear and apprehension of such further conduct if she continued with her employment, in effect creating a constructive discharge of plaintiff from her employment position. COUNT ONE Sexual Harassment 6. Plaintiff repeats and makes a part hereof the allegations contained in each and every prior paragraph of this Complaint as if same were more fully set forth at length herein. 7. The LAD prohibits unlawful discrimination by an employer against an employee by reason of the employee's sex. N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(a). -3-

8. Plaintiff was wrongfully and constructively discharged and terminated from her position of employment and was the victim of sexual harassment on the part of defendants in violation of the Law Against Discrimination (LAD). a. Hostile work environment sexual harassment: 9. Plaintiff was the victim of sexual harassment in a hostile work environment. 10. The conduct and actions of defendants towards plaintiff occurred because of her sex and a reasonable person of the same sex would consider it sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment and create an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. b. Quid pro quo sexual harassment: 11. The conduct and actions of defendants towards plaintiff constitute quid pro quo sexual harassment and defendant employer, Urban Groove, is strictly liable therefore. 12. As a result of the conduct of defendants, jointly and severally, plaintiff has suffered compensatory damages, including but not limited to the loss of her employment, including back and front pay, social security, fringe benefits, medical benefits, future earnings, emotional pain and suffering, physical pain and suffering, attorney's fees, and such other actual damages as permitted for recovery by the laws of the State of New Jersey and the United States of America. 13. The conduct of defendant was willful and wanton and plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment against defendants jointly, severally, or in the alternative, for compensatory and punitive damages, together with reasonable attorney's fees, costs of suit and such further relief as the Court may deem equitable and just. COUNT TWO Breach of Contract 14. Plaintiff repeats and makes a part hereof the allegations contained in each and every prior paragraph and count as if same were more fully set forth at length herein. 15. On or about September 3, 2008 plaintiff and defendant Urban Groove entered -4-

into a contract of employment. The contract of employment was an oral contract in which there was a clear and definite promise of employment by the employer made with the expectation that the plaintiff would rely thereon. 16. Plaintiff relied upon defendant's promise and at all times, was ready, willing and able to perform her duties and obligations under the contract. 17. Defendant employer owed to plaintiff a duty to honor said contract and to cause same to be performed in a lawful manner free from any violations of the LAD. 18. Defendant employer breached its duty and obligation to perform in that it caused the constructive discharge of plaintiff from its employ in violation of plaintiff's rights. 19. Plaintiff substantially relied upon the promises of defendant employer to her detriment. 20. As a result of the conduct of defendants, jointly and severally, plaintiff has suffered compensatory damages, including, but not limited to the loss of her employment, including back and front pay, social security, fringe benefits, medical benefits, future earnings, emotional pain and suffering, physical pain and suffering, attorney's fees, and such other actual damages as permitted for recovery by the laws of the State of New Jersey and the United States of America. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants, each of them, for compensatory damages, together with reasonable attorney's fees, costs of suit and such further relief as the Court may deem equitable and just. COUNT THREE Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith 21. Plaintiff repeats and makes a part hereof the allegations contained in each and every prior paragraph and count of this complaint as if same were more fully set forth at length herein. 22. Defendants were bound to act appropriately towards plaintiff pursuant to an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing which existed between plaintiff and defendants, -5-

and Plaintiff was legally entitled to rely thereon. 23. As a result of the conduct of defendants, jointly and severally, plaintiff has suffered compensatory damages, including, but not limited to the loss of her employment, including back and front pay, social security, fringe benefits, medical benefits, future earnings, emotional pain and suffering, physical pain and suffering, attorney's fees, and such other actual damages as permitted for recovery by the laws of the State of New Jersey and the United States of America. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants for compensatory and punitive damages, together with reasonable attorney's fees, costs of suit and such further relief as the Court may deem equitable and just. COUNT FOUR Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 24. Plaintiff repeats and makes a part hereof the allegations contained in each and every prior paragraph and count of this complaint as if same were more fully set forth at length herein. 25. Defendants are liable to plaintiff for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress in that (a) the acts of the defendants and plaintiff's emotional distress resulting there from were the result of intentional and/or reckless conduct on the part of defendants; (b) the conduct was extreme and outrageous; (c) the conduct of defendants was the proximate cause of the emotional injuries sustained by plaintiff; and (d) the emotional distress sustained by plaintiff was genuine and substantial and had a demonstrable negative effect on her life and work and has forced Plaintiff to seek medical and or psychological attention. 26. As a result of the conduct of Defendants, jointly and severally, Plaintiff has suffered compensatory damages, including, but not limited to the loss of her employment, including back and front pay, social security, fringe benefits, medical benefits, future earnings, emotional pain and suffering, physical pain and suffering, attorney's fees, and such other actual -6-

damages as permitted for recovery by the laws of the State of New Jersey and the United States of America. 27. The conduct of the defendants, each of them, was willful and wanton. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants for compensatory and punitive damages, together with reasonable attorney's fees, costs of suit and such further relief as the Court may deem equitable and just. COUNT SIX Negligence 28. Plaintiff repeats and makes a part hereof the allegations contained in each and every prior paragraph and count of this complaint as if same were more fully set forth at length herein. 29. Defendants are liable to plaintiff for negligence in that (a) defendants had a legal duty to plaintiff to prevent working conditions in which the acts of individuals would cause Plaintiff harm; (b) this duty was breached; (c) the conduct of defendants was the proximate cause of the harm sustained by plaintiff; and (d) the emotional distress sustained by plaintiff was genuine and substantial and had a demonstrable negative effect on her life and work and has forced plaintiff to seek medical and or psychological attention. 30. As a result of the conduct of defendants, jointly and severally, plaintiff has suffered compensatory damages, including, but not limited to the loss of her employment, including back and front pay, social security, fringe benefits, medical benefits, future earnings, emotional pain and suffering, physical pain and suffering, attorney's fees, and such other actual damages as permitted for recovery by the laws of the State of New Jersey and the United States of America. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants for compensatory damages, together with reasonable attorney's fees, costs of suit and such further relief as the Court may deem equitable and just. -7-

POMPELIO, FOREMAN & GRAY, L.L.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff P.S., a fictitious name By: PAUL S. FOREMAN, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff DATED: January 15, 2009 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff hereby demands a jury trial. DESIGNATION OF TRIAL COUNSEL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Paul S. Foreman, Esq., is hereby designated as trial counsel in the above captioned matter. L.L.C. POMPELIO, FOREMAN & GRAY, Attorneys for Plaintiff P.S., a fictitious name By: PAUL S. FOREMAN, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff DATED: November 2008 CERTIFICATION The undersigned hereby certifies that the matter in controversy is not the subject of any -8-

other action pending in any court or of any pending arbitration proceeding and that no other or arbitration proceeding are presently contemplated. The undersigned further certifies that there are no other parties of which he is presently aware or should be joined in this action. DATED: September 23, 2008 PAUL S. FOREMAN, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff DEMAND FOR INTERROGATORIES Plaintiff demands that the defendant produces certified answers to the Form C and Form C(1) Interrogatories within sixty (60) days of service of this Complaint. DEMAND FOR DOCUMENTS Plaintiff demands that the defendant produce copies of any and all documents in his possession with regard to any of the issues set forth in this Complaint. -9-