ECON 4270 Distributive Justice Lecture 4: Rawls and liberal equality

Similar documents
Normative Frameworks 1 / 35

Do we have a strong case for open borders?

Definition: Institution public system of rules which defines offices and positions with their rights and duties, powers and immunities p.

ECON 4270 Distributive Justice Lecture 10: Libertarianism. Marxism

Chapter 02 Business Ethics and the Social Responsibility of Business

Social Justice and Democracy

John Rawls's Difference Principle and The Strains of Commitment: A Diagrammatic Exposition

Phil 115, June 13, 2007 The argument from the original position: set-up and intuitive presentation and the two principles over average utility

The Veil of Ignorance in Rawlsian Theory

VALUING DISTRIBUTIVE EQUALITY CLAIRE ANITA BREMNER. A thesis submitted to the Department of Philosophy. in conformity with the requirements for

Economic Perspective. Macroeconomics I ECON 309 S. Cunningham

Why Rawls's Domestic Theory of Justice is Implausible

3. Because there are no universal, clear-cut standards to apply to ethical analysis, it is impossible to make meaningful ethical judgments.

S.L. Hurley, Justice, Luck and Knowledge, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003), 341 pages. ISBN: (hbk.).

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

John Rawls THEORY OF JUSTICE

Rawls versus the Anarchist: Justice and Legitimacy

Do we have a moral obligation to the homeless?

PLSC 118B, THE MORAL FOUNDATIONS OF POLITICS

At a time when political philosophy seemed nearly stagnant, John Rawls

FAIRNESS VERSUS WELFARE. Louis Kaplow & Steven Shavell. Thesis: Policy Analysis Should Be Based Exclusively on Welfare Economics

Contract law as fairness: a Rawlsian perspective on the position of SMEs in European contract law Klijnsma, J.G.

PLSC 118A, THE MORAL FOUNDATIONS OF POLITICS

Two Models of Equality and Responsibility

VI. Rawls and Equality

Jan Narveson and James P. Sterba

PLSC 118B, THE MORAL FOUNDATIONS OF POLITICS

Ethics and Engineering

The Social Contract Class Syllabus

Distributive vs. Corrective Justice

MAXIMIZING THE MINIMAL STATE: TOWARD JUSTICE THROUGH RAWLSIAN-NOZICKIAN COMPATIBILITY. Timothy Betts. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the

Distributive Justice Rawls

The Conflict between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle

Business Law 16th Edition TEST BANK Mallor Barnes Langvardt Prenkert McCrory

Economic philosophy of Amartya Sen Social choice as public reasoning and the capability approach. Reiko Gotoh

Ethical Basis of Welfare Economics. Ethics typically deals with questions of how should we act?

Topic 1: Moral Reasoning and ethical theory

Justice as fairness The social contract

Chapter 02 Business Ethics

Phil 115, May 24, 2007 The threat of utilitarianism

Political Obligation 3

Western Philosophy of Social Science

1 EQUALITY OF WHAT? 1.1. WHY EQUALITY? WHAT EQUALITY?

Social Contract Theory

C H A P T E R THEORETICAL BACKGROUND. certain theories, which have been developed by persons of legal authorities

John Rawls ( )

Reconciling Educational Adequacy and Equity Arguments Through a Rawlsian Lens

Nordic Journal of Political Economy

A Rawlsian Analysis of Pension Privatization

Incentives and the Natural Duties of Justice

Some reflections on the role of moral reasoning in economics

Lecture 2: Normative theories of social and fiscal justice in historical perspective (check on line for updated versions)

The Pareto Argument for Inequality Revisited 1

Immigration. Our individual rights are (in general) much more secure and better protected

Ethical Theories CSC 301 Spring 2018 Howard Rosenthal

Human Development and the current economic and social challenges

Phil 115, May 25, 2007 Justice as fairness as reconstruction of the social contract

The (Many) Models of Rawls and Harsanyi

Philosophy 285 Fall, 2007 Dick Arneson Overview of John Rawls, A Theory of Justice. Views of Rawls s achievement:

The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce, 8e (Cheeseman) Chapter 2 Ethics and Social Responsibility of Business

From the veil of ignorance to the overlapping consensus: John Rawls as a theorist of communication

Liberalism and Nihilism: Contemporary Constrained Performance Theories of Justice.

PHIL-2060: BUSINESS ETHICS

Great Philosophers: John Rawls ( ) Brian Carey 13/11/18

Is Rawls s Difference Principle Preferable to Luck Egalitarianism?

A THEORY OF JUSTICE. Revised Edition JOHN RAWLS

JUSTICE, NON-VIOLENCE, AND THE PRACTICE OF POLITICAL JUDGMENT: A STUDY OF RICOEUR S CONCEPTION OF JUSTICE YANG-SOO LEE

EMBRACING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IS AN ETHICAL DECISION

COWLES FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS YALE UNIVERSITY

RECONCILING LIBERTY AND EQUALITY: JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS. John Rawls s A Theory of Justice presents a theory called justice as fairness.

IMPARTIAL JUSTICE: CONDITIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Democratic Rights and the Choice of Economic Systems

Any non-welfarist method of policy assessment violates the Pareto principle: A comment

Towards a Global Civil Society. Daniel Little University of Michigan-Dearborn

JEFFERSON COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS PHL202H HONORS ETHICS. 3 Credit Hours. Prepared by: Michael Booker. Revised Date: January 2006 by Michael Booker

John Rawls: anti-foundationalism, deliberative democracy, and cosmopolitanism

Chapter Two: Normative Theories of Ethics

Economic Growth and the Interests of Future (and Past and Present) Generations: A Comment on Tyler Cowen

MGT610 Quiz Conference and solved by Masood khan before midterm spring 2012

The Tyranny or the Democracy of the Ideal?

1 Justice as fairness, utilitarianism, and mixed conceptions

Distributive Justice Rawls

Chapter 2 Positive vs Normative Analysis

PHIL : Social and Political Philosophy , Term 1: M/W/F: 12-1pm in DMP 301 Instructor: Kelin Emmett

Tradeoffs in implementation of SDGs: how to integrate perspectives of different stakeholders?

Utilitarianism, Game Theory and the Social Contract

INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES INVOLVING ETHICS AND JUSTICE Vol.I - Economic Justice - Hon-Lam Li

Justice as Fairness. John Rawls RESTATEMENT HARVARD U N I V E R S I T Y PRESS

Ethics Handout 18 Rawls, Classical Utilitarianism and Nagel, Equality

Rawls and Natural Aristocracy

Lecture 7 Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

AN EGALITARIAN THEORY OF JUSTICE 1

Justice as Fairness and the American Welfare Reform Debate

Ross s view says that the basic moral principles are about prima facie duties. Ima Rossian

Chapter 4: Voting and Social Choice.

The Restoration of Welfare Economics

ELIMINATING CORRECTIVE JUSTICE. Steven Walt *

The Proper Metric of Justice in Justice as Fairness

Principles of Distributive Justice

LIBERAL EQUALITY, FAIR COOPERATION AND GENETIC ENHANCEMENT

Transcription:

ECON 4270 Distributive Justice Lecture 4: Rawls and liberal equality Hilde Bojer www.folk.uio.no/hbojer hbojer@econ.uio.no February 16, 2011

Economics and welfarism Rawls: liberal equality Rawls: a Kantian The basic structure of society The social contract Primary goods The difference principle

Economics and welfarism Economics and welfarism 3 Normative economics: Optimal allocation (use) of resources Cost benefit analysis

Economics and welfarism Economics and welfarism 3 Normative economics: Optimal allocation (use) of resources Cost benefit analysis Takes the framework of laws and ethical norms as given Based on the Pareto principle Identical preferences (The representative consumer)

Economics and welfarism Economics and welfarism 3 Normative economics: Optimal allocation (use) of resources Cost benefit analysis Takes the framework of laws and ethical norms as given Based on the Pareto principle Identical preferences (The representative consumer) Distributional analysis: more of a problem

Economics and welfarism 4 Utility theory: a convenient and powerful tool in both descriptive and normative theory.

Rawls: liberal equality John Rawls and liberal equality 5 John Rawls: A Theory of Justice (1971) Changed the whole academic discourse about distributive justice Is frequently misrepresented, particularly in economic textbooks, So-called Rawlsian welfare function describes him as a welfarist

Rawls: liberal equality 6 Rawls was the first in recent time to give a serious critique of utilitarianism He did not know about welfarism in economic normative theory Two criticisms: 1. Utilitarianism postulates individual welfare as a universal good. Does not allow for different conceptions of the good 2. Does not conform to the Kantian imperative that one person should never be considered as means to the ends of another person Will become clearer later, I hope.

Rawls: liberal equality Rawls s liberalism 7 A liberal society is a society which allows different, conflicting even not commensurable definitions of the good

Rawls: a Kantian Rawls: a Kantian 8 Two important Kantian tenets: (categorical imperatives) You shall act so that your actions accord with a general rule you can accept No person should be treated as a means to the ends of other persons. Kantian ethics is deontological (absolute rules) and concern personal ethics Rawls s project: to apply Kantian ethics to the organisation of society

The basic structure of society The basic structure of society 9 Rawls theory of justice concerns the basic structure of society not day to day decisions about distribution and allocation of resources. Which are the basic structures of society?

The basic structure of society The basic structure of society 10 Citizenship and rights Ownership of property and natural resources Size and role of public sector Size and role of the market The family

The basic structure of society An important premiss 11 The existence of an organised society with laws and security and division of labour creates an economic surplus to the advantage of everybody and in particular: to the advantage of the most well to-do. Who have the most to lose the least advantaged have the least to lose

The social contract The social contract 12 A sort of constitution for constitutions describing the fundamental rules of society Should, according to Rawls, be unanimous and voluntary

The social contract The original position 13 Is a thought experiment, a device for thinking about the social contract The persons in the OP are to choose unanimously the social contract of a society they themselves would choose to live in. They are to choose in enlightened self-interest

The social contract The veil of ignorance 14 The persons do not know their position in society They do not know what kind of persons the are (gender, talents, race etc) They do not know their preferences or their conception of the good

The social contract The veil of ignorance 15 THICK VEIL OF IGNORANCE (Harsanyi assumes preferences are known) Why? Rawls contends that our preferences are, at least to some extent, formed by the society we live in.

The social contract Two basic principles 16 1. Complete liberty for everyone to the extent that this liberty does not hinder the liberty of others 2. Economic equality except when inequality is to the advantage of all The second principle is also called the difference principle (See textbook for exact quotes)

The social contract Principle of liberty 17 Follows from the fact that the parties in the OP do not know their preferences, or their conception of the good. Cf the definition of a liberal society above. Is the usual liberal formulation Implies the usual civic liberties: democracy, right to vote,

The social contract Primary goods 18 By economic equality Rawls means equality of primary goods goods that everyone needs, whatever their preferences, to further their project in life, their conception of the good.

The social contract Primary goods 19 Two important primary goods are 1. Income and wealth 2. The social bases of self-respect 2 should always be equally distributed

The difference principle Some implications of the difference principle 20 For simplicity: advantage for all becomes advantage to the least advantaged group

The difference principle 21 Figure 5.1

The difference principle 22 Figure 5.2

The difference principle 23 Figure 5.3