Case 5:16-cv NC Document Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
Case 5:16-cv NC Document Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:16-cv O Document 137 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 5982

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/20/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

Case 5:16-cv NC Document 128 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 31

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 98 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:04-cv AC-MKM Document 193 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:09-cv PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:06-cv DRH-SCW Document 529 Filed 10/01/13 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #19304 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case 3:14-cv TJC-JBT Document 173 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6189

Case 2:14-cv RJS Document 67 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case 2:01-cv SRC-CLW Document Filed 05/15/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID: EXHIBIT C

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:15-cv VAB Document 46 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 52

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

1631 Zimmerman Trail 319 Maverick St. Billings, MT San Antonio, TX T: (406) T: (210) F: (406) F: (210)

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:15-cv MGC Document 185 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2017 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 3:15-cv BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 80 PageID: 1050 EXHIBIT A

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 844 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2016 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 96-1 Filed: 09/20/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:637. Exhibit A

Case 1:14-cv DPG Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2018 Page 1 of 11

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 730 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-4 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Master File: JAR NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURIAA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 1372

Case 1:14-cv SMG Document 68 Filed 09/19/17 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1270

Case 2:15-cv DS Document 99-2 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 28. Appendix I

Case 1:09-cv DC Document Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 290 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case: 1:07-cv SAS-SKB Doc #: 230 Filed: 06/25/13 Page: 1 of 20 PAGEID #: 8474

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 8 of 156

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND

THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the. Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 87 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 7

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Case 1:16-cv AOR Document 50-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2017 Page 2 of 34

All. final approval a proposed settlement of this class action, which is unopposed by Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 3:13-cv BAS-RBB Document Filed 04/28/16 Page 2 of 33 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

: : : : : : CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Class Action Settlement Agreement (the Agreement or Settlement Agreement )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[PROPOSED] FINAL APPROVAL ORDER

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document 190 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-nc Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 Matthew C. Helland, CA State Bar No. 0 helland@nka.com NICHOLS KASTER, LLP One Embarcadero Center, Suite 0 San Francisco, CA Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - Rebekah L. Bailey, CA State Bar No. bailey@nka.com Kai H. Richter, MN Bar No. 0* krichter@nka.com Carl F. Engstrom, MN Bar No. 0* cengstrom@nka.com Jacob T. Schutz, MN Bar No. 0* jschutz@nka.com NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP *admitted pro hac vice 00 IDS Center 0 South th Street Minneapolis, MN 0 Phone: () -00 Fax: () - Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the proposed Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Jerry Johnson, Jesse Perry, Yolanda Weir, Karen White, Todd Salisbury, Peter Hitt, Patricia Collier, and Verlin Laine, as representatives of the class and on behalf of Fujitsu Group Defined Contribution and 0(k) Plan, Plaintiffs, v. Fujitsu Technology and Business of America, Inc., itself and as successor in interest to Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc., the Fujitsu Group Defined Contribution and 0(k) Plan Administrative Committee, the Fujitsu Group Defined Contribution and 0(k) Plan Investment Committee, Shepherd Kaplan LLC, Pete Apor, Belinda Bellamy, Sunita Bicchieri, and John Does - 0, Defendants. Case No. :-cv-0-nc [PROPOSED] FINAL APPROVAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT CASE # :-CV-0-NC

Case :-cv-0-nc Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 FINAL APPROVAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT Wherefore, this day of, 0, upon consideration of Plaintiffs motion for final approval of the Class Action Settlement Agreement dated December, 0 (herein the Settlement ) in the above matter, the Court hereby orders and adjudges as follows:. For purposes of this Final Approval Order and Judgment, except as otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as are ascribed to them in the Settlement Agreement.. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and personal jurisdiction over all parties to the action, including all members of the Settlement Class.. The Court confirms that the class preliminarily certified under Fed. R. Civ. P. (b)() is appropriate for the reasons set forth in its Preliminary Approval Order, and hereby finally certifies the following non-opt-out class: All participants and beneficiaries of the Fujitsu Group Defined Contribution and 0(k) Plan (the Plan ) at any time on or after June 0, 00 through September 0, 0 (the Class Period ), including any Beneficiary of a deceased person who was a Participant in the Plan at any time during the Class Period, and any Alternate Payees, in the case of a person subject to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order who was a Participant in the Plan at any time during the Class Period. Excluded from this class are Defendants, their directors, and any employees with fiduciary responsibility for the Plan s investment or administrative functions.. As reflected in the information from the Settlement Administrator,,0 Settlement Notices were timely distributed by first-class mail to all Class Members who could be identified with reasonable effort. Of those, approximately.% were ultimately undeliverable, after the Settlement Administrator searched for updated address information for any notices returned as undeliverable, and re-mailed notices to those Class Members. The form and method of notifying the Class Members of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement Agreement met the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. (c)() and (e), and due process, and constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances.. Pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act, U.S.C., et seq., a separate notice of the Settlement ( CAFA Notice ) was provided to the Attorneys General for each of the - - CASE # -CV-0-NC

Case :-cv-0-nc Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 states in which a Class Member resides, the Attorney General of the United States, and the United States Secretary of Labor. All requirements of the Class Action Fairness Act ( CAFA ), U.S.C., et seq., have been met, and Defendants have fulfilled their obligations under CAFA.. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. (e), the Court hereby approves the Settlement and the terms therein as a fair, reasonable, and adequate settlement and compromise of the claims asserted in the Class Action. The Court finds that the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, based on the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and determinations of mixed fact/law questions: a. The Settlement resulted from arm s-length negotiations by experienced and competent counsel overseen by a neutral mediator; b. The Settlement was negotiated only after Class Counsel had conducted a pre-settlement investigation and received pertinent information and documents from Defendants in discovery; c. The Settling Parties were well positioned to evaluate the value of the Class Action; d. If the Settlement had not been achieved, both Plaintiffs and Defendants faced significant expense, risk, and uncertainty in connection with the litigation, which likely would have been prolonged; e. The amount of the Settlement ($,000,000) is fair, reasonable, and adequate in light of the claims that were asserted, the risks of litigation, and settlements in other similar cases, and the Plan of Allocation is also fair, reasonable, and appropriate; f. The Class Representatives and Class Counsel support the Settlement, and have concluded that the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable and adequate; g. Class Members had the opportunity to be heard on all issues relating to the Settlement and the requested Administrative Expenses, Attorneys Fees and Costs, and Class Representative Service Awards by submitting objections to the Settlement Agreement to the Court. There were no objections to the Settlement. - - CASE # -CV-0-NC

Case :-cv-0-nc Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 h. The Settlement also was reviewed by an Independent Fiduciary, Nicholas L. Saakvitne, who has approved the Settlement.. The Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement Agreement is hereby GRANTED, the settlement of the Class Action is APPROVED as fair, reasonable and adequate to the Plan and the Settlement Class, and the Settling Parties are hereby directed to take the necessary steps to effectuate the terms of the Settlement Agreement.. The operative Amended Class Action Complaint and all claims asserted therein, whether asserted by the Class Representatives on their own behalf or on behalf of the Class Members, or derivatively to secure relief for the Plan, are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any of the Settling Parties, except as otherwise provided for in the Settlement Agreement.. Each Class Member and their respective heirs, beneficiaries, executors, administrators, estates, past and present partners, officers, directors, agents, attorneys, predecessors, successors, and assigns, shall be (i) conclusively deemed to have, and by operation of the Effective Approval Order shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled, released, relinquished, waived, and discharged the Released Parties from all Released Claims, and (ii) barred and enjoined from suing the Released Parties in any action or proceeding alleging any of the Released Claims, even if any Class Member may thereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which the Class Member or Class Counsel now know or believe to be true with respect to the Class Action and the Released Claims, whether or not such Class Members have executed and delivered a Former Participant Claim Form, whether or not such Class Members have filed an objection to the Settlement, and whether or not the objections or claims for distribution of such Class Members have been approved or allowed. 0. The Plan and each Class Member (and their respective heirs, beneficiaries, executors, administrators, estates, past and present partners, officers, directors, agents, attorneys, predecessors, successors, and assigns) shall be (i) conclusively deemed to have, and by operation of the Effective Approval Order shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled, released, relinquished, waived, and discharged the Released Parties from all Released Claims, and (ii) - - CASE # -CV-0-NC

Case :-cv-0-nc Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 barred and enjoined from suing the Released Parties in any action or proceeding alleging any of the Released Claims, even if the Plan or any Class Member may thereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which the Plan or any Class Member now knows or believes to be true with respect to the Class Action and the Released Claims.. Each Class Member shall release Defense Counsel, Class Counsel, and the Released Parties from any claims, liabilities, and attorneys fees and expenses arising from the allocation of the Gross Settlement Amount or Net Settlement Amount and for all tax liability and associated penalties and interest as well as related attorneys fees and expenses.. Defendants and each of them shall release, and shall (i) be conclusively deemed to have, and by operation of the Effective Approval Order shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled, released, relinquished, waived, and discharged each other from any and all claims arising from, relating to, or connected with the Class Action or any matters alleged or that could have been alleged, in or in response to the Amended Complaint, and any and all claims, whether under state or federal law or in equity, arising from their respective defense of the Class Action or any payments by or on behalf of any of them to settle the Class Action, including any and all claims for contribution or indemnification arising from any acts or omissions of any of them related to the matters alleged in the Amended Complaint or from their respective defense of the Class Action ( Defendants Claims inter se ); and (ii) be barred and enjoined from instituting, maintaining, prosecuting, or asserting any cause of action, demand, or claim on the basis of, connected with, or arising out of any of Defendants Claims inter se, even if any Defendant may thereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which any such Defendant now knows or believes to be true with respect to the Class Action and the Defendants Claims inter se.. The Settlement Administrator shall have final authority to determine the share of the Net Settlement Amount to be allocated to each Current Participant and each Authorized Former Participant pursuant to the Plan of Allocation specified in Article VI of the Settlement Agreement.. With respect to payments or distributions to Authorized Former Participants, all questions not resolved by the Settlement Agreement shall be resolved by the Settlement - - CASE # -CV-0-NC

Case :-cv-0-nc Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Administrator in its sole and exclusive discretion. Within twenty-one () calendar days following the issuance of all settlement payments to Class Members as provided by the Plan of Allocation, the Settlement Administrator shall prepare and provide to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel a list of each person who received a settlement payment or contribution from the Qualified Settlement Fund and the amount of such payment or contribution.. Upon the Effective Date of this Order, Plaintiffs, Defendants, all Class Members and the Plan shall be bound by the Settlement Agreement.. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims herein and personal jurisdiction over the Defendants and the Class Members pursuant to the provisions of ERISA, and expressly retains that jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing this Final Approval Order and/or the Settlement Agreement. Such retention of jurisdiction shall not affect the finality of the Court s judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED:, 0 HON. NATHANAEL COUSINS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 0 - - CASE # -CV-0-NC