SCOTUS Comparison Cases

Similar documents
Established judicial review; "midnight judges;" John Marshall; power of the Supreme Court

TOPIC CASE SIGNIFICANCE

THE AP TENDS TO DEVOTE THE MOST QUESTIONS. The Executive Branch The Bureaucracy The Legislative Branch

Civil Liberties Group Presentations Questions

TOPIC CASE SIGNIFICANCE

AP Government and Politics Summer Assignment 2018 J. Cunning

AP Government and Politics Summer Assignment Students have a FOUR part summer assignment ALL PARTS ARE DUE ON THE FIRST DAY OF SCHOOL

Summer Assignments for AP Government

Unit 2: The US Constitution CE Notes 43: The Judicial Branch

Copyright 2014 Edmentum - All rights reserved.

Amendment Review 1-27

Advanced Placement American Government and Politics REQUIRED SUMMER ASSIGNMENTS,

AP United States Government. Summer Assignment 2016

Marbury vs. Madison 1803

Civil Liberties Bad-tendency rule curtail speech or other 1 st Amd. If it might lead to an evil (Gitlow)

PSC : Civil Liberties Spring 2013 Tuesday and Thursday, 2-3:15 pm Graham 307

PLSC 215: Civil Rights and Liberties in a Diverse Society (Your Rights and Liberties) Honors [AKA The Forbidden Dinner Party Topics]

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS SUMMER ASSIGNMENT

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights. Government

Significant Supreme Court Cases. Around the World Style

Chief Justice, info Case Name and Year Holding Winners Losers Shorthand /Notes. -Strict Construction Power to tax is the (1819)

Final Revision, 11/7/16

AP Government and Politics Summer Assignment CCLA-ArTES Magnet High School Mrs. Ghoneim-Sobel

THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

underlying principle some rights are fundamental and should not be subject to majoritarian control

AP U.S. Government and Politics/Economics AP U.S. Government Summer Assignment Mr. Vasquez

AP Government Ch. 4 Civil Liberties & Ch. 5 Civil Rights Study Guide Name Date Period

I. The Six Basic Principles

Important Court Cases Marbury v. Madison established power of Supreme Court to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional

RIGHTS GUARANTEED IN ORIGINAL TEXT CIVIL LIBERTIES VERSUS CIVIL RIGHTS

AP United States Government and Politics Summer Assignment 2015 Ms. Bouton

AP GOVERNMENT SUMMER ASSIGNMENT

AP US GOVERNMENT & POLITICS UNIT 6 REVIEW

Landmark Decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court,

REPORTING CATEGORY 2: ROLES, RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENS

A.P. US Government & Politics Summer Assignment THIS IS A TWO PART ASSIGNMENT! BE SURE TO READ THROUGH THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT!!!

ADVANCED PLACEMENT AMERICAN GOVERNMENT SUMMER ASSIGNMENTS

e. City of Boerne v. Flores (1997) i. RFRA Unconstitutional f. Court Reversal on Use of Peyote in 2006 B. Freedom of Speech and Press 1.

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS SUMMER ASSIGNMENT

The Constitution Chapter 3

Methods of Proposal. Method 1 By 2/3 vote in both the House and the Senate. [most common method of proposing an amendment]

Government Final Exam Study Guide

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

1 pt. 2pt. 3 pt. 4pt. 5 pt

TUFTS UNIVERSITY. U R B A N & E N V I R O M E N T A L POLICY AND P L A N N I N G L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s of S o c i a l P o l i c y

Unit 3: The Constitution

APGOPO Unit 5 Study Guide A3

United States Government End of Course Exam Review

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights. Government

AP UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT & POLITICS SUPREME COURT REVIEW

Hours: MW 12:30-1:30 (office) and by and appointment Phone: ;

Big Idea 2 Objectives Explain the extent to which states are limited by the due process clause from infringing upon individual rights.

Courts and Civil Liberties Pol Sci 344

Law and Politics POL 106 Spring 2017 MW 2:50 4:10 pm

Assignment # 1: Sign up for the AP Government Schoology Group. Access Code is VDBTK Q9CWB.

TUFTS UNIVERSITY. U R B A N & E N V I R O M E N T A L POLICY AND P L A N N I N G L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s of S o c i a l P o l i c y UEP-0215

Name: Pd: Regarding Unit 6 material, from College Board:

Goal 2 The Constitution and Democracy

Unit 3: Civil Liberties, Civil Rights

United States Judicial Branch

Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Edwards only (nothing from Ellis debate reader, and chapter 6 of Edwards will be on the next exam).

Read the book Reclaiming Hope: Lessons Learned in the Obama White House about the Future of Faith in America by Michael Wear.

The Judicial System (cont d)

Troops Sent To the Border Piracy in Asia CNN Hero

Curricular Requirements

SUPPLIES Writing utensil Composition notebok YOU MUST HAVE COMPUTER AND INTERNET ACCESS OUTSIDE OF THIS CLASSROOM A binder or folder is suggested

Summer Reading Assignment The Surge: 2014 s Big GOP Win and What It Means for the Next Presidential Election: Edited by Larry Sabato

Unit 6A STUDY GUIDE Civil Liberties

Unit 2 Content Review: Interactions Among Branches of Government

AP US Government Formative Assessment #2

Unit #4d: Institutions Federal Courts AP US Government & Politics Mr. Coia

6. The First Amendment prevents the government from restricting expression base on its a. ideas.

Civil Liberties and Public Policy. Edwards Chapter 04

TUFTS UNIVERSITY. U R B A N & E N V I R O M E N T A L POLICY AND P L A N N I N G L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s of S o c i a l P o l i c y UEP-0215

The Heritage of Rights and Liberties

Dred Scott v. Sandford

A Correlation of. To the. Massachusetts History and Social Science Curriculum Framework Grade 8

CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES. A. Introduction

Chapter 4: Civil Liberties

LEGAL UPDATE: RECENT SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND BEYOND. Chaka Donaldson, NEA Office of General Counsel

Government Study Guide Chapter 4

Exam. 6) The Constitution protects against search of an individual's person, home, or vehicle without

Paideia US History EOC Exam Review Packet

AP United States Government and Politics Syllabus

Appendix C SCPS - Civics EOC Review Guide. Congress. Makes Laws (House of Representatives and Senate) Executive Branch

You be the Judge. How the court decided

Exam 4 Notes Civil Liberties

UNIT 5: JUDICIAL BRANCH, CIVIL LIBERTIES & CIVIL. Miss DeLong Exam Review RIGHTS

Advanced Placement United States Government and Politics Course Syllabus

AP Gov Exam Review The Policymaking System The Constitution The Agenda in Philadelphia The Madisonian Model The Madisonian Model Individual Rights

Government 357(M) THE STRUCTURE OF INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES

By: Maia Spieldenner, Michelle Henneke, Chloie Calderon. Creative Federalism (Picket Fence Federalism)

YALE UNIVERSITY SURVEY OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS SURVEY C

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Shaw V. Reno (Year:1993)

Advanced Placement United States Government and Politics

HPISD CURRICULUM (SOCIAL STUDIES, GOVERNMENT) EST. NUMBER OF DAYS:10 DAYS

e) City of Boerne v. Flores (1997) (1) RFRA Unconstitutional f) Court Reversal on Use of Peyote in 2006 B. Freedom of Speech and Press 1.

Lesson 2: Constitutional Compromise & a Bicameral Legislature

Transcription:

for the AP U.S. Government and Politics Redesign The College Board has redesigned the AP U.S. Government and Politics curriculum effective for the 2018 19 school year. One of the most significant revisions to the course is the addition of a list of 15 Supreme Court cases students are required to know in depth. This knowledge will be assessed in a free response question (FRQ) on every exam that will require students to compare the facts, issue, arguments, or decisions in one of the required case to a non-required case. There may be qualitative analysis and comparison multiple choice questions that require students to compare Supreme Court cases as well. To aid teachers in helping their students build the skills necessary to successfully respond to these questions, Street Law has compiled this list of its case summaries that can be used as comparison cases to the 15 required cases. Note that this is not an exhaustive list it only includes comparison cases that exist in Street Law s Free Resource Library. The required cases below are organized by unit to reflect the AP U.S. Government and Politics Course framework. All case summaries may be found in Street Law s Free Resource Library (https://store.streetlaw.org/ resource-library/). To effectively use the case summaries, please see our guide to Using Case Studies in the Classroom (https://store.streetlaw.org/using-case-studies-in-the-classroom/). The strategies that best scaffold the skills necessary to answer the Supreme Court Comparison FRQ are: Applying a Precedent, Opinion Writing, and Moot Court (where the required case is a precedent in the comparison case). Unit 1: Foundations of American Democracy McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) United States v. Lopez (1995) Unit 2: Interactions Among Branches of Government Baker v. Carr (1962) Shaw v. Reno (1993) Marbury v. Madison (1803) Unit 3: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Engel v. Vitale (1962) Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) Schenck v. United States (1919) New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) McDonald v. Chicago (2010) Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Roe v. Wade (1973) Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Unit 4: American Political Ideologies and Beliefs No related cases. Unit 5: Political Participation Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) 1

Unit 1: Foundations of American Democracy Unit 2: Interactions Among Branches of Government McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Does Congress have the authority under the Constitution and the Commerce Clause to commission a national bank? If so, does the state of Maryland have the authority to tax a branch of the national bank operating within its borders? Gonzales v. Raich (2005) Commerce Clause, Controlled Substances Act, medicinal marijuana National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012) Commerce Clause, Affordable Care Act Gibbons v. Ogden* (1824) Commerce Clause, transportation Baker v. Carr (1962) Do federal courts have the power to decide cases about the apportionment of population into state legislative districts? Shelby County v. Holder (2013) Jurisdiction, 14 th Amendment/Equal Protection Clause, Voting Rights Act Gill v. Whitford (2018) Jurisdiction, 14 th Amendment/Equal Protection Clause, standing, partisan gerrymandering Shaw v. Reno (1993) Jurisdiction, 14 th Amendment/Equal Protection Clause, racial gerrymandering U.S. v. Lopez (1995) Does the Commerce Clause give Congress the power to pass the Gun Free School Zones Act? United States v. Morrison (2000) Commerce Clause, Violence Against Women Act Gonzalez v. Raich (2005) Commerce Clause, Controlled Substances Act, medicinal marijuana Gibbons v. Ogden* (1824) Commerce Clause, transportation Shaw v. Reno (1993) Does the North Carolina residents claim that the 1990 redistricting plan discriminated on the basis of race raise a valid constitutional issue under the 14th Amendment s Equal Protection Clause? Comparison Case: Gill v. Whitford (2018) Jurisdiction, 14th Amendment/Equal Protection Clause, standing, partisan gerrymandering 2

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Does Marbury have a right to his commission, and can he sue the federal government for it? Does the Supreme Court have the authority to order the delivery of the commission? See also Landmarkcases.org U.S. v. Lopez (1995) Judicial review, Commerce Clause, Gun Free School Zones Act Dred Scott v. Sandford* (1857) Judicial review, due process, standing, slavery United States v. Nixon* (1974) Judicial review, executive privilege Unit 3: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Engel v. Vitale (1962) Does the recitation of a prayer in public schools violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment? Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe (2000) Establishment Clause, student-led, student-initiated prayers at football games Town of Greece v. Galloway (2014) Establishment Clause, sectarian prayer at town meetings Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002) Establishment Clause, scholarship program to send children to religious private schools Van Orden v. Perry (2005) Establishment Clause, Ten Commandments on state property Good News Club v. Milford Central School (2001) Establishment Clause, religious club use of public school facilities Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) Under what conditions does the state s interest in promoting compulsory education override parents First Amendment right to free exercise of religion? Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer (2017) See also Classifying Arguments Free Exercise Clause, 14th Amendment/ Equal Protection Clause, exclusion of church from state grant program Locke v. Davey (2004) Free Exercise Clause, funding religious instruction with college scholarships Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018) Free Exercise Clause, First Amendment/ speech, baker required to create wedding cake to same-sex couple 3

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) Does a prohibition against the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of symbolic speech, violate the students freedom of speech protections guaranteed by the First Amendment? Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) First Amendment/speech/press, prior restraint of student newspaper Morse v. Frederick (2007) See also Applying Precedents First Amendment/speech, students prodrug message during a school-supervised event Virginia v. Black (2003) First Amendment/speech, cross burning Snyder v. Phelps (2011) See also Deliberation Materials First Amendment/speech, hate speech Texas v. Johnson* (1989) First Amendment/speech, flag burning Schenck v. U.S. (1919) Did Schenck s conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his First Amendment free speech rights? Case summary Snyder v. Phelps (2011) See also Deliberation Materials First Amendment/speech, hate speech Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association (2011) First Amendment/speech, state law prohibiting sale of violent video games to minors Texas v. Johnson* (1989) First Amendment/speech, flag burning NY Times v. U.S. (1971) Did the government s efforts to prevent two newspapers from publishing classified information given to them by a government leaker violate the First Amendment protection of freedom of the press? Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) First Amendment/speech/press, prior restraint of student newspaper Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Association, Inc. v. United States (1999) First Amendment/speech/press, private casino gaming advertisements McDonald v. Chicago (2010) Does the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms apply to state and local governments through the 14th Amendment and thus limit Chicago s ability to regulate guns? 4

D.C. v. Heller (2008) Second Amendment, D.C. handgun ban Mapp v. Ohio* (1961) Incorporation Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Does the Sixth Amendment s right to counsel in criminal cases extend to defendants in state courts, even in cases in which the death penalty is not at issue? Alabama v. Shelton (2002) Sixth Amendment/right to counsel, suspended sentence Riley v. California (2014) Due process rights Fourth Amendment/rights of the accused, cell phone search incident to an arrest Chavez v. Martinez (2003) Due process rights Fifth Amendment/rights of the accused, self-incrimination Miranda v. Arizona* (1966) Due process rights Fifth Amendment/rights of the accused, self-incrimination See also Miranda Primer, Activity, and Checklist Roe v. Wade (1973) Does the U.S. Constitution protect the right of a woman to obtain an abortion? Comparison Case: Whole Woman s Health v. Hellerstedt (2016) Right to privacy, state abortion restrictions Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Does segregation of public schools by race violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment? Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007) Clause, school district race-conscious student assignment plan Fisher v. University of Texas (2016) Clause, race considered in undergraduate admissions Gratz v. Bollinger and Gutter v. Bollinger (2003) Clause, race considered in undergraduate and law school admissions Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) Clause, same-sex marriage 5

Plessy v. Ferguson* (1896) Clause, separate but equal Regents of the University of California v. Bakke* (1978) 14th Amendment/Equal Protection Clause, affirmative action in medical school admissions Williams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar (2015) First Amendment/speech, campaign restrictions for judicial office Unit 4: American Political Ideologies and Beliefs No related cases. Unit 5: Political Participation Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) Does a law that limits the ability of corporations and labor unions to spend their own money to advocate the election or defeat of a candidate violate the First Amendment s guarantee of free speech? McCutcheon v. FEC (2014) First Amendment/speech, aggregate contributions to political committees and candidates FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life (2007) First Amendment/speech, issue ads Randall v. Sorrell (2006) First Amendment/speech, limits on campaign contributions and spending 6