IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Similar documents
List of Schedule 1 Clause 16 amendments March 2018

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC By-law No

AGREEMENT BETWEEN CATTARAUGUS COUNTY PLANNING BOARD AND OF REFERRAL EXEMPTIONS

ENV-2016-AKL SFH

Case Name: Heritage Grove Centre Inc. v. Owen Sound (City)

2.1.1 Powers and Duties The Board of County Commissioners powers and duties under this Land Development Code are set out in this subsection.

HEARING EXAMINER FEE Accessory Dwelling Unit or

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN. Principal Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the Act

#962 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OFTHE BOROUGH OF OCEANPORT, MONMOUTH COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY TO ESTABLISH THE RMW ZONE DISTRICT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2017] NZHC AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent

E21. Treaty Settlement Land

ARTICLE 30 REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATIONS

SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS APPLICATION Planning and Community Development 550 Landa Street, New Braunfels TX (830)

Driggs AOI Zoning- DRAFT 5/22/17

10 TEMPORARY BUILDINGS AND TEMPORARY ACTIVITIES RULES

APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE OR PERMISSION

15 September 2017 BY HAND APPLICATION FOR DECLARATION CATO BOLAM CONSULTANTS LIMITED V AUCKLAND COUNCIL

BEFORE THE CHRISTCHURCH REPLACEMENT DISTRICT PLAN HEARINGS PANEL

City of Calistoga Staff Report

of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of a proposed review of the Kapiti Coast District Plan: Whole of Plan Integration

CHAPTER NONCONFORMITIES SECTION GENERALLY Intent and Purpose

I Te Koti Taiao o Aotearoa Ōtautahi Rohe ENV-2018-CHC-

ABSTRACT. HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (UD I) DEPARTMENT G.O. Ms. No.212 Dated:

lriilsyi^liv^/lsli=i) 1 U *-iuo twit T-A I tn AOjir* A o>tv f^f-\i t\tr^h

Decision No. [2017J NZEnvC I;;J, 5

Heritage Commercial Residential Zone (C4)

CITY OF ABBOTSFORD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND SERVICE FEE BYLAW, 2010 AMENDMENTS

Review of Minimum Parking Requirements (FILE # D ) Detailed Zoning Proposals

ORDINANCE NO. NORTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

MINUTES OF COUNCIL MEETING, JUNE 6, 2017 CIVIC SQUARE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 60 EAST MAIN STREET

The Planning Act: What s New, What Remains, What You Should Know. Zoning By-laws After Bill 51. by: Mary Bull. June 2006

Resolution Number: Date: March 11, 2013

ARLINGTON TOWN MEETING. Special Town Meeting of February 12, Amendment to Arlington Redevelopment Board s recommended vote under Article 2

Chapter 1224: Nonconformities

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND FEES BYLAW NO. 2791, 2012

Recommendation: APPROVE the modifications to Official Plan Amendment No. 89

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF VAUGHAN

City of Coquitlam BYLAW

APPLICATION FOR PLANNING APPROVAL UNDER CITY ORDINANCE NO. O-02-82, DATED JANUARY 18, 1982, AS AMENDED. Address

APPEALS INTENDED DECISIONS

CITY COMMISSION BRIEFING For Meeting Scheduled for May 16, 2013 Letter to DEP regarding Comprehensive Plan SITE PLAN CONSENT AGENDA ITEM

LOCAL GOVERNMENT, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW UPDATE. June 2018

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

CITY OF YORKTON BYLAW NO. 2/2010

ALPHABETICAL ORDINANCES

City of Philadelphia

ARTICLE 1: Purpose and Administration

COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA

Upon motion by, seconded by, the following. Ordinance was duly enacted, voting in favor of enactment, voting against enactment.

IOSCO TOWNSHIP ZONING ARTICLE 1 TITLE, PURPOSE, CONSTRUCTION, RULES APPLYING TO TEXT AND ENABLING AUTHORITY

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD AGENDA

THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY and is a consolidation of the following:

To the Far North District Plan. Relating to SIGNS AND LIGHTING.

Article 14: Nonconformities

ZONING ORDINANCE CLAY TOWNSHIP LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de I Ontario

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

Electoral Area "D" Electoral Area "C" Electoral Area "E" Electoral Area "F" City of Vernon (Board Chair) Electoral Area "B"

2. PLAN ADMINISTRATION

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER V RONALD M. KLINE AND RACHEL A. KLINE SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

City of Vancouver Zoning and Development By-law Effective January 6, 1971

The Corporation of the Township of Brock. Beaverton Thorah Community Centre. Planning Committee. Agenda

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

SUMMARY OF ZONING HISTORY

ORDINANCE NO. 03- O~

Planning and Intermunicipal Appeals

PRESENTED: January 15, 2008 FILE: / BYL 1984

Planning & Development Services AGENDA

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN. Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s 279(1 )(g) of the Act. On the papers DECISION ON COSTS

ORDINANCE NO

A technical guide to Deemed Permitted Activities

LAND USE PLANNING APPLICATION FORM

SECTION RURAL ZONES 201 RURAL ZONE RU-1. Uses Permitted

Staff Report TO: FROM: Chesapeake Board of Zoning Appeals Dale Ware, AICP, CZA RE: Application #ZON-BZA Carawan Lane Hearing Date: Febr

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF VAUGHAN

IN THE MATTER IN THE MATTER IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

NONCONFORMING USES, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR LOTS

CITY OF GILLETTE PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, January 23, :00 PM Council Chambers 201 E. 5th Street, Gillette, Wyoming (307)

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS - EAGLE COUNTY

INTERIM CONTROL BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION. Office Use Only File Number Application Fee Receipt Number

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT ACT, B I L L. No. 113 An Act to amend The Planning and Development Act, 2007

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN. Environment Judge JA Smith. Hearing: At Auckland, 16 August Mr DJ Collins for Auckland Council Mr Lau for himself

'Z.~ ~fllrj~'ml ~ 2<J Ii

ORDINANCE NO. O THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF DOUGLAS, COLORADO

CITY OF MORDEN. Regular Meeting January 23, 2017

COUNTY OF OAKLAND CITY OF NOVI ORDINANCE NO. 03- TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE (Planned Rezoning Overlay)

Development Application Fees Bylaw No. 8951

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Surrey, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA March 19, 2019

Chicken Keeping Registration Application City of Eden Prairie

Staff report for action - Proposed Planning Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments Draft Zoning By-law

UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE

BY-LAW NO NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kingston hereby ENACTS as follows.

- 4 OCT of the Resource Management Act of appeals under s 120 of the Act AND TE RUNANGA 0 NGATI AWA BETWEEN (ENV-2018-AKL )

TOWN OF MARKHAM ONTARIO

Board of County Commissioners. Request to Schedule Public Hearing to Consider Amendment to Zoning Ordinance to Include Secondary Dwelling Additions

DIVISION 10. Sec Nonconforming Use of Land, Buildings and Structures. (Amended by Ord 4067, 8/18/92; Ord 4227, 6/18/96)

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No , as amended....

of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan

Transcription:

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act BETWEEN KARUNA FALLS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED (ENV-2016-AKL-000122) Appellant AND THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under section 279 of the Act In Chambers at Auckland CONSENT ORDER [A] Under s 279(1 )(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991, the Environment Court, by consent, orders that: (1) the appeal is allowed subject to the agreed amendments to the proposed Thames-Coromandel District Plan set out in this order; (2) the appeal is otherwise dismissed. [B] Under s 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991, there is no order as to costs.

Page 2 REASONS Introduction [1] This appeal relates to the proposed Thames-Coromandel District Plan. The Appellant sought that its property at 233 Waikanae Valley Road, Waikawau be rezoned from Rural to Rural Lifestyle Zone or that provision for further development of the property be made. [2] The parties have now reached an agreement that will resolve the relief sought by the appellant and this appeal in its entirety. [3] I n making this order the Court has read and considered the appeal and the memorandum of the parties dated 8 June 2017. [4] The Court is making this order under s 279(1 )(b) of the Act, such order being by consent, rather than representing a decision or determination on the merits pursuant to s 297. The Court understands for present purposes that: (a) All parties to the proceedings have executed the memorandum requesting this order. (b) All parties are satisfied that all matters proposed for the Court's endorsement fall within the Court's jurisdiction, and conform to the relevant requirements and objectives of the Act, including in particular Part 2. Order [5] Therefore the Court orders, by consent, that the appeal is allowed in that the Thames-Coromandel District Council is directed to amend Sections 38 (Subdivision) and 56 (Rural Zone) of the Thames-Coromandel Proposed District Plan as shown in the Annexure A to this order. [6] This Order completely resolves the appeal by Karuna Falls Cooperative Society Limited in its entirety.

Page 3 [7] There is no order as to costs in relation to this order. DATED at Auckland this ~A. day of ~ 2017 D A Kirkpatrick Environment Judge

Annexure 'A' Page 4

APPENDIX 38.6 DISCRETIONARY ACTIVITIES RULE 9 Subdivision creating one or more additional lots 1. Subdivision creating one or more additional lots in the Rural Zone is a discretionary activity provided:.ill It is not within Section 2 Block VI Harataunga Survey District. 2. Subdivision creating one or more additional lots that is not a discretionary activity under Rule 9.1~ or c) is a non-complying activity. 3. Subdivision creating one or more additional lots within Section 2 Block VI Harataunga Survey District is a prohibited activity. Section 56 Rural Zone 56.4 PERMITTED ACTIVITIES RULE 17A Dwellings on Section 2 Block VI Harataunga Survey District Accessory buildings on Section 2 Block VI Harataunga Survey District Minor unit on Section 2 Block VI Harataunga Survey District 1. An activity in Rule 17A is a permitted activity provided: 1 That there are no more than 30 dwellings and associated accessory buildings, and these are located in the 'Ecovillage Housing Area' shown on Diagram A in 56.9.1 below; and hl There are no more than six (6) minor units located in the 'Ecovillage Housing Area' shown on Diagram A in 56.9.1 below; and.9 Each dwelling, minor unit or accessory building meets the standards in Table 5 at the end of Section 56 (excluding '5. maximum site coverage'); and.ill The maximum site coverage ofthe 'Ecovillage Housing Area' is 2%; and ~ The maximum building footprint for a dwelling, a minor unit and associated accessory building(s) is 450m 2 ; and fl Each dwelling and minor unit shall have vehicle access to Waikanae Valley Road. 2. A minor unit that is not permitted under Rule 17A.1 b) is a restricted discretionary activity, provided that no more than 30 minor units are constructed on Section 2 Block VI Harataunga Survey District. 3. The Council restricts its discretion to matters 2, 4, 6, 7 and 12 in Table 7 in Section 56.

1. Vehicle access within Section 2 Block VI Harataunga Survey District may be shared by more than one. dwelling. 2. 'Building footprint' in Rule 17 A means the gross floor area of a building at the ground floor level only. 56.5 RESTRICTED DISCRETIONARY ACTIVITIES RULE 29A Community facility on Section 2 Block VI Harataunga Survey District 1. A community facility on Section 2 Block VI Harataunga Survey District is a restricted discretionary activity provided: ~ It meets the standards in Table 5 at the end of Section 56; and hl It is located in the 'Ecovillage Housing Area' shown on Diagram A in 56.9.1 below. 2. The Council restricts its discretion to matters 2, 4-8, and 12 in Table 7 at the end of Section 56. 3. A resource consent application under Rule 29A.1 shall be assessed without public notification under Sections 95 and 95A of the RMA. 4. A community facility on Section 2 Block VI Harataunga Survey District that is not a restricted discretionary activity under Rule 29A.1 is a discretionary activity. 56.9 DIAGRAMS 56.9.1 Karuna Falls Cooperative Society ltd

,.,,,,,, Ecovillage Housing Area _..-.. _----- approximately 69 ha, 'Nater Supply \ Restoration Area, ", approximately \ I"... 17 ha. '... -- ---_... ~... --':.. _.....,,' Wellands Restoration Area approxlmatety 7 ha waterfall Restoration Area approximately 13 ha Section 2 Block VI Har.taunga SO approximately 297.86 ha 125 250 Karuna Falls Cooperative Society Ltd Diagram A Q Karuna Falls Site Boundary (Section 2 Block VI Harataunga SO) ~.....! Area Boundary D Cada.lral Boundary DIIII...-...,COC_COP"t'RIGHTRDaM:D c.sn......--.....-"'*""-... Z-.CO.FIec.cw'IIa,..-1CRSI CIIOYIfICOF"I1'IGJiTI'I:E:SElWED