UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:10-cv EFS Document 67 Filed 08/27/10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:17-cv JCC Document 152 Filed 03/30/18 Page 1 of 5 THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 2

harmed, and continue to be harmed. Unless and until Defendants are enjoined from acting

II. FACTS. Late on the afternoon of Thursday, January 16, Nooksack Tribal Council Chairman

IN THE TULALIP TRIBAL COURT TULALIP INDIAN RESERVATION TULALIP, WASHINGTON

IN THE NOOKSACK TRIBAL COURT

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON BACKGROUND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:17-cv JCC Document 120 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 2

Case 3:08-cv BHS Document 217 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMES NOW the plaintiff, and alleges as follows:

Case 2:17-cv JCC Document 111 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:17-cv JCC Document 122 Filed 10/11/17 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OE THE STATE OE WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHATCOM I. RELIEF REQUESTED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

I. ANSWER. COMES NOW Defendant IMPULSE MEDIA GROUP, INC. in the above-captioned

Omnibus Reconsideration Request for Nooksack Tribal Members Purportedly Disenrolled by Nooksack Holdover Tribal Council

II. ISSUESS PRESENTED. Whether the Tribal Court or Court Clerk clearly erred in rejecting Petitioners

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

CASE 0:17-cv SRN-LIB Document 1 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ORDER

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 11 UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON. Civ. No RE (Lead Case) CV RE (Consolidated Cases) and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No GOLD (and consolidated cases)

No II COURT OF APPEALS, DIVISION II OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, vs. Howard Shale, Appellant.

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/02/18 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:06-cv JR Document 25 Filed 02/01/2008 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv Document 430 Filed in TXSD on 11/18/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 294 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case 1:14-cv Document 183 Filed in TXSD on 03/05/15 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:15-cv NBF Document 16 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case 3:18-cv MMD-CBC Document 22-1 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:17-cv JAR-JPO Document 94 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:17-cv CSM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RAJ Document 8 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:11-cv LRS Document 130 Filed 12/14/12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cv BJR Document 72 Filed 07/05/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:16-cv JLR Document 7 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 6:06-cv RAW Document 73 Filed in USDC ED/OK on 11/03/2009 Page 1 of 10

Case: , 12/15/2015, ID: , DktEntry: 51-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT DEFEENDANT-APPELLEE S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Howard Shale, Appellant' s Response to Brief of Amicus. Curiae

Case 2:17-cv RSL Document 15 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 211 Filed 03/22/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE.

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING I. REPLY STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS

12 CVS. Scenic NC, Inc., ) Plaintiff ) ) ) North Carolina Department of MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. ) Transportation, ) Defendant )

Case 2:13-cv BJR Document 12 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv RAJ Document 13 Filed 10/25/12 Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

Case 1:15-cv JTN-ESC ECF No. 45 filed 11/03/15 Page 1 of 30 PageID.417

Case 2:89-sp RSM-KLS Document 27 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

2 STEPAN A. HAYTAYAN. 1 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF STODDARD COUNTY, MISSOURI

Case 2:16-cv CW Document 85 Filed 02/17/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

APPEAL NO. # IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES C. COLOMBE, DECEASED.

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 38 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv LJO-EPG Document 1 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 83 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 76 Filed 09/28/16 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:16-cv RJB Document 108 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 13

No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JAMES H. GALLAHER, JR.

Case 3:18-cv MMD-CBC Document 43 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:16-cv JCC Document 9 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STIPULATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

~upreme ~ourt of tbe Wniteb ~tate~ Jn 1!J;bt. No WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, Petitioner,

4:07-cv RGK-CRZ Doc # 92 Filed: 04/15/13 Page 1 of 8 - Page ID # 696 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Transcription:

0 Gabriel S. Galanda, WSBA #0 Anthony S. Broadman, WSBA #0 0 Roosevelt Way NE P.O. Box Seattle, WA (0) - Julio V.A. Carranza, WSBA # R. Joseph Sexton, WSBA # 0 Yakama Nation Office of Legal Counsel 0 Fort Road P.O. Box Toppenish, WA (0) - Attorneys for the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation r Honorable Rosanna Malouf Peterson UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION, Plaintiffs; v. ERIC H. HOLDER JR.; et al., Defendants. NO. CV--0-RMP REPLY RE: FEDERAL DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - 0-0 0 Roosevelt Way NE P.O. Box Seattle, WA (0) -

0 As to the United States, much as they have throughout the events leading up to this Motion, Federal Defendants attempt to insert themselves into the Tribal- County relationship. ECF No.. Federal Defendants lack standing to oppose Plaintiff s Motion, quite simply, because it seeks no relief against them. To be clear, Plaintiffs... respectfully request that the Court enjoin Yakima County[,] only. ECF No. at (emphasis added). Respectfully, the Court should ignore Federal Defendants Opposition. ECF No.. But even if Federal Defendants arguments are examined, they fail. Federal Defendants argue that the Nation cannot prevent Yakima County law enforcement, when acting as deputized federal officers, from entering the Reservation. ECF No.. Again, the motion at bar is aimed at Yakima County only; it does not seek to enjoin federal agents. The Court has already signaled that resolution of that matter must wait until it resolves Federal Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Still, Federal Defendants now attempt to put on part of their case in chief by arguing that County agents should be able to enter Reservation trust lands at will, while acting under color of federal law pursuant to the United States Marshal Service s Pacific Northwest Violent Offender Task Force. Federal Defendants concede that Yakima County law enforcement, when not acting as deputized federal officers, lack authority to enter Reservation trust lands absent Yakama s permission. ECF No. at. ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - - 0 Roosevelt Way NE P.O. Box Seattle, WA (0) -

0 Federal Defendants curious advocacy on behalf of Yakima County, however, belies the fact that to the extent County agents participate in this task force, they are not federal officers. ECF No. at. See ECF No. at (Memorandum of Understanding between Federal Defendants and Benton County stating that [e]ach Agency shall be responsible for the acts or omissions of its employees. Participating agencies or their employees shall not be considered as agents of any other participating agency. ) (emphasis added). Plaintiffs presume that Yakima County has entered into the same MOU since they refer to the same Pacific Northwest Violent Offender Task Force. Despite several discovery and governmental requests for any MOU to which Yakima County is a party, which falls within the Court s Discovery Orders ECF Nos., 0, Federal Defendants have still refused to produce such records. Indeed, the MOU is curiously absent from the declaration evidence submitted here (and previously) by Federal Defendants in defense of Yakima County, perhaps because of the above-quoted language making clear that County agents remain County agents while engaged in Task Force activities. Yet no matter what the MOU says, the United States Executive Branch does not have generalized power to make rules governing Indian conduct or limit sovereignty, meaning the Department of Justice stands without authority to promulgate, on a case-by-case basis... procedures for domesticating, serving or ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - - 0 Roosevelt Way NE P.O. Box Seattle, WA (0) -

0 enforcing state process in Indian country. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Fla. v. U.S., No. 00-, 000 WL 0, at * (S.D. Fla. Dec., 000). In other words, even were County agents somehow not considered agents of [Yakima County] while engaged in task force activities, the Department of Justice does not have the authority to somehow license them to act as agents of the United States in order to import state process over enrolled Yakamas on Reservation trust lands. Id.; Organized Village of Kake v. Egan, U.S. 0, (); Logan v. Andrus, F.Supp., (N.D.Okla. ) (only the Congress, and not the Executive Branch, has the authority to limit tribal sovereignty). Nor has the County introduced any evidence in support of its opposition papers to suggest that on February, 0, or August, 0, or February or, 0, County Deputies were in any way acting as deputized federal cops, while attempting to impose state criminal or civil processes on enrolled Yakamas on Reservation trust lands. Therefore, the existence or operations of the United States Marshal Service s Pacific Northwest Violent Offender Task Force is immaterial to Plaintiffs Motion against the County vis-à-vis the County. For all of these reasons, the Court should ignore Federal Defendants opposition, and issue the TRO against the County from further entering Yakama Reservation trust lands to assert criminal jurisdiction over Yakamas without complying with Yakama law. ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - - 0 Roosevelt Way NE P.O. Box Seattle, WA (0) -

DATED this th day of March 0. s/gabriel S. Galanda, WSBA# 0 Gabriel S. Galanda, WSBA# 0 Anthony S. Broadman, WSBA #0 Attorneys for Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation GALANDA BROADMAN, PLLC P.O. Box Seattle, WA (0) - Fax: (0) -0 Email: gabe@galandabroadman.com Email: anthony@galandabroadman.com 0 ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - - 0 Roosevelt Way NE P.O. Box Seattle, WA (0) -

0 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Gabriel S. Galanda, declare as follows:. I am now and at all times herein mentioned a legal and permanent resident of the United States and the State of Washington, over the age of eighteen years, not a party to the above-entitled action, and competent to testify as a witness.. I am employed with the law firm of, 0 Roosevelt Way NE, Seattle, WA.. On March th, 0, I filed the foregoing document, which will provide service to the following via ECF: George Fearing Gregory C Hesler Kenneth W Harper Lisa Beaton Maureen Elizabeth Rudolph Meriwether D Williams Michael John Kapaun Pamela Jean DeRusha Quinn N Plant Stephen John Hallstrom William John Schroeder William M Symmes The foregoing statement is made under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the State of Washington and is true and correct. Signed at Seattle, Washington, this th day of March 0. s/gabriel S. Galanda ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - - 0 Roosevelt Way NE P.O. Box Seattle, WA (0) -