Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

Similar documents
Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv LHT-DLH Document 6 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 8

Case: 1:12-cv CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Case 3:18-cv L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:03-cv LJM-TAB Document 745 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 8174

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:05-cv MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document 311 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 71 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:09-cv N Document 5 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 7 ORIGINAL

Case 1:11-cv RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:09-cv JP Document Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:09-cv N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT :NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED ---'-----,

: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 01 Civ (BSJ) Plaintiff, : : : v. : PARTIAL FINAL : JUDGMENT AND

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Case 3:11-cv JBA Document 200 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 1:12-cv Document 2-1 Filed 12/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 1:18-cv RWZ Document 53-1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 72 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:16-cv DPG Document Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2016 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

Case 1:15-cv BAH Document 1 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO Bannock Street Denver, CO GERALD ROME, Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

muia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Case No.:

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES, AND OTHER RELIEF

- 1 - Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, I COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.:

USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#:,---.- DATE FILED: 1 / j {2.~> is

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

3. USAT is a provider of cashless, micro-transactions an

NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALAN GRABISCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 830-X-6 EXEMPT SECURITIES AND EXEMPT TRANSACTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Case No. upon information and belief, except as to those allegations concerning Plaintiff, which are

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 2 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 4

Case 4:12-cv Document 209 Filed in TXSD on 07/02/14 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION. vs. DIVISION: A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. 2:17-cv-4720

Case 1:19-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..

Case 1:08-cv RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/03/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:19-cv Document 3 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 EXHIBIT 8

Case 2:10-cv PA -PJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

) NJ Holdings, LLC (d/b/a Coast to Coast ) Business Funding), Nickolas Godfrey, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEV ADA. consented to the entry of this Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction (the "Decree"), without

Case 1:18-cv TNM Document 14 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:10-cv RJL Document 3-1 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

C V CLASS ACTION

Sec. 202(a)(1)(C). Disclosure of Negative Risk Determinations about Financial Company.

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROW ARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer

CAUSE NO STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff

11? "76WiA, y01\v7-aikt ' DAVID DE

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Signed July 27, 2018 United States Bankruptcy Judge

Case 2:17-cv CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Transcription:

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ascenergy LLC et al Doc. Case :-cv-0-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of DAVID REECE (TX Bar No. 000) Email: ReeceD@sec.gov KEEFE BERNSTEIN (TX Bar No. 00) Email: BernsteinK@sec.gov Securities and Exchange Commission 0 Cherry Street, Suite 00 Fort Worth, TX 0 Telephone: () 00-0 Facsimile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission 0 0 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. ASCENERGY LLC and JOSEPH (a/k/a JOEY) GABALDON, Defendants, PYCKL LLC and ALANAH ENERGY, LLC, Relief Defendants. Case No.: :-cv-0-gmn-pal JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT ASCENERGY LLC, DEFENDANT JOSEPH (a/k/a Joey) GABALDON, AND RELIEF DEFENDANT ALANAH ENERGY, LLC The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Ascenergy LLC ( Ascenergy ), Defendant Joseph (a/k/a Joey) Gabaldon ( Gabaldon ), and Relief Defendant Alanah Energy, LLC ( Alanah ) having entered a general appearance; Dockets.Justia.com

Case :-cv-0-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of consented to the Court s jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of this action; consented 0 0 to entry of this Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction and except as otherwise provided herein in paragraph V); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Ascenergy and Defendant Gabaldon are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 0(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of (the Exchange Act ) [ U.S.C. j(b)] and Rule 0b- promulgated thereunder [ C.F.R. 0.0b-], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (d)(), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant Ascenergy s and/or Defendant Gabaldon s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys;

Case :-cv-0-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant Ascenergy and/or Defendant Gabaldon or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Ascenergy and Defendant Gabaldon are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section (a) of the Securities Act of (the Securities Act ) [ U.S.C. q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (d)(), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant Ascenergy s and/or Defendant Gabaldon s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant Ascenergy and/or Defendant Gabaldon or with anyone described in (a).

Case :-cv-0-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Ascenergy, Defendant Gabaldon, and Relief Defendant Alanah shall pay disgorgement of illgotten gains and prejudgment interest thereon and that Defendant Ascenergy and Defendant Gabaldon shall pay a civil penalty pursuant to Section 0(d) of the Securities Act [ U.S.C. t(d)] and Section (d)() of the Exchange Act [ U.S.C. u(d)()]. The Court shall determine the amounts of the disgorgement and civil penalty upon motion of the Commission. Prejudgment interest shall be calculated from August, 0, based on the rate of interest used by the Internal Revenue Service for the underpayment of federal income tax as set forth in U.S.C. (a)(). In connection with the Commission s motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, and at any hearing held on such a motion: (a) Defendant Ascenergy, Defendant Gabaldon, and Relief Defendant Alanah will be precluded from arguing that Defendant Ascenergy and/or Defendant Gabaldon did not violate the federal securities laws as alleged in the Complaint; (b) Defendant Ascenergy, Defendant Gabaldon, and Relief Defendant Alanah may not challenge the validity of the Consents or this Judgment; (c) solely for the purposes of such motion, the allegations of the Complaint shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court and Relief Defendant Alanah may not deny that it received or possess funds, or benefited from the use of funds, which are the proceeds of the unlawful activity of Defendant Ascenergy and Defendant Gabaldon; and (d) the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence, without regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In connection with the Commission s motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, the parties may take discovery, including discovery from

Case :-cv-0-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 appropriate non-parties. IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consents are incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant Ascenergy, Defendant Gabaldon, and Relief Defendant Alanah shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section of the Bankruptcy Code, U.S.C., the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant Gabaldon, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant Gabaldon under this Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant Gabaldon of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section (a)() of the Bankruptcy Code, U.S.C. (a)(). VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Judgment.

Case :-cv-0-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of VII. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment forthwith and without further notice. 0 IT IS SO ORDERED: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: June, 0 0