UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

Case 3:17-cv VC Document Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

E-FILED 12/26/2017 4:20 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. Cogburn, Deputy

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Case4:11-cv PJH Document65 Filed08/31/12 Page1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 160 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Case 8:14-cv DOC-AN Document 85 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:2663

Case 3:18-cv RS Document 30 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 39 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

CONSENT MOTION FOR A STATUS HEARING. Plaintiffs respectfully request that a status hearing be set in the abovecaptioned

Case5:10-cv JW Document72 Filed03/11/11 Page1 of 5

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2016 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

Case4:07-cv PJH Document728-1 Filed08/05/10 Page1 of 5

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:03-cv PJH

Case3:06-md VRW Document738-5 Filed07/07/10 Page1 of 8

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO JOIN A LAWSUIT TO RECOVER WAGES

Case 2:16-cv RAJ Document 8 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

Case 3:17-cv VC Document 88-1 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 6

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES CASE NO: 2: RGK-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:07-cv PJH Document 240 Filed 01/16/2009 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

Case 5:16-cv NC Document Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF KURT CASADINE IN SUPPORT 17. Defendants.

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 7 SAN FRANCISCO

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

West Lincoln Avenue Tel: (714) of the Long Beach Pediatric Surgery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendants. )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-4 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Investigations and Enforcement

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2017 Page 1 of 4

Application to Serve as Temporary Judge SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 150 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 7

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

Case 3:16-md VC Document 419 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 181 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION

Charles Edward Lincoln, pro se 603 Elmwood Place, Suite #6 Austin, Texas Tel:

Case 8:15-cv DOC-KES Document 184 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4371

JOINT RULE 16(b)/26(f) REPORT

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 543 Filed 01/15/2009 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv PSG-FFM Document 24 Filed 10/11/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:219. Deadline

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

Transcription:

Case :0-cv-0-PJH Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 Leodis C. Matthews [SBN 00] Leesq@aol.com D. P. Sindicich (Of Counsel) [SBN ] JurPython@roadrunner.com MATTHEWS & PARTNERS, P.C. SUITE 00 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 000- TELEPHONE:.0.0 FACSIMILE:.0. Attorneys For: PLAINTIFF C-ONE TECHNOLOGY & PRETEC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 C-ONE TECHOLOGY & PRETEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION - Vs - Plaintiff MOUNT & STOELKER, P.C., & Daniel S. Mount, inclusive Defendant. CASE NUMBER: C 0-0 PJH; AND RELATED ACTION NUMBER: C-0-00 PJH JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AS WELL AS ALL OTHER RELATED DATES AND TIMES DECLARATION OF D. P. SINDICICH IN SUPPORT THEREOF [PROPOSED] ODER [CIVIL LOCAL RULE - & -] / / / / / / / / Case No. C 0-0 PJH

Case :0-cv-0-PJH Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 0 WHEREAS on July, 00 the Court issued an Order setting the Case Management Conference in this Case for Thursday, August, 00 at :0 PM in Department and further ordered that a joint case management conference statement addressing each of the items listed in the Standing Order For All Judges of the Northern District be filed with the Court not less than seven calendar days prior to the scheduled Case Management Conference. WHEREAS Defendants Mount & Stoelker s and Daniel S. Mount s (together referred to as M&S ) pending motion to dismiss this Case for Lack of Federal Jurisdiction, originally scheduled to be heard on August, 00 has now been continued to October, 00, a date well after the date set for the Case Management Conference. WHEREAS Defendat Mount & Stoelher PC has filed a subsequent motion for remand [Case No C-0-00] which was adjudged by Order of the Court on August, 00 to be related and was therefore reassigned to this Department and also set for hearing on October, 00. WHEREAS the first response solicited in the Standing Order to counsel relates to the issue of Jurisdiction and Service and the issue of federal jurisdiction is the very matter which the Court will be addressing during the hearing set for October, 00. an earlier date. WHEREAS the Case Management Conference has not previously been continued from IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between C-One and Pretec on the one hand and M&S on the other, by and through their respective counsel undersigned, that, with the Court s permission:. The Case Management Conference now scheduled for August, 00 shall be Case No. C 0-0 PJH

Case :0-cv-0-PJH Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 0 continued for not less than forty-five () days after the issuance of the Court s rulings on the motions currently set for hearing on October, 00.. The deadline for the submission of the Joint Case Management Statement shall be continued to date not less than seven days prior to the rescheduled date for the Case Management Conference.. That all other orders related to case management, discovery, and/or other pre-trial matters be stayed pending the Court s rulings and Orders on the motions now set for hearing on October, 00. ACCORDINGLY, the parties hereby stipulate that, with the Court s permission, the deadline for submission of the Joint Case Management Statement be continued until not less than seven days prior to the date set for the continued Case Management Conference, that the continued Case Management Conference be set at the convenience of the Court for a date not less than fortyfive () days after its Court s rulings on the motions currently set for hearing on October, 00, and that all other orders related to case management, discovery, and/or other pre-trial matters be stayed pending the Court s rulings and Orders on the motions now set for hearing on October, 00. By his signature below counsel for M&S attests under penalty of perjury that he has met and conferred with counsel for C-One and Pretec and that he concurs in the filing of this Stipulation. Case No. C 0-0 PJH

Case :0-cv-0-PJH Document Filed 0//00 Page of Dated: August, 00 By: /s/ D. P. Sindicich Signed Electronically D. P. Sindicich [SBN ] EMAIL: JurPython@roadrunner.com Of Counsel MATTHEWS & PARTNERS, P.C. Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 000- Tel..0.0 Fax..0. Attorneys for Plaintiffs C-One and Pretec 0 Dated: August, 00 By: /s/ Jerry R. Hauser Signed Electronically Jerry R. Hauser [SBN: ] EMAIL: JHauser@PGHLLP.com Four Embarcadero Center, th Floor San Francisco, California Tel... Fax... Attorneys for Defendants Mount & Stoelker, P.C., and Daniel S. Mount 0 Case No. C 0-0 PJH

Case :0-cv-0-PJH Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 0 Supporting Declaration of D. P. Sindicich I, D. P. Sindicich, declare as follows:. I am an attorney an attorney admitted to practice in the State of California and the United States District Court for the Northern and Central Districts of California, and am Of Counsel for the firm Matthews & Partners, attorneys of record for C-One and Pretec, the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned cause. The matters referred to in this declaration are based on my own personal knowledge and if called as a witness I could and would so testify competently to those matters.. This morning I telephoned Jerry Hauser, attorney for Defendants Mount and Stoelker et al pursuant to the requirements of Civil Local Rule et seq. and preparatory to completion of a Joint Case Management Conference Statement. During the course of this conversation we met and conferred both agreed to a continuance of the Case Management Conference, the deadline to file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement, and that all other orders related to case management, discovery, and/or other pre-trial matters be stayed pending the Court s rulings and Orders on Defendant Mount and Stoelker s motions now set for hearing on October, 00.. It was further agreed that this joint stipulation would be e-filed through the auspices of Mr. Hauser s firm. / / / / I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on August, 00 in the City of Redlands, State of California. Case No. C 0-0 PJH

Case :0-cv-0-PJH Document Filed 0//00 Page of /s/ D. P. Sindicich Signed Electronically D. P. Sindicich 0 0 [Proposed] Order PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Case Management Conference in the above captioned matter now set for August, Case No. C 0-0 PJH

Case :0-cv-0-PJH Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 00 shall be continued to a date convenient to the Court not less than forty-five () days after the Court s rulings on Defendants Motions now set for hearing on October, 00. The deadline for submission of the required Joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be reset for a date not less than seven () days before the date of the rescheduled Case Management Conference. All other orders related to case management, discovery, and/or other pre-trial matters are to be stayed pending the Court s rulings and Orders on Defendant Mount and Stoelker s motions now set for hearing on October, 00. SO ORDERED Date:, 00 Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Judge Northern District of California 0 Case No. C 0-0 PJH