IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) hereby opposes Plaintiff s motion for preliminary injunction. 1

Case 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document 29 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO: 5:07-CV-231

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv MMD-CBC Document 59 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

Case 3:18-cv MMD-CBC Document 22-1 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 105 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 106

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW

Case 2:14-cv APG-VCF Document 107 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:10-cv RLH -GWF Document 127 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 10

READ THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION FOR MODIFICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Adams, in her Official capacity as Chairman of the Moore BOE, Carolyn M. McDermott, in her Official capacity as Secretary of the Moore BOE; William R.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 19 Filed: 11/06/14 1 of 8. PageID #: 221

Case 3:12-cv RCJ-WGC Document 26 Filed 07/13/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case: LTS Doc#:111 Filed:05/25/17 Entered:05/25/17 13:40:50 Document Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:16-CV-285

Case 4:15-cv DPM Document 25 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CURLING PLAINTIFFS S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

READ THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING

Case 2:10-cv RLH -GWF Document 63-1 Filed 01/28/11 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT A

Case 8:14-cv VMC-EAJ Document 26 Filed 10/01/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 590 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Unemployment Compensation Discovery Request Instructions

Proposed Rules for First Reading page 2. Rule 4.3 Withdrawal page 2. Rule 5.1 Prompt Completion page 5

Cory J. Swanson Anderson and Baker One South Montana Avenue PO Box 866 Helena, Montana Phone: (406) Fax: (406) (fax) Attorney

Case 2:68-cv MHT-CSC Document 759 Filed 09/09/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case LMI Doc 433 Filed 08/05/15 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document 27 Filed 12/01/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document 28 Filed 12/01/10 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:18-cv KGB-DB-BSM Document 38 Filed 06/14/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:18-cv MMD-CBC Document 43 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 195 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 10. James Kaste, Wyo. Bar No Timothy C. Fox, Montana Attorney General

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 0:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2018 Page 1 of 5

Plaintiff, Defendants. Plaintiff, Defendants. Plaintiff, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

MOTION F'OR JOINDER OF PLAINTIFF'S.APPELLEES AND PUTATIVE PLAINTIF'F.APPELLEE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF NEVADA

Case 1:06-cv CAP Document 47 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 202 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPHIRE

SSB DOCKET NO

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 24 Filed 03/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:13-cv MFU Document 13 Filed 04/19/13 Page 1 of 5 Pageid#: 53

Case 2:14-cv SPL Document 25 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/15/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 179 Filed 03/05/19 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:11-cv GBL -TRJ Document 4 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 349

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV RYSKAMP/VITUNAC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:16-CV-285

Case 2:12-cv JLH-LRS-SWW Document 88 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 7

Case pwb Doc 281 Filed 10/28/16 Entered 10/28/16 13:58:15 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 12

8:13-cv JFB-TDT Doc # 51 Filed: 10/08/13 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1162 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL AND GAS DIVISION FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DAN SCHWARTZ, in his official capacity as Treasurer of the State of Nevada, Appellant, v.

Case 3:17-cv L Document 23 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 151 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2011 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:17-cv MPT Document 58 Filed 03/07/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 492 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2018 Page 1 of 4

Bylaws Providence Master Homeowners Association

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

Docket Number: 3757 WASHINGTON ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. Mark F. Nowak, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Case 1:15-mc ESH Document 17 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case abl Doc 164 Entered 05/02/14 12:43:53 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 12 Filed: 10/24/14 1 of 7. PageID #: 162

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NO. 1:15-CV TDS-JEP. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 353 Filed: 01/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:4147

Case 4:18-cv JM Document 11 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv SVW-PLA Document 21 Filed 05/24/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:204

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Austin Diagnostic Med., P.C NY Slip Op 30917(U) April 18, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number:

Case 2:11-cv Document 89 Filed 12/03/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1777

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/ :51 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016 EXHIBIT I

Transcription:

0 0 CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO Attorney General MICHAEL L. WOLZ Nevada State Bar #0 Reno, Nevada ( 0- ( - (fax Attorneys for Director of Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources and the Nevada State Engineer UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA; NEVADA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES; R. MICHAEL TURNIPSEED, P.E., in his official capacity as Director, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources; and HUGH RICCI, P.E., in his official capacity as State Engineer for the State of Nevada, Defendants. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case No. :00-cv-00-RLH-LRL NEVADA STATE ENGINEER S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH STATE ENGINEER S ORDERS OF JUNE AND JULY, 00, AND REQUEST FOR ORDER Defendants, the State of Nevada; Allen Biaggi, Director, Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources; and Tracy Taylor, P.E., Nevada State Engineer (State Engineer, by and through their counsel of record, Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, and Michael L. Wolz,, hereby asks this Court for an order compelling DOE to immediately cease its use of water for all bore hole drilling. The State Engineer specifically requests that this Court instruct the parties in regard to completion of DOE s Phase drilling program in light of the fact that the State Engineer intended that DOE cease and desist the use of water for all bore hole drilling and not merely Phase. //// --

0 0 The State Engineer also requests, pursuant to LR - and the Court s Order of June, 00, that this Court shorten the time in which DOE may respond to this motion so that this issue will not be rendered moot as the result of DOE s ongoing drilling activities while this motion is pending. This motion is supported by the attached documents and on all pleadings and papers on file herein. MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES This Court in its Order of August, 00, denied DOE s Emergency Second Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Hearing on Shortened Time, holding DOE had failed to meet any of the criteria necessary to justify a preliminary injunction against the State of Nevada. By letter dated September, 00, the State Engineer asked DOE to immediately confirm that it had stopped its use of water for bore hole drilling pursuant to his June, 00, Cease and Desist Order. A copy of this letter is attached hereto as Exhibit A. On September, 00, DOE informed the State Engineer by letter that it has discontinued using water for drilling and boring activities associated with the Phase II bore hole drilling program. -- DOE stated, however: [p]lease note that Phase I drilling, which is not affected by the cease and desist order, is anticipated to conclude by the end of September 00.... Letter of September, 00, from James W. Hollrith, Acting Director, Yucca Mountain Site Operations Office, to Tracy Taylor, Nevada State Engineer. A copy of that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Although no support is cited for this position, it is assumed that DOE relies on this Court s statement in the August, 00, Order: [n]otwithstanding Plaintiff s expressed fear that the cease and desist order covered all use of water, the cease and desist order applies only to the Phase II drilling operations. Order of August, 00, at 0 n.. Because DOE has represented that it will be completed with Phase I of its drilling program by the end of September, the State Engineer does not feel that there is adequate time to engage in the normal negotiating process prior to seeking relief from this Court. The State Engineer will send, contemporaneously with the motion, a letter asking DOE to voluntarily cease using water as part of its Phase I drilling activities. Should DOE agree to permanently stop using water for those purposes this motion will be rendered moot and will be withdrawn by the State Engineer. DOE also states that it intends to conduct certain activities in the wind up of its Phase II drilling program such as plugging existing wells. The State Engineer does not object to DOE s use of water for those purposes.

0 0 It should be noted that DOE s own letter seems to suggest that it is still within DOE s prerogatives to use water for bore hole drilling despite this Court s clear finding that such activity is not authorized by law. DOE states: [i]n the event DOE determines to resume using water for Phase II borehole drilling in the future (based, for example, on an appeal or other changed circumstances, DOE will notify you before doing so. [Emphasis added.] Clearly, DOE may not determine to resume this use of Nevada water without a permit from the Nevada State Engineer, an order of this Court, or an agreement with both Nevada parties. In ordering DOE to cease and desist the use of water, the State Engineer intended that DOE cease the use of water in all bore hole drilling, not merely Phase II. As the State Engineer stated in his letter of July, 00: [i]f the conditions are not acceptable, the cease and desist order of June, 00, is hereby reinstated and the stay of that order entered June, 00, is lifted, and no water may be used for any bore hole drilling projects currently underway. Letter of July, 00 (emphasis added. A copy of that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit C. As is clear from that language, the State Engineer intended that no water be used for either Phase I or Phase II of the drilling program. Although the State Engineer s Cease and Desist Order of June, 00, made specific mention of Phase II, the State Engineer did so under the belief that Phase I was nearly complete. Letter of June, 00, at. A copy of that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit D. Additionally, this statement was made before the meeting with DOE and any description of Phase I had been provided the State Engineer. Letter of July, 00, Exhibit C, at. The State Engineer did not intend to imply in the June, 00, Cease and Desist Order that he agreed to the continuing use of water on the Phase I drilling program. He believed, based on DOE s representations, that the Phase I drilling program was all but complete and that the use of water for that program was, therefore, moot. There are no factual or legal justifications for treating the Phase I or Phase II bore hole drilling programs differently under this Court s August, 00, Order. All of the reasons given by this Court showing that DOE s use of water is improper under Nevada law are as readily applicable to Phase I of the drilling program as they are to Phase II. Likewise, DOE --

0 0 cannot identify any legal authority for prosecuting the Phase I drilling work any more than it can for Phase II. There is no legal justification for treating either phase of the drilling program differently from the other under this Court s Order of August, 00. The State Engineer, therefore, requests this Court instruct the parties regarding the manner in which the Order of August, 00, should be implemented and specifically ask that this Court direct DOE to cease the use of water for all bore hole drilling. DATED this 0th day of September, 00. CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO Attorney General By: c:\documents and settings\payoung\my documents\wolz\doe water apps\usdc cv-s-00-0\mot to compel compliance 000.doc /s/ Michael L. Wolz MICHAEL L. WOLZ Nevada State Bar #0 Reno, Nevada ( 0- Attorneys for Director of Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources and the Nevada State Engineer --

0 0 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I am an employee of the Office of the Attorney General, State of Nevada, and that on this 0th day of September, 00, I electronically filed the foregoing NEVADA STATE ENGINEER S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH STATE ENGINEER S ORDERS OF JUNE AND JULY, 00, AND REQUEST FOR ORDER with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following via their e-mail addresses: Stephen G. Bartell, Trial Attorney General Litigation Section Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice Post Office Box Washington, D.C. 00-0 stephen.bartell@usdoj.gov Marta A. Adams Nevada Attorney General 00 North Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 0- maadams@ag.state.nv.us Blaine T. Welsh Assistant United States Attorney Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 000 Las Vegas, Nevada 0 Blaine.Welsh@usdoj.gov /s/ Pamela Young Pamela Young --