Attorneys for Plaintiff Regina Bozic, the Proposed Classes, and the Appeals Class (See FRAP 3(c)(3))

Similar documents
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:09-cv IEG -BGS Document 55 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 5

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

Case 3:15-cr BAS Document 166 Filed 03/02/17 PageID.752 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:14-cv ODW-RZ Document 66 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:791

Case 3:18-cv DMS-MDD Document 256 Filed 10/09/18 PageID.4031 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:16-md GAO Document 381 Filed 08/17/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 12/08/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 80-1, Page 1 of 8 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 4:18-cv JSW Document 18 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:15-cv D Document 48 Filed 08/11/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID 310

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/18 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:1

Case3:06-md VRW Document738-5 Filed07/07/10 Page1 of 8

Case 1:14-cv CMH-TRJ Document 14 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 83

Case4:13-cv JSW Document122 Filed10/31/14 Page1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

"Uge EB JAN Daie Prodessod - By: %I, Y-.sT. wij ~1 ~

Case: 1:17-cv JG Doc #: 87 Filed: 01/11/19 1 of 5. PageID #: 1056 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:11-cv JAH-WMC Document 38 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

Case 3:16-md FLW-LHG Document 115 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1596 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MDL 2738

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

JOINT RULE 16(b)/26(f) REPORT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[Additional Attorneys on Signature Page]

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed10/14/09 Page1 of 5

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

March 11, Re: Realtek Semiconductor Corp. v. LSI Corp. et al., No Panel: Judges Farris, Reinhardt & Tashima

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: , 08/27/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 126-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Case 3:16-md VC Document 419 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 2018 AT 10:00 A.M.

Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 0:11-cv RNS Document 149 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 5:15-cv RGK-SP Document 99 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:1395 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:18-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiffs' Response to Individual Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice

Case4:10-cv CW Document205 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 6

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

Case 5:18-cv TES Document 204 Filed 04/15/19 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv DLH-CSM Document 1 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv AET-LHG Document 61 Filed 06/08/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 972 : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST COURTHOUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Deadline.com

Case 3:12-cv GPC-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 9

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2016

Case , Document 48-1, 07/16/2015, , Page1 of 1

Case 5:09-cv JW Document 214 Filed 02/09/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Submitted:September 23, 2013 Decided: December 8, 2014)

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-bas-mdd Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 0) ron@consumersadvocates.com MICHAEL T. HOUCHIN (SBN 0) Arroyo Drive San Diego, California 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiff Regina Bozic, the Proposed Classes, and the Appeals Class (See FRAP (c)()) 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 REGINA BOZIC, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, and the general public., v. Plaintiff, HENNY DEN UIJL, et al. Defendants. Case No. -cv--bas (MDD) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FROM THE FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER ISSUED ON JANUARY, 0 ENTITLED "ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE" [ECF No. ] [Eastern District of California Case Number Opened as -cv-00] PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION APPEAL

Case :-cv-00-bas-mdd Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: That Plaintiff Regina Bozic, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, and the general public, hereby takes an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from this District Court's Order dated January, 0 entitled "Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue." See ECF No.. Plaintiff Bozic takes this appeal as a representative of the classes that are defined in her pending Motion for Class Certification (the "Appeals Class"). See ECF No.. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure (c)(), "In a class action, whether or not the class has been certified, the notice of appeal is sufficient if it names one person qualified to bring the appeal as representative of the class." FRAP (c)(); see also Massie v. U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 0 F.d 0, (d Cir. 00) ("Rule (c)() requires the notice of appeal to specify that the class representative is appealing in a representative capacity."); Murphy v. Keystone Steel & Wire Co., a Div. of Keystone Consol. Indus., F.d 0, 0 (th Cir. ). Plaintiff intends to take this appeal as a matter of right for the non-exhaustive reasons outlined below that may include, but are not limited to, the following: discretion to exercise the Court's virtually unflagging obligation... to "Plaintiff Regina Bozic commenced this class action against numerous defendants, including Obesity Research Institute ( ORI ), Henny Den Uijl, and Bryan Corlett, arising from allegations of misrepresentation and fraud related to a weight-loss product known as Lipozene. Defendants now mov[ed] to stay this action under the Colorado River doctrine, or alternatively, transfer this action to the Eastern District of California for consolidation with an earlier-filed action under the 'first-to-file' rule." REGINA BOZIC, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, & the general public, Plaintiff, v. HENNY DEN UIJL, et al., Defendants., No. -CV--BAS(MDD), 0 WL, at * (S.D. Cal. Jan., 0).

Case :-cv-00-bas-mdd Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 exercise the jurisdiction given [to it]. See R.R. St. & Co. Inc. v. Transp. Ins. Co., F.d, (th Cir. 0) (quoting Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, U.S. 00, ()). discretion under the Wilton/Brillhart doctrine because Plaintiff and the class members' "outlier" action for a declaratory-judgment does not present an opportunity for ventilation of the same state law issues. R.R. St. & Co., F.d, (th Cir. 0). discretion under the "First-to-File Rule" because the Eastern District of California lacks federal subject matter jurisdiction to hear the purported "first-filed" action under the Rooker Feldman doctrine that prevents... lower federal courts from exercising jurisdiction over cases brought by state-court losers' challenging state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced. Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., F.d, 0 (th Cir. 00). discretion under U.S.C. 0(a) because this action could not "have been brought" in the Eastern District of California in accordance with U.S.C.. the presence of an ongoing state court proceeding was an "Interlocutory Decision" within the meaning of U.S.C. because it is effectively an Order "refusing or dissolving" an injunction.

Case :-cv-00-bas-mdd Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of discretion because "a district court retains jurisdiction to enforce its judgments, including consent decrees." Hook v. State of Ariz., Dep't of Corr., F.d 0, 0 (th Cir. ). Plaintiff and the Class members "allege a violation of the consent decree, the district court had jurisdiction." Id. 0 0 DATED: February, 0 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Michael T. Houchin Michael T. Houchin LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON ron@consumeradvocates.com MICHAEL T. HOUCHIN Arroyo Drive San Diego, California 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Counsel for Plaintiff Regina Bozic, the Proposed Classes, and the Appeals Class

Case :-cv-00-bas-mdd Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 REPRESENTATION STATEMENT Counsel for Regina Bozic, on behalf of herself, all others Similarly Situated, and the General Public: Ronald Marron Law Office of Ronald Marron Arroyo Drive San Diego, CA 0 ()-00 ()- (fax) ron@consumersadvocates.com Michael Houchin Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron Arroyo Drive San Diego, CA 0 --00 -- (fax) 0 Counsel for Defendants Henny den Uijl, Sandra den Uijl, Obesity Research Institute, Continuity Products, Innotrac Corporation, National Weight Loss Institute, and Zodiac Foundation: Patrick J Mulkern Gordon & Rees LLP 0 W. Broadway, Suite 000 San Diego, CA 0 --00 -- (fax) pmulkern@gordonrees.com

Case :-cv-00-bas-mdd Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 Hazel Mae Pangan Gordon and Rees LLP 0 West Broadway Suite 000 San Diego, CA 0 ()-00 ()- (fax) hpangan@gordonrees.com Richard P Sybert Gordon and Rees 0 West Broadway Suite 000 San Diego, CA 0 () -00 () - (fax) rsybert@gordonrees.com Counsel for Defendant Conversion Systems (Terminated): Refugio Jose Gonzalez Jampol Zimet LLP 00 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 00 Los Angeles, CA 00 --00 x0 --0 (fax) jgonzalez@cmlawfirm.com

Case :-cv-00-bas-mdd Document - Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 0) ron@consumersadvocates.com MICHAEL T. HOUCHIN (SBN 0) Arroyo Drive San Diego, California 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiff Bozic and the Proposed Classes REGINA BOZIC, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, and the general public., v. Plaintiff, HENNY DEN UIJL, et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Defendants. PROOF OF SERVICE Case No.: -cv--bas (MDD) PROOF OF SERVICE -cv--bas (MDD)

Case :-cv-00-bas-mdd Document - Filed 0/0/ PageID.0 Page of 0 0 I am employed in the County of San Diego, State of California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this action. My business address is Arroyo Drive, San Diego, California 0. On February, 0, I served the following document(s):. NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. REPRESENTATION STATEMENT on the following parties: Patrick J Mulkern Gordon & Rees LLP 0 W. Broadway, Suite 000 San Diego, CA 0 --00 -- (fax) pmulkern@gordonrees.com Hazel Mae Pangan Gordon and Rees LLP 0 West Broadway Suite 000 San Diego, CA 0 ()-00 ()- (fax) hpangan@gordonrees.com Refugio Jose Gonzalez Jampol Zimet LLP 00 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 00 Los Angeles, CA 00 --00 x0 --0 (fax) jgonzalez@cmlawfirm.com PROOF OF SERVICE Richard P Sybert Gordon and Rees 0 West Broadway Suite 000 San Diego, CA 0 () -00 () - (fax) rsybert@gordonrees.com Ronald Marron Law Office of Ronald Marron Arroyo Drive San Diego, CA 0 ()-00 ()- (fax) ron@consumersadvocates.com Michael Houchin Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron Arroyo Drive San Diego, CA 0 --00 -- (fax) -cv--bas (MDD)

Case :-cv-00-bas-mdd Document - Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 by the following means: [ X ] By E-service: I served the above-entitled document(s) by filing them on the Court's public docket, which then caused the above-entitled recipients to receive an ECF Notification of the documents.. [X] I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that I am a member of the bar of this Court, at whose direction the service was made, and that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February, 0 at San Diego, California. /s/ Michael T. Houchin Michael T. Houchin PROOF OF SERVICE -cv--bas (MDD)