Pınar Bilgin. A328B (290) Wednesday 10:30-12:00 and by appointment.

IR 501 International Relations Theory Pınar Bilgin A328B (290) 2164 pbilgin@bilkent.edu.tr http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~pbilgin Wednesday 10:30-12:00 and by appointment Aims This course is designed as a post-graduate level introduction to International Relations theory. The content and nature of International Relations theory is by no means fixed. Indeed, International Relations theory has been the subject of intense academic, intellectual and political debates. The main aim of this course is to introduce students to main concepts of and major debates in International Relations theory and deepen their insight into the dynamics of theory/practice. Objectives The objectives of this course are both subject-specific and general. General objectives include the development of oral, written and research skills as the course requires students to become able to read, absorb and critically assess a significant amount of complex (and at times contradictory) material. The subject-specific objectives include developing students understanding of what is meant by theory and why theorising is an important enterprise; knowledge and understanding of the key literature in the discipline; knowledge and understanding of International Relations beyond their immediate area of interest; ability to locate their area of interest within the discipline; ability to analyse practices of world politics from a conceptual perspective; ability to discuss in depth some of the main issues in International Relations in theory and practice. 1

Teaching Since the course is taught as a post-graduate level seminar, the onus is on you to read widely around the topics. The seminars on occasions may include mini lectures designed to introduce and/or contextualise that week s topic, but you will be doing most of the work. My role will be to provide a basic overview of that week s topic, offer you contending perspectives on the issues concerned, and seek to generate a discussion structured around a set of questions. The aim is to encourage you to think independently and critically whilst remaining firmly grounded in the knowledge provided by the readings. The reading list is by no means exhaustive. It should rather be viewed as a representative sample of theoretical works. In the pages that follow, you will find a list of required and further readings for each week. Our discussions will be based mostly on the required readings. The lists of recommended texts are there to provide a broader context as well as more detail, which may be useful as a starting point and reference for written assignments or future studies. What you should remember at all times is that good discussions depend on serious preparation by students. You are strongly encouraged to read the texts carefully and prepare written answers to the questions to ensure thorough preparation especially in the first few weeks of the course when you are less experienced in participating in seminars. It is critical that you do all your readings and come in ready to take active part in class discussions. This is critical not only for your own intellectual development but also because participation is 30% of your overall grade. Please be reminded that you will only be in a position to do well in your assignments if you have attended the classes and read the literature (all of the required texts plus some of the recommended ones). Coming to the classes prepared is necessary not only because this constitutes a part of your assessment, but also because this will help you understand the course material much better so that you would be in a very strong position to do well in your exams/assignments. 2

Assessment 30% of your assessment will be based on in-class participation. You will be expected to demonstrate evidence of having read and thought about that week s topic. Your participation will be assessed on a weekly basis. You are required to attend all the classes (in accordance with the University regulations). If you cannot attend please let me know beforehand, or contact me (immediately) afterwards to provide a legitimate excuse for your absence. Attendance will be taken and absences will be noted. 70% of your assessment will be based on a written assignment. This assignment will have two parts, one theory-based, one empirical. The theory-based part (30%) is due December 11, 2009, 17:30. The empirical part (30%) is due January 4, 2010, 17:30. There will be a one-day workshop during the week of January 4, where all assignments will be discussed and peer reviewed. Your participation in and contributions to this workshop will also be assessed (10%). Revised written assignments (parts 1 and 2 combined) are due January 10, 17:30. Since no more than one student will be allowed to sign up each theory, you are strongly encouraged to make your choices and e-mail me pbilgin@bilkent.edu.tr. We will decide as a group which empirical case to look at. Everyone will be analyzing the same empirical case from a different theoretical perspective. The theory-part of the assignment is intended as a literature review of the chosen theory (maximum 1500 words). The empirical part of the assignment is intended as an analysis of the case from the perspective of the same theory (maximum 2500 words). This assignment is modelled after the Sterling-Folker book you will be reading as part of this course. 3

Please try to follow the requirements listed below when preparing your assignments: Be careful not to copy out great chunks from the assigned text or other articles/books. This is at best weak and at worst plagiarism. Plagiarism consists of any form of passing off, or attempting to pass off, the knowledge or work of other people as one's own. It is a form of cheating and is considered an academic offence. The following are simple guidelines to help you avoid such problems: Surround all direct quotations with inverted commas and cite the precise source (including page numbers) in a footnote. Use quotations sparingly and make sure that the bulk of the essay is in your own words. Remember that it is 'what you say' that gives an essay merit. Make sure you give references to your source(s) throughout the text, not just when you give direct quotations but also when you paraphrase or give your version. Presentation Each assignment should be typed. State the number of words used at the end. The word limit is there to make you decide what is or is not important to say. The ability to say what you want in a limited number of words is also a skill you need to gain. Essays that are over length will be penalised. Appropriate footnotes and/or bibliography should be supplied. Do not use single-spacing Leave a sufficient margin for comments. Pay attention to how you write the essay (your style) as well as its content. It is important to develop your 'writing skills' as a student of International Relations. 4

What follows is a list of required/recommended readings for each week. Please also consider the following studies for further research (in order of date of publication): (Der Derian and Shapiro, 1989, Hollis and Smith, 1990, Rosenau and Der Derian, 1993, Booth and Smith, 1995, Lebow and Risse-Kappen, 1995, Burchill and Linklater, 1996, Smith et al., 1996b, Kubalkova et al., 1998b, Fry and O'hagan, 2000, Jorgensen, 2000, Linklater, 2000, Chan et al., 2001, Crawford and Jarvis, 2001, Elman and Elman, 2001, Carlsnaes et al., 2002, Brown, 2007, Devetak et al., 2007, Chan and Moore, 2009, Tickner and Waever, 2009). 1 Course Plan Week 1 Introduction: What is IR Theory (for)? Required reading: (Sterling-Folker, 2006g, Smith, 2007) Further reading: (George, 1994, Booth and Smith, 1995, Neufeld, 1995, Smith et al., 1996a, Woods, 1996, Nicholson, 2000, Buzan and Little, 2001) Week 2 (Neo)classical realism and its critics Required reading: (Sterling-Folker, 2006h, Taliaferro, 2006, Lebow, 2007, Steele, 2007) Further reading: (Carr, 1946, Herz, 1950, Rothstein, 1972, Morgenthau, 1985, Wilson, 1998, Williams, 2004) 1 All required readings are available at the reserve desk of BU library. For edited books, ask for the book, not the author of the chapter. All required articles are available on electronic reserve of BU library. Recommended texts are available at BU Library. Please search the Library catalogue or Electronic Sources to access them. 5

Week 3 The English School and its critics Required reading: (Suzuki, 2004, Knudsen, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006c, Dunne, 2007) Further reading: (Bull and Watson, 1984, Gong, 1984a, 1984b, Wight, 1991, Watson, 1992, Bull, 1995, Dunne, 1995, 1998, Buzan, 2001) Week 4 Liberalism and its critics Required reading: (Barkawi and Laffey, 1999, Butler and Boyer, 2006, Sterling- Folker, 2006f, Panke and Risse, 2007) Further reading: (Doyle, 1986, Rosenau and Czempiel, 1992, Cohen, 1994, Moravcsik, 1997) Week 5 Structural realism and its critics Required reading: (Adams, 2006, Quackenbush and Zagare, 2006, Mearsheimer, 2007, Waever, 2009) Further reading: (Waltz, 1959, 1979, Mearsheimer, 1990, Wendt, 1992, Baldwin, 1993a, Mearsheimer, 2009) 6

Week 6 Neoliberalism and its critics Required reading: (Kay, 2006, Martin, 2007, Tsygankov and Tsygankov, 2007) Further reading: (Keohane and Nye, 1987, Keohane, 1988, Keohane and Nye, 1989, Baldwin, 1993b) Week 7 Critical theory and its critics Required reading: (Cafruny, 2006, Freyberg-Inan, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006e, Hobson, 2007, Rupert, 2007) Further reading: (Cox, 1981, 1987, Linklater, 1990a, 1990b, Cox, 1995, Cox and Sinclair, 1996, Robinson, 1996, Linklater, 1997, Wallerstein, 2006) Week 8 Constructivism and beyond? Required reading: (Hoffmann, 2006, Jackson, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006b, Fierke, 2007, Sorensen, 2008) Further reading: (Kratochwil, 1989, Onuf, 1989, Weldes, 1996, Weldes and Saco, 1996, Kubalkova et al., 1998a, Weldes, 1999, Weldes et al., 1999, Onuf, 2009) 7

Week 9 Feminism in IR Required reading: (Agathangelou and Ling, 2004, D'amico, 2006, Mertus, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006d, Tickner and Sjoberg, 2007) Further reading: (Enloe, 1990, Peterson, 1992, Zalewski, 1995, Tickner, 1997, Enloe, 2000, Sylvester, 2002) Week 10 Postmodernism/poststructuralism and its critics Required reading: (Spegele, 2002, Falger and Van Der Dennen, 2006, Shinko, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006a, Campbell, 2007) Further reading: (Campbell, 1992, 1993, Weber, 1998, Edkins, 1999, Weber, 1999) Week 11 Globalisation and IR theory Required reading: (Freyberg-Inan, 2006, Halperin, 2006, Hay, 2007) Further reading: (Clark, 1997, Clark, 1998, Held and Mcgrew, 1998, Clark, 1999, Falk, 2000, Scholte, 2000) 8

Week 12 IR: Still a discipline? Required reading: (Waever, 1998, Bilgin, 2008) Further reading: (Lebow and Risse-Kappen, 1995, Tickner, 2003, Tickner and Wæver, 2008, Agathangelou and Ling, 2009, Ching-Chane Hwang and Ling, 2009, Tickner and Waever, 2009) Week 13 International Relations and Social Science Required reading: (Hollis and Smith, 1990, Kurki and Wight, 2007) Further reading: (Cox, 1981, Waever, 1998, Wendt, 1999, 2000, Wight, 2002, Guilhot, 2008) Week 14 Political theory, the political and international relations Required reading: (Brown, 2007, Grovogui, 2007) Further reading: (Linklater, 1990b, Walker, 1993, Williams et al., 1993, Grovogui, 2006) 9

Bibliography Adams, K. R. (2006) Structural Realism: The Consequences of Great Power Politics. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 18-37. Agathangelou, A. & L. H. M. Ling (2004) Power, Borders, Security, Wealth: Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies Quarterly 48, 517-538. Agathangelou, A. M. & L. H. M. Ling (2009) Transforming World Politics from Empire to Multiple Worlds, Routledge. Baldwin, D. A. (1993a) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York, Columbia University Press. Baldwin, D. A. E. (1993b) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York, Columbia University Press. Barkawi, T. & M. Laffey (1999) The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force and Globalization. European Journal of International Relations, 5, 403-434. Bilgin, P. (2008) Thinking Past Western ir? Third World Quarterly, 29, 5-23. Booth, K. & S. Smith (1995) International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge, Polity Press. Brown, C. (2007) International Relations as Political Theory. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 34-51. Bull, H. (1995) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London, Macmillan. Bull, H. & A. Watson (Eds.) (1984) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford Clarendon Press. Burchill, S. & A. Linklater (1996) Theories of International Relations, New York, St. Martin's Press. Butler, M. J. & M. A. Boyer (2006) Public Goods Liberalism: The Problems of Collective Action. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 75-91. Buzan, B. (2001) The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of International Studies, 27, 471-488. Buzan, B. & R. Little (2001) Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 30, 19-+. Cafruny, A. W. (2006) Historical Materialism: Imperialist Rivalry and the Global Capitalist Order. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 209-224. 10

Campbell, D. (1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Manchester, Manchester University Press. Campbell, D. (1993) Politics without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics and the Narratives the Gulf War, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers. Campbell, D. (2007) Poststructuralism. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 203-228. Carlsnaes, W., T. Risse-Kappen & B. A. Simmons (2002) Handbook of International Relations, London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif., SAGE Publications. Carr, E. H. (1946) The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, London, Macmillan. Chan, S., P. G. Mandaville & R. Bleiker (Eds.) (2001) The Zen of International Relations: IR Theory from East to West, London, Palgrave Macmillan. Chan, S. & C. Moore (2009) Approaches to International Relations, Los Angeles ; London, SAGE. Ching-Chane Hwang, B. C. & L. H. M. Ling (2009) Lust/Caution in IR: Democratising World Politics with Culture as a Method. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 37, 743-766. Clark, I. (1997) Globalization and Fragmentation: International Relations in the Twentieth Century, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Clark, I. (1998) Beyond the Great Divide: Globalization and the Theory of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 24, 479-498. Clark, I. (1999) Globalization and International Relations Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Cohen, R. (1994) Pacific Unions: A Reappraisal of the Theory That 'Democracies Do Not Go to War with Each Other'. Review of International Studies, 20, 207-223. Cox, R. W. (1981) Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 10, 126-155. Cox, R. W. (1987) Production, Power, and World Order : Social Forces in the Making of History, New York, Columbia University Press. Cox, R. W. (1995) Approaches to World Order, New York, Cambridge University Press. Cox, R. W. & T. J. Sinclair (1996) Approaches to World Order, Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge University Press. Crawford, R. A. & D. S. Jarvis (Eds.) (2001) IR - Still an American Social Science: Toward Diversity in International Thought, Albany, NY, State University of New York Press. 11

D'amico, F. (2006) Critical Feminism: Deconstructing Gender, Nationalism, and War. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 268-281. Der Derian, J. & M. J. Shapiro (1989) International/Intertextual Relations : Postmodern Readings of World Politics, Lexington, Mass., Lexington Books. Devetak, R., A. Burke & J. George (2007) Introduction to International Relations : Australian Perspectives, Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge University Press. Doyle, M. (1986) Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review, 80, 1151-1169. Dunne, T. (1995) The Social Construction of International Society. European Journal of International Relations, 1, 367-389. Dunne, T. (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, New York, St. Martin's Press. Dunne, T. (2007) The English School. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 127-147. Edkins, J. (1999) Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers. Elman, C. & M. F. Elman (Eds.) (2001) Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists and the Study of International Relations, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. Enloe, C. (1990) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, Berkeley, University of California Press. Enloe, C. H. (2000) Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives, Berkeley, University of California Press. Falger, V. S. E. & J. M. G. Van Der Dennen (2006) Biopolitics: Evolutionary History and Modern Conflict. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 288-301. Falk, R. A. (2000) Predatory Globalization: A Critique, Cambridge, Polity Press. Fierke, K. M. (2007) Constructivism. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 166-184. Freyberg-Inan, A. (2006) World System Theory: A Bird's-Eye View of the World Capitalist Order. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 225-241. Fry, G. & J. O'hagan (Eds.) (2000) Contending Images of World Politics, London, Macmillan Press. George, J. (1994) Discourses of Global Politics: Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers. 12

Gong, G. W. (1984a) China's Entry into International Society. IN Bull, H. & Watson, A. (Eds.) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford, Clarendon Press: 171-183. Gong, G. W. (1984b) The Standart Of "Civilization" In International Society, Oxford University Press. Grovogui, S. N. (2006) Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International Order and Institutions, New York, Palgrave Macmillan. Grovogui, S. N. (2007) Postcolonialism. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 229-246. Guilhot, N. (2008) The Realist Gambit: Postwar American Political Science and the Birth of Ir Theory. International Political Sociology, 2, 281-396. Halperin, S. (2006) International Relations Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity. IN Jones, B. G. (Ed.) Decolonizing International Relations. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield: 43-63. Hay, C. (2007) International Relations Theory and Globalization. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 266-287. Held, D. & A. Mcgrew (1998) The End of the Old Order? Globalization and the Prospects for World Order. Review of International Studies, 24, 219-243. Herz, J. H. (1950) Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 2, 157-180. Hobson, J. M. (2007) Is Critical Theory Always for the White West and Western Imperialism? Beyond Westphilian Towards a Post-Racist Critical IR. Review of International Studies, 33, 91-116. Hoffmann, M. J. (2006) Social (De)Construction: The Failure of a Multinational State. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 123-138. Hollis, M. & S. Smith (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations, New York, Oxford University Press. Jackson, P. T. (2006) Relational Constructivism: A War of Words. IN Sterling- Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 139-155. Jorgensen, K. E. (2000) Continental IR Theory: The Best Kept Secret. European Journal of International Relations, 6, 9-42. Kay, S. (2006) Neoliberalism: Institutions at War. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 62-74. Keohane, R. O. (1988) International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32, 379-396 13

Keohane, R. O. & J. S. Nye (1987) Power and Interdependence Revisited. International Organization, 41, 725-753. Keohane, R. O. & J. S. Nye (1989) Power and Interdependence, Glenview, Scott, Foresman/Little Brown College Divison. Knudsen, T. B. (2006) The English School: Sovereignty and International Law. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 311-326. Kratochwil, F. V. (1989) Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Kubalkova, V., N. G. Onuf & P. Kowert (1998a) International Relations in a Constructed World, New York, M. E. Sharpe. Kubalkova, V., N. G. Onuf & P. E. Kowert (1998b) International Relations in a Constructed World, New York, M. E. Sharpe. Kurki, M. & C. Wight (2007) International Relations and Social Science. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 13-33. Lebow, R. N. (2007) Classical Realism. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 52-70. Lebow, R. N. & T. Risse-Kappen (1995) International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War, New York, Columbia University Press. Linklater, A. (1990a) Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations, Basingstoke, Macmillan. Linklater, A. (1990b) Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations, London, Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics and Political Science. Linklater, A. (1997) The Transformation of Political Community: E.H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations. Review of International Studies, 23, 321-338. Linklater, A. (2000) International Relations : Critical Concepts in Political Science, London ; New York, Routledge. Martin, L. L. (2007) Neoliberalism. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 109-126. Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990) Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15, 5-56. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2007) Structural Realism. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 71-88. 14

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2009) Reckless States and Realism. International Relations, 23, 241-256. Mertus, J. (2006) Liberal Feminism: Local Narratives in a Gendered Context. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 252-267. Moravcsik, A. (1997) Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, 51, 513-553. Morgenthau, H. J. (1985) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York, Knopf: Distributed by Random House. Neufeld, M. A. (1995) The Restructuring of International Relations Theory, Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press. Nicholson, M. (2000) What's the Use of International Relations? Review of International Studies, 26, 183-198. Onuf, N. G. (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, Columbia, University of South Carolina Press. Onuf, N. G. (2009) Structure? What Structure? International Relations, 23, 183-199. Panke, D. & T. Risse (2007) Liberalism. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 89-108. Peterson, V. S. (1992) Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers. Quackenbush, S. L. & F. C. Zagare (2006) Game Theory: Modeling Interstate Conflict. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 98-114. Robinson, W. I. (1996) Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, Us Intervention, and Hegemony, Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press. Rosenau, J. N. & E.-O. Czempiel (1992) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Rosenau, J. N. & J. Der Derian (1993) Global Voices : Dialogues in International Relations, Boulder, Westview Press. Rothstein, R. L. (1972) On the Costs of Realism. Political Science Quarterly, 87, 347-362. Rupert, M. (2007) Marxism and Critical Theory. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 148-165. Scholte, J. A. (2000) Globalization: A Critical Introduction, New York, St. Martin's Press. Shinko, R. E. (2006) Postmodernism: A Genealogy of Humanitarian Intervention. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 168-181. 15

Smith, S. (2007) Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 1-12. Smith, S., K. Booth & M. Zalewski (1996a) International Theory : Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge University Press. Smith, S., K. Booth & M. E. Zalewski (1996b) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, New York, Cambridge University Press. Sorensen, G. (2008) The Case for Combining Material Forces and Ideas in the Study of IR. European Journal of International Relations, 14, 5-32. Spegele, R. D. (2002) Emancipatory International Relations: Good News, Bad News or No News at All? International Relations, 16, 381-401. Steele, B. J. (2007) 'Eavesdropping on Honored Ghosts': From Classical to Reflexive Realism. Journal of International Relations and Development, 10, 272-300. Sterling-Folker, J. (2006a) Biopolitics. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 283-287. Sterling-Folker, J. (2006b) Constructivism. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 115-122. Sterling-Folker, J. (2006c) The English School. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 303-310. Sterling-Folker, J. (2006d) Feminism. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 243-251. Sterling-Folker, J. (2006e) Historical Materialism and World System Theory. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 199-208. Sterling-Folker, J. (2006f) Liberalism. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 55-61. Sterling-Folker, J. (2006g) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 1-11. Sterling-Folker, J. (2006h) Realism. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 13-17. Suzuki, S. (2004) China's Perceptions of International Society in the Nineteenth Century: Learning More About Power Politics? Asian Perspective, 28, 115-144. Sylvester, C. (2002) Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey, New York, Cambridge University Press. 16

Taliaferro, J. W. (2006) Neoclassical Realism: The Psychology of Great Power Intervention. IN Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 38-53. Tickner, A. & O. Wæver (2008) International Relations Scholarship around the World, Routledge. Tickner, A. & O. Waever (2009) Global Scholarship in International Relations: Worlding Beyond the West, New York, Routledge. Tickner, J. A. (1997) You Just Don't Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41, 611-632. Tickner, J. A. (2003) Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 32, 295-324. Tickner, J. A. & L. Sjoberg (2007) Feminism. IN Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 185-202. Tsygankov, A. P. & P. A. Tsygankov (2007) A Sociology of Dependence in International Relations Theory: A Case of Russian Liberal IR. International Political Sociology, 1, 307-324. Waever, O. (1998) The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations. International Organization, 52, 687-727. Waever, O. (2009) Waltz's Theory of Theory. International Relations, 23, 201-222. Walker, R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Wallerstein, I. M. (2006) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, Durham, Duke University Press. Waltz, K. N. (1959) Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis, New York, Columbia University Press. Waltz, K. N. (1979) Theory of International Politics, New York, Random House. Watson, A. (1992) The Evolution of International Society : A Comparative Historical Analysis, London ; New York, Routledge. Weber, C. (1998) Performative States. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 27, 77-+. Weber, C. (1999) IR: The Resurrection or New Frontiers of Incorporation. European Journal of International Relations, 5, 435-450. Weldes, J. (1996) Constructing National Interests. European Journal of International Relations, 2, 275-318. Weldes, J. (1999) Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press. Weldes, J., M. Laffey, H. Gusterson & R. Duvall (1999) Introduction: Constructing Insecurity. IN Weldes, J., Laffey, M., Gusterson, H. & Duvall, 17

R. (Eds.) Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press: 1-33. Weldes, J. & D. Saco (1996) Making State Action Possible: The United States and the Discursive Construction of 'the Cuban Problem', 1960-1994. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 25, 361-395. Wendt, A. (1992) Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46, 391-425. Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press. Wendt, A. (2000) On the Via Media: A Response to the Critics. Review of International Studies, 26, 165-180. Wight, C. (2002) Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations. IN Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. & Simmons, B. A. (Eds.) Handbook of International Relations. London, SAGE Publications: 23-51. Wight, M. (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions, London, Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Williams, H., M. Wright & T. Evans (1993) A Reader in International Relations and Political Theory, Buckingham, Open University Press. Williams, M. C. (2004) Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 58, 633-665. Wilson, P. (1998) The Myth of the 'First Great Debate'. Review of International Studies, 24, 1-16. Woods, N. (1996) Explaining International Relations since 1945, New York, Oxford University Press. Zalewski, M. (1995) Well, What Is the Feminist Perspective on Bosnia? International Affairs, 71, 339-356. 18