FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :40 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 212 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2018

Similar documents
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/ :51 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016 EXHIBIT I

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/19/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/19/2018

(718) Jordan Greenberger, Esq. Ouzounian v. Herrera et al.; No /2017 Scheduling Sanctions Motion (Motion Sequence 006)

Affirmation of Howard Cotton Exhibit 1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/10/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/10/2017. Exhibit D

Case3:12-cv VC Document88 Filed06/09/15 Page1 of 2

Case: 1:02-cv Document #: 953 Filed: 02/11/07 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:21143 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/23/ :26 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/ :00 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2017

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/13/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 155 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/13/2017

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS FROM CITY OF FORT COLLINS

Sitt Entity Defendants on the ground that Plaintiff had failed to make the necessary showing of

COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

MOTION FOR TELEPHONE TESTIMONY OF W. SCOTT ROCKEFELLER WITH REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED RULING

Information or instructions: Motion Order Affidavit for substituted service package PREVIEW

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/21/ :42 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 230 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/21/2018

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.: CACE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/ :40 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2016

Auto accident Motion for Summary Judgment complete package

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) Complainant, Case No. SC v. TFB File No ,500(1A)

ALL STATE INTERIOR DEMOLITION INC. WITH CROSS-CLAIMS

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/05/ :46 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/05/2017

ALLEGRA FUNG, ESQUIRE

scc Doc 928 Filed 03/12/12 Entered 03/12/12 18:37:05 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/25/ :56 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 24 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2016

Sample STATE OF NEW YORK CREDITOR. ,, SUMMONS Plaintiff, Index No. -vs- Date Filed: DEBTOR d/b/a. ,, Defendant. TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT:

James M. Maloney. Attorney at Law Proctor in Admiralty. P.O. Box Bayview Avenue Port Washington, NY April 7, 2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENT S EXPERT AND WITNESS INTERROGATORIES GENERAL OBJECTIONS

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/ :59 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2017

Diaz v City of New York 2017 NY Slip Op 30529(U) February 10, 2017 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: /14 Judge: Thomas P.

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between all parties to the within action that disclosure shall proceed and be completed as follows:

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/17/2018 INDEX NO / :15 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 246 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/17/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/22/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/22/2015

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 126 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/20/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/20/2018

Case 1:08-cv CMA Document 71-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2008 Page 1 of 12 6/16/2008 Sancho, Ion

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. Peter S. Holmes, Kent C. Meyer, Jessica Nadelman, Attorneys of Record for Defendant

READ THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING

HAHN & BOWERSOCK FAX KALMUS DRIVE, SUITE L1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626

5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT

5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2016

Plaintiff. Defendants. UPON READING the annexed Affidavit of Bruce A. Hubbard, duly affirmed and

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 75 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2018

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D LT. CASE NO.: CA-13

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :51 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 62 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. Supreme Court Case No. SC BENJAMIN RAUL ALVAREZ, REPORT OF REFEREE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/21/ :31 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/21/2017

Scialdone v Stepping Stones Assoc., LP 2014 NY Slip Op 33861(U) November 10, 2014 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 12514/11 Judge:

herein, counsel will move this Court before the Honorable Denny Chin, United States District

Transcript of Bryan Michael Pagliano

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

Case: 4:15-cv CAS Doc. #: 34 Filed: 10/13/15 Page: 1 of 5 PageID #: 503

Filing # E-Filed 03/06/ :49:13 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CI-19 UCN: CA015815XXCICI

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 14 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiff,

ONONDAGA COUNTY JUSTICES AND LOCAL RULES

Case 2:14-cv PAM-CM Document 128 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 23 PageID 984

RECEIVED ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF

REPUBLICAN RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT S RULE 26(a)(1) DISCLOSURES

Case 1:14-md JMF Document 3703 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 5

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

VIA ECF and HAND DELIVERY

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/22/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/22/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2016 EXHIBIT C

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016 EXHIBIT E

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/13/ :29 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2016

December 15, Dear Justice Singh: VIA ECF LITIGATION

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/17/ :10 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/17/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :13 PM

FROM THE KORTE WARTMAN LAW FIRM. Page: 1 IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA (AW)

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

BRCS REPLY AFFIDAVIT

Case 2:08-cv GLF-NMK Document 78 Filed 01/20/10 Page 1 of 5

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/16/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 75 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/16/2018

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018

Filing # E-Filed 12/26/ :55:03 PM

Moore))) ~~~Reese ATTORNEYS AT LAW. January 25, 2013

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. 3 In the matter of the application of MIDWEST ENERGY COOPERATIVE (i) for a

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

scc Doc 812 Filed 02/10/12 Entered 02/10/12 16:44:16 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/09/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/09/2014

U.S. District Court DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Prescott Division) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:05-cv FJM

THERE ARE NO SUBMITTED MOTIONS IN THIS PART AND ALL MOTIONS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, MUST BE ORALLY ARGUED.

RESPONDENTS. American Express Centurion Bank C/0 American Express Centurion Bank Legal Division 200 Vesey Street New York, NY 10285

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 130 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2015

CONSUMER COMPLAINT HANDLING PROCEDURES OF THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Case3:12-mc CRB Document45 Filed01/02/13 Page1 of 6

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :36 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2018

Information & Instructions: Motion to dissolve writ of garnishment. 1. A Motion to dissolve a Writ of Garnishment should set forth the following:

below Plaintiffs 3/14/16 5/11/16 7/20/16 Other (not itemized above specify) premises liability

Transcription:

LEVI HUEBNER& ASSOCIATES, PC ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 338 ATLANTIC AVENUE, SUITE 202 BROOKLYN, NY 11201 TEL: (212) 354-5555 FAX: (718) 636-4444 EMAIL: NEWYORKLAWYER@MSN.COM Via Email To: sinead@goralaw.com And Via First Class Mail To: February 23, 2018 Sinead Rafferty, Esq. Gora, LLC 9 West Broad Street, Suite 550 Stamford, CT 06902 Re: Trust Mortgage LLC., v. Peter Andrews & Gregory Palmer et al. Index No. 650699/15 Dear Ms. Rafferty: Plaintiff has been trying to obtain outstanding discovery from Peter Andrews, Gregory Palmer, DBI Coinvestment Fund VIII, LLC, DBI Coinvestor Fund VIII, LLC, & Dream Builder Investments, (" LLC, your clients,") and schedule depositions for over two years. 1. The PC Order dated February 2, 2016, directed in part that "all Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's duly served Notice of Discovery and Disclosure Demands dated January 12, 2016, on or before March 3, 2016, Additionally, Plaintiff duly served deposition demands dated May 2015" 26, [DE 90]. 2. The CC Order dated June 7, 2016 directed in part that Defendants Peter Andrews, Gregory Palmer, DBI Coinvestment Fund VIII, LLC, DBI Coinvestor Fund VIII, LLC, & Dream Builder Investments, LLC, shall respond to Plaintiff's duly served Notice of Discovery & Inspection, Combined Discovery Demands dated January 12, 2016 on or before July 7, 2016 and your clients were to be deposed prior to all other parties. [DE 91]. 3. On July 8, 2016, Plaintiff furnished your clients with a good faith letter [DE 102]. 4. On August 10, 2016, Plaintiff furnished your clients with a good faith letter [DE 103]. 5. Due to your client's failure to furnish discovery, Plaintiff brought its first discovery motion dated September 19, 2016 [DE 99]. 6. The CC Order dated September 20, 2016 ordered in part that "regarding Plaintiff's Discovery Demands dated January 12, 2016, Defendants, Peter Andrews, Gregory Palmer, DBI Coinvestment Fund VIII, LLC, DBI Coinvestor Fund VIII, LLC, & Dreambuilder are directed to respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Demands with complete responses along with all responsive 1 of 13

documents indicating which demands the documents are responding to within 30 days and your clients were to be deposed prior to all other parties [DE 108]. 7. On March 22, 2017, Plaintiff served your clients with a deficiency letter [DE 158] and Plaintiff served your clients with a Demand for Interrogatories [DE 159]. 8. The CC Order dated August 8, 2017 directed that "Defendants Andrews, Palmer and the DBI have failed to respond to Plaintiff's Deficiency Letter, dated March 22, 2017, Interrogatories dated March 22, 2017, & Combined Discovery Demands dated January 12, 2016, Defendant to Comply with all of Plaintiff's outstanding discovery by September 8, 2017 or face preclusion. Depositions no later than October 27, 2017, Defendants deposition to proceed first [DE 165]. 9. By email dated August 8, 2017 plaintiff demanded outstanding discovery and to schedule depositions of your clients [DE 178]. 10. On August 24, 2017 Plaintiff served your clients with a good faith letter [DE 177]. 11. After your clients continued failure to comply with discovery, on September 19, 2017 Plaintiff brought its second discovery motion [DE 171]. 12. On November 20, 2017 you informed my office that you will be representing your clients. 13. On November 21, 2017, at the conclusion of the deposition of William Weinstein, the principal of Stelis, on the record we discussed discovery: Mr. Huebner: "Are you going to give me outstanding discovery, Sinead? Ms. Rafferty: I have to speak with my client. I'm just getting up to speed on this case. A true copy of the cover page and relevant transcript is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 14. By telephone conference on November 22, 2017 I reiterated your clients' clients obligation to furnish outstanding discovery and to hold depositions and by email that day you responded, "I have not yet had an opportunity to discuss discovery with my clients and will do so after the holiday." A true copy of your email November 22, 2017 is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 15. Notably, on November 30, 2017 you were able to file your clients' clients opposition to Plaintiff's motion to reargue in the Appellate Division. However, to date you have failed to furnish outstanding discovery or schedule the deposition of your clients. 16. On November 30, 2017 I contacted you by email and have yet to receive a response. 17. On December 29, 2017 I sent you a further good faith letter regarding discovery, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 18. Moreover, I left messages with you regarding outstanding discovery on November 30, 2017, December 1, 2017, December 15, 2017, December 29, 2017, January 15, 2018, January 29, of 2018 and February 16, 2018. To date none my calls have been returned. 2 of 13

Pursuant to Uniform Rules 202.7. (c) let this again serve as a good faith notice regarding the foregoing. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Please feel free to contact the undersigned with any questions. Very truly yours, / s / Levi Huebner Levi Huebner LH:el Encls. 3 of 13

Exhibit A 4 of 13

1 340 2 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK 3 --------------------------X 4 TRUST MORTGAGE, LLC, 1 5 Plaintiff, 6 -against- Index 650699/2015 No: 7 PETER ANDREWS, GREGORY PALMER a/k/a GREG PALMER, DBI COINVESTMENT FUND VIII, LLC, DBI 8 COINVESTOR VIII, LLC, DREAMBUILDER 9 INVESTMENTS, LLC and STELIS, LLC, Defendants. 10 --------------------------X 11 November 21, 2017 2:00 p.m. 12 13 14 Continued telephone deposition of 15 WILLIAM S. WEINSTEIN, taken by plaintiff, 16 pursuant to stipulation, at the offices of 17 Levi Huebner 6 Associates, 535 Dean Street, 18 Brooklyn, New York 11217, before Joseph B. 19 Pirozzi, a Registered Professional Reporter 20 and Notary Public of the State of New York. 21 22 23 24 25 PIROZZI 6 HILLMAN 212-213-5858 5 of 13

1 341 2 APPEARANCES: 3 4 5 LEVI HUEBNER 6 ASSOCIATES, PC 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 535 Dean Street - Suite 100 8 Brooklyn, New York 11217 9 BY: LEVI HUEBNER 10 11 12 GORA, LLC 13 Attorneys for Defendants Peter Andrews 1 il n ~ 1 n ~ 1 14 Gregory Palmer a/k/a /1 / Greg Palmer, DBI 15 Coinvestment Fund VIII, LLC, DBI 16 Coinvestor VIII, LLC, Dreambuilder 17 Investments, LLC 18 9 West Broad Street 19 Suite 550 20 Stamford, CT 06902 21 BY: SINEAD RAFFERTY (Via telephone) 22 23 24 25 PIROZZI 6 HILLMAN 212-213-5858 6 of 13

1 Weinstein 418 2 MR. HUEBNER: Thank you very 3 much. 4 MR. KAPLAN: Are we going to do 5 any more scheduling? I don't know, we' 6 we've got to get this case over with. 7 MR. HUEBNER: Are you going to 8 give me my outstanding discovery, 9 Sinead? 10 MS. RAFFERTY: I have to speak to 11 my client. I'm just getting up to 12 speed on this case. 13 MR. HUEBNER: That's not an 1 il 1 14 answer, but I got it. We' 15 Thank you very much. re off 16 the record. 17 (Time noted: 3:50 p.m.) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PIROZZI 6 HILLMAN 212-213-5858 7 of 13

8 of 13

newyorklawyer@msn.com From: Sinead Rafferty <sinead@goralaw.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 6:16 PM To: Levi Huebner Esq Subject: Trust Mortgage v. Peter Andrews et al. Dear Levi: This e-mail memorializes the conversation we had this evening regarding the substitution of counsel papers filed in the above referenced matter. I am now the sole attorney of record for Peter Andrews, Gregory Palmer a/k/a Greg Palmer, DBI Coinvestment Fund VIII LLC, DBI Coinvestor Fund VIII LLC, and Dreambuilder Investments, LLC and have replaced Paul Verner as to all of the aforementioned defendants. Additionally, having only been involved in this case since yesterday, I have not yet had the opportunity to discuss outstanding discovery with my clients and will do so after the holiday. Have a happy thanksgiving. Best, Sinead Rafferty Sinead Rafferty Gora LLC 9 W. Broad Street, Suite 550 Stamford, CT 06902 Phone: (646) 298-8523 Email: Sinead@GoraLaw.com www.qoralaw.com 1 9 of 13

10 of 13

LEVI HUEBNER& ASSOCIATES, PC ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 338 ATLANTIC AVENUE, SUITE 202 BROOKLYN, NY 11201 TEL: (212) 354-5555 FAX: (718) 636-4444 EMAIL: NEWYORKLAWYER@MSN.COM December 29, 2017 Via Email To: sinead@goralaw.com And Via First Class Mail To: Sinead Rafferty, Esq. Gora, LLC 9 West Broad Street, Suite 550 Stamford, CT 06902 Re: Trust Mortgage LLC., v. Peter Andrews & Gregory Palmer et al. Index No. 650699/15 Dear Ms. Rafferty: Plaintiff has been trying to obtain outstanding discovery from Peter Andrews, Gregory Palmer, DBI Coinvestment Fund VIII, LLC, DBI Coinvestor Fund VIII, LLC, & Dream Builder Investments, (" LLC, your clients,") and schedule depositions for over two years. 1. The PC Order dated February 2, 2016, directed in part that "all Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's duly served Notice of Discovery and Disclosure Demands dated January 12, 2016, on or before March 3, 2016, Additionally, Plaintiff duly served deposition demands dated May 2015" 26, [DE 90]. 2. The CC Order dated June 7, 2016 directed in part that Defendants Peter Andrews, Gregory Palmer, DBI Coinvestment Fund VIII, LLC, DBI Coinvestor Fund VIII, LLC, & Dream Builder Investments, LLC, shall respond to Plaintiff's duly served Notice of Discovery & Inspection, Combined Discovery Demands dated January 12, 2016 on or before July 7, 2016 and your clients were to be deposed prior to all other parties. [DE 91]. 3. On July 8, 2016, Plaintiff furnished your clients with a good faith letter [DE 102]. 4. On August 10, 2016, Plaintiff furnished your clients with a good faith letter [DE 103]. 5. Due to your client's failure to furnish discovery, Plaintiff brought its first discovery motion dated September 19, 2016 [DE 99]. 6. The CC Order dated September 20, 2016 ordered in part that "regarding Plaintiff's Discovery Demands dated January 12, 2016, Defendants, Peter Andrews, Gregory Palmer, DBI Coinvestment Fund VIII, LLC, DBI Coinvestor Fund VIII, LLC, & Dreambuilder are directed to respond to Plaintiff's Discovery Demands with complete responses along with all responsive 11 of 13

documents indicating which demands the documents are responding to within 30 days and your clients were to be deposed prior to all other parties [DE 108]. 7. On March 22, 2017, Plaintiff served your clients with a deficiency letter [DE 158] and Plaintiff served your clients with a Demand for Interrogatories [DE 159]. 8. The CC Order dated August 8, 2017 directed that "Defendants Andrews, Palmer and the DBI have failed to respond to Plaintiff's Deficiency Letter, dated March 22, 2017, Interrogatories dated March 22, 2017, & Combined Discovery Demands dated January 12, 2016, Defendant to Comply with all of Plaintiff's outstanding discovery by September 8, 2017 or face preclusion. Depositions no later than October 27, 2017, Defendants deposition to proceed first [DE 165]. 9. By email dated August 8, 2017 plaintiff demanded outstanding discovery and to schedule depositions of your clients [DE 178]. 10. On August 24, 2017 Plaintiff served your clients with a good faith letter [DE 177]. 11. After your clients continued failure to comply with discovery, on September 19, 2017 Plaintiff brought its second discovery motion [DE 171]. 12. On November 20, 2017 you informed my office that you will be representing your clients. 13. On November 21, 2017, at the conclusion of the deposition of William Weinstein, the principal of Stelis, on the record we discussed discovery: Mr. Huebner: "Are you going to give me outstanding discovery, Sinead? Ms. Rafferty: I have to speak with my client. I m just getting up to speed on this case. 14. By telephone conference on November 22, 2017 I reiterated your clients obligation to furnish outstanding discovery and to hold depositions and by email that day you responded, "I have not holiday." yet had an opportunity to discuss discovery with my clients and will do so after the 15. Notably, on November 30, 2017 you were able to file your clients opposition to Plaintiff's motion to reargue in the Appellate Division. However, to date you have failed to furnish outstanding discovery or schedule the deposition of your clients. 16. On November 30, 2017 I contacted you by email and received no response. 17. Moreover, I left messages with you regarding outstanding discovery on November 30, 2017, December 1, 2017, December 15, 2017, and December 29, 2017. To date none of my been returned. calls have Pursuant to Uniform Rules $ 202.7. (c) let this again serve as a good faith notice regarding the foregoing. 12 of 13

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Please feel free to contact the undersigned with any questions. Very truly yours, / s / Levi Huebner Levi Huebner LH:el 13 of 13