FINAL ORDER. Findings. Facts. Counties, A list of the wells at ( Wells ) is. ownership of the rights below a horizontal to permit

Similar documents
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL OIL AND GAS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL AND GAS DIVISION FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

AMENDED PROPOSAL FOR DECISION

FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

June 19, 2007 EXAMINER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI

RESULTS STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF ALABAMA AUGUST 22 & 24, 2006

******************************************************* * KEY ISSUES:

May 16, Michael Mulvey PROPOSAL FOR DECISION

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

^ BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI

^ with the Board and that the Board has full jurisdiction of the

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA RIMROCK RESOURCE OPERATING, LLC HORIZONTAL DRILLING AND SPACING UNIT

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

IN THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI AMENDED ORDER. On June 16,1999, this matter came on for hearing before the State Oil and Gas Board on

STATE Gil A; ID GAS L;OARD Relief! fc VMwh. Avi.r.g S~>-/v*ar

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RE: PETITION OF GULF SOUTH RESOURCES, JAN

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

State Oil and Gas Board on the Petition of Pachuta Corporation

AMEND THE SPECIAL FIELD RULES FOR THE TINSLEY FIELD TO PROVIDE FOR THE Mnw TINSLEY FIELD UNIT IN THE TINSLEY FIELD, NUV - j 2007

STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD Clyde a Davis. State Oil & Gas Supervisor THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI

GAS CORPORATION TO AMEND THE

STATE OIL AND GAS BOARP

OIL & GAS DOCKET NO

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division Revised March 2017 COMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT

JUNE 29, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. at the William B. Travis State Office Building, 1701 N. Congress

Marshall Enquist, Hearing Examiner Richard Atkins, Hearing Examiner c/o Docket Services. Texas Oil & Gas Division. this Brief on CD.

1 E 2017 BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA APPLICANT: CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC. ) CAUSE CD NO.

ihi'gi!ñ,ib,'é'iipffi

ST. PATRICK FIELD, AMITE JUN 0 "

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA STAFF'S REVISED PROPOSED RULES. March 6,2013 TITLE 165. CORPORATION COMMISSION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA WAYNE A. LEAMON REVOCABLE TRUST AND JANE GOSS REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

ORDER. THIS DAY this matter came on for hearing before the State. Oil and Gas Board on the Petition of Exchange Oil & Gas Corporation

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION

RE: PETITION OF KCS RESOURCES, INC. TO FILED FOR RECORD ESTABLISH SPECIAL FIELD RULES AND AN MER FOR SOUTH WINCHESTER FIELD, OUT - \ 2007

COMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division

mineral leases have heretofore executed a "Unit Operating

AOGC Fayetteville Shale Activity Report To Be Presented to the Arkansas Legislative Council Reporting Period: July 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

IN THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI ORDER. This matter came on to be heard on the sworn Petition

TO AMEND THE SPECIAL FIELD U RULES FOR THE LEAF RIVER FIELD, COVINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI!1 Vv

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Company was represented at the hearing by its attorney James M. Nix.

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA RIMROCK RESOURCES OPERATING, LLC RIMROCK RESOURCES OPERATING, LLC

VERIFIED APPLICATION

PRODUCTION COMPANY TO AMEND THE ) STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD. the 19th day of June, 2002, on the Petition of QUESTAR EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

OFFICIAL MINUTES RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS FORMAL COMMISSION ACTION JANUARY 23, 2004

DOCKET NO ORDER NO. Ill-Io

IN THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI ORDER. THIS DAY this cause came on to be heard by the State Oil and

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

BEFORE THE OIL & GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO APPLICATION

IN THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI DOCKET NO

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

SUGGESTIONS FOR OPERATORS OPTIONAL PROCEDURE FOR SPACING-RELATED APPLICATIONS OCC-OAC 165:

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA FINDINGS AND ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OP MISSISSIPPI

ORDER NO. / C 3 *- (rf

Rifle, CO A (1) Resources, Inc. Group. Withdrawn. Group. Kerr-McGeee. Group. D (3) Red Hawk. E (6) Piceance Synergy. Group. F (5) Encana Noble

The Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulations, 1969

New Mexico State Land Office Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division Revised Feb. 2013

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS FORMAL COMMISSION ACTION DECEMBER 7, 2004

FILED JUN BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, L.L.C. AND CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L.L.C.

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

ONLINE VERSION STATE/FEDERAL/FEE EXPLORATORY UNIT UNIT AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE NO.

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO VERIFIED APPLICATION

Plaintiffs Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, Colorado and the City of Lafayette allege as follows:

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA

City of Denton Special Election PROPOSITION REGARDING THE PROHIBITION OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE O}(LAHO1A

STORAGE FIELD, SMITH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI. ' buptrviso

INTERIM ORDER OF THE COMMISSION MULTIUNIT HORIZONTAL WELL. Findings

("Petitioner") requesting authority to use the Byrd Salt Dome in Greene County, Mississippi

BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA REPORT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

FPL FARMING, LTD. V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS, L.C.: SUBSURFACE TRESPASS IN TEXAS

TOWN OF HURON Proposed Local Law No. 6 of the Year A Local Law to Impose a Moratorium on Natural Gas and Petroleum

AOGC Fayetteville Shale Activity Report To Be Presented to the Arkansas Legislative Council Reporting Period: April 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO APPLICATION

Township 10 North. Range 57 West. 6th P.M.

Transcription:

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION OIL AND GAS DOCKET No. APPLICATION OF NORTH SOUTH OIL, LLC TO CONSIDER CREATING THE PROPOSED LULING BRANYON R FIELD PURSUANT TO STATEWIDE RULE CALDWELL AND GUADALUPE COUNTIES, TEXAS 40, 01-0311764: FINAL ORDER 40 Exc The Railroad Commission of Texas ( Commission) finds that notice in abovenumbered docket was provided to all parties entitled to notice. A hearing in numbered docket was heard on March 5, 2018, by a Commission Technical Examiner and Administrative Law (collectively, Examiners ) This proceeding was duly submitted to Commission at a held in its offices in Austin, After considering and record in this Commission following findings of fact and of law. Judge evidence conclusions conference case, adopts Texas. above Findings of Facts 1. North South Oil, LLC ( North South ) an exception to Statewide Rule 40 (16 TEx. ADMIN. CODE 3.40) for wells in Luling-Branyon Field is a depth of minerals within correlative interval of Luling-Branyon Field ( Field ) in CaIdwell and Counties, A list of wells at ( Wells ) is re issue requests Guadalupe attached as Attachment A. where Texas. 2. To accomplish Rule 40 exceptions, North South creation of Luling-Branyon R 40 Exc Field for with ownership of rights below a horizontal and to permit interval wells. In conjunction to for Rule 40 exceptions, North South filed an application to Field s field rules to allow in Field with ownership of rights below a horizontal to permit interval wells in Luling-Branyon R 40 Exc Field. North South s application to Field s rules is for Commission s at its 19, 2018 Oil and Oil and deeper June request deeper conference as Gas Consent Agenda. requests those deeper set deep those consideration Gas Docket No, 01-0308634 on 3. Approving a Rule 40 Exception for Wells and transferring Wells to Luling-Branyon R40 Exc. Field would grant Statewide Rule 40 in Luling-Branyon Field and permit to develop individual ownership in Luling-Branyon Field follows: as exceptions a. Operators of with no horizontal of ownership within interval for Luling-Branyon Field AND of shallow rights a horizontal of ownership within that interval shall permit wells Luling-Branyon Field (Field ID Number 55679001). designated tracts above under same

OIL AND GAS DocKn No. 01-0311764 PAGE 2 OF 8 b. Operators with ownership of rights below a horizontal within interval for Luling-Branyon Field shall permit wells Luling-Branyon R40 Exc. Field (Field ID No. 555679100). under designated deep c. Any using Field ID Number for rights (Luling-Branyon R40 Exc Field) certifies, by of that number, that ownership of oil and rights is divided horizontally on tract for which drilling permit is sought. operator gas use deep d. Where ownership of oil and is horizontally divided, Field Rules for Luling-Branyon Field will apply to wells drilled under Luling-Branyon Field and wells drilled Luling-Branyon R40 Exc Field, such that proration units on a tract above and below horizontal division of ownership are and may overlap. gas independent separately under 4. Notice of North South s Luling-Branyon Field. request was provided to all of record in 5. No one and to application to exceptions has protested North South s for Statewide Rule 40 Luling-Branyon R40 Exc Field or North South s Field s rules, create request 6. A hearing held on March 5, 2018 regarding North South s to field rules for Luling-Branyon Field, for Statewide Rule 40 exception for 35 of its wells and to Luling-Branyon R40 Exc Field. The application is The Rule 40 exceptions, creating Luling-Branyon R 40 Exc Field and transferring Wells from field rule application and given its own number, which is in this order. was proposed was severed docket used create unprotested. ment proposed Statewide requests 7. Commission Oil and Gas staff ( Staff ) filed an curiae identifying an of in to field rules with a field-wide Rule 40 exception that could potentially result in by allowing double of to multiple wells within a common, conventional, drive reservoir. concern assignment pressure/water request acreage amicus waste area Statewide 8. A correlative interval Luling-Branyon Field was in Final Order No, and Luling-Branyon Field is defined entire correlative interval from 1,620 feet to 2,164 feet shown on log of Petroleum Investment Co. - J. E. Allen A 42-187-33111). This interval is a single reservoir for proration and includes both Austin Chalk and Edwards Formations. Texas purposes 01-0262944 for designated as as designated as Lease, Well No. 46 (API No. 9. The Luling-Branyon Field from conventional reservoirs, Austin Chalk interval and Edwards interval. However, Austin Chalk and Edwards intervals not and are not in communication. are produces connected

OIL AND GAS DOCKET No. 01-0311764 PAGE 3 OF 8 a. The Edwards and Austin Chalk Formations are separated by two major shale formations (Eagle Ford and Del Rio), which are present throughout Luling-Branyon Field area. There may be natural fractures within individual productive zones, for example, re could be natural fractures within Austin Chalk, and re could be natural fractures within Edwards, but se natural fractures do not extend to cause communication between se two formations. b. The Bureau of Economic Development (BEG) addresses Austin Chalk portion of Luling-Branyon Field separately from Edwards portion of Luling-Branyon Field. Per BEG Atlas of Major Texas Reservoirs, Austin Chalk Formation portion of Luling-Branyon Field is a solution gas drive reservoir. The Edwards Formation portion of Luling-Branyon field is a water drive reservoir. 10. There is a difference in mineral ownership within Luling-Branyon Field. There are shallow rights, which is typically Austin Chalk Formation. North South is only interested in developing deeper mineral rights within Luling Branyon Field, namely Edwards Formation. a. The Edwards Formation is located at very base of correlative interval for Luling-Branyon Field. b. If North South is not authorized to develop Edwards Formation in Luling Branyon Field, specifically with horizontal wells, waste will occur as re is no or way to produce se recoverable hydrocarbons within Edwards Formation at this time. c. This residual oil in Luling-Branyon Field will go unrecovered if it can t be produced through this particular technology of drilling horizontal wells and producing wells in Edwards Formation at high water cuts. 11. Statewide Rule 40 prohibits double assignment of acreage to non-stacked lateral, horizontal wells in same field. 12. North South has received Statewide Rule 40 violation letters from Commission that have resulted in oil overproduction due to inability to assign an oil allowable to several of North South s leases. a. North South has leased rights to develop below base of Austin Chalk on leases with current Statewide Rule 40 double assignment of acreage violations in Luling-Branyon Field. b. In total, North South is requesting to transfer 35 wells to proposed Luling-Branyon Statewide Rule 40 exception field. The 35 are unable to be

OIL AND GAS DOCKET No. 01-0311764 PAGE 4 OF 8 assigned an allowable due to double assignment of acreage with wells that are completed in Austin Chalk Formation. 13. The Luling-Branyon Field was discovered on August 8, 1922 at a depth of 1,900 feet. The field has been producing for almost 100 years and field is currently on 2-acre density. As of March 2018, re were 1,536 total wells on proration schedule for Luling-Branyon Field. Of se 1,536 wells, 131 were horizontal wells. 14. Horizontal wells drilled in Edwards Formation are not hydraulically fracture stimulated. The wells are open-hole completions that produce simply by creating a new pressure sink in immediate vicinity of pore spaces and produce a lot of water 15. The only way to continue to develop Edwards Formation in Luling Branyon Field is by creating a relatively large draw-down in immediate vicinity of pore space. The horizontal well contacts a lot of reservoir volume and creates a pressure sink along horizontal lateral, allowing last remaining residual oil to be liberated. a. The only way this residual oil in Edwards Formation is going to be produced, is through horizontal wellbores at high water cuts. b. This completion technique is analogous to a new technology. 16. In this case, an exception to Statewide Rule 40 is necessary for North South to produce its fair share of hydrocarbons. 17. Granting an exception to Statewide Rule 40 in this case is necessary to prevent waste and to protect correlative rights. 18. In past, Commission has granted exceptions to Statewide Rule 40 and approved Spraberrry (Trend Area) R40 Exc Field in Oil and Gas Docket No. 7C-0283443 to prevent waste. 19. The Commission granted an exception to Statewide Rule 40 in Oil and Gas Docket No. 08-0309365. 20. A Statewide Rule 40 exception is necessary in order to allow North South to obtain an allowable to produce its wells in Luling-Branyon Field where re is a depth of minerals within correlative interval for field.

OIL AND GAS DOCKET No. 01-0311764 PAGE 5 OF 8 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. North South s application for Statewide Rule 40 exceptions in Luling Branyon Field where re is a depth of minerals within correlative interval is necessary to prevent waste and protect correlative rights. 2. Pursuant to 2001.144(a)(4)(A), of Texas Government Code, and by agreement of parties in writing or on record, parties have waived right to file a motion for rehearing and Final Order in this case can be final and effective on date Final Order is signed. Therefore, it is ORDERED that application of North South Oil, LLC for an exception to Statewide Rule 40 in Luling-Branyon Field for 35 wells listed on Attachment A and to create proposed Luling Branyon R 40 Exc Field CaIdwell and Guadalupe Counties, Texas is hereby GRANTED. It is furr ORDERED that Luling-Branyon R40 Exc Field (Field ID No. 55679100), is hereby created and that wells listed on Attachment A are transferred into newly created Luling-Branyon R40 Exc Field (Field ID No. 55679100), without need for a new drilling permit. However, a Form P-4, Producer s Transportation Authority and Certificate of Compliance, is required to be filed for all leases to change field name. New lease numbers will be assigned if operator does not already have an existing lease number assigned in Luling-Branyon R40 Exc Field. Form P-16, Acreage Designation, and full lease plats are also required in new field and should be sent to Commission with Form P-4 if acres are not already assigned to operator s wells that meet new field criteria. Operators must respond within sixty (60) days of this order s effective date.

OIL AND GAS DOCKET No. 01-0311764 PAGE 6 OF 8 Done this 19th day of June 2018. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS plf11 s4. flajith R WAYNE CHRISTIAN ATTEST:... C!, I SECRET1AY 0 -

OIL AND GAs Door No. 01-0311764 PAGE 7 OF 8 AUACHMENT A API No. 42-055-35006 CR Ranch Unit IH API No. 52-055-35007 CR Ranch Unit 211 API No. 42-055-35012 CR Ranch Unit 311 API No.42-055-35014 CR Ranch Unit 4H API No, 42-055-35020 CR Ranch Unit SR API No. 42-055-35021 CR Ranch Unit 611 API No. 42-055-35032 CR Ranch Unit 711 API No. 42-055-35033 CR Ranch Unit 811 API No. 42-055-35034 CR Ranch Unit 9H API No.42-055-35074 CR Ranch Unit 1011 API No.42455-35076 CR Ranch Unit I 111 API No. 42-055-35077 CR Ranch Unit 1211 API No. 42-055-35079 CR Ranch Unit 13H API No. 42-055-35078 CR Ranch Unit 1411 API No. 42-055-34926 Clark 111 API No. 42-055-34976 Clark 211 API No. 42-055-35005 Clark 3M API No. 42-055-35038 Ellison 111 API No. 42-055-35039 Ellison 211 API No. 42-055-35041 Ellison 311 API No. 42-055-35064 Ellison 411

OIL AND Gn DOCKET No. 01-0311764 PAGE 8 OF 8 ATTACHMENT A (continued) API No. 42-055-35066 ElTison 5H API No. 42-055-35065 Ellison 6W API No. 42-055-35070 Ellison 7H API No. 42-055-35072 Ellison 8W API No. 42-055-35089 Ellison 9H API No. 42-055-35096 Ganvood Unit 1 H API No. 42-055-35016 Komfiiehrer I H API No. 42-055-35017 Komhrer 2W API No. 42-055-35092 Komfizehrer 3M API No. 42-055-35082 Leyendecker I HR APE No. 42-055-35086 Lcyendecker, RI. 3W API No. 42-055-35067 Young III API No. 42-055-35069 Young 2W API No. 42-055-35083 Young 3W