FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. January 8, 2013

Similar documents
March 20, Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission th St., S.W. Washington, D.C

O!nngress nf tqe 1ltnite~ B'aslfington, 20515

Willard receives federal Universal Service Fund ( USF ) support as a cost company, not a price cap company.

Thank you for your time and leadership on this critical issue.

Farm Credit Administration 1501 Farm Credit Drive McLean, VA Fax: (703) Online FOIA Request Form

STATE MEMBERS OF THE FEDERAL-STATE JOINT BOARD ON UNIVERSAL SERVICE

Idaho Voters Pamphlet Concerning Proposed Constitutional Amendment HJR 5. General Election

Federal Communications Commission DA Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ORDER

The Honorable Phil Mendelson Chairman Council ofthe District of Columbia 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Suite 410 Washington, D.C.

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

The National Congress of American Indians Resolution #SAC

Federal Communications Commission

II GreenbergTraurig VIA ELECTRONIC FILING. April 18, 2013

House Energy and Commerce Committee House Energy and Commerce Committee 2185 Rayburn House Office Building 237 Cannon House Office Building

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Adopted: August 2, 2010 Released: August 2, 2010

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Adopted: October 7, 2008 Released: October 7, 2008

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER

Please contact Mark Merry at (850) or if you have any questions.

Please contact Kim Holland at (850) or if you have any questions.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. v. ) NOTICE OF ERRATA TO PETITION FOR REVIEW

USDA. Office of the Secretary Washington, D.C

Department of Justice (DOJ) Response to Congressman Lamar Smith regarding Executive Order and status of INTERPOL in the United States, 2010

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION P.O. BOX 3265, HARRISBURG, PA June 23, 2016

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 12 th Floor Washington, D.C October 30, 2014

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF XO COMMUNICATIONS, LLC

ROANOKE VALLEY BROADBAND AUTHORITY P.O. Box 2569, Roanoke, VA

LOCAL NUMBER PORTABILITY

ROY C. MAYO, III CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF AMHERST

SUMNER SQUARE M STREET, N.W. SUITE 400 WASHINGTON, D.C } FACSIMILE: 1202} March 7, 2014

The Federal Communications Commission: Current Structure and Its Role in the Changing Telecommunications Landscape

PCAOB. its reviews in conformance with Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.

Dear Chairman Thune, Ranking Member Nelson, Chairman Shuster, and Ranking Member DeFazio:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA HARRISBURG September 6,2012

COMMENTS OF THE NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

CHAPTER 1 TITLE, INTENT AND PURPOSE

June 30, 2011 in Courtroom B 2101 N. Lincoln Blvd., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Before Maribeth D. Snapp, Administrative Law Judge

Before The Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS ADVOCATE Suite 1102, Commerce Building 300 North Second Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101

Review of Foreign Ownership Policies for Broadcast, Common Carrier and Aeronautical

CHARLES L. FRALEY, III CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF GILES REPORT ON AUDIT

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Fund. lilnited

veri on May 6, 2013 Ex Parte Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 lih Street, SW Washington, DC 20554

AMENDMENT NO. 2. to the INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT. between

October 25, Dear Chairman Nadler and Ranking Member Franks:

FCC ARMIS REPORTS - Instructions December 2004 Page 1 of 12

FCC BROADBAND JURISDICTION: THE PSTN TRANSITION IN AN ERA OF CONGRESSIONAL PARALYSIS. Russell Lukas April 4, 2013

The Federal Communications Commission: Current Structure and Its Role in the Changing Telecommunications Landscape

response to query from The House Committee on Financial Services re agency staffing, 2012

Agenda Item 2A: Federal Advocacy Letters AGENDA ITEM 2A

INDEPENDENT REGULATORY REVIEW COMMISSION 333 MARKET STREET, 1 4TH FLOOR, HARRISBURG, PA September 14, 2005

March 17, Commissioner Lancaster arrived after the start of the meeting at 7:03 P.M. Commissioner Harry L. Foy, Jr. arrived at 7:04 P.M.

Case 1:10-cr RJD Document 1 *SEALED* Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 1

PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT COUNCIL

Regulatory Commission of Alaska. December 27, 2017

CITY OF SANIBEL RESOLUTION APPROVING BUDGET AMENDMENT/TRANSFER NO AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE

TOP SECRET!/COMOO'//NO.i'ORN

<--~RA~MC.USC~G

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Congress made clear its intention that these process improvements should be more ministerial than substantive and generally uncontroversial.

CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT

STATE OF MICHIGAN. At the July 17,2000 meeting of the Michigan Public Service Commission in Lansing,

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

Capitol Hill 101 Government Relations Issue Briefing and Hill Visits Review

James Inhofe Senate Republican Oklahoma Russell Senate Office Building

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC No

tinitnl ~tatrs ~rnatr WASHINGTON, DC 20510

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

*** NTA Alert *** ~Refuge From Cruel Trapping 1081~

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON

MINUTES JOINT COMMITTEE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2701

United Spinal Association Webinar Series

Control Number : Item Number : 279. Addendum StartPage : 0

Adopted: November 19, 1998 Released: November 20, By the Commission: Commissioner Furchtgott-Roth dissenting and issuing a statement.

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER. Adopted: September 5, 2017 Released: September 8, 2017

Re: "Final" EPA Chlorpyrifos, Diazinon, and Malathion Biological Evaluations Released on January 18, 2017

PUBLIC LANDS LEGISLATION WITH CONSERVATION, RECREATION,

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2626

Federal Update for the Alaska Municipal League. August 2018

REGULATION NO. 3 ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY COMMISSION LICENSING OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATORS

CLOSED CIVIL CASE. Case 1:09-cv DLG Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2010 Page 1 of 10

Florida ABLE, Inc. Direct-Support Organization Disclosure 2016 June 27, 2016

Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

201!NOV 29 P fcl3. REVIEW cqjffljnssion. INDEPEND^FREGtlLA TORY. (1) Agency: Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission th St., S.W. Washington, D.C

Please ensure that your response to the checklist, including any payment of the fee (if not submitted),

HART WAGNER^ TRIAL ATTORNEYS

29th Annual Institute on Telecommunications Policy & Regulation

u.s. Department of Justice

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 57 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 6, 2015 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 26, Introduced by Assembly Member Quirk.

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2701

September 1 3, Via Hand Delivery

The Staff and The Sword Ministry. LETTERS TO THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (1979 to 2008)

H.R. XX (Huffman, D-CA) The Public Lands Telecommunications Act HR XX (Eshoo, D-CA) Community Broadband Act of 2016

%WT INDEPENDENT REGULATORY REVIEW COMMISSION 333 MARKET STREET, 14TH FLOOR, HARRISBURG, PA 17101

Transcription:

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION JULIUS GENACHOWSKI CHAIRMAN. The Honorable James E. Risch United States Senate 483 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator Risch: Thank you for your letter regarding the FCC's Universal Service Fund reforms. I appreciate your interest this matter and am pleased to provide the enclosed letter on this issue from the Chief ofthe Wireline Competition Bureau's Telecommunications Access Policy Division. Ifyou have any additional questions or need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. ------. Julius Genachowski Enclosure 445 12lH STREET s.w. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 202-418-1000

Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 The Honorable Jim Risch United States Senate 483 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator Risch: Thank you for your letter expressing concerns about the effect ofthe Commission's Universal Service Fund (USF) reforms on rural telecommunications providers. I want to assure you that the Commission will continue to work with all stakeholders, including rural carriers, throughout the reform process. The Commission's implementation ofthe Transformation Order continues to be guided by three key goals: expanding broadband to the millions ofunserved Americans, preserving voice and broadband service in areas that would not be served absent support, increasing fiscal responsibility and accountability in USF spending to ensure the long term sustainability ofthe Fund, and setting forth transition periods that recognize business realities. In addition as we hear from stakeholders about concerns with implementation, we will make adjustments as appropriate. For instance, on April 25, 2012, the Commission extended the transition for originating intercarrier compensation payments, a concern raised by many smaller carriers. Likewise, in the Wireline Competition Bureau's April Benchmarks Order, the Bureau revised the initially proposed high-cost loop support benchmark categories to respond to a number ofthe concerns raised by smaller carriers. In particular, the revised methodology accounts for several additional drivers ofcost in comparing spending between carriers, it takes recent investment into consideration, it extends the transition period to give carriers greater time to adjust, and it provides a streamlined process to address any concerns about the accuracy ofcarriers' data. The Commission also extended a number ofreporting deadlines for smaller carriers. Even as we continue to make necessary adjustments, the Chairman believes that it is important to keep moving forward with implementation ofthe Commission's once-in-a generation reforms and not roll back progress that we have made. As we do, the Commission and staffwill continue to run a fair, open process in which the valid concerns ofstakeholders are addressed - working closely with affected carriers to ensure that residents ofthe nation's rural

Page 2 - The Honorable Jim Risch and high-cost areas receive the quality voice and broadband services that all Americans need. I appreciate your interest in this very important matter. Please let me know ifi can be ofany further assistance. cc: The Honorable Mike Crapo The Honorable Mike Simpson The Honorable Raul Labrador 7..;8 ~f.,c.fl- Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION JULIUS GENACHOWSKI CHAIRMAN The Honorable Michael D. Crapo United States Senate.. 2J9: Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator Crapo: Thank you for your letter regarding the FCC's Universal Service Fund reforms. I appreciate your interest this matter and am pleased to provide the enclosed letter on this issue from the Chiefofthe Wireline Competition Bureau's Telecommunications Access Policy Division. Ifyou have any additional questions or need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Julius Genachowski Enclosure 445 12TH STREET s.w. WASHINGTON, D: C. 20554 202-418-1000

Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 The Honorable Mike Crapo United States Senate 239 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator Crapo: Thank you for your letter expressing concerns about the effect ofthe Commission's Universal Service Fund (USF) reforms on rural telecommunications providers. I want to assure you that the Commission will continue to work with all stakeholders, including rural carriers, throughout the reform process. The Commission's implementation ofthe Transformation Order continues to be guided by three key goals: expanding broadband to the millions ofunserved Americans, preserving voice and broadband service in areas that would not be served absent support, increasing fiscal responsibility and accountability in USF spending to ensure the long term sustainability ofthe Fund, and setting forth transition periods that recognize business realities. In addition as we hear from stakeholders about concerns with implementation, we will make adjustments as appropriate. For instance, on April 25, 2012, the Commission extended the transition for originating intercarrier compensation payments, a concern raised by many smaller carriers. Likewise, in the Wireline Competition Bureau's April Benchmarks Order, the Bureau revised the initially proposed high-cost loop support benchmark categories to respond to a number ofthe concerns raised by smaller carriers. In particular, the revised methodology accounts for several additional drivers ofcost in comparing spending between carriers, it takes recent investment into consideration, it extends the transition period to give carriers greater time to adjust, and it provides a streamlined process to address any concerns about the accuracy ofcarriers' data. The Commission also extended a number ofreporting deadlines for smaller carriers. Even as we continue to make necessary adjustments, the Chairman believes that it is important to keep moving forward with implementation ofthe Commission's once-in-a generation reforms and not roll back progress that we have made. As we do, the Commission and staff will continue to run a fair, open process in which the valid concerns ofstakeholders are addressed - working closely with affected carriers to ensure that residents ofthe nation's rural

Page 2 - The Honorable Mike Crapo and high-cost areas receive the quality voice and broadband services that all Americans need. I appreciate your interest in this very important matter. Please let me know ifi can be ofany further assistance. cc: The Honorable Jim Risch The Honorable Mike Simpson The Honorable Raul Labrador - /~~!Cl _ Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 0uLlUS GENACHOWSKI CHAIRMAN.The Honorable Raul Labrador U.S. House ofrepresentatives 1523 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Ladrador: Thank you for your letter regarding the FCC's Universal Service Fund reforms. I appreciate your interest this matter and am pleased to provide the enclosed letter on this issue from the Chiefofthe Wireline Competition Bureau's Telecommunications Access Policy Division. If you have any additional questions or need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. ~---_.. Julius Genachowski Enclosure 445 12lH STREET S.W. WASHINGTON. D.C. 20554 202-418-\000

Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 The Honorable Raul Labrador U. S. House ofrepresentatives 1523 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Labrador: Thank you for your letter expressing concerns about the effect ofthe Commission's Universal Service Fund (USF) reforms on rural telecommunications providers. I want to assure you that the Commission will continue to work with all stakeholders, including rural carriers, throughout the reform process. The Commission's implementation ofthe Transformation Order continues to be guided by three key goals: expanding broadband to the millions ofunserved Americans, preserving voice and broadband service in areas that would not be served absent support, increasing fiscal responsibility and accountability in USF spending to ensure the long term sustainability ofthe Fund, and setting forth transition periods that recognize business realities. In addition as we hear from stakeholders about concerns with implementation, we will make adjustments as appropriate. For instance, on April 25, 2012, the Commission extended the transition for originating intercarrier compensation payments, a concern raised by many smaller carriers. Likewise, in the Wireline Competition Bureau's April Benchmarks Order, the Bureau revised the initially proposed high-cost loop support benchmark categories to respond to a number ofthe concerns raised by smaller carriers. In particular, the revised methodology accounts for several additional drivers ofcost in comparing spending between carriers, it takes recent investment into consideration, it extends the transition period to give carriers greater time to adjust, and it provides a streamlined process to address any concerns about the accuracy of carriers' data. The Commission also extended a number ofreporting deadlines for smaller carriers. Even as we continue to make necessary adjustments, the Chairman believes that it is important to keep moving forward with implementation ofthe Commission's once-in-a generation reforms and not roll back progress that we have made. As we do, the Commission and staff will continue to run a fair, open process in which the valid concerns ofstakeholders are addressed - working closely with affected carriers to ensure that residents ofthe nation's rural

Page 2 - The Honorable Raul Labrador and high-cost areas receive the quality voice and broadband services that au Americans need. I appreciate your interest in this very important matter. Please let me know ifi can be ofany further assistance. Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau cc: The Honorable Jim Risch The Honorable Mike Crapo The Honorable Mike Simpson

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION JULIUS GENACHOWSKI CHAIRMAN The Honorable Mike Simpson U.S. House ofrepresentatives '2) 12 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Simpson: Thank you for your letter regarding the FCC's Universal Service Fund reforms. I appreciate your interest this matter and am pleased to provide the enclosed letter on this issue from the Chiefofthe Wireline Competition Bureau's Telecommunications Access Policy Division. Ifyou have any additional questions or need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. ------. Julius Genachowski Enclosure 445 12TH STREET S.W. WASHINGTON. D.C. 20554 202-418-1000

Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 The Honorable Mike Simpson U. S. House ofrepresentatives 2312 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Simpson: Thank you for your letter expressing concerns about the effect ofthe Commission's Universal Service Fund (USF) reforms on rural telecommunications providers. I want to assure you that the Commission will continue to work with all stakeholders, including rural carriers, throughout the reform process. The Commission's implementation ofthe Transformation Order continues to be guided by three key goals: expanding broadband to the millions ofunserved Americans, preserving voice and broadband service in areas that would not be served absent support, increasing fiscal responsibility and accountability in USF spending to ensure the long term sustainability ofthe Fund, and setting forth transition periods that recognize business realities. In addition as we hear from stakeholders about concerns with implementation, we will make adjustments as appropriate. For instance, on April 25, 2012, the Commission extended the transition for originating intercarrier compensation payments, a concern raised by many smaller carriers. Likewise, in the Wireline Competition Bureau's April Benchmarks Order, the Bureau revised the initially proposed high-cost loop support benchmark categories to respond to a number ofthe concerns raised by smaller carriers. In particular, the revised methodology accounts for several additional drivers ofcost in comparing spending between carriers, it takes recent investment into consideration, it extends the transition period to give carriers greater time to adjust, and it provides a streamlined process to address any concerns about the accuracy ofcarriers' data. The Commission also extended a number ofreporting deadlines for smaller carriers. Even as we continue to make necessary adjustments, the Chairman believes that it is important to keep moving forward with implementation ofthe Commission's once-in-a generation reforms and not roll back progress that we have made. As we do, the Commission and staff will continue to run a fair, open process in which the valid concerns ofstakeholders are addressed - working closely with affected carriers to ensure that residents ofthe nation's rural

Page 2 - The Honorable Mike Simpson and high-cost areas receive the quality voice and broadband services that all Americans need. I appreciate your interest in this very important matter. Please let me know ifi can be ofany further assistance. cc: The Honorable Jim Risch The Honorable Mike Crapo The Honorable Raul Labrador Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau