Case 3:14-cv ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MARION COUNTY

Case fra Doc 3 Filed 11/21/13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Adv. Proc. No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON COMPLAINT

Case 6:18-cv MC Document 1 Filed 01/04/18 Page 1 of 12

Case tmr Doc 1 Filed 02/18/13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:18-cv SB Document 1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 1 of 20

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:13-cv JE Document 1 Filed 12/20/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv AC Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 15-CV-1588

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:15-cv SAC-KGS Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 3:18-cv RV-CJK Document 1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Civil Case Number:

Case 1:13-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

2:15-cv LJM-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 01/14/15 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 6:16-cv AA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2018 Page 1 of 10. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 8:17-cv CEH-JSS Document 1 Filed 08/09/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1

2/13/ :36 PM 19CV07131 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT. Negligence FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/18 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 46 Filed 04/06/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 6:17-cv EFM-GEB Document 1 Filed 07/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:18-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff,

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:12-cv L-BH Document 43 Filed 04/29/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID 611

Case 3:17-cv SB Document 7 Filed 05/01/17 Page 1 of 16

Case 3:18-cv AC Document 1 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 17

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/04/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/28/2018 Page 1 of 13

Case 6:12-cv TC Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#: 1

Case 2:18-cv KJM-DB Document 1 Filed 09/21/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:08-cv JHR -KMW Document 37 Filed 05/04/09 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 222 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 08/18/17 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:11-cv CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE NO.

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 18 Filed: 02/01/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:365

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

Case 3:12-cv PK Document 1 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID#: 1

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:15-cv MDH Document 1 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:18-cv BAJ-RLB Document 1 08/17/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Southern District Court Case No. 1:13-cv Lardner v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. Document 42.

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO : : : : : : : : : : :

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Complaint

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case: 4:15-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/11/15 1 of 18. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11. Deadline

Case 9:11-cv KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7/19/2018 6:06 PM 18CV30704 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Plaintiff WOF SW GGP 1 LLC alleges as follows:

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1

Case 3:16-cv CRS Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2016

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Adv. Proc. No. COMPLAINT

CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

1/1/2019 4:52 PM 19CV00011 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

10/18/ :38 AM 18CV47218 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT.

Transcription:

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 1 Eric Olsen, Oregon Bar No. 783261 Lead Trial Attorney for Mr. Fuller David Johnson, Oregon Bar No. 123553 Of Attorneys for Mr. Fuller eolsen@olsendaines.com 503-362-9393 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION MICHAEL FULLER, a Portland consumer, v. Plaintiff, LA FITNESS aka Fitness International, LLC, a Delaware company, Case No. 3:14-cv-252 UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT 28 USC 2201(a) ORS 646.636 ORS 646.638 Demand for Jury Trial Defendant. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 1

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 2 of 13 Page ID#: 2 1. JURISDICTION AND THE PARTIES This Honorable Court has jurisdiction over this civil action pursuant to 28 USC 1332 because true diversity of citizenship exists between the Parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. 2. This is an action for actual or statutory damages, punitive damages, declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney fees and costs brought by Michael Fuller (Mr. Fuller) against Fitness International, LLC (LA Fitness). 3. From October 7, 2013, to the date of this Complaint, Mr. Fuller has lived at his home in Portland and has been a person as defined at ORS 646.605(4). 4. From October 7, 2013, to the date of this Complaint, LA Fitness has been a Delaware company that has operated a gym at 1400 NW Northrup Street in Portland. 5. From October 7, 2013, to the date of this Complaint, LA Fitness has regularly operated its Portland gym and has been a person as defined at ORS 646.605(4). 6. Venue is proper in this district because Mr. Fuller s billing information was provided here, Mr. Fuller lives here and LA Fitness operates its gym here. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 2

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 3 of 13 Page ID#: 3 7. LA FITNESS AGREES TO COLLECT ITS DUES AUTOMATICALLY On or around October 7, 2013, Mr. Fuller gave LA Fitness his billing information and agreed to pay its $29.99 monthly membership dues. 8. LA Fitness agreed to automatically collect its monthly dues from Mr. Fuller via electronic funds transfer. 9. The billing information Mr. Fuller gave LA Fitness in October was completely accurate and current. 10. Mr. Fuller gave LA Fitness his billing information for an American Express card, with an account number ending in 6289, and with an expiration date of 10/16. 11. From October 7, 2013, to the date of this Complaint, the American Express card has always been active. 12. From October 7, 2013, to the date of this Complaint, the American Express card always had available credit to pay LA Fitness s monthly dues. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 3

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 4 of 13 Page ID#: 4 13. MONTH #1 On October 7, 2013, LA Fitness successfully accessed the billing information Mr. Fuller provided it and charged him $59.98 for its first and last month s dues. 14. MONTH #2 On November 7, 2013, LA Fitness failed to automatically collect its dues from Mr. Fuller as it had agreed. 15. Instead, LA Fitness harassed Mr. Fuller repeatedly in the morning on his work phone. 16. LA Fitness s collectors blitzed Mr. Fuller s work phone, using multiple agents from across the country to call him simultaneously. 17. When LA Fitness called, Mr. Fuller confirmed his American Express billing information, which matched the information LA Fitness already had on file. 18. On or around November 8, 2013, LA Fitness successfully accessed the billing information Mr. Fuller had originally provided it and collected its $29.99 dues. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 4

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 5 of 13 Page ID#: 5 19. MONTH #3 The next month, on December 7, 2013, LA Fitness again failed to automatically collect its dues from Mr. Fuller. 20. Again, LA Fitness harassed Mr. Fuller repeatedly in the morning on his work phone. 21. Again, Mr. Fuller confirmed his American Express billing information, which again matched the information LA Fitness already had on file. 22. On December 10, 2013, LA Fitness successfully accessed the billing information Mr. Fuller originally provided it and collected its $29.99 dues. 23. LA Fitness would not give Mr. Fuller the reason why it failed to access his American Express card through electronic funds transfer on December 7. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 5

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 6 of 13 Page ID#: 6 24. MONTH #4 For the third month in a row, in January 2014, LA Fitness harassed Mr. Fuller repeatedly in the morning on his work phone. 25. Mr. Fuller again confirmed his American Express billing information. 26. As in November and December 2013, Mr. Fuller s confirmed billing information matched the information LA Fitness already had on file. 27. Mr. Fuller explained his frustration to LA Fitness and asked it to stop needlessly harassing him each month. 28. On January 10, 2014, LA Fitness successfully accessed the billing information Mr. Fuller originally provided it and collected its $29.99 dues, and an additional $5.00 fee. 29. Mr. Fuller protested the additional fee and replied to an email LA Fitness sent him, asking it to explain why it was not automatically accessing his American Express billing information as it had previously agreed to. 30. LA Fitness refused to answer Mr. Fuller s email and refunded the fees it collected. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 6

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 7 of 13 Page ID#: 7 31. MONTH #5 For the fourth month in a row, in February 2014, LA Fitness again harassed Mr. Fuller repeatedly in the morning on his work phone. 32. As in November, December, and January, Mr. Fuller confirmed his American Express billing information, and it matched the information LA Fitness already had on file. 33. On February 12, 2014, LA Fitness successfully accessed the billing information Mr. Fuller provided it and collected its $29.99 dues, plus another $5.00 fee. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 7

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 8 of 13 Page ID#: 8 34. LA FITNESS CHOSE TO PLAY THE ODDS The fees charged by LA Fitness were unfair because its failure to timely access Mr. Fuller s billing information via electronic funds transfer was its own choice. 35. The fees charged by LA Fitness were unfair because the billing information originally provided by Mr. Fuller on or around October 7, 2013, always turned out to be accurate and current. 36. The fees charged by LA Fitness were unfair because it continued to charge the fees even after it learned the fees were not authorized. 37. On various occasions from November 2013 to February 2014, Mr. Fuller tried to resolve this matter without the need for a lawsuit. 38. However, LA Fitness s collectors continue to blitz Mr. Fuller s work phone each month and charge him unfair fees. 39. Having no other choice, Mr. Fuller must now prosecute LA Fitness to make things right. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 8

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 9 of 13 Page ID#: 9 40. REQUEST FOR COURT ORDER LA Fitness continues to charge Mr. Fuller unfair fees and will not stop harassing him on his work phone. 41. Mr. Fuller respectfully requests that this Honorable Court issue an order recognizing that LA Fitness was not authorized to charge Mr. Fuller its fees. 42. Further, Mr. Fuller respectfully requests that this Honorable Court issue an order prohibiting LA Fitness from harassing him on his work phone in the future. 43. FAIR COMPENSATION As a direct result of LA Fitness s unfair trade practices as alleged above, Mr. Fuller has suffered actual damages, including economic loss (periodic loss of use of funds collected to pay unauthorized fees), time distracted while at work, expenses, and severe and ongoing frustration. 44. LA Fitness s repeated morning calls to Mr. Fuller s work phone are inappropriate and constitute harassment. 45. Mr. Fuller requests fair and just compensation from LA Fitness. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 9

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 10 of 13 Page ID#: 10 46. PUNITIVE DAMAGES Mr. Fuller requests LA Fitness pay punitive damages. 47. LA Fitness chose to ignore its repeated billing failures, hoping to profit on a large scale by playing the odds that no consumer would take the time to file a formal complaint. 48. LA Fitness s choice to secretly profit on unauthorized fees stood to give it an unfair advantage over other gyms that choose to do business honestly. 49. Further, LA Fitness s repeated harassment and unauthorized fees constitute a pattern of unfair practices, and violate the standards of business practices deemed acceptable in Mr. Fuller s community. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 10

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 11 of 13 Page ID#: 11 50. CAUSES OF ACTION FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Unfair Trade Practices) (ORS 646.638) Mr. Fuller re-alleges the above paragraphs by reference. 51. LA Fitness injured Mr. Fuller through its willful and malicious use of unfair trade practices as detailed above, specifically violating 646.608(1)(k) and (u). 52. As a result of LA Fitness s willful and malicious use of unfair trade practices, Mr. Fuller suffered ascertainable economic loss (periodic loss of use of funds collected to pay unauthorized fees), expenses and emotional harm, and is entitled actual or statutory damages, punitive damages, and reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to ORS 646.638. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 11

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 12 of 13 Page ID#: 12 53. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Declaratory Relief) Mr. Fuller re-alleges the above paragraphs by reference. 54. Pursuant to ORS 646.636 and 28 USC 2201(a), Mr. Fuller is entitled to and so requests an order and judgment recognizing that LA Fitness was not authorized to charge Mr. Fuller its fees. 55. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Injunctive Relief) Mr. Fuller re-alleges the above paragraphs by reference. 56. Pursuant to ORS 646.636, Mr. Fuller is entitled to and so requests an order prohibiting LA Fitness from harassing him on his work phone in the future. 57. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 12

Case 3:14-cv-00252-ST Document 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 13 of 13 Page ID#: 13 WHEREFORE, Mr. Fuller requests order and judgment against LA Fitness as follows: A. For a declaratory order and judgment pursuant to ORS 646.636 and 28 USC 2201(a) as requested in paragraph 54; B. For an order providing injunctive relief pursuant to ORS 646.636 as requested in paragraph 56; C. For judgment awarding Mr. Fuller actual or statutory damages; D. For judgment awarding Mr. Fuller punitive damages; E. For judgment awarding Mr. Fuller attorney fees and costs; and F. For such other and further relief as this Honorable Court may deem just and proper. DATED: February 14, 2014 s/ David Johnson David Johnson, Oregon Bar No. 123553 Of Attorneys for Mr. Fuller djohnson@olsendaines.com 503-362-9393 UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES COMPLAINT - Page 13