Case 2:12-cv TSZ Document 21 Filed 08/06/12 Page 1 of 5 The Honorable Mary Alice Theiler

Similar documents
PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO THE DEFENDANT. Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs ArrivalStar S.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2015 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:15-cv LMB-JFA Document 37 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 374

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. For its answer to the Complaint, Defendants James Allen Diamonds, Inc.

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 9 Filed: 04/11/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:218

Case3:12-cv VC Document46 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 5

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S REPLY TO THE COUNTERCLAIMS OF GOOGLE INC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-1294 v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION. Plaintiff(s), Defendant(s).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION

Case 2:16-cv MAT Document 10 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Plaintiff.

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv TSZ Document 15 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:13-cv BJR Document 12 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 38 Filed: 01/13/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:167 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv SLR Document 12 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Judge:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1

Case3:12-cv VC Document21 Filed06/09/14 Page1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv CMH-TCB Document 25 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 159

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv DBP Document 26 Filed 03/24/15 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant Midwest Industrial Supply, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

Case 2:13-cv MJP Document 19 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 203 Filed 02/12/2008 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:16-cv JCC Document 9 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 21 Filed: 03/05/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:14-cv WYD-MEH Document 26 Filed 07/17/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION V. A-13-CA-359 LY

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document 2 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 14. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:13-cv DRH-SCW Document 13 Filed 04/11/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #311

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Northern Ill.'s New Local Patent Rules

Case 8:10-cv JDW-EAJ Document 86 Filed 05/25/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID 913

Case 2:16-cv RSM Document 60 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 8 Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez

Case 2:17-cv JCC Document 120 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 2

Case 1:13-cv SS Document 1 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv TC Document 163 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:08-cv JEB Document 50 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:06-cv DFH-TAB Document 11 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:09-cv GCS-MKM Document 24 Filed 12/22/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:13-cv FDS Document 57 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2015 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:15-cv RSL Document 88 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ) ) ) ) Plaintiff Mohamed A. Hussein ( Plaintiff ), by his attorneys and on behalf of all others

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:12-cv TSZ Document 33 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Transcription:

Case 2:12-cv-00977-TSZ Document 21 Filed 08/06/12 Page 1 of 5 The Honorable Mary Alice Theiler UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, v. Plaintiffs, CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendants. ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS JURY DEMAND Plaintiffs ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited, by and through its counsel, answer the Defendant Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority s counterclaims as follows: PARTIES 1. Admit. 2. Admit. 3. Admit. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. Admit. 5. Admit. 6. Admit. ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS - 1

Case 2:12-cv-00977-TSZ Document 21 Filed 08/06/12 Page 2 of 5 ACTUAL CASE AND CONTROVERSY 7. Admit. 8. Admit. 9. Admit. 10. Admit that the controversy should be promptly adjudicated, otherwise deny. COUNT I: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT 11. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference their response to the foregoing paragraphs. 12. Deny. 13. Deny. 14. Deny. 15. Deny. 16. Admit that Defendant requests a declaratory judgment, otherwise deny. COUNT II: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF PATENT INVALIDITY 17. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference their response to the foregoing paragraphs. 18. Deny. 19. Deny. 20. Deny. 21. Deny. 22. Admit that Defendant requests a declaratory judgment, otherwise deny. COUNT III: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF PATENT UNENFORCEABILITY 23. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference their response to the foregoing paragraphs. 24. Admit that Plaintiffs have asserted their patent rights in over 25 lawsuits and have licensed the 781 patent to over 66 separate entities, otherwise deny. 25. Deny. 26. Admit that Defendant requests a declaratory judgment, otherwise deny. ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS - 2

Case 2:12-cv-00977-TSZ Document 21 Filed 08/06/12 Page 3 of 5 COUNT IV: VIOLATION OF WASHINGTON UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, RCW 19.86.020 27. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference their response to the foregoing paragraphs. 28. Admit that Plaintiffs have asserted their patent rights in over 25 lawsuits and have licensed the 781 patent to over 66 separate entities, otherwise deny. 29. Deny. 30. Deny. 31. Deny. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Plaintiffs assert the following affirmative defense in response to Defendant s counterclaims. Plaintiffs reserve the right to allege additional affirmative defenses as they become known through the discovery process. 1. Defendant s counterclaims fail to state a basis upon which relief can be granted. 2. Defendant s assertions of non-infringement and invalidity set forth in the counterclaims are insufficient because they are asserted without a factual basis or a showing of plausibility as required by Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009). requested. 3. Defendant s unclean hands due to its acts of infringement preclude the relief PRAYER FOR RELIEF THEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that Defendant be denied the relief requested in its counterclaims and that Plaintiffs are granted the relief set forth in their complaint. ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS - 3

Case 2:12-cv-00977-TSZ Document 21 Filed 08/06/12 Page 4 of 5 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 6 th day of August, 2012. s/david A. Lowe, WSBA No. 24,453 Lowe@LoweGrahamJones.com LOWE GRAHAM JONES PLLC 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, Washington 98104 T: 206.381.3300 F: 206.381.3301 Geoffrey D. Smith (admitted Pro Hac Vice) gsmith@dowellbaker.com Anthony E. Dowell, (admitted Pro Hac Vice) aedowell@dowellbaker.com DOWELL BAKER, P.C. 201 Main St., Suite 710 Lafayette, IN 47901 T: 765. 429.4004 F: 765. 429.4114 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS - 4

Case 2:12-cv-00977-TSZ Document 21 Filed 08/06/12 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was electronically filed through the CM/ECF system, which will provide email notification to counsel of record listed below: Brian C. Park BCPark@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 600 University Street, Suite 3600 Seattle, WA 98101 Nathan C. Brunette NCBrunette@stoel.com 900 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600 Portland, OR 97204 s/caitlin Blazier Kavanagh ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS - 5