Aarhus Convention and Nuclear

Similar documents
EN S REG TRANSPARENCY PROTECTION COMPETENCE CONTROL INDEPENDENCE COOPERATION REGULATION. Second Regulatory Conference Brussels, June 2013

Practical examples on the application of the Convention to nuclear energy-related activities

Draft Resolution. Risk and safety assessments ( stress tests ) of nuclear power plant in the European Union and related activities

UJD SR Practices in Communicating with Public

Legal Framework for Public Participation (General Overview)

ENEF European Nuclear Energy Forum Patricia Lorenz Antinuclear Campaigner

L ASN. its roles, key figures, its organisation

HERCA-WENRA approach for better cross-border coordination of protective actions during the early phase of a nuclear accident

Economic and Social Council

Implementation of the EU Directive and its potential generalisation worldwide. Speaking Points

Summary Report. September Workshop rapporteurs: Adeline Clos and Patrick Majerus

EIA Temelin 3 and 4 no public participation possible for German public

Continuous shared learning and improvement of nuclear safety and regulatory organisations through the OECD/NEA

Economic and Social Council

STATEMENT REPUBLIC OF POLAND. delivered by Mr Andrzej Przybycin. to the 62. General Conference

Statement on behalf of Hungary. Ms Andrea Beatrix Kádár

Convention on Nuclear Safety

The Global Safety Regime

On behalf of the State, the ASN regulates nuclear safety and radiation protection, in order to protect workers, patients, the public and the

English - Or. English NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY NUCLEAR LAW COMMITTEE

Social Convergence in the EU

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Council Decision

4. The Task force meeting adopted the provisional agenda prepared by the secretariat (AC.6 Informal document No.13).

Economic and Social Council

Republic of Croatia. Zagreb, May 2012

6 th Review Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Nuclear Safety. 24 March 4 April 2014 Vienna, Austria.

Page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Future Policy for Radiological Protection

Economic and Social Council

Les Entretiens européens in Poland :

CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY TEXT

Legal Framework for Nuclear Safety (General Overview)

7 th Review Meeting of the Contracting Parties to The Convention on Nuclear Safety. 27 March 7 April 2017 Vienna, Austria.

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo, 1991)

Economic and Social Council

Call for Participants. Municipalities Options towards Integration of Refugees and Social Cohesion November 2018, Istanbul, Turkey

Agenda Item 9 CX/EURO 02/9

Trip Report. Meeting Objectives:

Strategic Plan Co-funded by the European Union GRZEGORZ CZAJKA

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

What is Social Platform?

9th Meeting of the Carpathian Convention Working Group on Sustainable Tourism Septembrie 2017 DRAFT MEETING REPORT

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of establishing the list of supporting documents to be presented by visa applicants in Ireland

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

EU-UKRAINE PARLIAMENTARY COOPERATION COMMITTEE. Sixteenth Meeting March Brussels. Co-Chairmen: Mr. Pawel KOWAL and Mr Borys TARASYUK

The Universal Periodic Review- Handbook

Council of the European Union Brussels, 15 October 2015 (OR. en)

OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY

FINAL REPORT OF THE BANKING ENLARGEMENT PROJECT A social dialogue within an enlarged Europe

Economic and Social Council

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

EU Regulatory Developments

Economic and Social Council

Migration: Global challenges, European responses

SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS EXPERT GROUP MEETING ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCILS

National Regulatory Infrastructure Organizational Structure of French ASN. November 9th 2010 Organizational Structure of French ASN 1

ACT No of 13 June 2006 on Transparency and Security in the Nuclear Field

It is a special honor for me and pleasure to respond to your invitation and to address you today, as GFMD Co-Chair on behalf of Germany.

RESTRICTED. COUNCIL Original: English/ 12 May 1993 French/ Spanish

Study on the Implementation of Article 9.3 and 9.4 of the Aarhus Convention in 17 of the Member States of the European Union

6956/16 MN/IC/ra DGC 2A

Coordinated Supervision of Eurodac. Activity Report

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

International Nuclear Law Essentials. Programme

2. The table in the Annex outlines the declarations received by the General Secretariat of the Council and their status to date.

ERCC. Coordination and Cooperation. 15 February 2016

CONVENTION ON EARLY NOTIFICATION OF A NUCLEAR ACCIDENT* CONVENTION ON ASSISTANCE IN THE CASE OF A NUCLEAR ACCIDENT OR RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY*

EUROPEAN COUNCIL COMMON STRATEGY ON UKRAINE Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, in particular Article 13(2) thereof,

THE EEAS COMING OF AGE:

CONCLUSIONS. of the. Meeting of the Foreign Affairs Committees of the Parliaments of the Visegrad Group Countries February 2019

Addressing threats to nature in the Carpathian Mountains

Identification of the respondent: Fields marked with * are mandatory.

Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES 2019

Executive Summary of Self-Evaluation Report

2 nd Extraordinary Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Nuclear Safety August 2012 Vienna, Austria. Final Summary Report

Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union. Act of Accession and its Annexes

Limited THE EUROPEAN UNION, hereinafter referred to as the "Union" THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA, THE CZECH REPUBLIC,

International Nuclear Law Essentials. Programme

Overview of Public Participation for Nuclear Power Plant in China

Statement of. Dr. József Rónaky Director General of the Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority,

NATIONAL ROMA PLATFORM

The EU Macro-regional Strategies relevant for Western Balkans, with specific Focus on the Environmental Issues

REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON THE MEDICRIME CONVENTION SINGLE POINTS OF CONTACT

Public Participation in the Nuclear Field in Japan

Public Hearing on the implementation of EU policies for youth employment: a civil society perspective

Consultation EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Contribution from Local Government Denmark. About Local Government Denmark

I ntroduction to Nuclear Law

Vienna Declaration on Nuclear Safety

ASN ACTIONS RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCIES

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 21 May /08 ADD 1 ASIM 39 COAFR 150 COEST 101

Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Ukraine

Empowerment through Participation

CULTURE AND DEMOCRACY FRAMEWORK INDICATORS FOLLOW UP TO THE LAUNCH EVENT

By Ivan Ivanov, ERIO s Executive Director

European Union. Statement on the occasion of the 62 nd General Conference of the IAEA

ECE/MP.EIA/2017/4 ECE/MP.EIA/SEA/2017/4. Economic and Social Council

Transcription:

European Economic and Social Committee Aarhus Convention and Nuclear European Roundtable "Aarhus Convention implementation in the context of Nuclear Safety" 4-5 December, 2012, Brussels European Economic and Social Committee, Room VMA3, rue Van Maerlant, 2, 1040 BRUSSELS Organised by the ANCCLI and the European Commission (DG ENER), with the support of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) and the French Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) Context of the Roundtable Speaking languages: English, French, German Announcement The Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters was signed in 1998 by the EC and all the EU member states. That same year, the Committee of the Regions adopted a resolution on nuclear safety and the local and regional democracy. These two documents mark a strong political and legal recognition of access to information and participation in the nuclear field. More than ten years later, how are these principles implemented in a practical way? It is the purpose of the Aarhus Convention and Nuclear (ACN) initiative to assess this implementation and to identify in the different countries involved pathways of progress. This is done through European and national pluralistic roundtables involving civil society and policy makers. Since September 2009, the European Commission and the National Association of Local Information Commissions and Committees (ANCCLI) have opened a European space for dialogue on the practical implementation of the Aarhus Convention in the nuclear field, notably 1

in partnership with the European Forum of Nuclear Energy (ENEF) and the French Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development. This space is open to national initiatives. Several national roundtables were implemented in the Member States of the European Union as well as in Ukraine. The European Commission and the ANCCLI also organized European Roundtables on thematic issues, in partnership with organizations involved in the ACN initiative. The first European Roundtable was held in April 2010 on the Practical Implementation of the Aarhus Convention in the field of radioactive waste management. The second Roundtable addressed issues of access to expertise and capacity building and was held in January 2011. The third Roundtable took place in February 2012 and focused on issues of preparation and management of nuclear and post-nuclear emergencies. Instances of the Aarhus Convention to the United Nations (UNECE, Geneva) are associated with this work, including through cooperation with the working group of the Aarhus Convention on public participation. Nuclear Safety, a major concern in the post-fukushima context The Fukushima accident has raised, all over the world, the societal awareness of the risks and catastrophic potential entailed by civil nuclear activities and of the imperious necessity to reach and maintain a high level of nuclear safety. The Stress Tests on the European nuclear activities have been developed in this perspective. There is now a wide range of public and governmental attitudes towards the role of nuclear power. However, vigilance on nuclear safety will remain a topical issue whatever is the position of each Member State vis-à-vis the nuclear energy, even in the countries having decided to phase out, for they will have to undertake decommissioning activities for decades and radioactive waste management on the long term. Nuclear safety does not only entail a high commitment of the nuclear operators and safety authorities but also an actual engagement and vigilance of the civil society in the follow up of the safety of nuclear activities as stated by the terms of the Aarhus Convention. Following the nuclear accident in Fukushima, the European Commission and the European Nuclear Safety Regulators' Group (ENSREG) agreed on 25 May 2011 on voluntary tests for the EU's 143 nuclear power reactors. The assessments were conducted by independent national authorities and through peer review. The tests started on 1 June 2011. The experience of European Stress Tests on Nuclear Safety has also demonstrated the relevance of the contribution of civil society to a continuous improvement and strengthening of the safety of nuclear installations. Creating the conditions and means for enabling citizens to effectively contribute to the surveillance of nuclear activities in the various contexts of European countries is an ambitious goal. There is a long way to walk in order to promote and enhance the role of civil society in European nuclear countries. On 24 April 2012, in the aftermath of the Fukushima accident and the subsequent European Stress Tests, a meeting was held at the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) in Brussels involving representatives of the EESC, the European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group (ENSREG), the Directorate General of ENERGY (DG ENER) of the European Commission, the French IRSN and the ANCCLI. At this meeting, the participants agreed on the principle of the organization of a fourth European ACN roundtable on the practical implementation of the Aarhus Convention in the context of nuclear safety. 2

Objectives of the European Roundtable The European Round Table is aiming at the identification of key issues for the implementation of the Aarhus Convention in the context of nuclear safety in Europe. The implementation of the Aarhus Convention in decisions regarding nuclear safety will be reviewed with the stakeholders in relevant contexts in Europe and notably: Along the lifecycle of nuclear installation involving various questions of nuclear safety at different stages such as planning, siting, operating, implementing major changes of the installation, extension of lifetime, closing, decommissioning and post-closure watching. Particular attention will be paid to transboundary aspects of public information and participation regarding nuclear safety (also linked with Espoo convention). Various case studies of public information and participation on decisions involving nuclear safety along the lifecycle of nuclear installations in European member states will be presented and assessed (and notably Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania, France, Hungary and Germany). In the context of the Stress Tests of Nuclear Safety implemented at national and European levels in the aftermath of the Fukushima accident. Case studies of public information and participation processes along the stress tests exercises in member states (notably in Bulgaria, France and the Slovak Republic) will be presented and assessed by the participants Expected outcomes of the European Roundtable are: A participatory assessment involving the civil society and other stakeholders of the present conditions of practical implementation of the Aarhus Convention in the context of nuclear safety (at the various stages of expertise and decision-making). The interactions between the public, the experts, the public authorities and the operators will be reviewed in this perspective. Recommendations for further improvements of Aarhus Convention implementation in the context of nuclear safety, at local, national and European levels and notably regarding: o o The practical conditions and means for an effective contribution of the civil society to the quality of decisions regarding nuclear safety in the various contexts of nuclear installations lifecycle. The contribution of the various other categories of stakeholders (experts, regulators and operators) in order to support public information and participation on the long run in the context of nuclear safety. Recommendations regarding the practical implementation of the Directive 2009/71/Euratom on the safety of nuclear installations regarding public information and participation (and more specifically the expected updates of this directive regarding nuclear transparency). 3

Agenda Speaking languages: English, French, German First Day, 4 December 2012 13:30 Welcome coffee 14:30 Introduction M. Peter FAROSS, Deputy Director General, Directorate-General for Energy, EC M. Jean-Claude DELALONDE, Chairman of the ANCCLI Ms. Ulla SIRKEINEN, Vice-President of the Section for Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society (TEN), EESC M. Jacques REPUSSARD, Director General, IRSN 14:45 Session 1 - Nuclear installation Safety along Lifecycle Citizen & expert group on ASSE II Radioactive Waste Repository Closure in Germany, Beate KALLENBACH-HERBERT, Öko Institute The Hungarian Paks NPP Life time extension Environmental Impact Assessment, Zsuzsanna KORITAR, Energia Klub The implementation of the Aarhus Convention in the context of the siting Belarusian NPP in Ostrovets, Tatyana NOVIKOVA, Ecohome 15:45 Coffee break 16:00 The Czech Republic Temelin 3&4 reactors Environmental Impact Assessment, Jan HAVERKAMP, Greenpeace Civil Society contributions to nuclear safety in Gravelines, France, Coralie PINEAU, Gravelines, Local Commission of Information 16:40 Discussion 17:30 Adjourn 18:00 Buffet Dinner in Brasserie Van Maerlant, offered by the ANCCLI 4

Second Day, 5 December 2012 9:30 Session 2 Stress Tests (EU & National levels) The European stress tests transparency framework, Andreas MOLIN, Chairman of the ENSREG Transparency Group The European nuclear stress tests : an analysis of transparency and public engagement, Richard ADAMS, EESC The National and Local civil society involvement in the French Stress Tests, Ludivine GILLI, IRSN, Michel LAURENT and Charly VARIN, chairman and director of the three Local Commissions of Information of la Manche 10:30 10:45 Coffee Break Public involvement in the Bulgarian Stress Tests exercise, Albena SIMEONOVA, Foundation for Environment & Agriculture Presentation of the stress tests public engagement in the SLOVAK Republic, Dagmar ZEMANOVA, Slovak Nuclear Regulatory Authority (UJD) A review of NGOs contribution to the Stress Tests, Patricia LORENZ, Friends of the Earth Europe 11:45 Discussion 13:00 Lunch in Brasserie Van Maerlant, offered by the EESC and the ANCCLI 14:30 16:00 Session 3 Practical implementation of AC in the context of Nuclear Safety: What should be a step forward? The Nuclear Directives Transparency Framework, Massimo GARRIBBA, DG ENER Civil society interactions with experts, the recommendations of the French ACN Roundtable for public involvement in nuclear safety, François ROLLINGER, IRSN The work of Aarhus Convention Task Force on Public Participation in Decision Making, Phil KEARNEY, Chairman of the TFPPDM The PIPNA framework for Public Information and Participation in the context of Nuclear Safety, Stephane BAUDE, Mutadis Civil society input in framing public research in nuclear sector: current challenges, Roger GARBIL, DG Research Raising civil society participation: the experience of REC, Sylvia VAGHI, Regional Environmental Center Discussion 16:30 Conclusive session Andreas MOLIN, ENSREG Fiona MARSHALL, Aarhus Secretariat (Unece) Jean-Jacques DUMONT, ASN Jacques REPUSSARD, IRSN Pierre-Jean COULON, EESC Peter FAROSS, DG ENER Jean Claude DELALONDE, ANCCLI 17:30 End of the meeting 5