IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 108,207. In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER Y. MEEK, Respondent. ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Similar documents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 108,207. In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER Y. MEEK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,928. In the Matter of ELIZABETH ANNE HUEBEN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,378. In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,607. In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,542. In the Matter of BENJAMIN N. CASAD, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,097. In the Matter of TIMOTHY CLARK MEYER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

208.4 Inquiry Panel Review. applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary to practice law in

FILED AUG KANSAS BOARD OF HEALING ARTS

LAWYERING FOR A LAWYER WITH A DISABILITY BEFORE THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 2, 2010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

F I L E D MAY KS Board of Healing Arts

Proposed Rule Change to Kan. Sup. R Registration of Attorneys.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. (Before a Referee) Case No.: SC v. TFB File No.: ,037(07A)(OSC)

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,861 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

Effective January 1, 2016

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,200. In the Matter of LARRY D. EHRLICH, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

DOCKET NO AGREED ORDER

A male female. JOURNAL ENTRY OF ADJUDICATION AND SENTENCING Pursuant to K.S.A , and

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 109,512. In the Matter of SUSAN L. BOWMAN, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR Case No. SC [TFB No ,112(18B)(CRE)]

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO ALACHUA COUNTY DRUG COURT

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. This matter is before the North Carolina Medical Board. on the application of Brent Ashley Westbrook, P.A.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 113,492 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, LUKE LOGAN CRAWFORD, Appellant.

BLUE RIDGE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT PRETRIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 113,970. In the Matter of JARED WARREN HOLSTE, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

Representing Revoked or Suspended Drivers Before the Secretary of State

TREGO COUNTY DIVERSION PROGRAM GUIDELINES Trego County Attorney s Office, 216 N Main St., WaKeeney, KS 67672

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PHARMACY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 111,478. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, ZACHARY EISENHOUR, SR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,361. In the Matter of LAWRENCE E. SCHNEIDER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

No. 107,661 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. SHANE A. BIXENMAN, Appellee, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant.

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA NO

RULES PARAMEDIC ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRUNSWICK

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 113,010 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

No. 112,908 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. In the Matter of C.D.A.-C., A Child Under Eighteen (18) Years of Age.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 HOUSE BILL 494 RATIFIED BILL

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,858 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DALLAS F. YOAKUM, Appellant.

Sentencing hearing after conviction for impaired driving; determination of grossly aggravating and aggravating and mitigating factors;

TITLE 6 - COURTS CHAPTER 1 - COURTS AND PROCEDURES

West Virginia Board of Optometry

IC Chapter 16. Problem Solving Courts

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Nos. 118, ,298 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

VOLUSIA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 2018 Judicial Election Questionnaire. 6. Military Service (including Reserves) Service Branch Highest Rank Dates

RIGHTS REGARDING INVOLUNTARY CIVIL COMMITMENT FOR TREATMENT OF AN ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER IN MASSACHUSETTS

APPENDIX A Affidavit in Support of Application to Resign While Proceeding or Investigation is Pending INSTRUCTIONS An application pursuant to section

ALABAMA BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 540 X 12 QUALIFIED ALABAMA CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE (QACSC)

CORRECTIONAL SERVICES ARTICLE Title 8 State and Local Correctional System - Generally

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,153 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. TRACI RATZLAFF, Appellant,

14.12: Judgment and Sentencing at Arraignment or Trial

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 100,246. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, WILLIAM E. MCKNIGHT, JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

Social Security Number Required: Enter on separate page provided in the application. 7 Dentist Address:

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD. In re: Martha M. Davis PRB File No Decision No Facts

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 102,473. In The Matter of JAMES A. CLINE, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Nos. 118, , ,675 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

Representing the Revoked or Suspended Driver Before the Office of the Secretary of State

IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT FOR LAKEWOOD / UNIVERSITY PLACE / STEILACOOM / DUPONT PIERCE COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

VOLUSIA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION. Judicial Election Questionnaire. 6. Military Service (including Reserves) Service Branch Highest Rank Dates

BEFORE THE BOARD OF HEALING ARTS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER

S17Y1439. IN THE MATTER OF DAVID R. SICAY-PERROW. Following this Court s remand of this reciprocal disciplinary matter, see

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: JOHNNY S. ANZALONE. 15-DB-004 c/w 15-DB-053 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

CRAIG HOSPITAL ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO BYLAWS OF THE MEDICAL STAFF

Limited driving privilege. (a) Definition of Limited Driving Privilege. A limited driving privilege is a judgment issued in the discretion

Taxi License Application Board of Public Safety

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW VS. OF McLENNAN COUNTY, TEXAS

09 LC EC/AP. By: Representatives Cole of the 125, Neal of the 1, Pruett of the 144, Hanner of the 148, A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its

1 :' i,-.,, 1 t\o\ BEFORE THE BOARD OF HEALING ARTS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. In the Matter of Terrence Lee Lakin, D.O. KSBHA Docket No.

CHAPTER 13. AUTHORIZED LEGAL AID PRACTITIONERS RULE GENERALLY RULE PURPOSE RULE DEFINITIONS

Part 3. Principal and Teacher Employment Contracts. 115C-325. System of employment for public school teachers. (a) Definition of Terms.

IN THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MUNICIPAL COURT OF DERBY, KANSAS

COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. - and - TANIA SCOTT REGISTRATION NO. JE06287 NOTICE OF HEARING

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,164 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JULIA DENG, Appellee, SCOTT HATTRUP, Appellant.

Path 1 Path 2 Path 3. Notice of Suspension. which may lead to. Termination

ORDER GRANTING OCCUPATIONAL DRIVER S LICENSE I. JURISDICTION FINDING

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,863. In the Matter of LYLE LOUIS ODO, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

S14Y1458. IN THE MATTER OF RAND J. CSEHY. Rand J. Csehy (State Bar No ) pled nolo contendere to two counts

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

CORRECTIVE ACTION/FAIR HEARING PLAN FOR HENDRICKS REGIONAL HEALTH DANVILLE, INDIANA

Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators. Part I. Mediator Qualifications

Substitute for HOUSE BILL No. 2159

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA AT RICHMOND IN THE MATTER OF SUPREME COURT RULES, PART 6, IV, PARAGRAPH 13 PETITION

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF PHARMACY. THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the North Carolina Board of Pharmacy (the

People v. Bill Condon. 16PDJ050. December 23, 2016.

) Docket No. 14-KAOOO&L>

No. 112,243 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. TYLER FISCHER, Appellant, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

State of Michigan. Attorney Grievance Commission

PREVENTION OF AND TREATMENT FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE BILL

Transcription:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 108,207 In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER Y. MEEK, Respondent. ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT On December 7, 2012, this court suspended the respondent Christopher Y. Meek, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 40 months. See In re Meek, 295 Kan. 1160, 289 P.3d 95 (2012). Additionally, the court provided that after 12 months of suspension, the court would stay the remaining 28 months of suspension and place respondent on probation. Also in its December 7, 2012, opinion the court ordered that respondent comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 406) and respondent pay the costs of the proceedings. On December 9, 2013, the respondent filed a petition with this court for reinstatement to the practice of law in Kansas. In the petition, respondent confirmed that he has complied with Supreme Court Rule 218 and paid the costs of the proceedings. The court, after carefully considering the record, grants the respondent's petition for reinstatement, under the following terms and conditions of probation: Abstinence. The respondent will remain abstinent from alcohol and all other mind-altering drugs, except medications prescribed by a medical doctor. In the event the respondent is prescribed a mind-altering drug by a medical doctor, the respondent will immediately inform the Executive Director of the Kansas Lawyers Assistant Program (KALAP), the KALAP monitor, and the Disciplinary Administrator. The respondent will execute appropriate releases so that the medical doctor may discuss the prescription 1

of the medication with the Executive Director of KALAP, the KALAP monitor, and the Disciplinary Administrator. Beginning immediately, the respondent will provide the Disciplinary Administrator with a report regarding his compliance with this term of probation. Aftercare. Previous to this suspension, the respondent completed inpatient treatment with Valley Hope in Atchison, Kansas. Upon release from inpatient treatment, the treatment facility recommended that the respondent participate in aftercare. The respondent will execute appropriate releases so that Valley Hope may provide information to the Executive Director of KALAP, the KALAP monitor, and the Disciplinary Administrator. The respondent will continue participating in aftercare pursuant to the discharge recommendations. Beginning immediately, the respondent will provide quarterly reports to the Disciplinary Administrator regarding his compliance with the aftercare program recommended by Valley Hope. Alcohol and Drug Evaluation. As a condition of the respondent's federal criminal probation, the respondent submitted to an alcohol and drug evaluation. Within 14 days of this order, the respondent will execute appropriate releases so that the Executive Director of KALAP, the KALAP monitor, and the Disciplinary Administrator may receive a copy of the report of the alcohol and drug evaluation. After the appropriate releases have been executed and within 30 days of the date of this order, the respondent will provide the Executive Director of KALAP, the KALAP monitor, and the Disciplinary Administrator with a copy of the alcohol and drug evaluation. Further, the respondent will comply with all recommendations contained in the report for treatment, aftercare, meetings, and relapse prevention, as well as recommendations that may arise during 2

the treatment, aftercare, meetings, and relapse prevention. If the respondent fails to comply with the recommendations contained in the report or as may arise during the treatment, aftercare, meetings, or relapse prevention, the respondent will immediately report his lack of compliance to the Disciplinary Administrator. Beginning immediately, the respondent will provide quarterly reports to the Disciplinary Administrator regarding his compliance with the recommendations contained in the report of the alcohol and drug evaluation. Substance Abuse Monitoring Contract. On March 7, 2011, the respondent entered into a Substance Abuse Monitoring Contract. Within 14 days of the date of this order, the respondent will execute appropriate releases so that the Executive Director of KALAP, other KALAP staff, and the KALAP monitor may discuss the respondent's compliance with the contract with the Disciplinary Administrator. The respondent will comply with each and every term of the Substance Abuse Monitoring Contract. If the respondent fails to comply with the terms of the Substance Abuse Monitoring Contract, the Executive Director of KALAP, other KALAP staff, and the KALAP monitor will immediately report the respondent's lack of compliance with the Disciplinary Administrator. If the respondent fails to comply with the terms of the Substance Abuse Monitoring Contract, the respondent will immediately report his lack of compliance to the Disciplinary Administrator. Beginning immediately, the KALAP monitor and the respondent will provide quarterly reports to the Disciplinary Administrator including current information regarding the respondent's compliance with each and every term of the Substance Abuse Monitoring Contract. 3

Federal Probation. At the time the hearing panel issued its final hearing report, the respondent was on federal criminal probation. If the respondent has been discharged from probation, he will immediately provide documentary support of his release from federal criminal probation to the Disciplinary Administrator. If the respondent remains on federal criminal probation, beginning immediately, he will provide the Disciplinary Administrator with quarterly reports regarding his status on federal criminal probation. If the respondent violates the terms and conditions of the federal criminal probation, he will immediately report the violation to the Disciplinary Administrator. In the event the respondent is released from federal probation, he will provide a final report regarding his federal probation, with documentary support of his release from federal probation. Random Drug Screens. Currently, the Executive Director of KALAP, the KALAP monitor, and the federal probation officer require the respondent to submit to random drug screens. Within 14 days of the date of this order, the respondent will provide the Disciplinary Administrator with a copy of each and every drug screen test results since September 1, 2009, requested by the federal probation officer, the Executive Director of KALAP, and KALAP monitor. The respondent will comply with any and all requests made by the Director of KALAP, the KALAP monitor, and the federal probation officer. In addition, the Disciplinary Administrator may require the respondent to submit to random drug screens at a drug testing center selected by the Disciplinary Administrator. The respondent will be responsible for all costs associated with the random drug screens. If the Disciplinary Administrator directs the respondent to appear at a specific drug testing center for a random drug screen, he will appear at the drug testing center within 8 hours. 4

Continued Cooperation. The respondent will continue to cooperate with the Disciplinary Administrator. If the Disciplinary Administrator requests any additional information, the respondent will timely provide such information. Additional Violations. The respondent will not violate the terms of his probation or the provisions of the Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct. In the event that the respondent violates any of the terms of probation or any of the provisions of the Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct at any time during the probationary period, the respondent will immediately report such violation to the KALAP monitor and the Disciplinary Administrator. The Disciplinary Administrator will take immediate action directing the respondent to show cause why the probation should not be revoked. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Kansas conditioned upon his compliance with the annual continuing legal education requirements and upon his payment of all fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission and subject to the terms and conditions of probation as detailed above. When the respondent has complied with the annual continuing legal education requirements and has paid the fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission, the Clerk is directed to enter the respondent's name upon the roster of attorneys engaged in the practice of law in Kansas. 5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order of reinstatement of Christopher Y. Meek shall be published in the official Kansas Reports, and the costs herein are assessed to the respondent. Dated this 7th day of January, 2014. 6