EPIC now seeks five categories of records related to alleged surveillance of the President and/or members of his campaign.

Similar documents
(3) Any Privacy Threshold Analysis or similar initial privacy assessment that assessed the need for a PIA for the Quiet Skies program;

EPIC seeks the NPPD s Privacy Impact Assessment for Media Monitoring Services and related records. 1

EPIC seeks records related to alternative screening procedures in CBP s biometric entry/exit program. 1

FOIA and Request for Expedited Processing & Fee Waiver

August 23, BY U.S. MAIL AND Freedom of Information Act Request Request for Expedited Processing

March 20, Dear Mr. Hardy, Ms. Mallory & Ms. Jones:

EPIC seeks documents about the planned transfer of personal data concerning noncitizens from USCIS to the U.S. Census Bureau ( Bureau ).

President s Surveillance Program or PSP Terrorist Surveillance Program or TSP STELLARWIND National Security Agency or NSA

1. All s sent to or from Brett Kavanaugh on the following dates:

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/20/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Freedom of Information Act Request (Expedited Processing Requested)

Case 1:15-cv TSC Document 14 Filed 01/06/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED SEP NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON, CLERK. Case 1:07-cv RBW Document 1 Filed 09/27/07 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/08/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv KBJ Document 15 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

Re: Freedom of Information Act Request (Expedited Processing Requested)

INSTITUTE FOR THE ELIMINATION OF POVERTY & GENOCIDE 9 GAMMON AVENUE ATLANTA, GEORGIA OFFICE

April 18, 2017 FEE WAIVER

Case 3:19-cv SK Document 1 Filed 01/17/19 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:18-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 05/01/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Re: Freedom of Information Act Request (Expedited Processing Requested)

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 49 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 35

April 12, Dear FOIA Officer:

Suite RE: Investigating Improper White House Influence on Specific Investigations

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST

January 14, Dear Chairman Graham and Ranking Member Feinstein:

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Accordingly, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), we request copies of the following records 1 in EPA s possession:

In this early case the Human Rights Committee established its position on the extraterritorial effect of the ICCPR:

February 8, The Honorable Jerrold Nadler Chairman U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary 2141 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT

Issue Area Current Law S as reported by Senate Judiciary Comm. H.R as reported by House Judiciary Comm.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cv RBW Document 17 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv EGS Document 13 Filed 05/01/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Comments of EPIC 1 Department of Interior

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

Electronic Privacy Information Center September 24, 2001

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION

I. The Requesting Organization Idaho Progressive Student Alliance

Reauthorization of the FISA Amendments Act

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

April 12, Dear Mr. Hardy:

Case 1:17-cv RCL Document 11-7 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Freedom of Information Act Request: Interior s Political Appointees and Aurelia Skipwith s Nomination

Via Electronic and U.S. Postal Service Delivery. January 17, 2019

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 8

Freedom of Information Act Request (Expedited Process & Fee Waiver/Limitation Requested)

Case 1:16-cv RDM Document 1 Filed 12/13/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Reauthorization of the FISA Amendments Act

CRS Report for Congress

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

T-Mobile US, Inc. Transparency Report for 2016

T-Mobile Transparency Report for 2013 and 2014

U.S. Department of Justice

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case3:07-cv SI Document59-1 Filed05/09/08 Page1 of 12 EXHIBIT A

Freedom of Information Act Request: Greater Sage-Grouse Order and Memorandum

February 9, 2017 By

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. v. Civil Action No.

CRS Report for Congress

u.s. Foreign Intelligence.

! FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST. August 8, 2017

BILLS PENDING AS OF 9/11/13 THAT RELATE TO NSA SURVEILLANCE

CASE SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON MAY 17, No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

A US Spy Tool Could Spell

December 13, Dear FOIA Officers:

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/19/18 Page 2 of 10

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act: A Sketch of Selected Issues

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA : : : : : : : : : : MEMORANDUM. Plaintiff Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC),

JOINT STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD OF JAMES R. CLAPPER DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

1st Session Mr. ROBERTS, from the Select Committee on Intelligence, submitted the following R E P O R T. together with

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv RC Document 1 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Freedom of Information Act Office th Street SW, Stop 5009 Washington, D.C.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Syllabus Law : Surveillance Law Seminar. George Mason University Law School Fall 2015 Arlington Hall, Hazel Hall. Professor Jake Phillips

Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004: Lone Wolf Amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

Notes on how to read the chart:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, AND

Case 1:13-cv AT Document 18 Filed 03/03/14 Page 1 of 8 ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Freedom of Information Act Request: White House Website Removal of Climate Change

September 7, FOIA Officer Office of Management and Budget th Street NW Washington, DC

Transcription:

VIA E-MAIL Arnetta Mallory FOIA Initiatives Coordinator Room 10702 600 E Street, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Dear Ms. Mallory, This letter constitutes a request under the Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA ), 5 U.S.C. 552, and is submitted on behalf of the Electronic Privacy Information Center ( EPIC ) to the Department of Justice National Security Division ( ). EPIC seeks records related to alleged electronic surveillance and related activities revealed to the public by the President of the United States ( ). The, which was created in 2006 to consolidate the Justice Department s national security operations, is responsible for coordinating and facilitating national security investigations. In particular, the Office of Intelligence represents the government before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ( FISC ). As a result of the s role in making filings with the FISC, it follows that any FISA application seeking to conduct electronic surveillance or other FISAauthorized searches of Donald J. Trump, his associates, or facilities within Trump Tower would be held by. EPIC now seeks five categories of records related to alleged surveillance of the President and/or members of his campaign. Documents Requested 1. Any and all applications made pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 1804 where the target of electronic surveillance was Donald J. Trump, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, Michael T. Flynn, Jared Corey Kushner, Jeffrey D. Gordon, Paul Manafort, or Carter Page ; 2. Any and all applications made pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 1823 where the premises or property to be searched were located in Trump Tower, 725 5 th Ave, New York, NY 10022; 3. Any and all applications made pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 1842 where the person to whom is leased or in whose name is listed the telephone line or other facility to which the pen

register or trap and trace device is to be attached or applied was one of the aforementioned individuals in 1 above; 4. Any and all applications made pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 1861 where the tangible things sought were located in Trump Tower, 725 5 th Ave, New York, NY 10022; and 5. Any and all applications made pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 1861 for call detail records of a specific selection term associated with one of the aforementioned individuals in 1 above; Request for Expedited Processing EPIC is entitled to expedited processing of this request. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(E)(v)(II); 28 C.F.R. 16.5(e)(1)(ii). There is there is an urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged federal government activity, and the request is made by a person who is primarily engaged in disseminating information. 16.5(e)(1)(ii). First, there is an urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged federal government activity. 16.5(e)(1)(ii). There can be no question that there is an urgency to inform the public about the alleged government activity at issue in this request. The President of the United States himself has called for an investigation into the alleged surveillance of his campaign during the 2016 Election. This serious charge has been denied by intelligence officials from the current and former administration, and will likely be the subject of ongoing investigations in Congress. On the morning of March 4, 2017, the President of the United States alleged in a series of tweets that former President Obama had [his] wires tapped in Trump Tower just before the victory. 1 The President went on to allege [h]ow low has President Obama gone to tapp [sic] my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy! 2 White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer issued a statement on Sunday March 5 th that President Donald J. Trump is requesting that as part of their investigation into Russian activity, the congressional intelligence committees exercise their oversight authority to determine whether executive branch investigative powers were abused in 2016. 3 In response to the President s allegations, FBI Director James B. Comey has asked the Department of Justice to publicly reject the assertion, arguing that the highly charged claim is false and must be corrected. 4 Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper also categorically denied the President s allegations, stating that For the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there 1 @realdonaldtrump, Twitter (Mar. 4, 2017, 6:35 AM), https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/837989835818287106. 2 @realdonaldtrump, Twitter (Mar. 4, 2017, 7:02 AM), https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/837996746236182529. 3 The White House, Statement from the Press Secretary (Mar. 5, 2017), https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/03/05/statement-press-secretary. 4 Michael S. Schmidt & Michael D. Shear, Comey As,s Justice Dep.t to Reject Trump s Wiretapping Claim, N.Y. Times (Mar. 5, 2017), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/05/us/politics/trump-seeks-inquiry-into-allegations-that-obamatapped-his-phones.html. 2

was no such wiretap activity mounted against the President-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign. 5 Clearly there is public interest in the resolution of these allegations made by President Trump of potentially unlawful wiretapping of his election campaign. In submitting this request for expedited processing, I certify that this explanation is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 16.5(e)(3); 552(a)(6)(E)(vi). Request for News Media Fee Status and Fee Waiver EPIC is a representative of the news media for fee classification purposes. EPIC v. Dep t of Def., 241 F. Supp. 2d 5 (D.D.C. 2003). Based on EPIC s status as a news media requester, EPIC is entitled to receive the requested record with only duplication fees assessed. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(II). See also 28 C.F.R. 16.10(c). Further, any duplication fees should also be waived because disclosure of the requested information is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute to the public understanding of the operations or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of EPIC, the requester. 28 C.F.R. 16.10(k)(2); 552(a)(4)(A)(iii). EPIC s request satisfies this standard based on DOJ s considerations for granting a fee waiver. The Department of Justice evaluates the three considerations to determine whether this requirement is met: (i) the subject of the request must concern identifiable operations or activities of the Federal Government with a connection that is direct and clear, not remote or attenuated ; (ii) disclosure must be likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of those operations or activities ; and (iii) disclosure must not be primarily in the commercial interest of the requester. 16.10(k)(2)(i) (iii). As to the first consideration, the subject of the request concerns identifiable operations or activities of the federal government because the requested documents involves alleged surveillance activities of the federal government, facilitated by. 16.10(k)(2)(i). The alleged records clearly concern the agency s surveillance operations and activities, which selfevidently constitute activities of the federal government. As to the second consideration, disclosure would also be likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of those operations or activities. 16.10(k)(2)(ii). The President has made an explosive allegation concerning unlawful wiretapping by former President Obama, and any information concerning the existence (or not) of the records at issue in this request would contribute meaningfully to the public s understanding of the government s operations and these serious allegations. 16.10(k)(2)(ii)(A). Disclosure will contribute to the understanding of a reasonably broad audience of persons interested in the subject because, as provided in the relevant FOIA regulations, will presum[e] that a representative of the news media will satisfy this consideration. 16.10(k)(2)(ii)(B). 5 Jeremy Diamond, Clapper: No Such Wiretap Activity Mounted on Trump, CNN (Mar. 5, 2017), http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/05/politics/clapper-trump-wiretap/. 3

As to the third consideration, [d]isclosure of the information is not primarily in the commercial interest of EPIC. 16.10(k)(2)(iii). EPIC has no commercial interest in the requested records. EPIC is a registered non-profit organization committed to privacy, open government, and civil liberties. 6 The DOJ regulations state that [c]omponents ordinarily will presume that when a news media requester has satisfied the [public interest standard], the request is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester. 16.10(k)(2)(iii)(B). As established in the sections above, EPIC is a news media requester and therefore there is no commercial interest behind this request. Conclusion For these reasons, a fee waiver should be granted. Thank you for your consideration of this request. I anticipate your determination within ten calendar days. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(E)(ii)(I); 28 C.F.R. 16.5(e)(4) For questions regarding this request I can be contacted at 202-483-1140 x111 or FOIA@epic.org. Respectfully submitted, Eleni Kyriakides Eleni Kyriakides EPIC Fellow 6 About EPIC, EPIC.org, http://epic.org/epic/about.html. 4

5