IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX

Similar documents
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX

The parties to this case, through their respective counsel, have conferred by regarding

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE OF FILING

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, United Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "United" or

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ACTION FOR DAMAGES, DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX

AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR FEES. Appellee, Mohammad Hamed, hereby requests attorneys' fees pursuant to V.I.

DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED

DEFENDANT MANAL MOHAMMAD YOUSEF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER. COMES NOW, Manal Mohammad Yousef (hereinafter "Manal Yousef'), by and

expressly on the petition does not constitute an adjudication of the Intervenor

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX DEFENDANTS' EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER

NOTICE OF FILING. Groner Law, PC

Opposition "), filed November 12, 2012; and Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to

The Defendants have raised essentially two arguments in response to this

Case 1:15-bk MFW Doc 848 Filed 01/09/17 Entered 01/09/17 16:22:41 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX

INTRODUCTION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

J&S Dev Corp v. Montrose Global

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ORDER SETTING CALENDAR OF CASES FOR CONSIDERATION AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX

DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' RENEWED TRO APPLICATION

Case 9:17-cv WPD Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/19/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

ORDER SETTING CALENDAR OF CASES FOR CONSIDERATION AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ORDER SETTING CALENDAR OF CASES FOR CONSIDERATION AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ORDER OF THE COURT

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO 3951)* Docket Number: TO1 CONTACT CENTERS, INC. Jeffrey J. Reich, Esquire James W Kutz, Esquire VS.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION. Defendant Gary Blount ("Defendant") s response to Plaintiff s Motion for Partial

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CA COA

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 6 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 5. In the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Austin Division

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2018 Page 1 of 4

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Mastering Civil Procedure Checklist

No SAMUEL HALL; HALL & GRIFFITH, PC

Case 1:17-cv WES-PAS Document 20 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 227 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio Court of Common Pleas

Case 1:05-cv RAE Document 53 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al Doc. 82 Case 2:06-cv DF-CMC Document 82 Filed 06/01/2006 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document 29 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:16-cv JHS Document 50 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case pwb Doc 1097 Filed 11/26/14 Entered 11/26/14 10:26:12 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

Case3:12-cv VC Document46 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 5

Case 1:16-cv CMH-TCB Document 25 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 159

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case 1:07-cv GMS Document 7 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

ctvtl No. sx-í6-cv429

Case 3:16-cv LRH-WGC Document 92 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/25/ :15 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/25/2017

Case 2:03-cv EFS Document 183 Filed 03/12/2008

Case 3:13-cv JJB-SCR Document 27 09/20/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:18-cv JGK Document 26 Filed 02/21/19 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:02-cv RWZ Document 948 Filed 02/18/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Order: Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) Complainant, Case No. SC v. TFB File No ,500(1A)

Case 2:14-cv RJS Document 67 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

FILED: ORANGE COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :05 PM

Case 1:16-cv TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 1372

NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio Court of Common Pleas

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case 1:06-cv DFH-TAB Document 11 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 24

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS SIXTH DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. (consolidated with Case No ) v. Hon. Matthew F.

CIVIL ACTION. Defendant Jeff Carter, by and through his counsel Law Offices of Walter M. Luers, by

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Edward W. Nottingham

Honorable James J. Wechler v. San Juan River Adjudication. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Claims of Navajo Nation CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Case 3:15-cv RGJ-KLH Document 38 Filed 11/25/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 257 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION. DAVID ESRATI : Case No CV Plaintiff, : Judge Richard Skelton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. Classroom 329 SYLLABUS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. For its answer to the Complaint, Defendants James Allen Diamonds, Inc.

Case 3:02-cv AVC Document 188 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION C.A. NO. 1:16-CV TCB

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2014 PA Super 135 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 2:13-cv DAK Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 10

DECISION AND JUDGMENT

Case 2:13-cv DBP Document 2 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:16-cv TSC Document 9 Filed 09/20/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Transcription:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX WALEED HAMED, as the Executor of the Estate of MOHAMMAD HAMED, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, FATHI YUSUF and UNITED CORPORATION Defendants and Counterclaimants, Case No.: SX-2012-CV-370 ACTION FOR DAMAGES, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DECLARATORY RELIEF JURY TRIAL DEMANDED WALEED HAMED, WAHEED HAMED, MUFEED HAMED, HISHAM HAMED, and PLESSEN ENTERPRISES, INC., Counterclaim Defendants. WALEED HAMED, as the Executor of the Estate of MOHAMMAD HAMED, Plaintiff, UNITED CORPORATION, Defendant. WALEED HAMED, as the Executor of the Estate of MOHAMMAD HAMED, Plaintiff, Consolidated with Case No.: SX-2014-CV-287 ACTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Consolidated with Case No.: SX-2014-CV-278 ACTION FOR DEBT AND CONVERSION JURY TRIAL DEMANDED FATHI YUSUF, Defendant. HAMED S SIXTH REQUEST FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 37-47 OF 50 TO YUSUF PURSUANT TO THE CLAIMS DISCOVERY PLAN OF 1/29/2018

Page 2 - Hamed's SIXTH RFAS Nos. 37-47 - as to Claims RFPD 37 of 50: Please produce any and all documents relating to gifts given by Fathi Yusuf (and/or is wife) to Mafi Hamed and Shawn Hamed and/or their spouses at the time of their weddings to Yusuf daughters. RFPD 38 of 50: Please produce any and all documents relating to gifts given by United Corporation to Mafi Hamed and Shawn Hamed and/or their spouses at the time of their weddings to Yusuf daughters. RFPD 39 of 50: Please produce any and all documents relating to gifts given by the Plaza Extra Corporation to Mafi Hamed and Shawn Hamed and/or their spouses at the time of their weddings to Yusuf daughters.

Page 3 - Hamed's SIXTH RFAS Nos. 37-47 - as to Claims RFPD 40 of 50: Please produce any and all documents relating to gifts to Mafi Hamed and Shawn Hamed and/or their spouses at the time of their weddings to Yusuf daughters as to Fathi Yusuf or his spouse or his daughters seeking return, credit or offset in divorce proceedings. RFPD 41 of 50: Please produce any and all documents identified in or relating to your responses to Hamed's Interrogatories 42-48 of 50. RFPD 42 of 50: Please produce any and all documents identified in or relating to your responses to Hamed's RTAs 46-48 of 50.

Page 4 - Hamed's SIXTH RFAS Nos. 37-47 - as to Claims RFPD's 44-47 relate to the events and actions of Fathi Yusuf averred in his and United's testimony and filings as follows: (1) in Yusufs March 4, 2013 Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law submitted to the Court after the Preliminary Injunction hearings, Yusuf specifically asked for a finding that he was in charge of the business' functions which would include accounting and payment of taxes agreeing with Hamed's statement, to wit: 40.... as Fathi Yusuf "is in charge for everybody" and everything. (Jan. 25, 2013 Hr'g Tr....(reflecting Mohammad Hamed's concession, even during his direct testimony, that "Mr. Yusuf he is in charge for everybody" [and] acknowledging again that Fathi Yusuf is in "charge" of "all the three stores.... After the Court's April 2013 Preliminary Injunction was issued in response to that testimony, Yusuf continued his assertion that he alone was in charge of the Partnership's management functions -- as was the case in his May 9, 2013, Motion to Stay the Preliminary Injunction. However, the testimony of the Plaintiff was clear when he admitted that he never worked in any management capacity at any of the PIaza Extra Stores, which role was under the exclusive ultimate control of Fathi Yusuf...[Id. at 6.] RFPD 43 of 50: Please produce any and all documents identified in or relating to your responses to Hamed's RTA 49 of 50 which asks: 49. ADMIT or DENY that at the time the criminal tax evasion prosecuted in United States of America v United Corp., et. al., VI D.Ct. 2005-cr-015, to which United pled guilty, was undertaken, Fathi Yusuf was in charge of the finances for the Plaza Extra Partnership and created the criminal plan to skim grocery store funds which led to the criminal conviction. RFPD 44 of 50: Please produce any and all documents which demonstrate that Mohammad Hamed "never worked in any management capacity at any of the PIaza Extra Stores, which role was under the exclusive ultimate control of Fathi Yusuf" at the time of the criminal activities to which the guilty plea was made and conviction entered.

Page 5 - Hamed's SIXTH RFAS Nos. 37-47 - as to Claims RFPD 45 of 50: Please produce any and all documents which disprove that that "management capacity at any of the PIaza Extra Stores [ ] was under the exclusive ultimate control of Fathi Yusuf" at the time of the criminal activities to which the guilty plea was made and conviction entered. RFPD 46 of 50: Please produce any and all documents which disprove that that "management capacity at any of the PIaza Extra Stores [ ] was under the exclusive ultimate control of Fathi Yusuf" at the time of the criminal activities to which the guilty plea was made and conviction entered. RFPD 47 of 50: Please produce any and all documents which prove or disprove that Fathi Yusuf planned, directed and controlled the criminal activities to which the guilty plea was made and conviction entered.

Page 6 - Hamed's SIXTH RFAS Nos. 37-47 - as to Claims Dated: March 31, 2018 A Carl J. Hartmann III, Esq. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 5000 Estate Coakley Bay, L6 Christiansted, Vl 00820 Email: carl@carlhartmann.com Tele: (340) 719-8941 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Joel H. Holt, Esq. Counsel for Plaintiff Law Offices of Joel H. Holt 2132 Company Street, Christiansted, Vl 00820 Email: holtvi@aol.com Tele: (340) 773-8709 I hereby certify that on this 31st day of March, 2018, I served a copy of the foregoing by email (CaseAnywhere ECF), as agreed by the parties, on: Hon. Edgar Ross Special Master % edgarrossjudge@hotmail.com Gregory H. Hodges Stefan Herpel Charlotte Perrell Law House, 10000 Frederiksberg Gade P.O. Box 756 St. Thomas, VI 00802 ghodges@dtflaw.com Mark W. Eckard Hamm, Eckard, LLP 5030 Anchor Way Christiansted, VI 00820 mark@markeckard.com Jeffrey B. C. Moorhead CRT Brow Building 1132 King Street, Suite 3 Christiansted, VI 00820 jeffreymlaw@yahoo.com A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 6-1(e) This document complies with the page or word limitation set forth in Rule 6-1(e). A