DEFENDANTS JAMES AND VALERIE JUDD S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Similar documents
DEFENDANTS JAMES AND VALERIE JUDD S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THEIR PENDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DEFENDANTS JUDD S MOTION TO COMPEL AND RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Preliminary Statement

DEFENDANT JAMES JUDD S NOTICE OF SERVING OBJECTIONS AND ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO PARAGON VENTURES LIMITED MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

DEFENDANT ERSICA P. GIANNA S MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION FOR DEFINITE STATEMENT, AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

DEFENDANT, ROBERT A. UCHIN REVOCABLE TRUST'S, AMENDED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST REOUEST FOR PRODUCTION

PLAINTIFFS AMENDED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT CONGREGATION OF THE HOLY GHOST WESTERN PROVINCE. Deponent Date Time

MARGARET J. SMITH, CASE NO.: (07)

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION. Pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P , Plaintiffs P&S Associates, General Partnership

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO (07) COMPLEX LITIGATION UNIT

Plaintiffs, P & S Associates, General Partnership ( P&S ), and S & P Associates,

Plaintiffs, P&S Associates, General Partnership ( P&S ), S&P Associates, General

Defendants. / DEFENDANT, ERSICA P. GIANNA S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

Defendants DALORES BARONE, CARL BOSCHETTI, DENISE B. BRYAN, and ETTOH, LTD. (collectively the Boschetti Defendants 1 ) through the

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE AND MEMORANDA IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT ETTOH, LTD s MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

MARGARET J. SMITH, CASE NO.: (07)

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION OF RECORDS CUSTODIAN OF DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL, LLP

PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. Pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P (a), Plaintiffs P & S Associates, General Partnership

Filing # E-Filed 03/30/ :52:31 PM

Filing # E-Filed 09/14/ :37:55 PM

Filing # E-Filed 10/24/ :07:49 PM

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE AND MEMORANDA IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JAMES AND VALERIE JUDD S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO FRANK AVELLINO S NOTICE OF PRODUCTION TO NON-PARTY UNDER RULE 1.351

PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS THIRD REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

Defendant, Frank Avellino ( Avellino ), files this response to Plaintiff s Supplemental

Filing # E-Filed 04/04/ :49:40 PM

Filing # E-Filed 11/23/ :59:27 PM

Filing # E-Filed 06/14/ :33:44 PM

Filing # E-Filed 03/11/ :10:57 PM

Filing # E-Filed 10/09/ :39:26 PM

Plaintiffs P & S Associates, General Partnership ( P&S ), S & P Associates, General

Filing # E-Filed 03/06/ :49:13 PM

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA UNDER RULE FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS WITHOUT DEPOSITION

DEFENDANTS FRANK AVELLINO AND MICHAEL BIENES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE AND MEMORANDA IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO S AND MICHAEL BIENES MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-SEITZ/MCALILEY

Filing # E-Filed 02/15/ :43:13 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Docket Number:2849 MOORE FLESHER TRUCKING CO., INC. Dwight L. Koerber Jr., Esquire CLOSED VS.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, vs.

Information or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel PREVIEW

Case 2:08-cv RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC

Case JKO Doc 9248 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 5

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

Attorneys are expected to read and follow the Florida Bar Family Section Bounds of Advocacy that can be found at

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Case No

Case LMI Doc 23 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 10. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC

Docket Number: Daniel K. Natirboff, Esquire Samuel B. Fineman, Esquire CLOSED

JUDICIAL PRACTICE PREFERENCES FOR CIRCUIT FAMILY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/16/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/16/2017. Exhibit D

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO.: 01-57AP JOHN SHARPE. Appellant-Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2015 Page 1 of 7

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

RULES OF PRACTICE - DISTRICT COURTS OF COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS

Docket Number: 3900 THOMAS DIDIANO, THOMAS DIDIANO, JR. AND THOMAS DIDIANO & SON, INC. Carlyle J. Engel, Esquire VS.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMSHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION. Petitioner, RULING AND ORDER JENNIFER E. NASHOLD, CHAIRPERSON:

Docket Number: 4074 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No CIV-SEITZ/MCALILEY

Case JKO Doc 9147 Filed 05/01/13 Page 1 of 17

Filing # E-Filed 01/22/ :54:09 PM

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE. THIS COURT, having determined the need to facilitate an orderly progression of

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ALEX BISTRICER, as limited partner of GULF ISLAND RESORT, L.P., and GULF ISLAND RESORT, L.P.

Docket Number: 2643 PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF WASHINGTON, PENNSYLVANIA, INC.

COMES NOW, Marc Anayas, appearing for a specific and limited purpose only, by

Case 1:17-cv DPG Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Honorable Judge Thomas Ramsberger 545 First Avenue North, Room 200 St. Petersburg, FL JURY TRIAL WEEKS * ALL ONE (1) WEEK DOCKETS *

This is one of the Lawyers in Brian Korte`s office, SUSANNA LEHMAN, ESQ. She makes the Plaintiff very confused and argued a very different angle of

State your full name, social security number, date of birth, residence address, and telephone number.

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2016 Page 1 of 5

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT CASE NOS. 3D D (Consolidated)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Division : : : : : : : : : PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES

Case 1:12-cv JAL Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/05/2013 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No CI-11 MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CV-BLOOM/VALLE

Docket Number: 2441 LABOR & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, INC.

NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio Court of Common Pleas

Docket Number: Robert J. Ray, Esquire John P. Sieminski, Esquire Benjamin Sorisio, Esquire Ira L. Podheiser, Esquire VS.

Information or instructions: Plea in abatement motion & Order to quash service Alternate Form

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/11/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/11/2016 EXHIBIT 2

~'

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA

2. Green Tree is without knowledge of the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of

Transcription:

Filing # 14804842 Electronically Filed 06/13/2014 03:32:37 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 12-34121(07) PHILIP J. VON KAHLE, as Conservator of P&S ASSOCIATES, GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, and S&P ASSOCIATES, GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, Complex Litigation Unit Plaintiffs, vs. JANET A. HOOKER CHARITABLE TRUST, et al, Defendants. DEFENDANTS JAMES AND VALERIE JUDD S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants James and Valerie Judd reply to Plaintiff s Response to their Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: THE UNCONTROVERTED FACTS 1. Defendant James Judd did not sign the S&P Partnership Agreement or either of the checks to S&P. 2. The affidavit of Valerie Judd attached to Defendants Judds Motion for Summary Judgment states that the signature on the single page dated 7/14/2000 (Ex. 1 to her affidavit) and the signatures on the two checks to S&P Associates (Ex. 2 to her affidavit) were her signatures and not those of James Judd. 3. The one page signed Agreement dated 7/14/2000 makes no reference to the 14 page Amended and Restated Partnership dated December 21, 1994. 1

4. Defendants Judd did not receive quarterly distributions or other periodic distributions from S&P. Pursuant to the one page signed agreement, all payments due to Valerie Judd became reinvestments in capital. This can also be seen from the K-1 attached to the Judds Motion for Summary Judgment as Exhibit 3. The only payments made by S&P Associates were withdrawals of capital requested by Valerie Judd when she requested a portion of the funds for living expenses (see Valerie Judd s Answers to Plaintiff s Interrogatories No. 2 and 4). At the time of her last request she was told by the S&P Associates secretary or receptionist that the Judds were no longer qualified to be investors (see Valerie Judd s Answer to Plaintiffs Interrogatory No. 4). 5. The relationship of the Judds with S&P Associates was therefore terminated by S&P Associates in 2008 when Valerie Judd called to ask to withdraw funds and was told that they were no longer qualified investors. Defendants Judd intend to file a supplement to their Motion for Summary Judgment to show that this occurred no later than December 3, 2008, the date S&P issued and sent its check for this withdrawal. A copy of the check will be attached. 6. There is absolutely no indication that Defendants Judd were ever aware of, or participated in, any wrongful conduct at any time. Accordingly: James Judd, not having signed any Partnership Agreement, was not a partner in S&P Associates and is not subject to any claim by Plaintiffs against Partners of S&P Associates, is not subject to any provision of the Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated December 21, 1994 or any provision of the Florida Statutes relating to obligations of partners (or former partners). 2

The single page dated 7/14/2000 signed by Valerie Judd, (attached as Exhibit 1 to her affidavit) is the only S&P Associates agreement she was given. It makes no reference to, and does not incorporate, the 14 page Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of S&P Associates, dated December 21, 1994, which Plaintiffs have attached to the Third Amended Complaint. Furthermore, since neither Valerie Judd (nor James Judd) ever received (or were given) the 14 page Amended Partnership Agreement, they are not bound by any of its provisions. The one page agreement dated 7/14/2000 provides that all quarterly distributions would by reinvested in the Partnership. As such they become capital contributions as can be seen on the K-1s issued by S&P Associates that were filed by S&P Associates with the Internal Revenue Service along with the Form 1065 filed by S&P Associates (see e.g. the K-1 for 2007 attached as Ex. 3 to Defendants Judds Motion for Summary Judgment.) Because S&P Associates advised Valerie Judd that the Judds were no longer qualified to be investors with S&P Associates, any ongoing relationship with either Valerie or James Judd as Partners in S&P Associates was effectively terminated and they are no longer subject to any wind down provisions of the Florida Statutes. Counsel for Defendants Judd is presently attempting to resolve various pending discovery issues with Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to this Court s Order, which denied Defendants Judds Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Pleadings without prejudice and anticipates that a Motion to Compel may become necessary. There is also additional pending discovery that counsel for Defendants Judd believes will be relevant. Counsel for Defendants Judd anticipates that this will be incorporated in a supplement to this reply. It should also be noted that the unsigned one page letter dated July 24, 2000, which Plaintiffs attached to their Response, makes no reference whatsoever to the 14 page Amended and Supplemental Partnership Agreement of December 21, 1994. 3

This will be further addressed in a Supplemental Motion to more fully present the facts and argument that since James was never a partner and Valerie did not sign or receive the 14 page Amended and Supplemental Agreement, they are not subject to any of its provisions. Significantly, the unsigned letter attached to Plaintiff s Response make no reference to the 14 page Partnership Agreement dated December 21, 1994. In addition, Defendants Judd will further argue that: A. Plaintiffs are estopped to ignore and contradict the K-1 s and Partnership Returns Form 1065 filed by the original partners of S&P Associates showing that: i. the funds held were capital investments by Defendants Judd; ii. iii. Investment income was received by S&P Associates from its investments; and all payments to Defendants Judd were withdrawals of capital; and B. Plaintiffs, as Successor General Partners, have an equal fiduciary duty to all partners and not to act in favor of certain partners to the detriment of other Partners or former Partners, akin to a corporation not having a right to choose to sue certain shareholders for the benefit of other shareholders. Dated this 13 th day of June, 2014 Respectfully submitted, s/ Julian H. Kreeger JULIAN H. KREEGER, P.A. Florida Bar No. 098595 Attorneys for Defendants James and Valerie Judd Offices at Grand Bay Plaza 2665 Bayshore Drive, Suite 220-14 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: 305-373-3101 Facsimile: 305-381-873 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via Electronic Mail upon Leonard Samuels, Esq. of Berger Singerman and counsel identified below registered to receive electronic notifications, and regular U.S. mail upon Pro Se parties on this 13 th day of June, 2014 upon the following: Counsel E-mail address: Ana Hesny, Esq. ah@assoulineberlowe.com; ena@assoulineberlowe.com Eric N. Assouline, Esq. ena@assoulineberlowe.com; ah@assoulineberlowe.com Annette M. Urena, Esq. aurena@dkdr.com; cmackey@dkdr.com; service-amu@dkdr.com Daniel W Matlow, Esq. dmatlow@danmatlow.com; assistant@danmatlow.com Debra D. Klingsberg, Esq. dklingsberg@huntgross.com Robert J. Hunt, Esq. bobhunt@huntgross.com Joanne Wilcomes, Esq. jwilcomes@mccarter.com Evan Frederick, Esq. efrederick@mccaberabin.com Etan Mark, Esq. emark@bergersingerman.com; drt@bergersingerman.com; lyun@bergersingerman.com Evan H Frederick, Esq. efrederick@mccaberabin.com; janet@mccaberabin.com; beth@mccaberabin.com B. Lieberman, Esq. blieberman@messana-law.com Jonathan Thomas Lieber, Esq. jlieber@dobinlaw.com Mariaelena Gayo-Guitian, Esq. mguitian@gjb-law.com Barry P. Gruher, Esq. bgruher@gjb-law.com William G. Salim, Jr., Esq. wsalim@mmsslaw.com Domenica Frasca, Esq. dfrasca@mayersohnlaw.com; service@mayersohnlaw.com Joseph P. Klapholz, Esq. jklap@klapholzpa.com; dml@klapholzpa.com Julian H Kreeger, Esq. juliankreeger@gmail.com L Andrew S Riccio, Esq. ena@assoulineberlowe.com; ah@assoulineberlowe.com Leonard K. Samuels, Esq. lsamuels@bergersingerman.com; vleon@bergersingerman.com; drt@bergersingerman.com Marc S Dobin, Esq. service@dobinlaw.com; mdobin@dobinlaw.com; Michael C Foster, Esq. mfoster@dkdr.com; cmackey@dkdr.com; kdominguez@dkdr.com Michael Casey, Esq. mcasey666@gmail.com Richard T. Woulfe, Esq. pleadings.rtw@bunnellwoulfe.com Michael R. Casey, Esq. mcasey666@gmail.com Brett Lieberman, Esq. blieberman@messana-law.com Marc Dobin, Esq. service@dobinlaw.com Peter Herman, Esq. PGH@trippscott.com Robert J Hunt, Esq. bobhunt@huntgross.com; sharon@huntgross.com; eservice@huntgross.com Ryon M Mccabe, Esq. rmccabe@mccaberabin.com; janet@mccaberabin.com; beth@mccaberabin.com Steven D. Weber, Esq. sweber@bergersingerman.com; lwebster@bergersingerman.com; drt@bergersingerman.com Thomas J. Goodwin, Esq. tgoodwin@mccarter.com; wendt@mccarter.com; jwilcomes@mccarter.com Thomas L Abrams, Esq. tabrams@tabramslaw.com; fcolumbo@tabramslaw.com Thomas M. Messana, Esq. tmessana@messana-law.com; tmessana@bellsouth.net; mwslawfirm@gmail.com Zachary P Hyman, Esq. zhyman@bergersingerman.com; DRT@bergersingerman.com; clamb@bergersingerman.com By: s/ Julian H. Kreeger JULIAN H. KREEGER Florida Bar No. 098595 5