UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Case 1:99-mc Document 667 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. C.A. NO. Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/23/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Jonathan E. Singer (pro hac vice to be filed) 60 South 6 th Street, Suite 3200 Minneapolis, MN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Case No. PARTIES

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case3:12-cv VC Document21 Filed06/09/14 Page1 of 12

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/05/10 Page 1 of 20

Case 3:10-cv FLW-DEA Document 48 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2016 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/17 Page 1 of 24 PageID #: 1

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Transcription:

0 RICHARD G. CAMPBELL, JR. Nevada Bar No.: ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP 0 West Liberty Street, Suite 0 Reno, Nevada 0 Telephone No.: () -00 Facsimile No.: () -0 Email: rcampbell@armstrongteasdale.com JENNIFER E. HOEKEL Nevada Bar No.: 00 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 00 St. Louis, Missouri 0 Telephone No.:..00 Facsimile No.:..0 Email: jhoekel@armstrongteasdale.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Computerized Screening, Inc. COMPUTERIZED SCREENING, INC., v. Plaintiff, STAYHEALTHY, INC. Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA CASE NO. PLAINTIFF COMPUTERIZED SCREENING, INC. S COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 0 Plaintiff Computerized Screening, Inc. ( CSI ) states as follows for its Complaint against Stayhealthy, Inc. ( Stayhealthy ):. This is an action arising under the patent laws of the United States, U.S.C. et seq., for infringement of U.S. Patent No.,, (the Patent ), attached herein as Exhibit. --

0 0. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under U.S.C. sections and (a). THE PARTIES. Plaintiff CSI is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business at 0 Gateway Drive, Reno, Nevada.. On information and belief, Defendant Stayhealthy is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at S. Myrtle Avenue, Monrovia CA 0. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. On information and belief, Stayhealthy is subject to personal jurisdiction in this district because it has used, offered for sale, and/or sold infringing products in this district, and has contributed to or induced third-parties to infringe in this district.. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to U.S.C. (b), (c) and 00(b) because a substantial part of the events giving rise to CSI s claims occurred in this district and Stayhealthy resides in this district as it is a corporation subject to personal jurisdiction in this district. BACKGROUND. Charles P. Bluth ( Mr. Bluth ), founder of CSI in, is a co-inventor of the Patent. Mr. Bluth is a serial entrepreneur who has owned and operated twenty-two businesses in Nevada and other states.. CSI is an FDA registered Class II medical manufacturer of patient interactive kiosks that integrate non-invasive and invasive preventive health screening technology and telemedicine solutions. CSI s kiosks provide accurate blood pressure and heart rate testing, complete fitness evaluation, drug encyclopedia and compatibility, information on local health care providers from physicians to hospitals to crisis centers, create personal health records and electronic medical records, and can track an individual s health status on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. The kiosks provide handicap accessible seating and a weight scale integrated into the seat for weight measurement. --

0 0. CSI s kiosks are installed in grocery and drug stores, as well as corporations, emergency rooms, hospitals, clinics, and physician s offices around the United States. 0. On February, 00, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ( USPTO ) duly and legally issued the Patent to CSI for an invention entitled Health Care Information System.. On December, 00, a request for reexamination was filed in the USPTO. The request was granted, the patent claims reexamined, and on September 0, 0, the USPTO issued the reexamination certificate.. Upon reexamination, the patentability of claims -, -0,,,, - and was confirmed. Claims -, -,,, 0-,, -, 0-,, and - were found patentable as amended. Claims, - and, dependent on an amended claim, were found patentable. New claims - were added.. CSI is the owner by assignment of the Patent.. The Patent is generally directed to health monitoring kiosks that measure blood pressure or weight and transmit the data through a network to store the measurement data in remote data storage.. Stayhealthy kiosks employ the inventions claimed in the Patent.. Stayhealthy has manufactured, used, offered for sale, and/or sold within the United States the Healthcenter Kiosk.. CSI has informed Stayhealthy of the Patent. COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO.,,. CSI realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs - of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.. The Patent is valid, enforceable, and unexpired. 0. Stayhealthy has infringed and continues to infringe the Patent, literally and under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, having made, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing, without authority, products, including but not limited to the Healthcenter Kiosk. --

0 0. Stayhealthy has contributed to and/or induced, and continues to contribute to and/or induce, the infringement of the Patent by selling, offering to sell, and/or importing into the United States infringing health monitoring kiosks, with the direct infringement being accomplished by end users of at least the Healthcenter kiosks. Stayhealthy has encouraged, trained, and instructed customers and end users to operate health monitoring kiosks to measure blood pressure or weight and transmit the data through a network to store the measurement data in remote data storage. Stayhealthy knew that these acts constitute infringement of the Patent. Further, the Stayhealthy kiosks have no substantial non-infringing purpose.. Stayhealthy s conduct has damaged and will continue to damage CSI.. Stayhealthy s infringement has been in willful disregard of CSI s patent rights, making this case exceptional under U.S.C... CSI will suffer further damages and irreparable injury unless and until Stayhealthy is enjoined by this Court from continuing such infringement. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, CSI respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in its favor and against Stayhealthy and enter an Order granting the following relief:. Declare that the Stayhealthy has infringed, contributed to the infringement of, and/or induced the infringement of the Patent;. Permanently enjoin and restrain Stayhealthy and all others with actual notice of the order from further acts infringing the Patent, including making, importing, using, selling, offering for sale, contributing to the infringement of, and/or inducing the use of all products and/or systems found to infringe the Patent;. Require Stayhealthy to send a copy of any judgment or injunction in this case in favor of CSI to each licensee, sublicensee, distributor, person, or entity to whom Stayhealthy sells, has sold, or has otherwise distributed products and/or systems found to infringe the Patent;. Order the impounding and destruction of all of Stayhealthy products and/or systems that infringe the Patent; --

0. Award CSI patent infringement damages and pre-judgment interest pursuant to U.S.C. ;. Order an accounting of Stayhealthy s profits resulting from sales of its products and/or systems that infringe the Patent;. An Order trebling damages for willful patent infringement pursuant to U.S.C. ;. A finding that this case is exceptional pursuant to U.S.C. and an Order granting reasonable costs and attorneys fees; and. Award such other relief as the Court may deem appropriate and just under the circumstances. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of all claims and all issues triable as of right by jury in this action. 0 DATED this rd day of July, 0. By: /s/jennifer E. Hoekel RICHARD G. CAMPBELL, JR. Nevada Bar No.: ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP 0 West Liberty Street, Suite 0 Reno, Nevada 0 Telephone No.: () -00 Facsimile No.: () -0 Email: rcampbell@armstrongteasdale.com JENNIFER E. HOEKEL MO Bar No.: 0MO 00 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 00 St. Louis, Missouri 0 Telephone No.:..00 Facsimile No.:..0 Email: jhoekel@armstrongteasdale.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Computerized Screening, Inc. --