Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Similar documents
Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:1

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 8

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT FOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-789 COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:07-cv GEL Document 1 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 1 Filed 12/08/08 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 21. Case No.

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Transcription:

0 0 Robert J. Lauson (,) bob@lauson.com Edwin P. Tarver, (0,) edwin@lauson.com LAUSON & TARVER LLP 0 Apollo St., Suite. 0 El Segundo, CA 0 Tel. (0) -0 Fax (0) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION Privacy Pop, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company Plaintiff, vs. Gimme Gimme, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company; and Does - 0, Defendants. Case No.: :-cv-00 Plaintiff s Complaint for Patent Infringement Jury Trial Demanded Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ). / / / / / /

0 0 THE PARTIES. Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC is a California limited liability company having an address at Alton Parkway, Irvine, CA 0. Plaintiff is a manufacturer and seller of bed tents. See privacypop.com.. Upon information and belief, Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC is a New York Limited Liability Company organized under the laws of the State of New York, having an address at Madison Ave. Suite, New York, New York 00. Defendant sells outdoor products, including tents at www.gimmegim.me and on Amazon.com.. Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities of Doe Defendants -0, inclusive, and therefore sues them by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will amend this complaint to allege their true names and capacities when they are ascertained. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, USC et seq and USC 0 et seq.. This Court also has subject matter jurisdiction for this action under USC and USC (a), in that it raises federal questions and relates to patents and trademarks.. Venue is proper in this district under USC (b) () and 00(b), because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred here and because Defendant committed acts of infringement in this district.

0 0. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendant because it committed and continues to commit acts of infringement in violation of the patent laws. It offers to sell infringing goods in California and in this judicial district, and upon information and belief, such sales are occurring and ongoing. The acts by Defendant cause injury to Plaintiff within this district. Upon information and belief, Defendant derives substantial revenue from selling infringing products within this district, and expects its actions to have consequences here. FACTUAL BACKGROUND. Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC sells a patented privacy bed tent for in-home use. Privacy Pop, LLC has been continuously and extensively using the trademark PRIVACY POP since 0 for bed tents.. On May, 0, Plaintiff filed U.S. patent application serial no. /0, for the design of its bed tent. 0. On April 0, 0, U.S. Design Patent No. D,, which covers Plaintiff s innovative bed tent design, issued to Plaintiff. See Exhibit A.. Recently, Plaintiff learned Gimme Gimme was selling an essentially identical bed tent, calling it a Privacy Bed Tent. On April, 0, Plaintiff, through counsel, sent a cease-and-desist letter to Defendant requesting written assurances that it would stop all sales of the infringing design. See Exhibit B.. On April, 0, Defendant responded through counsel indicating that it did not believe that it had or was infringing on Plaintiff s patent. See Exhibit C.

0 0 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Patent Infringement Under Patent Act USC. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs - as though set forth herein.. Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe U.S. Design Patent D, by using, selling and/or offering to sell in the United States, and/or importing into the United States the bed tent currently known as the Gimme Gimme Privacy Bed Tent which embodies the design covered by the patent.. On information and belief, Defendant willfully infringed the D, patent, selling the accused infringing product with full knowledge of Plaintiff s existing patent rights.. Plaintiff is being irreparably damaged by Defendant infringing the D, patent, entitling Plaintiff to injunctive relief.. Defendant s willful infringement of the D, patent, among other factors, renders this case exceptional within the meaning of U.S.C.. // // //

0 0 including: PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Court enter Judgment against Defendant A. a finding that Defendant infringed the D, patent; B. an order permanently enjoining and prohibiting Defendant and its owners, officers, directors, agents, employees, affiliates, attorneys, and all others acting in privity or in concert with them, and their parents, subsidiaries, divisions, successors and assigns, from further acts of infringement of the asserted design patent, including sales, offers to sell and/or importing of the Gimme Gimme Privacy Bed Tent or colorable imitations; C. awarding Plaintiff all damages adequate to compensate for Defendant s infringement of the asserted patent, and lost profits if available; D. awarding Plaintiff treble damages, based on any infringement found to be willful, pursuant to USC, together with prejudgment interest; E. declaring this case to be exceptional and awarding Plaintiff its reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to USC ; and F. such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. DATED: April, 0 Respectfully Submitted, LAUSON & TARVER LLP By: /s/ Robert J. Lauson Robert J. Lauson, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC

0 0 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff hereby requests a trial by jury on all claims so triable. DATED: April, 0 Respectfully Submitted, LAUSON & TARVER LLP By: /s/ Robert J. Lauson Robert J. Lauson, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC