IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Similar documents
10/30/2017 7:04 PM 17CV47399 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed07/10/15 Page1 of 12

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:17-cv PK Document 9 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Oral Argument Requested

7/19/2018 6:06 PM 18CV30704 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Plaintiff WOF SW GGP 1 LLC alleges as follows:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON. To: Thomas M. Christ, John A. Bennett, Margaret S. Olney and Gregory A.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. [Complaint Filed 11/24/2010] [Alameda County Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH COUNSEL

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON DR 10, UE 88, UM 989

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

10/25/ :43 AM 17CV47062

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH UTCR CONFERRAL STATEMENT

Courthouse News Service

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

Case 2:15-cv MMD-GWF Document 50 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 4

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND

Case: 1:16-cv WOB Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/03/16 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY. Plaintiffs, Case No: PETITION THE PARTIES

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

10/11/2018 8:39 AM 18CV45669 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) COMPLAINT ) ) ) Case No.:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:17-cv CMH-JFA Document 1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

CITY OF WAUCHULA/HARDEE COUNTY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR RIGHT OF WAY UTILIZATION

8/31/2018 2:12 PM 18CV38516 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 6:12-cv TC Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/ :34 AM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2014

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2016

Case 1:13-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 6:18-cv MC Document 1 Filed 01/04/18 Page 1 of 12

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

RECITALS AGREEMENT ARTICLE I - TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

10/24/2017 4:33:20 PM 17CV46621 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Makovsky, and as Agent for Keith Makovsky, Kurt Makovsky, and William Makovsky, as

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

17CV14526 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF LANE

FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 09/19/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/19/2014

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/25/ :15 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/25/2017

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed01/09/15 Page1 of 16

16CV32458 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/26/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/26/2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv MO Document 1 Filed 04/04/18 Page 1 of 5

2/13/ :36 PM 19CV07131 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT. Negligence FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv KOB Document 1 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

and upon information and belief as to all other matters, alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

2/25/2019 4:13 PM 19CV08567 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

FILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :01 PM INDEX NO. E156010/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2018 EXHIBIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/20/ :42 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2015. Exhibit A

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 20 Filed 03/18/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 132

Case 3:16-cv KI Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 8

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012

11/29/2018 2:22 PM 18CV54567 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Doe v. Project Fair Bid, Inc. et al Doc. 1 Att. 1 EXHIBIT A. Dockets.Justia.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHELLE RENEE MCGRATH and VERONICA O BOY, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

FORM OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1

Maintenance Department Ricky Dowdy - Director Pine Street Hillsville, VA 24343

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

MATERIALS TRANSFER AND EVALUATION LICENSE AGREEMENT. Carnegie Mellon University

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

AECEiVED FEB 1 6 2008 MUER NASH LLP IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH SHARON FEHRS, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, STUBHUB, INC., a Delaware corporation, and ebay INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Case No. 0801-00515 DEFENDANTS EBAY INC.'S AND STUBHUB, INC.'S RULE 21 MOTIONS Oral Argument Requested (20 minutes) UTCR 5.010 Counsel for Defendants certifies that they conferred with Plaintiffs counsel by telephone on February 12,2008, but were unable to reach an agreement regarding the matters posed in this motion. UTCR 5.050 Defendants requests 20 minutes for oral argument and appearance in person. The names and telephone numbers of all parties served with this motion are set forth in the attached Certificate of Service. Official court reporting services will be provided and arranged by Defendants' counsel. FIRST MOTION Defendants ebay Inc. ("ebay") and StubHub, Inc. ("StubHub") (collectively, "~efendants")' move to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendants' motion to dismiss is supported by the 26 StubHub is an ebay company. These motions are brought on behalf of both parties. Page 1 -DEFENDANTS' RULE 21 MOTIONS DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 1300 S.W. Fifth Avenue. Suite 2300 Portland, Oregon 97201. (503) 241-2300 PDX 1817065~10086054-000001

1 concurrently-filed memorandum in support. 2 SECOND MOTION 3 In the event Defendants' first motion is not granted, Defendants move pursuant to ORCP 21D for an order requiring Plaintiff to make more definite and certain: (1) paragraphs 6, 11, and 12 of the complaint to specifically allege the particulars of Defendants' alleged conduct in offering tickets for sale on their Web sites, (2) paragraph 12 of the complaint by alleging how Defendants' conduct caused Plaintiff harm, and (3) paragraphs 13 and 28 of the complaint regarding the facts that support the claim of tortious interference. Defendants' motion to make more definite and certain is supported by the concurrentlyfiled memorandum in support and the attached pages of the complaint, marked as required by UTCR 5.020(2). DATED this 13th day of February, 2008. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP B derekgreen@dwt.c,om Telephone: 503-24 1-23 00 Facsimile: 503-778-5260 Of Attorneys for Defendants StubHub, Inc. and ebay Inc. Trial Attorney: Everett W. Jack, Jr. Page 2 -DEFENDANTS' RULE 21 MOTIONS DAVIS WRIGHT T R E W LLP 1300 S.W. Fifth Avenue. Suite 2300 Portland, Oregon 97201. (503) 241-2300 PDX 1817065~10086054-000001

ENTERED c I L- F!\ rp JAN - 9 2008 I; 2028 Jdlj -9 p;l 3: 59, 1N REGISTERBY LR!. I. -.,,j 2 t, u'l IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH L...,.. % : :. i~ii c;s;;~y SHARON FEHRS, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, STUBHUB, INC.,.a Delaware corporation, and ebay INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. I COMPLAINT FOR CLASS ACTION (Public Nuisance, Statutory Tort, Tortious Interference, and Other Claims) CLAIM NOT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY ARBITRATION For her complaint, on her behalf and on behalf of the class of persons described below, plaintiff alleges as follows: 1.Plaintiff is now and at all relevant times was an individual residing in Oregon and 18 entitled to the benefits and protections of Portland City Code 5 14A50.060. That provision 19 prohibits any person from offering for sale any ticket for an event at the Rose Garden Arena at a,-r.20 price greater than the retail price printed thereon. Violations of the provision are deemed a.: 21 public nuisance. StubHub, Inc., is now and at all relevant times has been a duly organized. 24 Delaware corporation doing business in Oregon ("StubHub"). Page 1 - Complaint for Class Action MILLER NASH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE: (503) 214-5K58 3rutl U.S. IIANCORP 'TOWER I1 I S.W. FIFTH AVENUE POUTI.ANI1 ORRCnN *17?.111-1L91 I EXHIBIT PAGE _b OF.<

ebay Inc. is now and at all relevant times has been a duly organized Delaware 3 corporation doing business in Oregon ("ebay"). StubHub is a subsidiary of ebay. 4 4 5 When Bruce Springsteen and the E-Street Band announced their 2007-2008 tour, 6 Portland, Oregon, was not a listed venue. Several months later, Springsteen and the E-Street 7 Band announced that they would perfom at the Rose Garden in Portland, Oregon, on March 28, 8 2008. Tickets for the performance would be offered for sale from the official venue over the 9 Internet beginning at 10 a.m. PST on December 8,2007. 10 5 11 Plaintiff wanted to attend the Portland performance with friends. Beginning 12 promptly at 10 a.m. PST on December 8,2007, plaintiff, through her computer, sought to 13 purchase four premier tickets to the Portland performance. Despite repeated effort to do so, 14 plaintiff was unable to purchase four premier tickets for the performance through the official 15 ticket outlet. 16 6 17 Plaintiff did notice that despite her inability to obtain premier tickets, defendant 18 StubHub almost immediately offered for sale on its Web site numerous premier tickets to the Portland performance. Those tickets were offered at prices greatly exceeding the price at which the tickets were officially offered for sale through the official on-line ticket purchasing site. At or about the same time, defendant ebay had similar offerings. 7 It has been widely reported that untold others have experienced a similar inability to purchase premier tickets from off~cial Web sites for performances at various venues but that such tickets are readily available from defendants' Web sites at prices greatly in excess of official prices. Page 2 - Con~plaint for Class Action MILLER NASH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE: ISn3, I21-5aSx 33UO V.S. OANCORP TOWER I I I S.W. FIFTH AVENUE PORTI.ANn OREGON '17103.?OV1

provided, as follows: Portland City Code $ 14A.50.060 now pro<des,'and at all relevant times has "14A.50.060 Resale of Tickets to Events at Municipal Facilities at a Premium Price Prohibited. "~ickets'to all events at municipally-owned facilities, including the Memorial Coliseum, PGE Park, and the public plaza at the Rose Quarter, and tickets to all events at the Rose Garden Arena other than season tickets, shall have printed thereon the retail price thereof. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or offer for sale any ticket for an event at any municipally-owned facility, or for any event at the Rose Garden Arena, at a price greater than the retail price printed thereon or at a price greater than the original retail price. Notwithstanding the above, this Section shall not be construed to prohibit service fees or charges imposed or collected by ticket outlets where service fees or charges are specifically authorized by the management of the facilities." Portland City Code $5 1.01.140 and 14A.20.050(A) now provide, and at all relevant times have provided, that a violation of the Code is a public nuisance. Portland City Code $ 14A.20.050(B) now provides, and at all relevant times has provided, that aiding and abetting a violation of the Code is deemed a violation of the Code. Defendants intentionally are now maintaining, and at all relevant times have maintained, Web sites on which they offer for sale tickets to events at the Rose Garden at prices in excess of the retail price of the ticket. Defendants' conduct constitutes, at the least, the act of aiding and abetting a violation of the Code. Plaintiff has suffered a special injury from defendants' conduct. She has been unable to purchase premier tickets as a result of defendants' conduct and will be unable to do so in the future if defendants are permitted to continue their conduct alleged hereip. Page 3 - Complaint for Class Action MILLER NASH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE: (5113) 212-5858 j4llu 0.5. BANCORP TOWER I I I S.W. FIFTII AVENUE BABE, --, 3- QF 5

2 In addition, defendants have intentionally interfered with plaintiffs prospective 3 advantare. Plaintiff has a right to an equal ability to purchase premier tickets for performances 4 at the Rose Garden and other venues. Defendants' maintenance of their Web sites directly and 5 substantially facilitates the deprivation of plaintiffs equal ability to purchase premier tickets. As 6 a result, plaintiff has suffered injury, and defendants have been unjustly enriched. 7 CLASS ALLEGATIONS 8 14 9 Plaintiff seeks to bring this action as a class action on behalf of herself and all 10 other persons who have sought to purchase premier tickets for events at the Rose Garden (or 1 1 other municipal venues) for the six years prior to commencement of this action (the "Class"). 12 NUMEROSITY 13 15 14 The proposed Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impractical. On 15 information and belief, thousands of persons fall within the definition of the Class. COMMON QUESTIONS OF FACT OR LAW 16 18 There are questions of law and fact common to the Class, including: 19 (a) Whether defendants have violated the Code; 20 @) Whether defendants have tortiously interfered with prospective advantage 21 of members of the Class; 22 (c) Whether Class members have a right to damages or restitution as a result 23 of defendants' conduct or whether defendants should be required to disgorge their unlawfully 24 obtained profits; and 25 (d) Whether defendants should be enjoined from operating their Web sites as 26 alleged herein. Page 4 - Complaint for Class Action MILLER NASH LLP ATTORNEYS I T LA\V TELEPHONE: (503) 111-SXJR 311111 U.S. BANCORP TOWER I I I S.W. FIFTll AVENUE PORTI.4ND OREGON Y73111.?6.>V

1 25 2 The court should declare that defendants' conduct as alleged herein is the 3 maintenance of a public nuisance. The court should further enjoin defendants fiom maintaining 4 a Web site in a manner that violates the Code as alleged herein. 5 26 6 To the extent that defendants have profited from their maintenance of a public 7 nuisance, they should be required to disgorge all such profits, with interest. SECOND CLAIM Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 26 of the complaint and further alleges as follows: Defendants have ~ortiously interfered with plaintiffs prospective advantage and that of the members of the Class and will continue to do so unless enjoined. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment as follows: 16. (1) That the court declare that defendants' conduct as alleged herein is 17 wrongful; 18 (2) That the court enjoin defendants and each of them from the conduct 19 complained of herein; 20 (3) That defendants be required to disgorge their profits, and interest thereon, 21 obtained as a result of the conduct alleged herein; 22 (4) That plaintiff be awarded her reasonable attorney fees and costs and 2 j disbursements; and 24 Page 7 - Complaint for Class Action MILLER NASI-I LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE: (5031 224-Ins8 34OU U.S. DANCORP TOWER 11 I S.W. FIFTH AVENUE PORTI.AND OREGON 8V72112.16VU

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that I served a true copy of the foregoing DEFENDANTS EBAY INC.3 AND STUBHUB, INC.'S RULE 21 MOTIONS on: 3 John F. Neupert, OSB #783168 4 Miller Nash LLP 111 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 3400 5 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone (503) 205-2461 6 Facsimile (503) 224-0155 Email john.neupert@millernash.com 7 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff Sharon Fehrs 0 10 jlfi by mailing a copy thereof in a sealed, first-class postage prepaid envelope, addressed to said attorney's last-known address and deposited in the U.S. mail at Portland, Oregon on the date set forth below; - 0 by causing a copy thereof to be hand-delivered to said attorney's address as shdwn above on the date set forth below; 12 [7 by sending a copy thereof via overnight courier in a sealed, prepaid envelope, addressed to said attorney's last-known address on the date set forth below; 13 [7 by faxing a copy thereof to said attorney at hisfher last-known facsimile number l4 on the date set forth below; or 15 by emailing a copy thereof to said attorney at hislher last-known email address as 16 set forth above. 17 Dated this 13th day of February, 2008. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP / Derek D. ree en$^^ #042960 Of Attorneys for Defendants StubHub, Inc. and ebay Inc. Trial Attorney: Everett W. Jack, Jr. Page 1 - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 1300 S.W. Fifth Avenue. Suite 2300 Portland, Oregon 97201 - (503) 241-2300 PDX 1817065~10086054-000001