IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION. ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

Similar documents
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv WHA-GMB Document 137 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 17

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

Distinctions with a Difference: A Comparison of Federal and State Court Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 08/16/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 28-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case pwb Doc 1097 Filed 11/26/14 Entered 11/26/14 10:26:12 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011)

United States Court of Appeals

Case: , 04/24/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 23-1, Page 1 of 2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011)

Case: , 08/14/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 04/25/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 61-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 05/19/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 33-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No.

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-1570-L MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FEDERAL RULES APPELLATE PROCEDURE

Case: , 07/03/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 12-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Appellant, v. Case No. 8:12-cv-2498-T-33 Bankr. No. 8:11-bk CPM ORDER

1 HB By Representative Williams (JD) 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 11-MAR-15. Page 0

Seminole Appellate Court Rules of Appellate Procedure

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No

Case: , 10/18/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 57-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Karen Tucker v. Secretary US Department of Hea

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Case: 3:18-cv JJH Doc #: 40 Filed: 01/08/19 1 of 6. PageID #: 296

Case: , 03/23/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 38-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:14-cv CG-N Document 59 Filed 01/25/15 Page 1 of 6

De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144 (C.A.9 (Cal.), 1990)

Case: , 04/30/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 58-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 12/29/2014, ID: , DktEntry: 20-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Appellants-Plaintiffs, V. CASE NO Appellee-Defendant, Appellee-Intervenor-Defendant.

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

A Lawyer's Guide to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure - A Practical Handbook, 3 J. Marshall J. of Prac. & Proc. 260 (1970)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv TCB.

Case 2:09-cv CAS-MAN Document 107 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:1464 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 04/17/2019, ID: , DktEntry: 37-1, Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HILAO v. ESTATE OF MARCOS

Case: , 02/19/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 54-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:12-cv Document 41 Filed in TXSD on 05/24/12 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

West Virginia Manufactured Housing Construction Safety Standards Act. Chapter 21, Article 9 Code of West Virginia and Legislative Rule

Richard Silva v. Craig Easter

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, LUCERO and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.

Framing the Issues on Appeal Nuts and Bolts November 15, 2016

Case: /20/2014 ID: DktEntry: 56-1 Page: 1 of 4 (1 of 13) NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: /16/2014 ID: DktEntry: 37-1 Page: 1 of 4 (1 of 9) NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 12/15/2015, ID: , DktEntry: 51-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TITLE VI JUDICIAL REMEDIES CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT. Seminar Presentation Rob Foos

Chapter 355. (House Bill 728) Residential Property Foreclosure Required Documents Timing of Mediation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL NO. 4:86CV00291

Case 1:05-cv IMK-JSK Document 338 Filed 07/02/2008 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case 4:16-cv Y Document 52 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID 678

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case: , 07/23/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 39-1, Page 1 of 6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 4:15-cv CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 3:16-cv CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. WAYNE BOUYEA, : : Petitioner : : v. : CIVIL NO. 3:CV : MEMORANDUM

3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE. The New Hampshire Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules

By Jeffry M. Nichols, Shareholder, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

December 31, 2014 FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Case: , 03/16/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 06/04/2018 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Docket No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff Jamehr Small, a prisoner confined at the Livingston Correctional Facility,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before HOLMES, PORFILIO, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

_._..._------_._ _.._... _..._..._}(

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv CAP Document 47 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 4:97-cv JCP Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/1998 Page 1 of 10

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

Case: , 01/02/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 43-1, Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

District Court, E. D. New York. April, 1874.

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. In re: CHRISTOPHER KNECHT, Petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

ORDER ON ARRAIGNMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO.

United States Court of Appeals

Anthony Catanzaro v. Nora Fischer

Transcription:

Case 2:15-cv-00620-MHT-TFM Document 70 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST, INC.; and JANE DOE, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 2:15cv620-MHT ROBERT BENTLEY, Governor of Alabama, in his official capacity; and STEPHANIE McGEE AZAR, Acting Commissioner, Alabama Medicaid Agency, in her official capacity, Defendants. (WO ORDER Before the Court is the parties Joint Motion to Enter Final Order (doc. no. 69. Upon consideration of the motion, it is ORDERED that the motion (doc. no. 69 is granted as follows: Defendants Robert Bentley and Stephanie McGee Azar, and all those acting in concert with them, are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from suspending Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc., or terminating

Case 2:15-cv-00620-MHT-TFM Document 70 Filed 11/30/15 Page 2 of 3 their provider agreements based upon any allegation, video or documentation prepared by, or in concert with, the Center for Medical Progress that has been released or made available as of the date of this Order. PROVIDED HOWEVER, that nothing in this Order prohibits the Governor and Commissioner from terminating Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc. s Medicaid provider agreements for cause as defined by the Medicaid Act, should such cause arise in the future. Defendants Robert Bentley and Stephanie McGee Azar, and all those acting in concert with them, are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from terminating Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc. s Medicaid provider agreements on an at-will basis. Defendants shall pay Plaintiffs counsel fifty one thousand, nine dollars and eighty nine cents ($51,009.89 in full satisfaction of any claim for attorneys fees, expenses and costs within ninety (90 days of this Order. 2

Case 2:15-cv-00620-MHT-TFM Document 70 Filed 11/30/15 Page 3 of 3 The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 30th day of November, 2015. _ /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-00620-MHT-TFM Document 70-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 2 A copy of this checklist is available at the website for the USCA, 11th Circuit at www.ca11.uscourts.gov Effective on December 1, 2013, the new fee to file an appeal will increase from $455.00 to $505.00. CIVIL APPEALS JURISDICTION CHECKLIST 1. Appealable Orders: Courts of Appeals have jurisdiction conferred and strictly limited by statute: (a (b (c (d (e Appeals from final orders pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1291: Only final orders and judgments of district courts, or final orders of bankruptcy courts which have been appealed to and fully resolved by a district court under 28 U.S.C. 158, generally are appealable. A final decision is one that ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment. Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Mestre, 701 F.2d 1 365, 1 368 ( 11th Ci r. 1 983. A magistrate judge s report and recommendation is not final and appealable until judgment thereon is entered by a district court judge. 28 U.S.C. 636(c. In cases involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a judgment as to fewer than all parties or all claims is not a final, appealable decision unless the district court has certified the judgment for immediate review under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b. Williams v. Bishop, 732 F.2d 885, 885-86 (11th Cir. 1984. A judg ment which resolves all issues except matters, such as attorneys fees and costs, that are collateral to the merits, is immediately appealable. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 486 U.S.196, 201, 108 S.Ct. 1717, 1721-22, 100 L.Ed.2d 178 (1988; LaChance v. Duffy s Draft House, Inc., 146 F.3d 832, 837 (11th Cir. 1998. Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(a: Appeals are permitted from orders granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions or refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions... and from [i]nterlocutory decrees... determining the rights and liabilities of parties to admiralty cases in which appeals from final decrees are allowed. Interlocutory appeals from orders denying temporary restraining orders are not permitted. Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b and Fed.R.App.P. 5: The certification specified in 28 U.S.C. 1292(b must be obtained before a petition for permission to appeal is filed in the Court of Appeals. The district court s denial of a motion for certification is not itself appealable. Appeals pursuant to judicially created exceptions to the finality rule: Limited exceptions are discussed in cases including, but not limited to: Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546, 69S.Ct. 1221, 1225-26, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949; Atlantic Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass n v. Blythe Eastman Paine Webber, Inc., 890 F.2d 371, 376 (11th Cir. 1989; Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp., 379 U.S. 148, 157, 85 S.Ct. 308, 312, 13 L.Ed.2d 199 (1964. Rev.: 4/04

Case 2:15-cv-00620-MHT-TFM Document 70-1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 2 of 2 2. Time for Filing: The timely filing of a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. Rinaldo v. Corbett, 256 F.3d 1276, 1278 (11th Cir. 2001. In civil cases, Fed.R.App.P. 4(a and (c set the following time limits: (a (b (c (d (e Fed.R.App.P. 4(a(1: A notice of appeal in compliance with the requirements set forth in Fed.R.App.P. 3 must be filed in the district court within 30 days after the entry of the order or judgment appealed from. However, if the United States or an officer or agency thereof is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed in the district court within 60 days after such entry. THE NOTICE MUST BE RECEIVED AND FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT NO LATER THAN THE LAST DAY OF THE APPEAL PERIOD no additional days are provided for mailing. Special filing provisions for inmates are discussed below. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a(3: If one party timely files a notice of appeal, any other party may file a notice of appeal within 14 days after the date when the first notice was filed, or within the time otherwise prescribed by this Rule 4(a, whichever period ends later. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a(4: If any party makes a timely motion in the district court under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of a type specified in this rule, the time for appeal for all parties runs from the date of entry of the order disposing of the last such timely filed motion. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a(5 and 4(a(6: Under certain limited circumstances, the district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal. Under Rule 4(a(5, the time may be extended if a motion for an extension is filed within 30 days after expiration of the time otherwise provided to file a notice of appeal, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Under Rule 4(a(6, the time may be extended if the district court finds upon motion that a party did not timely receive notice of the entry of the judgment or order, and that no party would be prejudiced by an extension. Fed.R.App.P. 4(c: If an inmate confined to an institution files a notice of appeal in either a civil case or a criminal case, the notice of appeal is timely if it is deposited in the institution s internal mail system on or before the last day for filing. Timely filing may be shown by a declaration in compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1746 or a notarized statement, either of which must set forth the date of deposit and state that first-class postage has been prepaid. 3. Format of the notice of appeal: Form 1, Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, is a suitable format. See also Fed.R.App.P. 3(c. A pro se notice of appeal must be signed by the appellant. 4. Effect of a notice of appeal: A district court loses jurisdiction (authority to act after the filing of a timely notice of appeal, except for actions in aid of appellate jurisdiction or to rule on a timely motion of the type specified in Fed.R.App.P. 4(a(4.