IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Similar documents
Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/03/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-789 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IQ BIOMETRIX S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 3:12-cv-686

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

Complaint for Patent Infringement

Case 6:08-cv Document 1 Filed 12/24/2008 Page 1 of 5 COMPLAINT

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. C.A. NO. Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/25/16 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) )

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. 1. This is an action for direct patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos.

Case 1:10-cv CMH -TRJ Document 1 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv RAJ -FBS Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC., EVEREADY BATTERY COMPANY, INC., v. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No.: 1:12-cv-02640 WAHL CLIPPER CORPORATION and WAHL CLIPPER NINGBO LTD., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiffs Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Eveready Battery Company, Inc. (collectively Energizer ) alleges against Defendants Wahl Clipper Corporation and Wahl Clipper Ningbo Ltd. (collectively Wahl or Defendants ) as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 2. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c), and 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) because Wahl Clipper Corporation resides in this judicial district and Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction here. 3. The Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants. Wahl Clipper Corporation is incorporated in the State of Illinois and resides in this judicial district. In addition, Wahl Clipper Corporation has entered into and conducted business in this judicial district and regularly avails itself of the benefits of this judicial district. On

information and belief, Defendants have entered into and conducted business in this judicial district related to the subject in dispute. Defendants have made, used, offered for sale, sold, and/or imported hair trimmer products containing primary lithium batteries that infringe Energizer s patent rights. Defendants have placed the infringing hair trimmer products in the stream of commerce with knowledge that the products will be offered for sale and/or sold in Illinois. The infringing products have been offered for sale and sold in Illinois. THE PARTIES 4. Plaintiff Energizer Holdings, Inc. is a Missouri corporation. Energizer Holdings, Inc. maintains corporate offices at 533 Maryville University Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63141. Plaintiff Eveready Battery Company, Inc. is a Delaware corporation. Eveready Battery Company, Inc. maintains corporate offices at 533 Maryville University Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63141. Energizer is in the business of making, offering for sale, selling and supporting a variety of primary batteries, including but not limited to the Energizer Ultimate Lithium and Advanced Lithium batteries. 5. On information and belief, Defendant Wahl Clipper Corporation is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, with its principal place of business at 2900 North Locust Street, Sterling, Illinois 61081. 6. On information and belief, Defendant Wahl Clipper Ningbo Ltd. is a Chinese corporation with its principal place of business at Xikou, Fenghua, Zhejiang 315502, People s Republic of China. On information and believe, Wahl Clipper Ningbo Ltd. is wholly or majority owned by Wahl Clipper Corporation. 2

FACTUAL BACKGROUND Energizer s Patents 7. On March 1, 1994, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 5,290,414 (the 414 Patent), for an invention entitled Separator/Electrolyte Combination For A Nonaqueous Cell. (A copy of the 414 patent is attached herewith as Exhibit A.) Energizer owns all rights, title, and interest in and to the 414 Patent. Energizer has complied with the requirement of 35. U.S.C. 287(a) by placing a notice of the 414 Patent on packages of batteries that embody the invention. 8. On April 12, 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 7,923,138 (the 138 Patent), for an invention entitled Housing for a Sealed Electrochemical Battery Cell. (A copy of the 138 patent is attached herewith as Exhibit B.) Energizer owns all rights, title, and interest in and to the 138 Patent. 9. On June 28, 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 7,968,230 (the 230 Patent), for an invention entitled High Discharge Capacity Lithium Battery. (A copy of the 230 patent is attached herewith as Exhibit C.) Energizer owns all rights, title, and interest in and to the 230 Patent. 10. On August 30, 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 8,007,940 (the 940 Patent), for an invention entitled Separator/Electrolyte Combination For A Nonaqueous Cell. (A 3

copy of the 940 patent is attached herewith as Exhibit D.) Energizer owns all rights, title, and interest in and to the 940 Patent. 11. On October 26, 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and legally issued United States Reissue Patent No. RE41,886 (the 886 Patent), for an invention entitled Nonaqueous Electrochemical Cell with Improved Energy Density. (A copy of the 886 patent is attached herewith as Exhibit E.) The 886 Patent is a reissue of U.S. Patent No. 7,157,185 (the 185 Patent). Energizer owns all rights, title, and interest in and to the 886 Patent. Energizer has complied with the requirement of 35. U.S.C. 287(a) by placing a notice of the 886 Patent and/or the 185 Patent on packages of batteries that embody the invention. Wahl s Infringing Products 12. Wahl is in the business of making, offering for sale, importing, and selling electrical hair clippers and trimmers, including the Lithium Pen Trimmer, pictured below. 4

13. Wahl s Lithium Pen Trimmer is sold with a primary lithium battery, which Wahl includes in the product packaging. Wahl advertises the battery with the word Lithium appearing prominently on the front of the packaging. 14. Wahl also advertises the lithium battery on the back of the product packaging, as follows: AAA Lithium Battery included. You can get years of use with the included battery. 15. The lithium batteries included with Wahl s Lithium Pen Trimmers are labeled Great Power and LiFeS2 AAA 1100mAh 1.5V. The lithium batteries included with Wahl s Lithium Pen Trimmers are manufactured in the Peoples Republic of China and supplied by Great Power Battery (H.K.) Co., Ltd. 16. Defendant Wahl Clipper Ningbo Ltd. assembles the Lithium Pen Trimmers in the People s Republic of China. 17. On information and belief, Wahl imports the Lithium Pen Trimmers into the United States and sells the Lithium Pen Trimmers to distributors and/or retailers for retail sale in this district and throughout the United States. 5

COUNT I Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,290,414 18. Energizer hereby re-alleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1-13 as if fully set forth herein. 19. Wahl has been and still is infringing, contributing to the infringement of, and/or inducing the infringement of the 414 Patent by making, selling, using, offering for sale, and/or importing into the United States Lithium Pen Trimmers embodying the patented invention and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 20. To the extent that Wahl has continued and does continue its infringing activities after receiving notice of the 414 Patent, such infringement is willful, entitling Energizer to the recovery of treble damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284. In addition, this is an exceptional case justifying an award of attorneys fees and costs to Energizer pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285. 21. Energizer has been damaged by Wahl s infringement, which will continue unless enjoined by this Court. COUNT II Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,923,138 22. Energizer hereby re-alleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1-17 as if fully set forth herein. 23. Wahl has been and still is infringing, contributing to the infringement of, and/or inducing the infringement of the 138 Patent by making, selling, using, offering for sale, and/or importing into the United States Lithium Pen Trimmers 6

embodying the patented invention and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 24. To the extent that Wahl has continued and does continue its infringing activities after receiving notice of the 138 Patent, such infringement is willful, entitling Energizer to the recovery of treble damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284. In addition, this is an exceptional case justifying an award of attorneys fees and costs to Energizer pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285. 25. Energizer has been damaged by Wahl s infringement, which will continue unless enjoined by this Court. COUNT III Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,968,230 26. Energizer hereby re-alleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1-21 as if fully set forth herein. 27. Wahl has been and still is infringing, contributing to the infringement of, and/or inducing the infringement of the 230 Patent by making, selling, using, offering for sale, and/or importing into the United States Lithium Pen Trimmers embodying the patented invention and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 28. To the extent that Wahl has continued and does continue its infringing activities after receiving notice of the 230 Patent, such infringement is willful, entitling Energizer to the recovery of treble damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284. In addition, this is an exceptional case justifying an award of attorneys fees and costs to Energizer pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285. 7

29. Energizer has been damaged by Wahl s infringement, which will continue unless enjoined by this Court. COUNT IV Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,007,940 30. Energizer hereby re-alleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1-25 as if fully set forth herein. 31. Wahl has been and still is infringing, contributing to the infringement of, and/or inducing the infringement of the 940 Patent by making, selling, using, offering for sale, and/or importing into the United States Lithium Pen Trimmers embodying the patented invention and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 32. To the extent that Wahl has continued and does continue its infringing activities after receiving notice of the 940 Patent, such infringement is willful, entitling Energizer to the recovery of treble damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284. In addition, this is an exceptional case justifying an award of attorneys fees and costs to Energizer pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285. 33. Energizer has been damaged by Wahl s infringement, which will continue unless enjoined by this Court. COUNT V Infringement of U.S. Reissue Patent No. RE41,886 34. Energizer hereby re-alleges the allegations of Paragraphs 1-29 as if fully set forth herein. 35. Wahl has been and still is infringing, contributing to the infringement of, and/or inducing the infringement of the 886 Patent by making, selling, using, 8

offering for sale, and/or importing into the United States Lithium Pen Trimmers embodying the patented invention and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. 36. To the extent that Wahl has continued and does continue its infringing activities after receiving notice of the 886 Patent, such infringement is willful, entitling Energizer to the recovery of treble damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284. In addition, this is an exceptional case justifying an award of attorneys fees and costs to Energizer pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285. 37. Energizer has been damaged by Wahl s infringement, which will continue unless enjoined by this Court. WHEREFORE, Energizer prays for judgment and relief as follows: A. A preliminary and permanent injunction against Wahl s continued infringement, inducing of infringement, and contributing to infringement of the 414, 138, 230, 940 and/or 886 patents (collectively the "Asserted Patents"); B. An award of damages in favor of Energizer and against Wahl sufficient to compensate Energizer for Wahl s infringement of the Asserted Patents, and an assessment of prejudgment interest and post-judgment interest; C. Trebling of damages for willful infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284; D. A finding by the Court that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 285; E. An award to Energizer of its reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, and costs of this action; and 9

F. Such other and further relief as the Court finds just and proper. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 38, Plaintiff Energizer hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. Dated: April 11, 2012 Respectfully submitted: s/ Charles M. McMahon Gary M. Ropski Charles M. McMahon Bryan Leitenberger Jeremy S. Snodgrass BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE NBC Tower Suite 3600 455 North Cityfront Plaza Drive Chicago, Illinois 60611 Telephone: (312) 321-4200 Facsimile: (312) 321-4299 Email: gropski@brinkshofer.com cmcmahon@brinkshofer.com bleitenberger@brinkshofer.com jsnodgrass@brinkshofer.com Attorneys for ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. and EVEREADY BATTERY COMPANY, INC. 10