ImpeachmentProject.org Resolution in Support of Congressional Investigation regarding Impeachment of President Donald J. Trump

Similar documents
IMPEACHMENT: A Guide for Candidates

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE RESOLUTION REFERRED TO RULES AND EXECUTIVE NOMINATIONS, JUNE 22, 2018 A RESOLUTION

Mayor Jesse Arreguín and Councilmember Sophie Hahn. Support for the Investigation to Impeach President Donald Trump

SUBJECT: RESOLUTION CALLING ON THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO INITIATE THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS AGAINST PRESIDENT DONALD J.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. WAYNE W. WILLIAMS, Colorado Secretary of State, in his individual capacity.

Name: Adv: Period: Cycle 5 Week 1 Day 1 Notes: Relations between the US and Russia from 1991 Today

U.S. Constitution and Impeachment

Suggestions for Launching An Impeachment Campaign in Your City/County Quick Start Guide & Tool Kit

WikiLeaks Document Release

CRS Report for Congress

Constitution Cheat Sheet

One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America

POLICY INITIATIVES OF PRESIDENT TRUMP S CABINET:

Terrorism and Related Terms in Statute and Regulation: Selected Language

FEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation

Unit 7 Our Current Government

The Impeachment of Richard Nixon

200 Days of Donald Trump

Satan's Resurrection

Obstruction of Justice: An Abridged Overview of Related Federal Criminal Laws

City of El Cenizo, Texas, et al v. State of Texas Doc. 79 Att. 1

We the People: The Role of the Citizen in the United States

Constitution Test Study Guide

Impeach Donald Trump Now Campaign FAQs

Introduction to the Cold War

B[si]s of Suit w/ Sister Anaidah El

The Countering America s Adversaries through Sanctions Act 2017, the Trump Administration and Bureaucratic Drift

A Guide to the Bill of Rights

Case 1:18-cr ABJ Document 38 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA : : : : : : :

Articles of Confederation

National Latino Survey Sept 2017

Statement of Facts and Allegations against Chief Justice Roy S. Moore. Submitted February 26, 2015

On Dec 20, 2017, at 3:17 PM, Lee S Gliddon Jr wrote: POSTED

Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001

The Washington Post Barton Gellman, Washington Post Staff Writer March 11, 1992, Wednesday, Final Edition

Case 1:18-cv EGS Document 13 Filed 05/01/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Introduction. Analysis

False Claims Act. Definitions:

Decree By Federal Law No. 1 of Combating Terrorism Offences. We, Zayed Bin Sultan Al Nahyan President of The State of the United Arab Emirates;

Anti-Corruption Policy

HOUSE BILL 2162 AN ACT

The Constitution of the United States of America What problems did the constitutional delegates face as they met in Philadelphia in 1787?

Union of Concerned of Concerned Scientists Press Conference on the North Korean Missile Crisis. April 20, 2017

The Ordeal of Reconstruction. Chapter 22

Act on the Protection of Specially Designated Secrets

5.1d- Presidential Roles

Background Paper on Geneva Conventions and Persons Held by U.S. Forces

Military Service Offences

POLICY STATEMENT. Topic: False Claims Act Date Effective: 10/13/08. X Revised New Section: Corporate Compliance Number: 10.05

Mueller's End Game: Maybe As Soon As Trump Wants, But Not How He'd Like

The Political Assassination of Michael Flynn

Signed February 11, 2004; provisionally applied from February 11, 2004; entered into force December 9, 2004.

Civics Study Guide: Final 2015

Suite RE: Investigating Improper White House Influence on Specific Investigations

entry into force 7 December 1978, in accordance with Article 23

tinitro ~tatrs ~rnatr

Proper Business Practices and Ethics Policy

Five Things to Watch Out for with Iran Deal Decertification

Witness Interference in Cases before the International Criminal Court

House Judiciary Committee Analysis of the Nunes Memo

Analysis of Joint Resolution on Iraq, by Dennis J. Kucinich Page 2 of 5

Origins of the Cold War

Conflict on the Korean Peninsula: North Korea and the Nuclear Threat Student Readings. North Korean soldiers look south across the DMZ.

Florida Latino Survey Sept 2017

St Michael s Prep School Anti-bribery and corruption policy

Criminal Procedure. 8 th Edition Joel Samaha. Wadsworth Publishing

ACT ON THE PUNISHMENT OF CRIMES WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

Student Name: House of Representatives 1. Must be years old 2. years a citizen Length of Term: 2. How many terms can they serve?

Modern Presidents: President Nixon

2017 END OF YEAR UPDATE

Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen Remarks Prepared for Delivery to Chinese National Defense University Beij ing, China July 13,2000

CHAIR S COLUMN October 2017 Robert N. Weiner

SCPS - Civics EOC Review Guide

The Honorable Donald Trump President of the United States White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C

The President pro tempore: The managers on the part of the House will be received and escorted to the well of the Senate.

ANTI-CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY POLICY - INCLUDING CODE OF PRACTICE ON BUSINESS GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY

Main Idea: The framers of the Constitution created a flexible plan for governing the U.S far into the future.

KNOW YOUR CONSTITUTION EXAM. 1. The legislative powers of the Federal Government are vested in the:

Appendix C SCPS - Civics EOC Review Guide. Congress. Makes Laws (House of Representatives and Senate) Executive Branch

Chapter 6, Section 1 Understanding the Constitution. Pages

The Americans (Survey)

Enforcement and prosecution policy

The Articles of Confederation (Simplified) Approved by all 13 states between 1777 and 1781.

Ethics in Judicial Elections

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Jim Porter <jporter2327 On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Jim Porter

THE EARLY COLD WAR YEARS. US HISTORY Chapter 15 Section 2

Anti-Bribery Policy. Anti-Bribery Policy

CXXVII. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 206

Section 9-1: Understanding the Constitution

Methods of Proposal. Method 1 By 2/3 vote in both the House and the Senate. [most common method of proposing an amendment]

nitcd rates cnat February 8, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

Student Handout: Unit 3 Lesson 3. The Cold War

Summer News Quiz 2015

EXTRADITION TREATY WITH THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

Small Business Lending Industry Briefing

VII. AUSTRALIA 8 SUMMARY OF LEGISLATION OF AUSTRALIA RELATED TO TERRORISM Counter Terrorism Legislation package. (a)

Internet gadfly Kim Dotcom admits FBI document... document on Seth Rich is bogus b he won t delete it TRAVIS GETTYS 30 MAY 2017 AT 08:47 ET

Corporate Administration Detection and Prevention of Fraud and Abuse CP3030

Trump s Cabinet. Letter to Delegates: Introduction:

Hi there I m (Name). You know by now that our president has a bunch of

Transcription:

ImpeachmentProject.org Resolution in Support of Congressional Investigation regarding Impeachment of President Donald J. Trump WHEREAS, the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution provides that no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State, WHEREAS, the Domestic Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution provides that, besides the fixed salary for his four-year term, the President shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them, WHEREAS, Donald J. Trump, the President of the United States, owns various business interests and receives various streams of income from all over the world, by means of which he receives emoluments from foreign governments, states of the United States, or the United States itself, WHEREAS, the term emoluments includes a broad range of financial benefits, including but not limited to monetary payments, purchase of goods and services even for fair market value, subsidies, tax breaks, extensions of credit, and favorable regulatory treatment, WHEREAS, leading constitutional scholars and government ethics experts warned Donald J. Trump shortly after the November 2016 election that, unless he fully divested his businesses and invested the money in conflict-free assets or a blind trust, he would violate the Constitution from the moment he took office, WHEREAS, on January 11, 2017, nine days before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump announced a plan that would, if carried out, remove him from day-to-day operations of his businesses, but not eliminate any of the ongoing flow of emoluments from foreign governments, state governments, or the United States government, WHEREAS, on January 20, 2017, Donald J. Trump took the oath of office and became President of the United States, WHEREAS, from the moment he took office, President Trump has been in violation of the Foreign Emoluments Clause and the Domestic Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution, thereby corruptly advancing his personal wealth, undermining the integrity of the Presidency, and violating the public trust,

WHEREAS, section 30121 of chapter 52 of the United States Code prohibits the solicitation, acceptance, or receipt of a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value... in connection with a Federal, State, or local election from a foreign national, WHEREAS, on June 3, 2016, Donald Trump Jr., Trump s eldest son, exchanged a series of emails setting up a meeting to receive incriminating information about his father s general election opponent, which was described as coming from the Russian government, as part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump, WHEREAS, on June 9, 2016 Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, Trump s thencampaign manager, and Jared Kushner, Trump s son-in-law and senior advisor, met with several Russian citizens linked to the government with the intention of acquiring the information offered in the June 3 emails, WHEREAS, on July 8, 2017, the day this meeting was publicly revealed, Donald Trump Jr. released a public statement, which was later shown to be misleading, about the circumstances and purpose of the meeting, WHEREAS, it has been reported that, on July 8, 2017, Donald J. Trump personally dictated his son s misleading statement about the meeting, WHEREAS, on May 9, 2017, Trump fired the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, James Comey, WHEREAS, on the date of his firing, Director Comey was leading one or more investigations that might have incriminated President Trump and/or his close associates, WHEREAS, regardless of the ultimate outcome of those criminal investigations, President Trump interfered with them by firing Director Comey, WHEREAS, Trump has advocated illegal violence, given aid and comfort to white supremacists and neo-nazis, and undermined the constitutional protections of equal protection under law, WHEREAS, in August 2017, Donald J. Trump, after neo-nazis and white supremacists marched on Charlottesville, Virginia, murdering one peaceful protestor and injuring several others in a terror attack, blamed the violence on both sides and stated that the neo-nazi and white supremacist marchers included very fine people,

WHEREAS, Donald J. Trump has abused the pardon power of the President, WHEREAS, on August 26, 2017, Donald J. Trump pardoned Joseph Arpaio, the former Arizona Sheriff who was convicted of criminal contempt of court for willfully and openly defying a judicial order to cease a practice, which the court found to be unconstitutional, of detaining people, based on their presumed Latino ancestry, without reasonable suspicion that they had committed any crime, WHEREAS, in our nation s history no previous president has ever pardoned a public official convicted of criminal contempt of court for willfully disobeying a court order to stop violating individuals constitutional rights, WHEREAS, the pardon undermines separation of powers and due process of law by allowing an official to skirt a judicial mandate without consequences, WHEREAS, the pardon sends a dangerous message both to unscrupulous government officials who may be inclined to follow in Arpaio s path, and also to President Trump s associates who may be subpoenaed in connection with ongoing federal investigations, that he may be willing to use the pardon power to protect them from negative consequences for defying court orders, further undermining separation of powers and due process of law, and obstructing justice, WHEREAS, in the late summer of 2017, Donald J. Trump made increasingly reckless public threats against North Korea, including that [b]eing nice to Rocket Man hasn t worked, that [m]ilitary solutions were locked and loaded, that he had instructed the Secretary of State he was wasting his time negotiating with North Korean leadership because we ll do what has to be done, that the United States might have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea, that North Korea will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen, that only one thing will work, and that North Korea or its leadership won t be around much longer, WHEREAS, Donald J. Trump reportedly informed a United States senator that he would bomb North Korea if it continued testing missiles, WHEREAS, after Donald J. Trump reportedly told senior advisers that he wanted to increase the country s nuclear weapons stockpile eightfold, the Secretary of State was so alarmed by the president s lack of understanding of the risks of nuclear weapons that he reportedly referred to the president as a moron, WHEREAS, the existing tension between and lack of accurate understanding of intentions of the leadership of the United States and North Korea means that threats of invasion or bombing could easily lead to a misunderstanding or miscalculation resulting in the use of nuclear weapons by either or both sides,

WHEREAS, such a conflagration could quickly spread to South Korea, Japan, China, and/or Russia, the latter two of which also have, and might be drawn into an exchange of nuclear weapons, WHEREAS, available public evidence suggests that Donald J. Trump does not understand, and/or is unwilling or unable to understand, the risks of the use of nuclear weapons, or of how the North Korean leadership could interpret or misinterpret his verbal threats or movement of military forces as military attacks that lead them to respond with conventional or nuclear attacks on the United States or other nations, WHEREAS, Donald J. Trump s reckless threats of nuclear war against foreign nations, undermining and subverting the essential diplomatic functions and authority of federal agencies, including the United States Department of State, and other conduct that heightens the risk of hostilities involving weapons of mass destruction, grossly and wantonly endanger the peace and security of the United States, its people and people of other nations, with reckless disregard for the risk of death and grievous bodily harm, WHEREAS, Donald J. Trump has issued public statements, including on Twitter, pressuring the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to investigate Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Party, and other political adversaries, WHEREAS, Donald J. Trump has issued public comments on other pending criminal and court-martial proceedings, with the evident purpose to direct and influence the prosecution and outcome of specific proceedings, to the detriment of the independence of law enforcement from command influence and in derogation of the right to a fair trial, WHEREAS, Donald J. Trump has directed or endeavored to direct law enforcement, including the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, to investigate and prosecute political adversaries and others, for improper purposes not justified by any lawful function of his office, thereby eroding the rule of law, undermining the independence of law enforcement from politics, and compromising the constitutional right to due process of law, WHEREAS, Donald J. Trump has repeatedly attacked major U.S. news organizations as fake news and the enemy of the American people, and abused the power of his office in efforts to retaliate against the independent press, thus undermining the freedom of the press at home and abroad; WHEREAS, Donald J. Trump, through his administration, has cruelly and deliberately imprisoned children who have committed no crime, separately from

their parents, in violation of the fundamental human rights of both parents and children in contravention of the Constitution, in some cases resulting in permanent separation of children from their parents due to government action, in violation of due process of law and the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments; WHEREAS, Donald J. Trump stands accused by his own personal attorney of having made and directed payments of hush money to prevent two former mistresses from speaking publicly about his extramarital affairs, for the purpose of influencing the 2016 election, and in violation of federal campaign finance law; NOW, THEREFORE, THE [CITY/TOWN] RESOLVES to call upon the United States House of Representatives to support a resolution authorizing and directing the Committee on the Judiciary of said House to investigate whether sufficient grounds exist for the impeachment of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, including but not limited to the following violations: (1) violating the Foreign Emoluments Clause and Domestic Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution; (2) obstructing justice; (3) conspiring with others to: (a) commit crimes against the United States involving the solicitation and intended receipt by the Donald J. Trump campaign of things of value from a foreign government and other foreign nationals; and (b) conceal those violations; (4) advocating illegal violence, giving aid and comfort to white supremacists and neo-nazis, and undermining constitutional protections of equal protection under the law; (5) abusing the pardon power; (6) recklessly threatening nuclear war against foreign nations, undermining and subverting the essential diplomatic functions and authority of federal agencies, including the United States Department of State, and engaging in other conduct that grossly and wantonly endangers the peace and security of the United States, its people and people of other nations, by heightening the risk of hostilities involving weapons of mass destruction, with reckless disregard for the risk of death and grievous bodily harm; (7) directing or endeavoring to direct law enforcement, including the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, to investigate and prosecute political adversaries and others, for improper purposes not justified by any lawful function of his office, thereby eroding the rule of law, undermining the independence of law enforcement from politics, and compromising the constitutional right to due process of law; (8) undermining the freedom of the press; (9) cruelly and unconstitutionally imprisoning children and their families; and (10) making and directing illegal payments to influence the 2016 election.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED to call upon the [STATE] Legislature to adopt its own resolution calling upon the United States House of Representatives to support a resolution authorizing an investigation into whether sufficient grounds exist for the impeachment of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be transmitted officially to the Member[s] of the United States House of Representatives that represent[s] the [city/town], namely, the Honorable ; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be transmitted officially to the state legislator[s] that represent[s] the [city/town] in the [STATE] Legislature, namely, the Honorable ; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be transmitted officially to certain cities and communities in this state, namely,. Approved and enacted this day: