THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND RELIGION IN AMERICA PSC 291 Professor Jackson Spring 2016

Similar documents
THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND RELIGION IN AMERICA PSC 291 Professor Jackson Fall 2017

Freedom & The First Amendment Spring, 2005 PSC 291/Rel 297 Professors Green & Jackson

GOD AND THE LAW: THE RELIGION CLAUSES OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University Fall 2016

GOD AND THE LAW: THE RELIGION CLAUSES OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. George Mason University Law School Fall 2014

INTRODUCTION HOW IS THIS TEXTBOOK DIFFERENT FROM TRADITIONAL CASEBOOKS?...VII ABOUT THE AUTHOR...XI SUMMARY OF CONTENTS... XIII

Political Science 352S. Civil Liberties in the Modern State. Fall Wellesley College

PSC : Civil Liberties Spring 2013 Tuesday and Thursday, 2-3:15 pm Graham 307

Establishment of Religion

The Law of Church and State: U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Since 2002

Lecture: The First Amendment

TUFTS UNIVERSITY. U R B A N & E N V I R O M E N T A L POLICY AND P L A N N I N G L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s of S o c i a l P o l i c y

Courts and Civil Liberties Pol Sci 344

The Status of Constitutional Religious Liberty at the End of the Millenium

Religion Clauses in the First Amendment

TUFTS UNIVERSITY. U R B A N & E N V I R O M E N T A L POLICY AND P L A N N I N G L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s of S o c i a l P o l i c y UEP-0215

Free Exercise of Religion by Closely Held Corporations: Implications of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Government 357(M) THE STRUCTURE OF INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES

"[T]his Court should not legislate for Congress." Justice REHNQUIST. Bob Jones University v. United States

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Davey's Deviant Discretion: An Incorporated Establishment Clause Should Require the State to Maintain Funding Neutrality

PLSC 215: Civil Rights and Liberties in a Diverse Society (Your Rights and Liberties) Honors [AKA The Forbidden Dinner Party Topics]

RIGHTS GUARANTEED IN ORIGINAL TEXT CIVIL LIBERTIES VERSUS CIVIL RIGHTS

Andrew R. Lewis. The public perception of the increasing politicization of the judiciary is growing within

IN FAVOR OF RESTORING THE SHERBERT RULE WITH QUALIFICATIONS

Summary The 111 th Congress has considered issues relating to health insurance for uninsured Americans (e.g., H.R. 3962, Affordable Health Care for Am

POL 744: Constitutional Law II Civil Rights. Dr. Carrington Office Hours: M-W 10:00am-11:30am. Assignments

No , -1453, -1505, 15-35, -105, -119, -191 In the Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT APPEAL CASE NO

SCOTUS Comparison Cases

Hours: MW 12:30-1:30 (office) and by and appointment Phone: ;

Religious Freedom Restoration Laws and Evolution of Free Exercise Protection. By Amanda Pine *

POS 335 The American Supreme Court. Syllabus Spring 2013

CRS-2 served a secular legislative purpose because the Commandments displays included the following notation: The secular application of the Ten Comma

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY GOVT 420: American Political Thought Summer 2013

LEGAL MEMORANDUM. mandate should prevail, vindicating. this nation s cherished right to freedom of conscience.

Chapter 15 CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS

THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

ARTICLE TIERS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE

TUFTS UNIVERSITY. U R B A N & E N V I R O M E N T A L POLICY AND P L A N N I N G L e g a l F r a m e w o r k s of S o c i a l P o l i c y UEP-0215

In the t Supreme Court of the United States

fftce of tbe ~ttornep ~eneral

Chapter 5 Civil Liberties Date Period

Supreme Court of the United States

CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES. A. Introduction

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Abandoning the Compelling Interest Test in Free Exercise Cases: Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Nos , , , 15-35, , , IN THE. Petitioners, SYLVIA BURWELL, ET AL., Respondents.

In the Supreme Court of the United States

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE

Nos , , , 15-35, , , &

Civil Liberties & the First Amendment CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

In the Supreme Court of the United States

The HHS Contraception Mandate vs. the Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Carl E. Olsen 130 E Aurora Ave Des Moines, Iowa

The Status of State Aid to Religious Schools in Australia and the US: An Update 2015 ANZELA Conference Brisbane, Australia

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

IRA C. LUPU. PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT: F. Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law Emeritus, The George Washington University, June 2012 present.

Supreme Court of the United States

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... INTEREST OF AMICUS... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT... 1 ARGUMENT... 1 CONCLUSION... 4

FINDING A CEILING IN A CIRCULAR ROOM: LOCKE V. DAVEY, FEDERALISM, AND RELIGIOUS NEUTRALITY. Jesse R. Merriam *

e. City of Boerne v. Flores (1997) i. RFRA Unconstitutional f. Court Reversal on Use of Peyote in 2006 B. Freedom of Speech and Press 1.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

AP Government Ch. 4 Civil Liberties & Ch. 5 Civil Rights Study Guide Name Date Period

Supreme Court of the United States

Case 4:17-cv Document 56-1 Filed in TXSD on 11/30/17 Page 1 of 25 BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH.

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 34 Filed 11/28/17 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Supreme Court of the United States

RLUIPA Defense: Avoiding and Defending RLUIPA Claims. Land Use & Sustainable Development Law Institute Bagels with the Boards CLEs

Supreme Court of the United States

City of Boerne v. Flores: Religious Free Exercise Pays a High Price for the Supreme Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Landmark Decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court,

Catholic Legal Perspectives

In the Supreme Court of the United States

No FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF NORTH GREENE, STATE OF NORTH GREENE,

The Need for a Compelling Interest Test on a State Level

UNIT 5: JUDICIAL BRANCH, CIVIL LIBERTIES & CIVIL. Miss DeLong Exam Review RIGHTS

BUDDY S BAKERY Petitioner. NORTH GREENE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION and ANNE MARIE, Respondents

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. ) BRIEF Defendant/Respondent. ) APPELLANT S SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Supplemental Texts: Woll, Peter. American Government: Readings and Cases, 15th ed. New York: Longman, 2003.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE April 20, Opinion No.

THE UNPUBLISHED FREE EXERCISE OPINION IN JENSEN V. QUARING

THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

STATE HEARING QUESTIONS

Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Battle to Protect Religious Liberty

CHALLENGING STATUTORY ACCOMMODATIONS FOR RELIGIOUSLY AFFILIATED DAYCARES: AN APPLICATION OF THE THIRD-PARTY-HARM DOCTRINE

Accommodation, Establishment, and Freedom of Religion

The Second Adoption of the Free Exercise Clause: Religious Exemptions Under the Fourteenth Amendment

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

HOBBY LOBBY IN CONSTITUTIONAL WATERS: TWO LIFE RINGS AND AN ANCHOR

Reply to Brief in Opposition, Melhorn v. Baltimore Washington Conf. of United Methodist Church

This is a great. The Supreme Court and Religious Liberty. Joseph D. Kearney

Caesar's or God's: The Coin of Religious Liberty and Generally Applicable Statutes

June 25, has secured religious liberty from the invasion of the civil authority. 2

Transcription:

THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND RELIGION IN AMERICA PSC 291 Professor Jackson Spring 2016 Required material: All assigned readings are posted in.pdf format on Blackboard. (The.pdf files can be printed on a 2-to-1 basis, if you so desire, conserving paper and ink. This is practical for many of the.pdf files that currently have one printed page per.pdf page, but probably not practical (i.e., legible) for the.pdf files that currently have two printed pages per.pdf page.) Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peacefully to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. --First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States This course is an examination of the special articulation and role of religion in the United States, particularly as expressed in the two religion clauses of the First Amendment. We will examine some of the key historical and political antecedents to the Constitution s formulation of religious freedom, and we will read closely and critically key decisions (usually, but not exclusively from the Supreme Court of the United States) that have shaped, and continue to shape, the application of the First Amendment s construct to American civil and social life. Work for the course will consist of regular class attendance and participation, a short mid-term paper and a final essay. (Students who are taking this for Political Science writing [PSC 291W] should meet with me at the end of the first class on January 19 th to discuss writing requirements that will be in lieu of the short mid-term paper and final essay.) January 19 Overture Richard Posner, Faith-Based Morality and Public Policy (and related material), http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2004/12/ 1

Stanley Fish, Liberalism and Secularism (2007), http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com Biblical Antecedents & Early Christianity: Covenant and Separation William S. Green & Gary Porton, Religious Resources for Political Culture: The Case of Judaism, in J. Neusner, ed., Religion and the Political Order: Politics in Classical and Contemporary Christianity, Islam, and Judaism (Atlanta, Scholars Press, 1996), pp. 109-20 Exodus 19-20; Exodus 24; Exodus 31; Deuteronomy 17:14-20; Judges 8:22-23, 9:1-15; I Samuel 8; Daniel 2-4; Matthew 22:15-21 Bruce Chilton, Primitive and Early Christianity, in J. Neusner, ed., God s Rule: The Politics of World Religions (Georgetown U. Press, 2003), pp. 37-60 January 26 Europe & Christianity: Persecution to Toleration Harold J. Berman and John Witte, Jr., Church and State, The Encyclopedia of Religion 3, pp. 489-95 William S. Green, Religion and Society in America, in J. Neusner, ed., World Religions in America: An Introduction [Revised and Expanded Edition] (Westminster/John Knox Press, 2000), pp. 246-55 John Noonan, Jr. & Edward Gaffney, Jr., Religious Freedom: History, Cases, and Other Materials on the Interaction of Religion and Government (Foundation Press 2001), pp. 117-37 (hereafter, Noonan & Gaffney ) John Locke, A Letter Concerning Toleration (1689) William S. Green, What Do We Mean by Religion and Western Civilization? in J. Neusner, ed., Religious Foundations of Western Civilization (Abingdon Press, 2006), pp. 3-23 Bernard Lewis, What Went Wrong: Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response (Oxford U. Press, 2002), pp. 96-116 February 2 The Colonial Experience & Constitutional Development John Witte, Jr. & Joel A. Nichols, Religion and the American Constitutional Experiment (Westview Press, 3rd ed. 2011), pp. 21-40 (hereafter Witte & Nichols ) Noonan & Gaffney, pp. 158-65 Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia (Query XVII) (1784) Noonan & Gaffney, pp. 169-73 2

James Madison, A Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments (1785) Noonan & Gaffney, pp. 178-200 George Washington, First Inaugural Address (1789) Congressional Resolution: Day of Thanksgiving (1789) George Washington, Farewell Address (1796) Thomas Jefferson, Letter to the Danbury Baptists (1802) James Madison, Detached Memoranda (circa 1817) February 9 The American Experience Through the Application of the First Amendment to States Noah Feldman, Divided by God: America s Church-State Problem and What we Should do About It (Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2005), pp. 53-56 (hereafter Feldman, Divided by God ) People v. Ruggles, 8 Johns. R. 290 (NY 1811) Barnes v. First Parish in Falmouth (Mass. 1810) (Noonan & Gaffney, pp. 222-31) Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (Book I, Chapter XVII) (1835) Witte & Nichols, pp. 118-22 & 130 Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) * Note on Cleveland v. United States Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925) Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940) *Note on Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania February 16 Free Exercise at the Supreme Court Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) * Note on McGowan v. Maryland and Braunfeld v. Brown * Note on Wisconsin v. Yoder * Note on United States v. Lee Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990) *Note on Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993) Congress Enters the Fray Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) *Note on Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal 3

Religious Exemption Law Map of the United States Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 *Note on Cutter v. Wilkinson Free Exercise and Corporations Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. (2014) February 23 Work on Mid-Term Paper March 1 Mid-Term Paper Due (half-class) Religion and its Exercise United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965) March 8 No class (Spring break) March 15 Perspectives on the Free Exercise of Religion Martha Nussbaum, Liberty of Conscience: In Defense of America s Tradition of Religious Equality (Basic Books 2008), pp. 116-20, 151-58, 164-74 (hereafter Nussbaum, Liberty of Conscience ) Kent Greenawalt, Religion and the Constitution Volume I: Free Exercise and Fairness (Princeton University Press 2006), pp. 124-56 Paul Horwitz, The Hobby Lobby Moment, 128 Harv. L. Rev. (2014), pp. 154-189 Thomas v. Review Board, 450 U.S. 707 (1981) *Note on United States v. Ballard March 22 The Establishment Clause and State Aid to Religious Schools Feldman, Divided by God, pp. 57-71, 86-92 [see February 9] Everson v. Bd. of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947) Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971) Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002) Tax Exemptions to Religious Organizations Walz v. Tax Comm. of the City of New York, 397 U.S. 664 (1970) 4

Standing and the Ability to Challenge Monetary Aid *Note on Taxpayer Standing March 29 Prayers, Pledges, and the First Amendment West Virginia State Bd. of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943) Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992) Town of Greece v. Galloway, 572 U.S. (2014) *Note on Newdow v. Rio Linda Union School District Commandments and Symbols Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39 (1980) Allegheny County v. Greater Pittsburgh ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989) April 5 Commandments and Symbols (cont.) Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005) (including Appendix ) McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky, 545 U.S. 844 (2005) Witte & Nichols, pp. 231-34 Religious Speech and the Establishment Clause Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263 (1981) Good News Club v. Milford Central School District, 533 U.S. 98 (2001) *Note on Faith Center Church Evangelistic Ministries v. Glover *Note on Christian Legal Society v. Martinez Exercise vs. Establishment Locke v. Davey, 540 U.S. 712 (2004) Exercise and Establishment Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC, 565 U.S. (2012) *Note on Bob Jones University v. United States April 12 Academic Views on the Supreme Court and the Religion Clauses Michael W. McConnell, Religious Freedom at a Crossroad, 59 U. Chicago Law Review (1992), pp. 115-94 5

Kathleen M. Sullivan, Religion and Liberal Democracy, 59 U. Chicago Law Review (1992), pp. 195-223 Noah Feldman, A Church-State Solution, NY Times Magazine (July 3, 2005) Andrew Koppelman, And I Don t Care What It Is: Religious Neutrality in American Law, 39 Pepperdine L. Rev. (2013), pp. 1115-1124 Nussbaum, Liberty of Conscience, pp. 225-32 [see March 15] Steven Smith, The Last Chapter?, 41 Pepperdine L. Rev. (2014), pp. 903-936 April 19 Work on Final Paper April 26 Papers Due; Concluding Thoughts and Discussion 6