Case 6:10-cv TC Document 1 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Similar documents
Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 4:05-cv CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 9:06-cv RHC Document 1 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintitl, Defendants. COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 1 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR~A I FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINO~ STRA~ E EASTERN DIVISION 0~U ) ) tl0v 1 0 7_604 ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

10/18/ :38 AM 18CV47218 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT.

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

EEOC v. Zale Corporation

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/ :56 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11. Deadline

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Case 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

Case 6:10-cv-06306-TC Document 1 Filed 09//10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 2 3 WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, REGIONAL ATTORNEY OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT OFFICE 350 THE EMBARCADERO, SUITE 500 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-1260 4 5 6 7 8 9 JOHN STANLEY, SUPERVISORY TRIAL ATTORNEY MAY CHE, TRIAL ATTORNEY OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 909 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 400 SEATTLE, WA 98104 TEL: (206) 0-6919 may.che@eeoc.gov ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 10 11 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 13 14 15 OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION CV'10-6306 CIVIL ACTION NO. TC 16 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT 17 v. JURY TRIAL DEMAND 18 HOLIDAY SPECIALTREES, LLC 19 20 Defendant. NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of COMPLAINT-Page 1 of 7 OPPORTUNITYCOMM1SSION Wa Telephone: (206) 0-6883 Facsimile: (206)0-6911 TDD: (206)0-6882

Case 6:10-cv-06306-TC Document 1 Filed 09//10 Page 2 of 7 Page ID#: 2 national origin and on the basis of sex, and to provide appropriate relief to Salomon Vasquez Martinez ("Mr. Martinez") and Diego Lazaro ("Mr. Lazaro"), each who was adversely affected by such practices. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleges that defendant, Holiday Specialtrees, LLC ("Holiday Specialtrees") subjected Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro to a hostile work environment because of national origin (Mixtec) and because of sex. Plaintiff seeks monetary and injunctive relief, including pecuniary and nonpecuniary compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 451, 1331, 1337, 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to sections 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. sections 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3) ("Title VII"), and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981a. 2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission"), is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and enforcement of Title VII, and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 706(f)(1) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1). COMPLAINT- Page 2 of7 Telephone: (206) 0-6883 Facsimile: (206) 0-6911 TDD: (206)0-6882

Case 6:10-cv-06306-TC Document 1 Filed 09//10 Page 3 of 7 Page ID#: 3 4. At all relevant times, defendant Holiday Specialtrees has been a corporation continuously doing business in the State of Oregon and has continuously had at least 15 employees. 5. At all relevant times, defendant Holiday Specialtrees has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701(b), (g) and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-(b), (g) and (h). 9 10 11 STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 6. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, charging party filed a charge with the Commission alleging violations of Title VII by defendant Holiday 12 Specialtrees. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 fulfilled. 7. From approximately Fall of 2005 through Spring of 2009, defendant Holiday Specialtrees has engaged in unlawful employment practices at its tree plantation in Woodburn, Oregon in violation of 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e- 2(a). The practices include subjecting Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro to a hostile work environment because of national origin. 8. From approximately Fall of 2005 through Spring of 2009, defendant Holiday Specialtrees has engaged in unlawful employment practices at its tree plantation in Woodburn, Oregon in violation of 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e- 2(a). The practices include subjecting Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro to a hostile work environment because of sex. COMPLAINT- Page 3 of 7 Telephone: (206) 0-6883 Facsimile: (206) 0-6911 TDD: (206)0-6882

Case 6:10-cv-06306-TC Document 1 Filed 09//10 Page 4 of 7 Page ID#: 4 9. The practices complained of in paragraph 7 by Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro were carried out by the direct supervisor ("Supervisor") of Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro. 4 10. The practices complained of in paragraph 8 by Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro were carried out by the Supervisor, a Crew Lead ("Crew Lead") who also had supervisorial authority over Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro, and other employees at defendant Holiday Specialtrees. The practices complained of carried out by coworkers were known to the Supervisor and encouraged by him. 11. The practices complained of in paragraph 7 by Mr. Martinez and Mr. i Lazaro include, but are not limited to, the following: the Supervisor prohibited Mr. 2 Martinez and Mr. Lazaro from speaking their native dialect Mixtecan because he said their language "sounded ugly"; the Supervisor frequently called them "damn Indian dog" (pinche indio perro), "scabby dog" (perro sarnoso), and "piece of shit" (pedazo de meirda); the Supervisor physically abused Mr. Lazaro by pushing him to the ground; the Supervisor threatened Mr. Martinez with his machete; the Supervisor required that Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro contribute to the Supervisor's daily beer fund and subject Mr. 9 Martinez and Mr. Lazaro to retaliatory treatment ifthey refused. 20 12. The practices complained of in paragraph 8 by Mr. Martinez include, but are not limited to, the following: the Supervisor subjected Mr. Martinez to sexually offensive comments such as, "I like your butt" (me gustan tus nalgas), "I want to fuck you" (tengo ganas de culiarte), and "you're a virgin" (estas quinto); the Supervisor exposed his penis to Mr. Martinez on at least one occasion; the Crew Lead exposed his COMPLAINT- Page 4 of7 EQUAL employment Telephone: (206) 0-6883 Facsimile: (206)0-6911 TDD: (206)0-6882

Case 6:10-cv-06306-TC Document 1 Filed 09//10 Page 5 of 7 Page ID#: 5 penis to Mr. Martinez on several occasions; the Crew Lead subjected Mr. Martinez to sexually offensive comments such as, "I want to stick it to you" (se me antoja echarte un palo), "you have a nice butt" (tienes buenas nalgas), and "you're tight" (estas apretado); the Crew Lead touched Mr. Martinez on the buttocks and chest; the Crew Lead picked up Mr. Martinez from behind and rubbed his groin against Mr. Martinez; and coworkers who were also relatives of the Supervisor exposed their penises to Mr. Martinez on several occasions. 13. The practices complained of in paragraph 8 by Mr. Lazaro include, but are not limited to, the following: the Supervisor touched Mr. Lazaro's buttocks, nipples, and chest; the Supervisor subjected Mr. Lazaro to sexually offensive comments such as, "old fag" (Viejo joto), "I want to fuck you" (tengo ganas de culiarte), and "suck my dick" (mamame la verta), and that it would "feel really good" because Mr. Lazaro did not have teeth; and coworkers who were also relatives of the Supervisor exposed their penises to Mr. Lazaro on several occasions. 14. Defendant Holiday Specialtrees did not provide charging parties orany other employees with training or policies about sexual harassment and how to report it. 15. The effect of the practices complained of in paragraph 7-14 above has been to deprive Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro of equal employment opportunities. 16. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 7-14 above were intentional. COMPLAINT- Page 5 of 7 Telephone: (206)0-6883 Facsimile: (206)0-6911 TDD: (206)0-6882

Case 6:10-cv-06306-TC Document 1 Filed 09//10 Page 6 of 7 Page ID#: 6 17. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 7-14 above were done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of the charging parties. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining defendant, its officers, successors, agents, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in any employment practices which discriminate. B. Order defendant to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for all employees, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices. C. Order defendant to make whole Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in paragraph 7-14 above, including past and future outof-pocket expenses, in amounts to be determined at trial. D. Order defendant to make whole Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro by providing compensation for past and future nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful practices complained of in paragraph 7-14 above, including without limitation emotional pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life, in amounts to be determined at trial. E. Order defendant to pay Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lazaro punitive damages for its malicious and reckless conduct described in paragraph 7-14 above, in amounts to be determined at trial. COMPLAINT- Page 6 of 7 Telephone: (206) 0-6883 Facsimile: (206) 0-6911 TDD: (206)0-6882

Case 6:10-cv-06306-TC Document 1 Filed 09//10 Page 7 of 7 Page ID#: 7 G. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public interest. H. Award the Commission its costs of this action. JURY TRIAL DEMAND complaint. The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its 9 10 DATED this rd day of September, 2010. 12 WILLIAM R. TAMAYO Regional Attorney P. DAVID LOPEZ General Counsel 13 14 JOHN STANLEY Supervisory Trial Attorney JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel 15 16 MAY CHE Trial Attorney GWENDOLYN Y. REAMS Associate General Counsel 17 18 19 20 BY/ i^ (AL EMPLOYMENT OP 1MISSION Seattle District Office Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 0-6919 NITY Office of the General Counsel 1801 "L" Street NW Washington, D.C. 20507 Attorneys for Plaintiff COMPLAINT- Page 7 of7 Telephone: (206) 0-6883 Facsimile: (206)0-6911 TDD: (206)0-6882