IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Similar documents
~ Civil Action No. A-04-C~-o03370lI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Griffin & EEOC v. Formosa Plastics

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

IN TIlE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR TIlE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge Gettleman CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. ) Defendant. )

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

Case 3:06-cv JMM Document 140 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. Tbe Litigation

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

I. Background and History of Proceedings

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ~ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE LmGATION

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

Case 2:99-cv JPM Document 14 Filed 11/24/1999 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

)

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

~. OC' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,C:;'IWELl.. cleiwestern DISTRICT OF LOmSIANA

NO. C A AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

)

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION NO Defendant. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

EEOC v. Altec Industries

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. CONSENT DECREE INTRODUCTION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Transcription:

United States Courts Southern District of Texas ENTERED SEP 2 0 2005 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IIIcbaaI No Milby, Clerk of COUrt I<:QUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, SATCHEL'S BBQ & STEAKS, INC. d/b/a SAVANNAH'S FINE CATERING, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-05-2979 CONSENT DECREE The parties to this Consent Decree are the Plaintiff, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), and Defendant, Satchel's BBQ & Steaks, Tnc. d/b/a Savannah's Fine Catering ("Satchel's"). This Consent Decree resolves the allegations raised by the EEOC ill the above-referenced Civil Action No. H-05-2979. The EEOC initiated this lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991. to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of race, Black, and to provide appropriate relief to James Peterson, who was adversely affected by such practices. The EEOC alleges that Satchel's allowed James Peterson to be SUbjected to a hostile work environment because he is Black. The EEOC and Satchel's wish to settle this action, without the risks, uncertainties and expenses of continued litigation. under the tenns in the Decree. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: ('Onl i'lil Decree Page I

1. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and the parties, venue is proper. and all administrative prerequisites to the EEOC's filing of this action have been met. The parties stipulate to the Court's jurisdiction. 2. This Consent Decree resolves all issues raised in the EEOC's complaint. The EEOC waives further litigation of all issues raised in the above-referenced complaint. The EEOC expressly reserves its right, however, to process and litigate any other charges which may now be pending or may in the future be filed against Defendant Satchel's. SCOPE OF CONSENT DECREE 3. The duration of this Decree shall be three (3) years from the date of its filing with the Court. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action during the period of this Decree and may enter further orders or modifications as may be appropriate. Should any disputes under this Decree remain unresolved after this three-year period, the term of the Decree shall be automatically extended, and the Court will retain jurisdiction of this matter to enforce the Consent Decree, until such time as all disputes have been resolved. INJUNCTIVE PROVISIONS 4. Race Discrimination. Satchel's is hereby enjoined from: a) Discriminating against any employee on the basis ofrace, Black, in violation of Title VII; b) Engaging in or being a party to any action, policy or practice that has the effect of harassing or intimidating any employee on the basis of race; and c) Creating, facilitating or permitting the existence of a work environment that is hostile to any employee through acts such as physical/verbal abuse and derogatory comments, on the basis of race. MONET AR Y RELIEF 5. Defendant Satchel's, in settlement of this dispute. shall pay to Mr. James Peterson a sum of $12,000.00 payable in one installment of $4,000.00 due on or before September 15, lollsell1 Decree Page 2

2005 and eight remaining monthly installments of $1,000.00 due on or before the 15th day of each month thereafter, with the final installment of $1,000.00 due on or before May 15, 2006. Each installment shall be mailed to James Peterson's attorney Andrew S. Golub at 8 Greenway Plaza, 14th Floor, Houston, Texas 77046. A copy of each settlement check and any accompanying transmittal documents shall be forwarded to Robert B. Harwin, Regional Attorney, San Antonio District Office, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 5410 Fredericksburg Road, Suite 200, San Antonio, Texas 78229. TRAINING 6. If Satchel's resumes business within 3 years of the date of this Consent Decree, Satchel's will provide two (2) hours of training to all owners, officers, managers, and supervisory personnel of Satchel's according to the following tenns on the subject of the employment provisions of Title VII, including race based discrimination and hostile work (;11" ironment 7. Within ten (10) days after the completion of the training session, Satchel's shall cct1i fy to the EEOC, in writing, that the required training has taken place and that required personnel attended. Such certification shall include: a) The date, location and duration of the training; and b) A copy of the registry of attendance which shall include the name and position or title of each person in attendance. POSTING REQUIREMENT 8. If Satchel's resumes business within 3 years of the date of this Consent Decree, Satchel's shall post copies of the Notice attached as Exhibit" A" to this Decree at its facilities in all conspicllous locations casily accessible to and commonly frequented by employees. The Notice shall then remain posted for the duration of this Decree. Satchel's shall ensure that the Notice is not allered, defaced or covered by any other matenal. Satchel's shall certify to the COn.lent Decree Page 3

EEOC in writing within ten (10) business days after entry of the Decree that the Notice has been properly posted. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9. Satchel's shall bear the costs associated with administering and implementing the provisions of this Decree. 10. Except as provided herein, the parties to this Decree shall bear their own costs and attorney's fees. Furthermore, the parties agree that pursuant to Section 706(k) of Title vn, 42 U.S.c. ~ 2000e-5(k), there is no "prevailing party" in this action or proceeding. 11. The terms of this Decree shall be binding upon the EEOC and Satchel's, its agents, officers, employees, servants, successors, and assigns. as to the issues resolved herein. 12. When this Consent Decree requires the submission by Satchel's of documents or otber materials to EEOC, such documents or other materials shall be mailed to Robert B. Harwin, Regional Attorney, 5410 Fredericksburg Road, Suite 200, San Antonio, Texas 78229. The Clerk shall furnish a copy hereo f to each attorney of record. SO ORDERED AND ENTERED this ~day of c- /~,2005. Respectfully submitted, ERIC S. DREIBAND General Counsel JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Consent Decree Pllge 4

Associate General Counsel ~~,~ ROBERT B. HARWIN Regional Attorney District of Columbia Bar No. 076083 S ervisory Trial ome)( xas State Bar No. 19708:100 Federal ID No. 14850 Attol11cy State Bar No. 18966770 Federal ld No. 13952 ~A~~ JEN~LL Attorney-in- Charge Colorado State Bar No. 033240 Federal 10 No. 36033 SCOTT. DOUGLASS & McCONNICO, LLP 600 Congrcss Avenue. Suite 1500 Austin, Texas 78701-2589 Telephone: (512) 495-6300 Facsimile: (512) 474-0731 A TTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Antonio District Office 5410 Fredericksburg Rd., Ste 200 San Antonio, TX 78229-3555 Telephone: (210) 281-7636 Facsimile: (210) 281-7669 ATTORNEYS FOR PLArNTIFF Consent Decree P(rge 5

EXHIBIT A NOTICE AS REQUIRED UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 I. This NOTICE to all employees of Satchel's is being posted as part of an agreement between Satchel's and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 2. Federal law requires that there be no discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of that person's race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or age with respect to hiring, compensation, promotion, discharge, or other tenns, conditions or privileges of employment. 3. Satchel's strongly supports and will comply with such Federal law in all aspects and it will not take any action against employees because they have exercised their rights under the law by filing charges with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 4. If you believe you are being discriminated against in any tenn or condition of your employment because of your race, religion, color. national origin, sex. or disability, or that you are being subjected to harassment because of your race or because of having engaged in Title VII-protected activity, you are encouraged to seek assistance from supervisory personnel, or from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 5410 Fredericksburg Road, Suite 200, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3555, (210) 281-7600 or 1-800-669-4000. 5. No retaliatory action may be taken against you for seeking assistance, filing a charge, or communicating with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 6. Basing employment actions on the race of an employee may also constitute a violation of Title VU of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and any such conduct is a violation of company policy. Any employee found to be in violation of this company policy will be subject to written reprimand, suspension, and/or discharge. 7. This NOTICE will remain posted until September 14, 2008, by direction of the U.s. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.