Intellectual Property Enforcement Ali S. Razai. OCPA Annual Educational Conference September 15, 2018

Similar documents
IP Impact: Design Patents. Mike Trenholm Ali Razai Terry Tullis

Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective

Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

SUBTITLE 12. MARYLAND UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT

U.S. Design Patent Protection. Finnish Patent Office April 10, 2018

Remedies: Injunction and Damages. 1. General

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

THE IMPORTANCE OF TRADE SECRET PROTECTION

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Trade Secrets Acts Compared to the UTSA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

LAWSON & PERSSON, P.C.

United States. Edwards Wildman. Author Daniel Fiorello

Economic Damages in IP Litigation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DOMESTIC OPTIONS FOR PROTECTING YOUR TRADEMARKS IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Gottschlich & Portune, LLP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Overview on Damages Available in Copyright and Trademark Disputes in the U.S. by Ralph H. Cathcart 1 COPYRIGHT DAMAGES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

WIPO ASIAN REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SYSTEM FOR HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES

Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal Penalties Related to Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) Case No. PARTIES

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, each Grantor agrees as follows:

CHAPTER 1. DISCLOSING EXPERT WITNESSES UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES: AN OVERVIEW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Trade Secrets Overview, Protection, and Litigation January 30, 2015 Mark C. Zebrowski

BARTKO ZANKEL BUNZEL ALERT!

Trade Secret Misappropriation and Remedies. (including a look at the new federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Nine years after Ebay Should German courts have discretion when deciding on injunctions in patent infringement litigations?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

Trademark and Patent Actions

Changing Landscape, US and Abroad 2017 In House Counsel Conference

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

The Supreme Court is Set to Decide the Scope of Business Method Patent Protection

Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal Penalties Related to Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

Subject Matter Conflicts in Patent Law Paul A. Stewart

Intellectual Property. EMBL Summer Institute 2010 Dusty Gwinn WVURC

PlainSite. Legal Document

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LAW Rule of conduct enforced by controlling authority; provides order, stability, and justice.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Trade Secrets. Alternative to Patent Protection. Paul F. Neils Jean C. Edwards. Copyright 2010, Paul F. Neils, Esq. All rights reserved

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/10/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

US Design Patents for Graphical User Interfaces in the US. Margaret Polson Polson Intellectual Property Law, PC

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BILL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2.

Indonesia. Contributing firm George Widjojo & Partners. Author George Widjojo Senior Partner

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LARRY KING ENTERPRISES, INC. and ORA MEDIA LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.

Case 1:18-cv DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2018 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-789 COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Chapter 13 Enforcement and Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights

DAY ONE: Monday, February 26, 2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case: 4:13-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

CARDSERVICE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. WEBSTER R. McGEE, and WRM & ASSOCIATES, d/b/a/ EMS - Card Service on the Caprock, Defendants.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 80 Article 1 1

Case 6:13-cv MHS Document 1 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

AAPEX. Intellectual Property Policy Statement. Protecting Your Intellectual Property Rights at AAPEX

TAG-Legal tag-legal.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Transcription:

Intellectual Property Enforcement Ali S. Razai OCPA Annual Educational Conference September 15, 2018

Benefits Of Litigation Preliminary Relief Damages Disgorgement of infringer s profits Lost profits Convoyed sales Price erosion Reasonable royalty Statutory damages Treble damages 2

Types Of IP Available And What They Protect Patent: prevent others from making, using or selling invention. Trademark (or service mark): symbol capable of identifying source of products (or services) Trade secret: information deriving value from secrecy, take measures to keep secret Copyright: to creator of written, musical or artistic work. Right to use and prevent others from copying without permission. 3

The Infusion Pump The Accused Device The Patented Product 4

Utility Patent Claim 5

The Bed Extender 6

Competitor s Product 7

Utility Patent Claim 8

Design Patent 9

Design Patent Claim 10

Ordinary Observer Test If in the eye of an ordinary observer, given such attention as a purchaser usually gives, two designs are substantially the same... the resemblance is such as to deceive such an observer, inducing him to purchase one supposing it to be the other. 11

Utility Patent Infringement 12

Design Patent Infringement 13

Comparison Utility Patent Expensive to get Claim Construction Complicated Local Patent Rules Summary Judgment Difficult to Prove Damages Design Patent Cheap to get Often No Claim Construction Usually No Local Patent Rules Summary Judgment More Difficult Disgorgement of Profits even if you re an NPE Easier to design around 14

Registered Trademarks Are Forever 15

Damages for Trademark or Trade Dress Infringement/Counterfeiting 15 U.S.C. 1117(a) (1) defendant s profits, (2) any damages sustained by the plaintiff, and (3) the costs of the action. In assessing damages the court may enter judgment for any sum above the amount found as actual damages, not exceeding three times such amount. The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party. 16

Treble Damages for Counterfeiting 15 U.S.C. 1117(b) in a case involving use of a counterfeit mark or designation the court shall enter judgment for three times such profits or damages, whichever amount is greater, together with a reasonable attorney s fee. 17

Statutory Damages for Counterfeiting 15 U.S.C. 1117(c) In a case involving the use of a counterfeit mark the plaintiff may elect instead of actual damages and profits, an award of statutory damages in the amount of (1) not less than $1,000 or more than $200,000 per counterfeit mark.; or (2) if the court finds that the use of the counterfeit mark was willful, not more than $2,000,000 per counterfeit mark.. 18

Damages for Patent Infringement Lost profits Disgorgement of profits (only design patents) Reasonable royalty Treble Damages 19

Damages for Patent Infringement 35 U.S.C. 284 damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer, together with interest and costs as fixed by the court. the court may increase the damages up to three times the amount found or assessed 20

Additional Remedy Available for Design Patent Infringement 35 U.S.C. 289 shall be liable to the owner to the extent of his total profit, but not less than $250. Disgorgement of total profits under Section 289 cannot be trebled 21

Attorneys Fees For Patent Infringement 35 U.S.C. 285 The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party. 22

Copyright Infringement 17 U.S.C. 504(a) an infringer of copyright is liable for either (1) the copyright owner s actual damages and any additional profits of the infringer ; or (2) statutory damages. 23

Statutory Damages For Copyright Infringement 17 U.S.C. 504(c) (1) the copyright owner may elect an award of statutory damages for all infringements involved in the action, with respect to any one work in a sum of not less than $750 or more than $30,000 as the court considers just. (2) In a case where the court finds, that infringement was committed willfully, the court in its discretion may increase the award of statutory damages to a sum of not more than $150,000. In a case where the court finds, that such infringer was not aware and had no reason to believe that his or her acts constituted an infringement of copyright, the court in its discretion may reduce the award of statutory damages to a sum of not less than $200. 24

Attorneys Fees For Copyright Infringement 17 U.S.C. 505 The court in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party other than the United States or an officer thereof the court may also award a reasonable attorney s fee to the prevailing party as part of the costs. 25

Damages For Trade Secret Misappropriation California Civil Code 3426.3: (a) A complainant may recover damages for the actual loss caused by misappropriation. A complainant also may recover for the unjust enrichment caused by misappropriation that is not taken into account in computing damages for actual loss. (b) If neither damages nor unjust enrichment caused by misappropriation are provable, the court may order payment of a reasonable royalty for no longer than the period of time the use could have been prohibited. (c) If willful and malicious misappropriation exists, the court may award exemplary damages in an amount not exceeding twice any award made under subdivision (a) or (b). 26

Olloclip Olloclip Product Defendant s Product 27

Causes of Action Trademark Infringement Counterfeiting Utility and Design Patent Infringement Copyright Infringement Trade Dress Infringement Trade Name Infringement Unfair Competition 28

Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction Trademarks, patents, copyrights, trade dress, and trade name are all valid and enforceable Defendant infringes each of the trademarks, patents, copyrights, trade dress, and trade name Damages 29

Ali S. Razai ali.razai@knobbe.com 949-760-0404 Orange County Los Angeles New York San Diego San Francisco Seattle Washington DC