IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 5 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

By and through his counsel, Michael H. Sussman, plaintiff hereby states and alleges against defendants:

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:

Plaintiff, )( CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:11-CV-523. against defendants City of Houston, Officer H.J. Morales, individually and in an official capacity,

Case 2:10-cv TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/16 Page 1 of 11 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1020

Case 1:12-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, v. No.

Case: 4:17-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/24/17 Page 1 of 23

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Case No.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Case3:09-cv EMC Document1 Filed08/28/09 Page1 of 8

Case 2:16-at Document 1 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:14-cv GAM Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

2:13-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

2:16-cv HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS - LAW DIVISION. v. No.: COMPLAINT AT LAW

Case 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

4:15-cv TGB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 05/29/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

2:15-cv PDB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Eastern District Court Case No. 1:11-cv Jordan et al v. The City of New York et al.

COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

Courthouse News Service

: : : : : : FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. COMES NOW TIANNA SMITH, Plaintiff in the above-captioned action, and hereby INTRODUCTION

Case 3:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-cv-12698

case 2:14-cv PPS-JEM document 15 filed 09/21/14 page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE

In the United States District Court for the District of Colorado

Case 3:08-cv DAK Document 31 Filed 02/25/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

9/10/2018 4:20 PM 18CV40045 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

Case 3:18-cv GMS Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:18-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2018 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:11-cv RM-MEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 3:15-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION

4:15-cv SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 COMPLAINT. 1. This is an action for money damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and

3:14-cv CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION. Plaintiff, No.: Defendants.

Case 1:17-cv RBK-JS Document 1 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case: 2:16-cv ALM-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/02/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/29/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/29/10 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

10/18/ :38 AM 18CV47218 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT.

DRAFT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. COMPLAINT. Plaintiffs, by their undersigned counsel, hereby file this Complaint as follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:12cv26

Lennox S. Hinds, Esq. Stevens, Hinds & White, P.C. 42 Van Doren Avenue Somerset, NJ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

Case 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 4:08-cv CW Document 19 Filed 07/22/2008 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11

CASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/09/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Plaintiff Edgar Castro for his Complaint against Defendants hereby alleges as

Case: 3:17-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/24/17 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 1

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION)

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Plaintiff Lisa Patton by way of Complaint against Defendants says: PARTIES

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/11/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 1:12-cv S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 4:10-cv TSH Document 4 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

Cobb v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 1 1) ORIGINAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT

Transcription:

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MARTHE BIEN-AIME, R.N., * * Plaintiff, * * CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. v. * * OFFICER CHRISTY VICE, * LT. MARK TINKEY, * OFFICER C.L. HYATT and * OFFICER SHAWN HUMPHREYS, * * Defendants. * COMPLAINT COMES NOW Marthe Bien-Aime, R.N., Plaintiff herein, and hereby files her Complaint against Defendants as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. This is a 42 U.S.C. 1983 action brought under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution arising from the Defendant police officers use of excessive force against Plaintiff, a registered nurse, because she would not let the officers enter the mental health facility where she was working as a charge nurse without first obtaining permission from her supervisor.

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 2 of 13 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 1988, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Jurisdiction is founded upon 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1343, and the aforementioned constitutional and statutory provisions. 3. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and N.D.L.R. 3.1B(3) because the event giving rise to this claim occurred in Gwinnett County, Georgia, which is situated within the district and divisional boundaries of the Atlanta Division of the Northern District of Georgia, and one or more of the parties reside within the Northern District of Georgia. 4. All of the parties herein are subject to the jurisdiction of this Court. PARTIES 5. Plaintiff Marthe Bien-Aime, R.N. (hereafter Plaintiff or Nurse Bien-Aime ) was, at all times relevant herein, an individual residing within the boundaries of the Northern District of Georgia and a licensed nurse under the laws of the State of 2

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 3 of 13 Georgia. 6. Defendant Officer Christy Vice (hereafter Defendant Vice or Officer Vice ) is an individual who was, at all times relevant herein, a police officer employed by the City of Lawrenceville who acted within the scope of his employment as a Lawrenceville police officer. 7. Defendant Lieutenant Mark Tinkey (hereafter Defendant Tinkey or Lt. Tinkey ) is an individual who was, at all times relevant herein, a police officer employed by the City of Lawrenceville who acted within the scope of his employment as a Lawrenceville police officer. 8. Defendant Officer C.L Hyatt (hereafter Defendant Hyatt or Officer Hyatt ) is an individual who was, at all times relevant herein, a police officer employed by the City of Lawrenceville who acted within the scope of his employment as a Lawrenceville police officer. 9. Defendant Officer Shawn Humphreys (hereafter Defendant Humphreys or Officer Humphreys ) is an individual who was, at all times relevant herein, a police 3

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 4 of 13 officer employed by the City of Lawrenceville who acted within the scope of his employment as a Lawrenceville police officer. 10. At all times relevant herein, all of the Defendants acted under color of state law and on behalf of the City of Lawrenceville, Georgia. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 11. At 10:45 p.m. on the evening of October 30, 2011, Plaintiff Marthe Bien-Aime arrived at work on her job as a charge nurse at the Summit Ridge mental health facility in Lawrenceville, Georgia. 12. At approximately 11:40 p.m., Nurse Bien-Aime was stopped in the hall by an assessment staff member who informed her as follows: that a female patient had called her husband and told him that she had been assaulted by a male patient, that the husband had called the police, and that the police were on the premises. 13. Nurse Bien-Aime then called the Director of Nursing, Shelley Beaubrun and relayed what had been reported to her by the staff member. 4

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 5 of 13 14. On her way back to the unit desk, Nurse Bien-Aime saw the female patient being questioned by police officers. 15. After questioning the female patient who had reportedly been assaulted, the police left Summit Ridge. 16. Later that shift at approximately 1:30 a.m., Nurse Bien-Aime saw several police officers including Defendants Vice, Hyatt and Humphreys return to the unit with an assessment staff member, and she heard one of the officers say that they were there to arrest the guy. 17. Nurse Bien-Aime did not know who the guy was. 18. Nurse Bien-Aime told the officers that she as the nurse in charge of the unit, she had a professional duty to protect her patients and had taken an oath to do so. She also said that she would need to call the Director of Nursing to get permission to let the officers into the unit. 5

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 6 of 13 19. Officer Vice told Nurse Bien-Aime that they had an arrest warrant for a patient and that she could be arrested for obstrung the officers from doing their duties. 20. Officer Vice then called Lt. Tinkey, who arrived at the scene shortly thereafter. 21. The Defendant officers had a piece of paper that they said was a warrant, but they did not allow Nurse Bien-Aime to read it, so she was unable to confirm whether it was a warrant or what patient it was for. 22. Nurse Bien-Aime then called the Director of Nursing, Shelley Beaubrun, and told her what was happening with the police officers. Ms. Beaubrun asked to speak with the officers and Nurse Bien-Aime held out the phone so that they could speak to her. 23. The officers refused to speak with Ms. Beaubrun and said they were going to arrest Nurse Bien-Aime for obstructing justice. 24. As Nurse Bien-Aime remained behind the counter in the nurse s station, waiting 6

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 7 of 13 for guidance from Ms. Beaubrun on the telephone, Lt. Tinkey burst through the door to the nursing station, followed by Officers Hyatt and Humphreys, and Defendant Vice grabbed the phone and began speaking to Ms. Beaubrun. 25. Lt. Tinkey, Officer Hyatt, and Officer Humphreys grabbed Nurse Bien-Aime s hands and arms and began twisting her arms backward. Then they threw her to the floor with great force and shackled her wrists with a chain and handcuffs. 26. Nurse Bien-Aime cried out in pain due to the tightness of the handcuffs, as well as from the aggravation of an old left shoulder injury and new injuries to other parts of the body resulting from Defendants unreasonable and unjustified use of force against her. 27. She asked the Defendant officer several times to loosen the handcuffs but they would not do it. 28. When they got her off the floor and began escorting her out, Nurse Bien-Aime had difficulty walking and the Defendant officers kept shoving her. 7

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 8 of 13 29. After going through a set of double doors in the hallway, Nurse Bien-Aime lost her balance and fell to the floor. The Defendant officers yelled for her to get up but she was not able to, and they told her they would drag her if she didn t get up. 30. Officer Vice said let s tase her and then they proceeded to do so. 31. After they had tased her, the officers picked her up off the floor and took her to a police car outside. They loosened the chain, but not the handcuffs, and placed her in the car. 32. The officers spent some time talking among themselves and then Officer Vice drove her to the Gwinnett County Detention Center. 33. At approximately 2:15 a.m., officers placed Nurse Bien-Aime against a wall at the jail, removed the handcuffs and chain, and then performed a body search. 34. Nurse Bien-Aime was told to raise her arms but she could not do it because of bilateral pain in her shoulders, arms, and wrists with numbness to the right thumb, 8

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 9 of 13 along with swelling, numbness and visible dislocation of the shoulders. 35. Before being placed in the cell, Officer Vice tried to question Nurse Bien-Aime and stated that if she did not answer her questions, she would book her as a John Doe and it would take her a lot longer to get out of jail. 36. Nurse Bien-Aime asked for medical attention while in the cell, and a jail nurse showed up and asked a few questions. The jail nurse left and sent someone back to the cell with a glove filled with ice. 37. At 8:20 a.m., Nurse Bien-Aime was moved to another area of the jail, where she requested that they take pictures of the swollen and dislocated parts of her face, left shoulder, arms, hands and wrists, including a visible laceration to her right arm. However, the jail staff only took one of two pictures that did not fully represent the extent of her injuries. 38. Nurse Bien-Aime was forced to remain in jail without treatment for her injuries until an arrest warrant was issued, a bond was set, and she was able to get someone to post her bond, during which time she endured significant physical pain and mental 9

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 10 of 13 distresss. 39. After being released from jail, Nurse Bien-Aime was able to obtain treatment for her injuries, and she was diagnosed with radial neuritis and anxiety which have prevented her from returning to work. Nurse Bien-Aime also has a scar on the right lower part of her back from being shot with a taser, as well as radiating pain from her right buttock down to her right leg and foot which continues to torment her. THEORIES OF RECOVERY 40. The aforementioned misconduct of Defendants constituted an unreasonable use of physical force, and thus an unreasonable seizure of her person, against a free citizen at liberty in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. 41. At no time did Plaintiff ever use or threaten to use physical force against Defendants, and at no time did Plaintiff pose such a threat to Defendants or others as to justify the use of force against her, and certainly not the level of force that was used by Defendants. 42. The law was clearly established in October 2011 that police officers may not use 10

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 11 of 13 physical force against a citizen who is not physically resisting the officer, and no reasonable police officer would have believed that it was appropriate to use the degree of force that Defendants used against Plaintiff under these circumstances; accordingly, Defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity for their objectively unreasonable use of excessive and unnecessary force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. DAMAGES 43. As a direct and proximate result of the above described conduct of Defendants, Plaintiff has been deprived of her constitutional rights and subjected to extreme physical and mental pain and suffering, has been forced to incur substantial medical expenses, and has lost significant income from her employment all of which is expected to continue into the future for which Defendants are liable in an amount to be proven at trial and determined by the enlightened conscience of fair and impartial jurors. 44. The aforementioned conduct of Defendants amounted to such conscious indifference and reckless disregard for the consequences as to also authorize the imposition of punitive damages against them to the extent permitted by law. 11

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 12 of 13 45. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and expenses of litigation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1988. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands the following: a) That this action be tried by a jury; b) That judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants in an amount to be determined by the enlightened conscience of fair and impartial jurors to the extent allowed by law; c) That Plaintiff be awarded attorney's fees and reasonable expenses of litigation; d) That all costs of this action be taxed against Defendants; and e) That the Court award any additional or alternative relief as may be deemed appropriate under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted this 18th day of October, 2013. /s/ Craig T. Jones CRAIG T. JONES Ga. Bar No. 399476 Attorney for Plaintiff 12

Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 13 of 13 THE FEDERAL FIRM 2 Ravinia Drive, NE Suite 1776 Atlanta, GA 30346 (678) 443-4044 craig@fedfirm.com 13