Case 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240

Similar documents
ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

Case 1:02-cv LJM-WTL Document 117 Filed 08/16/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

Currently before the Court for preliminary approval is a settlement (the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2907 Filed 06/05/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv JAG Document 41 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 258

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:09-cv PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:03-cv RCJ-PAL Document 2795 Filed 02/09/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:18-cv DMS-MDD Document 256 Filed 10/09/18 PageID.4031 Page 1 of 6

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

\ 'C,_ \) ~THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 2:13-cv CMV Doc #: 92 Filed: 11/14/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 812 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

mg Doc 4808 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 08:51:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 193 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 4730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 7:12-cv VB Document 109 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 9

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/24/2017 Page 1 of 12

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Case5:10-cv JF Document72 Filed09/16/11 Page1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON COBB, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,,

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 133 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION AMENDED ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/22/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2015

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 84 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

Case 2:14-cv RJS Document 67 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case 1:17-cv MGC Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2018 Page 1 of 21

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Case 2:11-cv JLL-MAH Document 69 Filed 02/22/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 739

Case 1:16-cv TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 1372

nm OPOREPJYINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 185 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 9

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ON PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

Case 2:13-md MMB Document 427 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 9

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

1:1_ (I f 0 HiIiB} ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 1:11-md SM Document 242 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (ALL CASES)

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-jst-jpr Document 0- Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 AYTAN Y. BELLIN (admitted pro hac vice AYTAN.BELLIN@BELLINLAW.COM BELLIN & ASSOCIATES LLC Miles Avenue White Plains, New York 00 Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( -0 JOSEPH R. COMPOLI, JR. (admitted pro hac vice josephcompoli@sbcglobal.net East th Street Cleveland, Ohio Telephone: ( -00 Facsimile: ( -0 ROGER FURMAN (STATE BAR NO. 0 roger.furman@yahoo.com Henefer Avenue Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: (0-00 Facsimile: (0-0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael Vandervort and U.S. Sample Services, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL A. VANDERVORT and U.S. SAMPLE SERVICES, INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No.: SACV --JST(JPRx Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker [PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER Date: October, 0 Time: :0 P.M. Judge: Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker [PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER

Case :-cv-0-jst-jpr Document 0- Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 This action came on for hearing before the Court, Honorable Josephine Staton Tucker presiding, on the motion of Plaintiffs Michael A. Vandervort and U.S. Sample Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, for preliminary approval and enforcement of a settlement reached between the parties. After considering all the papers and argument presented by the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that:. The settlement agreement signed by the two named Plaintiffs (the Settlement Agreement is incorporated into this Order and is preliminarily adopted as an Order of this Court.. A settlement class (the Settlement Class is provisionally certified, for settlement purposes only, comprised of all persons in the United States who, from October, 00 through November, 0, were sent or caused to be sent one or more facsimile advertisements by Defendant Balboa Capital Corporation, its employees, agents, vendors or contractors.. For settlement purposes only, the Court finds that certification of the Settlement Class is appropriate under the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. (a and (b( because (a the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impractical, (b there are common questions of law and fact that predominate over any questions affecting only individual class members, (c Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class, and (d a class action is an appropriate method for the fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy.. For settlement purposes only, and after considering the relevant factors in Fed. R. Civ. P., Plaintiffs Michael A. Vandervort and U.S. Sample Services, Inc. are conditionally designated as the representatives of the Settlement Class, and Plaintiffs counsel are conditionally appointed as counsel for the Settlement Class. The lead attorney and law firm conditionally representing the Settlement Class are Aytan Y. Bellin, Esq., Bellin & Associates LLC, Miles Avenue, White Plains, New York 00, ( -, ( -0 (fax.

Case :-cv-0-jst-jpr Document 0- Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P., the terms of the Settlement Agreement are preliminarily approved. The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is the product of good faith arm s length negotiation by competent, experienced counsel. Based on evaluation of the factors set forth in Eddings v. Health Net, Inc., No. 0 CV, 0 WL, * (C.D. Cal. Jan., 0 and Staton v. Boeing Co., F.d, ( th Cir. 00, the Court further finds that the settlement amount is fair, adequate and reasonable, and that the terms of the Settlement Agreement are within the range of possible final judicial approval, subject to further consideration at the Court s subsequent final approval hearing described below. Accordingly, the Settlement Agreement is sufficient to warrant notice thereof, in the manner described below, and a subsequent full hearing relating thereto.. The Court approves the Short-Form Notice, the Long-Form Notice and the Claim Form attached as Exhibits, and, respectively, to the Settlement Agreement.. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Defendant shall cause the Short-Form Notice to be sent, in the manner described in the Settlement Agreement and within days after entry of this Order, to all persons and entities that are members of the Settlement Class. In the event the Short-Form Notice cannot be transmitted to a given facsimile number, Defendant will make a reasonable effort to determine whether its records contain a mailing address associated with such facsimile number. If Defendant determines that it possesses such a mailing address, then it will cause the Short-Form Notice to be sent via first class mail to that mailing address. The Short-Form Notice shall direct recipients to a website on which the Long-Form Notice and Claim Form are available in PDF format.. The Court finds that the form and method of notice described in the Settlement Agreement constitute the best notice practicable under the

Case :-cv-0-jst-jpr Document 0- Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 circumstances, and comply fully with the requirements of Federal Rule and all applicable laws, Federal Rules and the United States Constitution. The Court further finds that no notice other than that identified in the Settlement Agreement is reasonably necessary in this action.. Counsel for Defendant shall, on or before the date of the Court s final approval hearing, file a proof of faxing (and mailing, if necessary of the Short-Form Notice with the Clerk of Court. 0. Any Settlement Class member who wishes to be excluded from the class must so state in writing in the manner specified in the Long-Form Notice no later than days after the date of the Short-Form Notice. Any person who does not timely and validly request exclusion shall be included in the Settlement Class and bound by the Court s final Judgment in this action. On or before the date of the Court s final approval hearing, Plaintiffs counsel shall file with the Court a list of all persons who have validly requested exclusion from the class.. Any Settlement Class member who does not validly exclude himself or herself from the Settlement Class but who wishes to appear at the Court s final approval hearing and/or object to the terms of the Settlement Agreement must send a written statement of the basis for the objection, within day after the date of the Short-Form Notice, that includes the information required by the Long- Form Notice, to: (a Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division, West Fourth Street, Santa Ana, CA 0-; (b Aytan Y. Bellin, Bellin & Associates, Miles Avenue, White Plains, NY 00; and (c Nancy M. Barnes, Thompson Hine LLP, 00 Key Center, Public Square, Cleveland, OH -. Any Settlement Class member who does not submit a timely and valid objection in accordance with this Order, the Short-Form Notice, the Long-Form Notice, and the Settlement Agreement shall not be treated as having filed a valid Objection to the Settlement. The Court will not consider objections that are untimely and/or

Case :-cv-0-jst-jpr Document 0- Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 otherwise invalid unless the Court, in its discretion, otherwise directs, upon application of such person and for good cause shown.. The Court will hold a hearing for final approval of the Settlement Agreement on, 0, at :0 p.m. in Courtroom 0A of the United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division, West Fourth Street, Santa Ana, California 0. At that final approval hearing, the Court will hear argument regarding its final determination as to whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and should be finally approved; to consider any objections of Settlement Class members; and to make a final determination as to Class Counsels request for attorneys fees and costs, and as to the Incentive Award to be paid the two named Plaintiffs. The Court may postpone, adjourn, or continue the hearing by Order without further notice to the Settlement Class. Any Settlement Class member who follows the procedures set forth in the Long-Form Notice may appear and be heard at this hearing.. Class Counsel shall file a motion for attorneys fees no later than 0 days after the Short-Form Notice is sent to the Class.. Pending the final approval hearing, Settlement Class members who do not request exclusion are enjoined from bringing or asserting any claim or action that was or could have been asserted in this action or that arise out of any matters released in the Settlement Agreement.. All proceedings in this action, other than those that may be necessary to carry out the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement or the responsibilities related or incidental thereto, are stayed until further order of this Court.. If the Court does not finally approve the Settlement Agreement, the Settlement Agreement and all proceedings had in connection therewith shall be without prejudice to the status quo ante rights of the parties to this action, and all

Case :-cv-0-jst-jpr Document 0- Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Orders issued pursuant to the Settlement Agreement shall be vacated. In such event, the Settlement Agreement, all negotiations concerning it, and all submissions made in connection with it shall not be used or referred to in this action for any purpose whatsoever. This Order shall be of no force or effect if final approval does not occur for any reason, and nothing in this Order shall be construed or used as an admission, concession, or declaration by or against the Defendant of any fault, wrongdoing or liability. Nor shall this Order be construed by or against Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class members that their claims lack merit or that the relief requested in this action is inappropriate, improper, or unavailable, or as a waiver by any party of any defenses it may have.. Neither the Settlement Agreement nor the terms of it constitute an admission, concession, or indication by the parties of the validity of any claims or defenses in this action, or of any wrongdoing, liability, or violation of law by Defendant or Plaintiffs.. The Court reserves the right to approve the Settlement Agreement with modifications, if any, as may be agreed to by Class Counsel and Defendant s counsel, and without future notice to the Settlement Class members. Dated: October, 0 United States District Judge