How to Discuss the Dreaded No Contest Clause

Similar documents
APPENDIX F APPX. F-1

What You Must Know About CONTESTING A WILL PART TWO: CAPACITY, UNDUE INFLUENCE & SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES

Estate Planning Highlights of the 2017 Texas Legislature Prof. Gerry W. Beyer

We welcome this opportunity to submit a response to the consultation on technical issues relating to succession.

Dr. Gerry W. Beyer Governor Preston E. Smith Regents Professor of Law Texas Tech University School of Law

Glossary of Estate Planning Terms

ALI-ABA Course of Study Sophisticated Estate Planning Techniques

LITIGATION IN PROBATE COURT

Battered Women's Legal Advocacy Project, Inc.

accountant examination of accounts accounting attorneys. lawyers beneficiaries accounting affidavits

RPPTL WHITE PAPER REVOCATION OF A WILL OR REVOCABLE TRUST IS SUBJECT TO CHALLENGE

WILLS OUTLINE I. IS THERE A WILL? a. Intestacy: If there is no will or the will is deemed invalid, or not all the property is disposed of, the

Chapter 25 Wills, Intestacy, and Trusts

Chapter 174: Devising a New Statutory Scheme for California's No Contest Clauses

Subject: Mary Vandenack on In the Matter of the Estate of Lois B. Erickson, Interference with Testamentary Intent

Ohio Basic Estate Planning

WILLS PROCEDURE INDEX

8. The cancellation of a will by the writing of a new will or the adding of a codicil to the will

Texas Fiduciary Litigation Update David F. Johnson

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

Vermont Bar Association. 60th Mid-Year Meeting Seminar Materials. *Probate Litigation. March 30-31, 2017 Equinox Resort & Spa Manchester Center, VT

Guide to Wills and Estates Section I 1 OVERVIEW

Contents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. Introduction to the Law of Succession. The Mind of the Testator

The Society of Will Writers Code of Practice:

WILLS and TRUSTS. Fall 2013 Professor Ford Tel.: COURSE SYLLABUS

ESTATES & TRUSTS winter 2007 ANSWER OUTLINE

SCHEDULE 2 PRACTICAL LEGAL TRAINING COMPETENCIES FOR ENTRY-LEVEL LAWYERS

Beverly Hills Bar Association Trusts & Estates Section. Case Summaries for May and June of 2018

CHAPTER 2: THE ESTATE PLAN AND THE PURPOSE

Powers of Attorney. by John S. Kitchen, JD, LLM johnkitchenlawoffices.com. A. General Powers of Attorney

WILLS AND ESTATES FUNDAMENTALS

Title. The Uniform Trust Decanting Act s conflicting official commentary. Summary. The Text

MASTER WILL FORM USE FOR ILLISTRATION PURPOSES ONLY

CHAPTER 2: THE ESTATE PLAN AND THE PURPOSE

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

NC General Statutes - Chapter 84 Article 1 1

Last Will and Testament

ACADEMIC COURSE SYLLABUS

Beverly Hills Bar Association Trusts & Estate Section. October and November 2017 Case Updates

PROBATE COURT OF THE TOWN OF LITTLE COMPTON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES

Estate Planning & Probate Section MCLE Meeting Location: Attorney Resource Center Date: October 24, 2018

Wills, Trust & Estate Administration Curriculum

Wills, Estates and Trusts The Terminology

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO ESTATE OF : O P I N I O N MARION C. RYAN, DECEASED : CASE NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

Lee Applebaum. Practice Groups. Education. Bar Admissions. Memberships

"Making a Will" Consultation Response: Wedlake Bell LLP

WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW SYLLABUS, POLICIES, AND ASSIGNMENTS 2012 SUMMER SESSION ESTATES, SECTION 497A PROFESSOR C.

2009 SESSION (75th) A SB Assembly Amendment to Senate Bill No. 277 (BDR ) Title: No Preamble: No Joint Sponsorship: No Digest: Yes

ISLE OF MAN TRUSTS ACT 1995 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO (Court Administration) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO

As Passed by the House. Regular Session Sub. S. B. No

North Carolina Closing Process Who, What, When, Where, How and Why?

Webinar: Texas Fiduciary Litigation Update December 12, David F. Johnson

COMMENTS TO SB 5196 (Ch. 42, Laws of 1999) COMMENTS TO THE TRUST AND ESTATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ACT. January 28, 1999

Wills and succession. Level: 2 Credit value: 4 GLH: 21 Assessment requirements specified by a sector or regulatory body: Aim:

PUBLIC CHAPTER NO. 24 SENATE BILL NO By Lowe Finney, Marrero. Substituted for: House Bill No By Overbey, Coleman, Sontany, Watson

ESTATES & TRUSTS P.N. Davis Winter 2012 ANSWER OUTLINE

Wills and Decedents' Estates

RECOVERING THE PROCEEDS OF FRAUD

TRUSTS & ESTATES SECTION THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA 180 HOWARD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF. I,, presently of,, declare that this is my Last Will and Testament.

WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION (AMENDMENT) ACT 1989 No. 17

Business Succession and Estate Planning Bulletin

NC General Statutes - Chapter 36C Article 4 1

Introductory Clauses

BarEssays.com Model Answer

2011 Legislative Update Texas Probate, Guardianship and Trust Legislation

RULE 64 ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES (NON-CONTENTIOUS)

C O H E N, T O D D, K I T E & S T A N F O R D, L L C

Proponent Testimony on House Bill 595 Patricia D. Laub, Chair of the OSBA Estate Planning, Trust & Probate Law Section Wednesday, May 16, 2018

ACADEMIC COURSE SYLLABUS. Successful completion of second-year required coursework COREQUISITES:

The Voice of the Legal Profession. Modernizing Requirements for Bonding of Estate Trustees

CONTESTING THE PLAN AND PLANNING THE CONTEST: DISCOVERY IN PROBATE LITIGATION

BUTTE COUNTY PUBLIC LAW LIBRARY 464 TITLES ARE SEARCHABLE

ETHICAL ISSUES IN A TRUSTS & ESTATES PRACTICE

FIDUCIARY FOCUS 2012: A CASE STUDY

The Incompetent Principal: Restraining the Attorney-In-Fact

RESOLUTION

LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE SAN MATEO COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 333 BRADFORD STREET, SUITE 200 REDWOOD CITY, CA (650)

Wills & Estate A Primer. Chidinma B. Thompson, Ph.D

POWER OF ATTORNEY GUIDE

Texas Pattern Jury Charges Family & Probate (2016 Ed.) List of Charges

ANATOMY OF A WILL (Simple) The text of the sample will is in black typeface; summary explanations and additional commentary is in red.

Pre-Emptive Costs Order Application

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA

Report of the Estate Planning, Trust and Probate Law Section

EJTN seminar on cross-border inheritance law Feb 2014 Recklinghausen

EXECUTOR TRUSTEE AND AGENCY COMPANY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA, LIMITED, ACT.

TRUSTS & ESTATES SECTION

2013 Texas Legislative Update

Superior Court of California County of Orange

Trusts Law 463 Fall Term Lecture Notes No. 3. Bailment is difficult because it bridges property, tort and contract.

Senate Bill No. 277 Senator Wiener

Will County Bar Association Probate Committee. April 18, 2012 Seminar. Current Update

Louisiana Last Will and Testament of

Estates, Trusts, and Wills

PASSING OF ACCOUNTS / FIDUCIARY ACCOUNTS Osgoode PD February 9, Kimberly A. Whaley

WILLS IN THE INDIAN PERSPECTIVE

Effect of the Hague Securities Convention on Perfection and Priority of a Security Interest in Indirectly Held Securities

Transcription:

How to Discuss the Dreaded No Contest Clause Denise E. Chambliss Chair, Trust and Estate Litigation Shareholder, Hoge Fenton 925-460-3364 denise.chambliss@hogefenton.com

Hoge Fenton is a multi-service law firm committed to delivering top-tier legal services to businesses and private clients. With offices in the Silicon Valley and Tri-Valley areas, and a global network of more than 90 distinguished firms in 60 countries, Hoge Fenton can assist with most of our clients key legal needs, regardless of their size, location, industry, or legal matter. Getting excellent legal service should be as easy as contacting one trusted professional. Our goal is to make it easy by providing a single, coordinated experience. Clients turn to us because our IP lawyers are not corporate lawyers who dabble in IP they are IP lawyers, period. Our employment lawyers practice exclusively employment law, and our family law attorneys are California State Bar Certified Specialists. This breadth of expertise means our attorneys can simply walk down the hall and consult other members of our legal team, providing our clients with a seamless experience.

discussion about the DREADED No Contest Clause Is a trustee on solid ground to inform a beneficiary objecting to a trust that they receive nothing because the objection triggers a no contest clause? The No Contest Clause is a two-sided coin. On one side of the coin, parents want to make certain their plans of distributing assets amongst their children and others are followed after their passing with enforcement of their wishes by a punitive risk of loss by objecting beneficiaries. On the flip side of that coin, beneficiary children may have concerns about losing their inheritance by triggering the no contest clause when their parents wishes or the allocation of assets are not acceptable.

why use a No Contest Clause The California well-established public policy for enforcing no contest clauses is to discourage litigation and give effect to the expressed intent of the testator (the person making their post-death distribution plans). In other words, persons creating a will and/or trust want to make certain their instructions are followed, complying with, and honored. The process and decisions going into a will and trust are very personal decisions and can be more complicated and complex than simply all beneficiaries receiving the assets in equal shares. The use of a no contest clause and the California Probate Codes are designed to give effect to those decisions.

what is a No Contest Clause A no contest clause is a tool in estate planning what is designed to discourage challenges or contests to one s will or trust. The judicial application of no contest clauses are controlled by statutes in the California Probate Code. California Probate Code Section 21311 (enacted in 2010), provides, in part, that a no contest clause shall only be enforced against a direct contest that is brought without probable cause. The phrases direct contest and probable cause are legal terms of art with specific meanings beyond their plain meaning. For instance, probable cause exists if, at the time of filing a contest, the facts known to the contestant would cause a reasonable person to believe that there is a reasonable likelihood that the requested relief will be-granted after an opportunity for further investigation or discovery. This means that the no contest clause will be triggered only when there is an absence of probable cause in the direct will or trust context. Probable cause is a low standard designed to protect an objector s right to assert arguable legal claims. The term reasonable likelihood has been interpreted as more than merely possible, but less than more probable than not. Overall, this elements means that if the attorney bringing the trust contest believes they will win, the probable cause element is satisfied and the no contest clause would not cause a loss of all inheritance under the contested will or trust. Note this simple explanation explains why will and trust contests are common. Objectors often believe they have little to lose by a will or trust contest. Conversely, California Probate Code Section 21311 (a)(2) and (3) still provides that when testators or settlors expressly state in the no contest clause that beneficiaries will be disinherited if they file a creditor s claim or challenge a transfer of trust property on the grounds that they own the property, probable cause will not protect the beneficiaries. In addition to just will and trusts, other beneficiary challenges such as a beneficiary s objection to a trust accounting could trigger the no context clause forfeiture..

best practices for an enforceable No Contest Clause To make certain the trustee has financial resources to defend an attack on a testamentary instrument like will or trust, a properly drafted no contest clause will include a sentence permitting the trustee to use trust assets for defense against trust contest, or a similar version in a will. Under the California no contest statutes, drafting attorneys should make certain that the no contest clause clearly states their client s intent that an attack on a person s distributive scheme (which includes the pre-nuptial agreement) could and would trigger disinheritance by enforcement of the no contest clause. Whether a particular proceeding constitutes a contest under a given document depends on (i) the scope of the no contest clause, (ii) the circumstances of the particular case, and (iii) the language of the instrument. A proceeding which would constitute a contest under one will would be permissible under another. Further, a no contest clause needs to be restated in each amendment or restatement of the original instruments with that clause, for the no contest clause to be applicable to challenges to any version of the estate plan.

final comments on No Contest Clauses A beneficiary can be faced with a hard decision take the less-than-desired gift from a will or trust, or risk it all and go double-or-nothing by a will or trust contest. When the beneficiary is not adequately motivated (not enough money passing by the will or trust), the double-or-nothing gamble will look alluring. In other words, where a beneficiary is completely disinherited, they lose nothing by contesting the will or trust. Trustees are well advised to engage legal counsel to help them defend the Trust and respect the testamentary intent of the settlors.

about the author Denise Chambliss, Chair of Hoge Fenton s Trust and Estate Litigation group and a member of the Estates & Trusts and Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice groups, is based primarily in the firm s Tri-Valley office. Denise was named a Northern California Super Lawyer for 2015, 2016, and for 2017, as chosen by her peers and through the independent research of Law & Politics and San Francisco Magazine. Denise E. Chambliss Chair, Trust and Estate Litigation Practice Group Shareholder, Hoge Fenton 925-460-3364 denise.chambliss@hogefenton.com Denise is an experienced trial lawyer who maintains a general civil and business trial practice, with a focus on trust and estate litigation representing individual and corporate trustees, as well as executors and beneficiaries. She has had numerous successful trials as well as many successful mediations on behalf of her clients in cases. In trust and estate matters, Denise has extensive experience in cases involving demand for trust accounting, trustee mismanagement, breach of fiduciary duties, removal of trustees, surcharge claims, and challenges to estate planning documents based on lack of capacity or undue influence. In her business civil litigation practice, she handles contract disputes, business fraud and tort claims, corporate and partnership disputes, unfair competition and trade secret misappropriation claims, and commercial real estate disputes, including those arising out of broker-agent relationships, commercial leasing, and construction defects. TRI-VALLEY 4309 Hacienda Drive, Suite 350 Pleasanton, CA, 94588-2746 925-224-7780 925-224-7782 SILICON VALLEY 60 South Market Street, Suite 1400 San Jose, CA, 95113-2396 408-287-9501 408-287-2583