Section 25: Information otherwise accessible Exemption Briefing

Similar documents
Decision Notice. Decision 005/2015: Mr M and the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland

Decision Notice. Decision 139/2016: Mr H and the Scottish Prison Service. Policy and procedures. Reference No: Decision Date: 28 June 2016

Decision Notice. Decision 181/2018: Mr G and Community Safety Glasgow

Decision 198/2014: Mr Michael McGovern and Glasgow City Council

Decision Notice. Decision 106/2018: Mr C and the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland. Detention of an individual

Decision 024/2007 Mr Charles Traynor and the Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police

Decision 192/2006 Mr David Sharpe and the Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police

Decision 076/ Mr David Laing and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary

Decision Notice. Decision 047/2018: James Donnelly and the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland

Decision Notice. Decision 083/2018: Ms L and Edinburgh College

Decision 067/2006 Mr George Harper & Perth and Kinross Council

Decision 120/2007 Mr Russell Findlay and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary

Decision 009/2009 Ms Jean Kesson and Glasgow City Council. Workforce Pay and Benefits Review. Reference No: Decision Date: 6 February 2009

Applicant: Ms Suzi Eskandari Authority: Scottish Children s Reporter Administration Case No: and Decision Date: 31 October 2007

Decision 031/2009 Mr L and the Scottish Prison Service. Policy relating to Asperger s syndrome. Reference No: Decision Date: 18 March 2009

Decision Notice. Decision 206/2018: Mr M and Aberdeenshire Council

Decision Notice. Decision 176/2016: Mr Roy Mackay and Scottish Borders Council. Archiving of s

Decision 136/2009 Fauldhouse Community Council and West Lothian Council. Submission to a legal adviser regarding a right of way dispute

Decision 100/2010 Mr John McClelland and City of Edinburgh Council

Decision 100/2013 Mr Alistair Sloan and the Scottish Ministers. Refusal to confirm or deny whether information is held

Decision 053/2011 Mr George Green and East Lothian Council. Purchase of audio-visual equipment. Reference No: Decision Date: 14 March 2011

Decision 087/2009 Mr Murdo Gordon and the Scottish Court Service

Decision 036/2007 Ms Sandra Uttley and the Chief Constable of Central Scotland Police

Decision 019/2011 Mr Allan Clark and Glasgow City Council. Names and addresses of Glasgow s Community Councillors

Failure to respond to request and request for a review within timescales

Decision 177/2010 Ms Matilda Gifford and the Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police

Applicant: Mr Norman Brown Authority: The Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police Case No: and Decision Date: 26 July 2007

Decision 202/2011 Ms Geraldine Bell and Glasgow City Council

Psychometric tests used during Sex Offender Treatment Programme

Decision 208/2006 Ms X and Scottish Borders Council

Decision 012/2008 Councillor Paul Welsh and North Lanarkshire Council

Decision 106/2012 Dr Nick McKerrell and Glasgow Caledonian University

2. In July 2013, prior to the Colleges merger, Mr K submitted a complaint to the then Clydebank College.

Decision 207/2013 Mr and Mrs B and the Scottish Court Service

Decision 215/2013 Mr Nigel Dale and Aberdeen City Council. Social work policies and procedures. Reference No: Decision Date: 2 October 2013

Decision 287/2013 Mr Stewart V. Mackenzie and Perth and Kinross Council

Decision 025/2010 Mr Peter Petersen and Grampian Joint Police Board

Decision 063/2012 Mr Drew Cochrane of the Largs and Millport News and the Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police

Decision 119/2007 Ms N and the Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service

Decision 070/2005 Ms R and the Scottish Tourist Board (operating as VisitScotland)

Decision 254/2013 Mr Peter Mortimer and Glasgow City Council

Decision 073/2014 Mr Derek Cooney and the Scottish Court Service

Freedom of Information

Decision 166/2013 Mr David Scott and Historic Scotland. Old Beacon, North Ronaldsay. Reference No: Decision Date: 9 August 2013

Decision 103/2010 Ms Jane Saren and City of Edinburgh Council

Decision 221/2010 Mr Gavin Catto and Aberdeen City Council. Failure to respond to a request and request for review

DISCLOSURE POLICY. 3.1 The Board of the Commission approved this policy on 19 December 2014.

Decision 156/2011 Mr Ralph Lucas and the University of Glasgow

Decision 120/2009 Mr Graeme Cassie and Midlothian Council. Procurement and conversion of Parkhead Lodge, Penicuik

Decision 055/2009 Mr N and South Lanarkshire Council. Inspection report and telephone note. Reference No: Decision Date: 18 May 2009

Decision 010/2011 Mr Keith Knowles and the Scottish Court Service

Decision 122/2010 Mr Kevin McIntyre and Clackmannanshire Council

Decision 267/2013 Mr Jonathan Flynn and Perth and Kinross Council

Decision 257/2013 Mr N and Perth and Kinross Council. Breadalbane Academy Secondary School fund

Decision 092/2010 Mr N and South Lanarkshire Council. Whether request vexatious. Reference No: Decision Date: 14 June 2010

Statistical information on complications and injuries associated with forceps delivery

Decision 273/2013 Mr Colin McLeod and Dundee City Council. Marchbanks recycling centre. Reference No: Decision Date: 3 December 2013

Decision 021/2005 Mr Michael Collie and the Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service

Code of Practice on the discharge of the obligations of public authorities under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (SI 2004 No.

Decision 096/2006 Mr George Waddell and South Lanarkshire Council

Refusing a request under the EIR

Subject Access Requests

Freedom of Information Policy

Freedom of Information Policy

I refer to your recent request for information which has been handled in accordance with the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.

Freedom of Information Policy, Procedures and Requests

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 POLICY

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION POLICY

CHURNET VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL POLICY FOR FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000

Decision 059/2011 Ms Agnes McWhinnie and City of Edinburgh Council

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002 FOR HOUSING PROFESSIONALS

THE PIGGOTT SCHOOL FREEDOM OF INFORMATION POLICY AND GUIDANCE

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 SUMMARY GUIDANCE

HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT CIRCULAR 1

Transport (Scotland) Bill

Information exempt from the subject access right (section 40(4) and

Freedom of Information Memorandum of Understanding (signed 24 February 2005)

Freedom of Information Act 2000 Environmental Information Regulations Decision Notice

Environmental Information Regulations Decision Notice

Merrydale Infant School Freedom of Information Act

Victim and Witness Care. Standard Operating Procedure

HOUSES OF THE OIREACHTAS COMMISSION HOUSES OF THE OIREACHTAS SERVICE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

UCL Freedom of Information Policy

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) Decision notice

Regulatory Activity (Section 31)

Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Bill [AS PASSED]

The Campaign for Freedom of Information

Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED]

Guidance for Children s Social care Staff around the use of Police Protection

An Assessment of the Thirteenth Year of Freedom of Information Act Requests to Invest Northern Ireland

PLUMBING INDUSTRY LICENSING SCHEME (SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN IRELAND) DUTIES OF A LICENSED BUSINESS

EXEMPTION NOTE. Prejudice and Likelihood

Committee Servicing: the Implications of Freedom of Information and Data Protection

Application for Police Officer

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice

Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004

IMMIGRATION ADVISERS LICENSING ACT 2007

Licensing (Scotland) Bill [AS AMENDED AT STAGE 2]

Data Protection. Standard Operating Procedure

Unacceptable, Persistent or Unreasonable Actions by Complainers

Transcription:

FOISA Guidance Section 25: Information otherwise accessible Exemption Briefing

Contents Glossary and abbreviations... 1 The exemption... 2 The exemption: the main points... 2 Duration of the exemption... 2 The identity of the requester... 2 Information may be reasonably obtainable even if you need to pay for it... 3 Information which authorities are obliged to make public... 3 Information made available to the public by the Keeper of the Records of Scotland... 3 Publication schemes... 4 Section 25 and the duty to give advice and assistance... 4 The format of the information... 4 Appendices... 6 Appendix 1: Resources... 6 SIC Decisions... 6 Other Resources... 8 Appendix 2: The exemption... 9 Section 25 Information otherwise accessible... 9 Document control sheet... 10 Glossary and abbreviations Term used Explanation FOISA Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 SIC, The Commissioner The Scottish Information Commissioner Section 60 Code Scottish Minsters Code of Practice on the discharge of Functions by Scottish Public Authorities under FOISA and the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004 Page 1

The exemption The exemption: the main points 1. Section 25 of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA) exempts information from disclosure where the requester can reasonably obtain the information without asking for it under FOISA. It has a different focus from most other exemptions. It is not about withholding information from the public; it recognises that where information is already available, there is no need to provide an alternative right of access to it through FOISA. 2. Information might be exempt under section 25 even if a payment has to be made for it. 3. Information will always be exempt under section 25 if: (i) (ii) (iii) there is legislation requiring the authority which holds the information (or any other body) to communicate it to the public, even if a payment has to be made for it. (Different rules apply if the legislation only requires the information be made available for inspection.) the Keeper of the Records of Scotland makes the information available for inspection and, where practical, copying, by the public, even if a payment has to be made for it the authority publishes the information as part of its publication scheme and any payment for the information is specified in the publication scheme. 4. This is an absolute exemption. So, if the information is otherwise reasonably obtainable, the public authority dealing with the request doesn t have to go on to apply the public interest test. 5. Where the exemption applies, authorities should tell the requester why they believe the information is available through other means. This will normally include telling the requester where they can obtain the information. Duration of the exemption 6. Unlike some of the other exemptions in FOISA, the exemption in section 25(1) can be applied to information regardless of how old the information is. Reasonably 7. The public authority should consider carefully whether the requester can access the information readily without asking for it. The exception is there to relieve public authorities of the burden of providing this kind of information, not to prevent or inhibit access. The Commissioner has, for example, refused to uphold the exemption for information where it was not straightforward to find the information within larger, published documents. See Appendix 1: Resources for an example decision. The identity of the requester 8. This is one of the few exemptions in FOISA where the identity of the requester is relevant. This is because the exemption applies to information which the requester (i.e. the person making the request) can reasonably obtain. Information may be generally accessible to the public at large, but not to an individual requester, if their personal circumstances prevent them from obtaining it. For example: Page 2

(i) (ii) (iii) a person with a visual impairment might not be able to access information provided only in text form on a website it might not be reasonable to expect someone who lives a long way from the public authority s offices to travel to inspect the information it might not be reasonable to expect someone who is prevented from accessing information online to obtain it by another, considerably more expensive, route (see Appendix 1: Resources for an example decision). 9. On the other hand, information might be reasonably obtainable by the requester (e.g. because they already have a copy of the information), but might not be reasonably obtainable by the public in general. Information may be reasonably obtainable even if you need to pay for it 10. Information may be reasonably obtainable even if a requester needs to pay for it. 11. Information which is held by the public authority, but which is also commercially available, such as Ordnance Survey maps, journals or books, is covered by this exemption. The market price for information which is commercially available will generally be taken as reasonable. 12. Whether other types of information are reasonably obtainable may depend on the circumstances of the requester. If the requester s means are limited or the fee payable to access the information is high, the information may not be reasonably obtainable to that requester and the exemption may not apply. Information which authorities are obliged to make public 13. If there is legislation requiring a public authority (or other body) to communicate information to the public, the information is considered to be reasonably obtainable and the exemption will apply. 14. As an example, the Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Act 2004 requires local authorities to publish their antisocial behaviour strategies. This information will, therefore, be reasonably obtainable (provided the authority does publish its strategy). 15. Some legislation requires authorities to make information available for inspection by the public. If an authority wishes to apply the exemption in section 25(1) to information that is only available by inspection, it must satisfy itself that it would be reasonably easy for the requester to inspect the information. 16. It may not be reasonable for the requester to travel to the location within available opening hours and therefore section 25(1) will not apply. Similarly, authorities cannot apply the section 25(3) exemption to information available only by inspection; the Commissioner does not approve publication schemes where access to published information is so restrictive. Many authorities are now publishing online information that used to be available only in paper ledgers and this makes it much easier both for the public to access and for authorities to provide it on request. Information made available to the public by the Keeper of the Records of Scotland 17. Information held by the Keeper of the Records of Scotland (also known as the National Records of Scotland) and which is made available to members of the public for inspection Page 3

and, where practical, copying, is exempt from disclosure under section 25. This is the case even if it is not practical for the requester to visit the National Records of Scotland to inspect or obtain a copy of the information. Publication schemes 18. All public authorities must adopt and maintain a publication scheme which has been approved by the Commissioner. Under section 25(3), information made available in accordance with an approved publication scheme is presumed to be reasonably obtainable to everyone and is exempt from disclosure under section 25 of FOISA. (See Appendix 1: Resources for a link to further guidance on publication schemes.) 19. Information is only considered to be "published" if it is information which is already prepared and easily available to anyone without having to make a request for it. Information should, wherever possible, be made available on the authority s website. There must be an alternative arrangement for people to access information if they cannot reasonably access it online or by inspection. 20. Charges for published information must not exceed the actual cost of providing the information. Authorities must therefore be careful when agreeing a set charge for a particular kind of document. See Appendix 1: Resources for an example decision. Section 25 and the duty to give advice and assistance 21. Section 15 of FOISA requires public authorities to provide reasonable advice and assistance to people who have made, or intend to make, an information request. If a public authority refuses a request on the basis that the information is otherwise accessible to the requester, the refusal notice must explain to the requester why the exemption applies (for more information on refusal notices, see the Commissioner s guidance on the content of notices there is a link to the guidance in Appendix 1: Resources). The authority should therefore take steps to establish that the specific information the requester has asked for is available elsewhere. 22. The authority should not assume that the requester will know where and how they can obtain the information. If the information is already publicly available, the authority should tell the requester how to access it, and should provide adequate signposting e.g. by giving them direct links to online information. 23. More advice on how to comply with this duty can be found in the Scottish Ministers Section 60 Code of Practice (see Appendix 1: Resources). The duty to advise and assist can be a factor in cases involving section 25 of FOISA. 24. See Appendix 1: Resources for example decisions. The format of the information 25. Under FOISA, requesters have the right to ask for a copy, summary or digest of the information they want. They can also ask to inspect a record containing the information. The authority must provide the information in the format requested where reasonably practicable (section 11 of FOISA). 26. The Court of Session considered the relationship between the section 25 exemption, and the right to ask for information in a particular format in Glasgow City Council v Scottish Information Commissioner (see Appendix 1: Resources). The Court confirmed that, Page 4

where information is exempt under section 25, the requester does not have the right to request the information in a different format. 27. However, public authorities may separately need to consider their duties under the Equality Act 2010 when dealing with any request for the information to be provided in a particular format (e.g. Braille or large print) or language. Page 5

Appendices Appendix 1: Resources SIC Decisions Reference Decision Number Para 7 112/2017 Para 8(iii) 224/2016 Parties Mr Kevin Keane and Aberdeen City Council Mr X and the Scottish Courts and Tribunal Service Summary The Council refused to provide information it considered to be in the public domain, citing a number of published reports. The Commissioner was not satisfied that all of the information could be located where the Council claimed it was to be found. Even where the information could be located via the links provided, finding it (without any further information) was a cumbersome and time-consuming task. The Commissioner was not satisfied that this was information which could be accessed readily without asking for it, and so refused to uphold section 25. The Commissioner refused to accept that information in a Scottish Law Commission report was reasonably obtainable by Mr X. Most people could obtain the information online, free of charge. Mr X s personal circumstances prevented him from doing this, so his only option was to purchase a hard copy, at considerable expense. This placed him at a clear disadvantage if section 25 were to be upheld, which the Commissioner did not believe was intended. Para 19 089/2017 Para 23 162/2014 Para 23 013/2007 Q and Aberdeen City Council Mr Q and the Scottish Prison Service Mr D and the Chief Constable of Strathclyde Police The Council was asked for a copy of a plan relating to a specific planning application. It replied that the information was available through its publication scheme for a standard 50 fee. We found that the Council was not entitled to charge 50 for one plan. The 50 fee was for provision of a complete planning application file. The charge greatly exceeded the cost of providing the information covered by the request. The Commissioner accepted that the information requested by Mr Q, which was accessible in the prison library, was reasonably obtainable and therefore exempt under section 25. However, the Scottish Prison Service failed to comply with section 15, by not giving Mr Q sufficient advice and assistance to allow him to locate the information readily within the library. The Police argued that because Mr D could seek a court order (in terms of section 1(1)(a) of the Administration of Justice (Scotland) Act 1972) to obtain the information, the information was otherwise reasonably obtainable by him. The Commissioner Page 6

Reference Decision Number Parties disagreed. Summary Para 23 206/2010 Para 23 059/2010 Para 23 196/2014 Para 23 169/2017 Ian Benson and the University of Glasgow John McKnight and Glasgow City Council Mr R and Scottish Prison Service Robert M Patterson and the Keeper of the Registers of Scotland Although the email addresses requested by Mr Benson were all available through the University website, each one had to be accessed individually. The Commissioner did not accept that information which would take around 25 hours to obtain could be described as "reasonably obtainable. The Commissioner could not accept the Council s argument that information was accessible under its publication scheme: it had no approved publication scheme in force and, in any event, its last approved publication scheme made no reference to information of the type Mr McKnight was seeking. The Commissioner had not been given sufficient evidence that the information was fully obtainable elsewhere even if some of it could be obtained elsewhere, the effort involved in searching for it meant that it was not reasonably obtainable. In line with all other exemptions, section 25 can only apply if the authority actually holds the information the requester is looking for. Here, the Scottish Prison Service purported to apply the exemption to information in a number of publications. These were publicly available, but were not held by the authority the proper course of action was to give the requester notice in terms of section 17(1) of FOISA. This involved a request about changes to a property title. We agreed that some of the information Mr Patterson wanted was exempt under section 25, even though the Keeper was entitled to charge a fee for it under the Registers of Scotland (Fees) Order 2014. All of the Commissioner s decisions are available on the Commissioner s website. To view a decision, go to www.itspublicknowledge.info/decisions and enter the relevant decision number (e.g. 032/2014). If you do not have access to the internet, contact our office to request a copy of any of the Commissioner s briefings or decisions. Our contact details are on the final page. Page 7

Other Resources Paragraph Resource Link 15 National Records of Scotland http://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/ 16 Publication scheme guidance http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/scot tishpublicauthorities/publicationschem es/publicationschemeshome.aspx 20 Content of notices guidance http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/law/ FOISA- EIRsGuidance/Contentofnotices/Conte nt_of_notices.aspx 19 21 Scottish Ministers Code of Practice on the Discharge of Functions by Scottish Public Authorities under FOISA and the EIRs (the Section 60 Code) Glasgow City Council v Scottish Information Commissioner [2009] CSIH 73 http://www.gov.scot/resource/0051/005 10851.pdf http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search- judgments/judgment?id=cc8f86a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7 Page 8

Appendix 2: The exemption Section 25 Information otherwise accessible (1) Information which the requester can reasonably obtain other than by requesting it under section 1(1) is exempt information. (2) For the purposes of subsection 1(1), information (a) may be reasonably obtainable even if payment is required for access to it; (b) is to be taken to be reasonably obtainable if (i) (ii) the Scottish public authority which holds it, or any other person, is obliged by or under any enactment to communicate it (otherwise than by making it available for inspection) to; or the Keeper of the Records of Scotland holds it and makes it available for inspection and (in so far as practicable) copying by, members of the public on request, whether free of charge or on payment. (3) For the purposes of subsection (1), information is to be taken to be reasonably obtainable if - (a) it is available (i) (ii) on request from the Scottish public authority which holds it, and in accordance with the authority s publication scheme, and (b) any associated payment required by the authority is specified in or determined under the scheme. Page 9

Document control sheet Document Information Full name of current version: Class, Title, Version No and Status. C2 FOISA Exemption Guidance Section 25: Information otherwise accessible v03 CURRENT ISSUE VC File Id 98851 Type Briefing Approver SMT Responsible Manager HOE Date of next planned review February 2021 Approval & Publication Approval Date (major version) 7 February 2018 For publication (Y/N) Y Date published 13/02/18 Name of document in website file library BriefingSection25InformationOtherwiseAccessible Corrections / Unplanned or Ad hoc reviews (see Summary of changes below for details) Date of last update Summary of changes to document Date Action by (initials) Version updated (e.g. 01.25-36) New version number (e.g. 01.27, or Brief description (e.g. updated paras 1-8, updated HOPI to HOOM, reviewed whole section on PI test, whole document updated, corrected typos, reformatted to new branding) 02.03) 13/02/18 KB 03.00 03.01 New document created following approval of draft 13/02/18 KB 03.01 03.02 DCS updated, published on website Page 10

Scottish Information Commissioner Kinburn Castle Doubledykes Road St Andrews, Fife KY16 9DS t 01334 464610 f 01334 464611 enquiries@itspublicknowledge.info www.itspublicknowledge.info Scottish Information Commissioner 2018 You may use and re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/opengovernment-licence/version/3/