OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

Similar documents
Josefina Hernandez v. Logix Federal Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Joy L. Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date:

IF YOU PAID A CONVENIENCE FEE WHEN MAKING A MORTGAGE PAYMENT TO NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC YOU ARE ENTITLED TO A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET...

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA WHEELING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

If You Returned a Rented U-Haul Truck in California,

Todd Wodja v. Washington State Employees Credit Union

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

If You Own or Owned a John Hancock Flex V Life Insurance Policy, a Class Action Lawsuit May Affect Your Rights.

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 17th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, KITTITAS COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 17th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : :

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID»

Danell Behrens v. Landmark Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 133 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A (Revised)

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT. This is the only way to receive a payment. Basic Information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

United States District Court for the Southern District of California

LEGAL NOTICE IF YOU REFINANCED A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE IN CONNECTICUT YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

Superior Court of the State of Washington, Yakima County

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

February 14, 2018 at 9:00 A.M.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.: 8:17-cv JSM-AEP

If You Were a Royalty Owner and Received a Payment from EQT Beginning December 8, 2008 for a West Virginia Natural Gas Well,

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

Notice of Honda and Acura Rear Brake Pad Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A CLASS ACTION READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE COUNTY

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, CLASS ACTION

A federal court authorized this supplemental notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

You Could Get Money From $44.95 Million in Settlements A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A California Superior Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-cv-2456-T-26EAJ. v. CASE NO. 8:15-cv-2588-T-26JSS

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

If you bought a SoftSheen-Carson Optimum Amla Legend Rejuvenating Ritual hair relaxer kit, this class action notice may affect your rights.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. CHARLES STATE OF MISSOURI

If You Purchased Scotts Turf Builder EZ Seed, You May Be Eligible to Get $15 Or More Per Package from a Class Action Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRY RYAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

If you lived in Missouri and bought Marlboro Lights Cigarettes between February 14, 1995 and December 31, 2003

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM FOR A PAYMENT

STATE OF MISSOURI, CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY

COURT APPROVED SETTLEMENT NOTICE AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendants. )

Djoric v. Justin Brands, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS

SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM EXCLUDE YOURSELF. Write to the Court explaining why you don t like the Settlement. OBJECT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to TD Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. A court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

THESE RIGHTS AND OPTIONS AND THE DEADLINES TO EXERCISE THEM ARE EXPLAINED IN THIS NOTICE. WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Parkinson v. Hyundai Motor America ) Case No. SACV AHS (MLGx) )

º Bay Area Beverage failed to provide its employees with proper meal and rest periods;

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 8:12-cv CJC(JPRx) CLASS ACTION

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois (Chancery Division)

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement.

Transcription:

OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION NICOLE MONTGOMERY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ORBITZ, LLC, Defendant. Superior Court of the State of California County of Los Angeles Case No. BC 335441 Civil Action THIS IS A COURT-ORDERED NOTICE. IF YOU PAID A MANDATORY, UNDISCLOSED HOTEL FEE/TAX (SUCH AS A RESORT FEE, SAFE FEE OR ENERGY SURCHARGE) TO A STARWOOD-BRAND HOTEL SUCH AS A SHERATON, FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON, WESTIN, W HOTEL, LE MÉRIDIEN, ST. REGIS, THE LUXURY COLLECTION, ALOFT OR ELEMENT BOOKED THROUGH ORBITZ, LLC SINCE JANUARY 1, 2003, A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. A California Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY THIS NOTICE ANSWERS THESE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS 1. Why should I read this Notice? 2. What is this Lawsuit about? 3. Who is included in the Class? 4. Why did I get this Notice? 5. What happens if I do nothing? 6. Why would I ask to be excluded from the Class? 7. If I don t want to be in the Class, how do I exclude myself? 8. Do I have a lawyer in this Lawsuit? 9. Should I get my own lawyer? 10. How will Class Counsel s fees and expenses be paid? 11. How and when will the Court decide who is right? 12. Do I have to come to the trial? 13. Will I get money after the trial? 14. How can I get additional information? 15. What are the important deadlines I need to be aware of? Page 1

1. Why should I read this Notice? If you paid an undisclosed mandatory fee (such as a resort fee, safe fee or energy surcharge) to a Starwood-brand hotel such as a Sheraton, Four Points by Sheraton, Westin, W Hotel, Le Méridien, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection, Aloft or Element hotel booked through Orbitz since January 1, 2003, a class action lawsuit known as Montgomery v. Orbitz, LLC, Case No. BC 335441 (the Lawsuit ) may affect your rights. You should read this Notice to learn how your rights may be affected, what your legal rights and options are, and what the deadlines are for exercising your rights and options. 2. What is this Lawsuit about? Nicole Montgomery ( Plaintiff ) filed this Lawsuit against Orbitz, LLC ( Orbitz ) claiming that, having made a reservation at a Westin hotel through Orbitz, and having paid Orbitz an amount of money that was identified as the Total cost of her stay at that hotel, including Taxes & fees, she was required to pay the hotel an additional, mandatory Resort Service Fee of $14.00 for her stay. Believing that others who used Orbitz to book rooms at hotels that charged mandatory fees may have had similar experiences, Plaintiff filed her case as a class action. A class action is a type of lawsuit in which one or a few individuals represent a larger group of people who were also allegedly harmed by a defendant s conduct. This group of people is referred to as the Class or as the Class Members. Plaintiff claims that Orbitz s conduct was a breach of California s Unfair Competition Law, which is codified in the California Business and Professions Code at Sections 17200 and 17500, and the following sections. Orbitz denies that it violated this statute and claims it acted lawfully. The Court has allowed the Lawsuit to proceed as a class action. Orbitz claims that, at the time she made her booking, it fully disclosed to Ms. Montgomery that she could be charged a resort fee by the hotel. Orbitz also claims that Ms. Montgomery is a member of a class of persons who already sued the hotel and settled their claims concerning the hotel s collection of resort fees, including the fee Ms. Montgomery allegedly paid. Orbitz also denies that it has violated the particular statute at issue. The Court has not decided the merits of Ms. Montgomery s claim or Orbitz s defenses. 3. Who is included in the Class? The Court has certified a Starwood Class, comprised of people who fall within one of the following categories Category 1 California and non-california residents who (1) during the Class Period booked a room or other lodging accommodation through Orbitz at a Starwood brand hotel, motel, resort or other lodging place located in the State of California; (2) were required to pay Mandatory Hotel Fees/Taxes in addition to the price they contracted to pay Orbitz; and (3)(a) did not receive notice of the Mandatory Hotel Fees/Taxes at the time they reserved and paid for their accommodation through Orbitz and/or (b) were misinformed or mislead about the amount of Mandatory Hotel Fees/Taxes due to information they received at the time of reservation from Orbitz. Category 2 California residents who (1) during the Class Period booked a room or other lodging accommodation through Orbitz at a Starwood brand hotel, motel, resort or other lodging place located outside the State of California; (2) were required to pay Mandatory Hotel Fees/Taxes in addition to the price they contracted to pay Orbitz; and (3)(a) did not receive notice of the Mandatory Hotel Fees/Taxes at the time they reserved and paid for their accommodation through Orbitz and/or (b) were misinformed Page 2

or mislead about the amount of Mandatory Hotel Fees/Taxes due to information they received at the time of reservation from Orbitz. The Class Period is the period between January 1, 2003 and December 18, 2009. The Starwood brand hotels are Sheraton, Four Points by Sheraton, Westin Hotels & Resorts, W Hotels, Le Méridien, St. Regis Hotels & Resorts, The Luxury Collection, Aloft Hotels and Element. Mandatory Hotel Fees/Taxes are charges imposed by hotels in addition to the amount already paid to Orbitz for the hotel stay, that are not optional and comprise (1) fees, charges or surcharges designated as being for hotel service, airport, transportation, convenience, energy, safe, safe warranty, utility, resort, resort services, facility and/or convenience, and/or (2) taxes such as occupancy taxes. 4. Why did I get this Notice? You received this Notice to inform you that you may be a member of the Starwood Class certified in this Lawsuit, and to notify you that you have legal rights and options that you may exercise before the Court holds a trial. At the trial, Judge Carl J. West of the Los Angeles County Superior Court will determine whether the claims being made against Orbitz on your behalf entitle Class Members to any recovery. If Judge West determines that Class Members are entitled to relief, you may be able to recover money or other benefits, and Orbitz may be ordered to change its disclosure practice. 5. What happens if I do nothing? You do not have to do anything now if you want to maintain the possibility of getting money or other benefits from this Lawsuit. By doing nothing, you are staying in the Class. If you stay in the Class, and the Class is awarded money or other benefits, either as a result of the trial or a settlement, you will be notified about how to apply for your share of the recovery. However, if you do nothing now you will not be able to separately sue, or continue to sue, Orbitz for the same claims that are the subject of this Lawsuit, regardless of whether Plaintiff wins or loses the trial. You will also be legally bound by all of the Orders the Court issues and the judgments the Court makes in this class action, including any decisions rendered in Orbitz s favor. 6. Why would I ask to be excluded from the Class? If you exclude yourself from the Class which is sometimes called opting-out of the Class you won t get any money or benefits from this Lawsuit, if any are awarded or obtained. However, you may be able to separately sue or continue to sue Orbitz for the legal claims that are the subject of this Lawsuit. If you exclude yourself, you will not be legally bound by the Court s judgments in this class action. If you bring your own lawsuit against Orbitz after you exclude yourself from the Class, you will have to hire and pay for your own lawyer for that lawsuit, and you will have to prove your claims. If you do exclude yourself so that you can start your own lawsuit against Orbitz, you should talk to your own lawyer soon, because your claims may be subject to a statute of limitations. 7. If I don t want to be in the Class, how do I exclude myself? If you do NOT want to remain a Class Member and wish to exclude yourself from the Lawsuit, you must send a written request to the below-listed address that legibly sets forth your name and address, and states that you wish to be excluded from the Starwood Class in Montgomery v. Orbitz, LLC, Case No. BC 335441. The request must be sent by first-class mail, postmarked no later than June 2, 2010, addressed to Page 3

Superior Court of the State of California Montgomery v. Orbitz, LLC Exclusion Requests P.O. Box 6188 Novato, CA 94948-9807 Requests for exclusion submitted after June 2, 2010 will not be effective. If your request for exclusion is on behalf of any entity or individual other than you (such as, for example, a relative), you must provide documentation of your legal authority to execute the request on behalf of that entity or other individual. 8. Do I have a lawyer in this Lawsuit? The Court has decided that two law firms are qualified to represent all Class Members as Class Counsel Kalcheim Law Group, P.C. and Shalov Stone Bonner & Rocco LLP. The lawyers at these two firms are experienced in handling similar consumer class actions. More information about Class Counsel is available at www.kallawgroup.com and www.lawssb.com. 9. Should I get my own lawyer? If you want to remain a member of the Class, but you do not wish to be represented by Class Counsel, you may enter an appearance through your own attorney at your own expense. To do so, you must file an Entry of Appearance with the Clerk of the Court. You will remain a Class Member with representation by your own attorney and you will be responsible for the fees and costs of your attorney. 10. How will Class Counsel s fees and expenses be paid? If Class Counsel recover money or other benefits for the Class, they may ask the Court for payment of their fees and expenses. You will not have to pay those fees and expenses. Rather, if the Court grants Class Counsel s request for the payment of fees and expenses, the fees and expenses will either be deducted from the Class s recovery or paid separately by Orbitz. 11. How and when will the Court decide who is right? As long as the Lawsuit is not resolved by a settlement, Class Counsel will have to prove the Class s claims at a trial in the Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County. The trial date has not yet been scheduled. It is likely to take place in late 2010 or early 2011. 12. Do I have to come to the trial? You do not need to attend the trial. Class Counsel will present the case for the Class Members, and Orbitz will present its defenses. You are welcome to attend the trial at your own expense. If you wish to participate in the trial, you should contact Class Counsel. 13. Will I get money after the trial? If the Class obtains money or other benefits as a result of the trial or a settlement, you will be notified about how to participate. As a condition of participating in any such recovery, you may be required to provide documentation of the fact that you paid undisclosed Mandatory Hotel Fees/Taxes. Thus, you should maintain any Orbitz reservation documents, hotel receipts, credit card statements or other documentation related to any hotel reservation made through Orbitz that resulted in you paying an undisclosed Mandatory Hotel Fee/Tax until the Lawsuit is resolved. 14. How can I get additional information about this Lawsuit? This Notice is only a summary of the proceedings in the Lawsuit. You may review the pleadings and other publicly-filed records, including the Third Amended Class Action Complaint filed February 13, Page 4

2008 and the Court s Amended Ruling and Order re Plaintiff s Motion for Class Certification filed on December 18, 2009, during normal business hours at the Office of the Clerk of Court, Los Angeles County, which is located at 600 South Commonwealth Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90005. Certain documents and other information are also available on the internet at www.orbitzhotelfeelawsuit.com. If you have questions concerning anything discussed in this notice, or wish to provide Class Counsel with any information concerning the Lawsuit, please visit the above website or contact Class Counsel at Mitch Kalcheim, Esq. Kalcheim Law Group, P.C. 9300 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 508 Beverly Hills, California 90212 (310) 461-1210 Mitch@kallawgroup.com Susan M. Davies, Esq. Shalov Stone Bonner & Rocco LLP 485 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1000 New York, New York 10018 (212) 239-4340 sdavies@lawssb.com PLEASE DO NOT CALL THE COURT OR ORBITZ. 16. What are the important deadlines I need to be aware of? Requests for Exclusion must be postmarked no later than June 2, 2010. BY THE COURT Dated March 29, 2010 /s/ Honorable Carl J. West Judge of the Superior Court Page 5