Case3:15-mj MAG Document26 Filed05/01/15 Page1 of 5

Similar documents
Case 3:07-cr EDL Document 49 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 8

Case3:14-cr CRB Document558 Filed10/20/14 Page1 of 11

vs. : Defendant. : DETENTION ORDER - RISK OF FLIGHT/DANGER On January 8, 2014, a hearing was held pursuant to Title 18, United States Code,

Case 1:17-cr ABJ Document 21 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CC ATTACHMENT SUMMONS PAGE: 1 USING THIS FORM. a. Original to sheriff for proof of service of process, then to court.

Case3:13-cv SI Document78 Filed04/08/14 Page1 of 6

Case 3:14-cr WHA Document 955 Filed 12/31/18 Page 1 of 5

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Case 8:18-cr TDC Document 35 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case3:09-cv JSW Document142 Filed09/22/11 Page1 of 7

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Case 9:07-mj JMH Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

Case 1:18-cr TFH Document 4 Filed 10/08/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 1:06-cr Document #: 82 Filed: 10/01/08 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:547

Case 1:16-cr KBJ Document 6 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IC Chapter 5. Search and Seizure

MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL BOND

2:10-cr NGE-MKM Doc # 295 Filed 03/25/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 4602 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:18-mj DAR Document 1-1 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Mag. No.

Case 2:17-mj KJN Document 1 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff, SECTION R

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

SECOND TIME PIMP SENTENCED TO LENGTHY PRISON SENTENCE

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Attorneys for the United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:12-cr TJS Document 11 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

Case 3:11-cr JW Document 11 Filed 11/15/11 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: CR-LENARD DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRAVEL

Filed DODGE County Court 6/ 29/ 18

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

When should this form be used? IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING E-FILING. What should I do next?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION

Case 3:09-cr JAJ-TJS Document 17 Filed 11/25/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

Case 5:09-cr JHS Document 31 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Feedback on the attached documents should be sent to the National Center on Full Faith and Credit at 800/ , ext. 2 or

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case3:11-cr WHA Document40 Filed08/08/11 Page1 of 10

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2017 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION ORDER

Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 11 Filed 01/22/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 108

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

NO. FIELD(MAT_Cause No) STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT. VS. FIELD(MAT_Court) JUDICIAL. TOUPPER(FIELD(MAT_Client Name)) BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

$2.50 COMPLAINT FOR UNLAWFUL DETAINER

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

2:13-mj DUTY Doc # 16 Filed 08/13/13 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 256 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Case: 2:13-cr MHW-TPK Doc #: 56 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 368

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND EMERGENCY RETURN OF CHILD PACKET

OKLAHOMA IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 25, 63.9 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 2312 Complaints (2007) Updated January 10, 2009

NO. EX PARTE IN THE DISTRICT COURT. TOUPPER(FIELD(MAT_Client Name)) BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS PETITION FOR EXPUNCTION OF RECORDS

n f! d 0, i:jo ~ (not to

Case 1:11-cr NMG Document 63 Filed 10/05/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

APPLICATION FOR JUVENILE DEPENDENCY LAW PANEL. Name: State Bar number: Telephone: Fax: Full time SF office address: Mailing address (if different):

Case: 1:10-cr SL Doc #: 898 Filed: 06/04/12 1 of 5. PageID #: 18606

Information or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel PREVIEW

Case 3:07-cv WHA Document 17 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 276 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 22 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing (Amendment) Act 2013.

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case Doc 52 Filed 10/01/15 Entered 10/01/15 16:38:57 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv TC Document 144 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Attention purchasers of Bertolli Brand Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2018

RULE TITLE AND SCOPE

/ o i ' "" Plaintiff, ) ) MOTION TO COMPEL vs. )

Case 1:02-cv EGS-JMF Document 560 Filed 11/18/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

Case 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 833 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 9

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 345 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv600-HSO-LRA

Suggestions in Opposition

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA)

State your full name, social security number, date of birth, residence address, and telephone number.

Case 1:05-cr EWN Document 332 Filed 04/03/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

MOTION OF DEFENDANT ROBERT E. STEWART FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DETENTION ORDER, WITH SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM. Action Requested. Deadline N/A

Case 1:15-cv WMS Document 1 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 16

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION No. 2:14-CR-14-D-1

Transcription:

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document26 Filed05/01/15 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney DAVID R. CALLAWAY (CABN 121782) Chief, Criminal Division KATHRYN HAUN (DCBN 484131) WILLIAM FRENTZEN (LABN 24421) Assistant United States Attorneys 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-7200 FAX: (415) 436-7234 Kathryn.haun@usdoj.gov William.frentzen@usdoj.gov RAYMOND N. HULSER (MABN 551350) Acting Chief, Public Integrity Section RICHARD B. EVANS (DCBN 441494) Trial Attorney 1400 New York Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 353-7760 Richard.B.Evans@usdoj.gov Attorneys for United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CARL MARK FORCE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3 CR-15-70370 GOVERNMENT S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 26 27 28 GOVERNMENT S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION CR 15-70370

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document26 Filed05/01/15 Page2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Comes now the United States through its undersigned attorneys and submits the following brief to clarify the record and in support of its motion for pretrial detention of defendant, Carl M. Force, IV. At the detention hearing on April 29, 2015, the Court inquired as to the status of defendant s outstanding passports and asked that the government confirm said status with the Department of State (DOS). At the time of the hearing, government counsel had been informed that, in addition to the personal blue passport that was recovered from defendant s vehicle at the time of the arrest (which was expired), there was a second personal blue passport that was valid until 2017, which had yet to be recovered. The United States has since learned that the second passport did indeed exist; however, according to DOS, that passport was an official red passport, which was issued to defendant while he was an agent with DEA. The United States is further informed that this second passport has been turned over to the DEA for destruction. This information was not known to government counsel at the time of the detention hearing and therefore, the United States wishes to correct the record on this matter at this time. Regardless, this fact does not change the government s position that a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that Force is still a risk of flight and thus, should be detained. As indicated during the detention hearing, defendant amassed certain special skills through his work as an undercover DEA agent operating on the dark web and has the knowledge and ability to obtain false identification, if he has not already done so. This would include passports, which were sold on the Silk Road and on a variety of black market sites. Indeed, that was one of the services that Force was performing in his undercover capacity procuring false identification for the target of the Maryland investigation, Dread Pirate Roberts, a.k.a., Ross Ulbricht. Additionally, as evidenced by the document created by Force entitled el plan, previously submitted to this Court, Force has actively considered and planned for how to leave the United States undetected and travel to a foreign country where he would be beyond the reach of U.S. law enforcement. In addition to his ability, Force also has the means to flee the country. As evidenced by Force s own ledger, which was seized during the search of his house, Force had more than $300,000 in bitcoins at the end of 2014. This is in addition to the funds in the various domestic bank accounts which he owns and the $150,000 tax refund, which the government learned about for the first time at the detention hearing on April 29 th. Then there is the issue of the $235,000 that Force wired to Pantera Capital in GOVERNMENT S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION CR 15-70370

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document26 Filed05/01/15 Page3 of 5 1 2 3 Panama on May 8, 2014, further destined for BTC-e, a digital currency exchange that is not registered with the U.S. Treasury Department s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) as it must be to be in compliance with U.S. law. It appears that these funds were subsequently moved to Eastern Europe 4 where they are now beyond the reach of United States law enforcement. 1 The existence of these 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 overseas funds is troubling to begin with; however, what is even more troubling is the fact that the defendant failed to disclose the existence of these funds to the Pretrial Services Office (PTS) during his interview on April 29 th. Force s lack of candor with the PTS is directly relevant to the issues of trust that are central to this Court s consideration of the government s present motion and were one of the primary reasons that the Court in Maryland ordered Force s detention at the hearing on April 2, 2015. One point bears special need for clarification as a result of defense counsel s proffer at the hearing, however, and that is Force s digital currency balances at overseas exchanges and what he told the government (and PTS) about them. It should be clear that Force did not simply have one overseas digital currency account. He had at least two, and those are only the ones known to the government. Force had and has an account at Bitstamp, based in Slovenia. Force also had, and has, an account at BTC-e, as described above. The Bitstamp account was the only account Force told the government about during his proffer, and by that time the Bitstamp account was already known to the government. Indeed, Bitstamp had apprised law enforcement of Force s account and of the large scale withdrawals he was attempting to make from it. Although Force has agreed to a freeze of the Bitstamp balances, the government has no way to access the large balances that were wired to BTC-e via Panama. Although defense counsel s proffer to this Court was that Force was willing to turn over the necessary passwords to the government to obtain those passwords on an apparent thumb drive, undersigned counsel represents to this Court that it contacted defense counsel months ago seeking any passwords or PGP encryption keys and was advised that Force had none and did not memorialize any. 24 25 26 27 28 1 At the hearing on the 29 th, defense counsel, for the first time, stated that these funds in the BTC-e account were the property of the United States and that Force had informed the government of this fact at the time of his proffer on May 30, 2014. This is simply not the case. At the time of his proffer Force informed that government that certain bitcoins in his Bitstamp account purportedly belonged to the United States but he made no mention the $235,000 that he had wired to Panama just two weeks prior to his proffer. GOVERNMENT S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION CR 15-70370

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document26 Filed05/01/15 Page4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Moreover, through defense counsel proffer to the Court at the detention hearing this week, it was represented that Force told the government of the BTC-e funds last year during the May 2014 proffer and now it is defendant s position that they were government funds all along. All undersigned counsel were present at that proffer and none recall this statement. Moreover, as government counsel noted at the hearing, if those funds belong to the government (which the government believes) and were wrongfully converted by Force, why would Force have moved them outside the country to an offshore account if his intention was to give them back to the United States? Given the defendant s lack of candor with the PTS, his access to large amounts of known and discovered funds, including those that he moved offshore; the real possibility of additional funds that have not yet been discovered by the government; his expert knowledge of undetectable or hard-to-detect methods of communication; his expert knowledge of false identities and procuring the same; his communications about a get out of town plan; the fact that when arrested and knowing of the government s case he was caught with a go bag of blank money orders totaling $5,000, a loaded weapon, and an expired passport; and the other factors described in the government s motion in support of detention and adduced at the hearing, the United States requests this Court reach the same conclusion as the Magistrate Judge in the District of Maryland and detain the defendant pending trial. Finally, given all the representations that were made about the different account balances and currency at the proffer, the government respectfully requests that the Court take into account the sworn testimony of Special Agent Tigran Gambaryan made through his affidavit in support of the Criminal Complaint in this case. Although it is somewhat lengthy, its factual descriptions and attachments depicting some of the defendant s transfers of digital currency should leave no doubt that Force was a master at hiding assets and covering his tracks, including requesting that evidence be deleted. /s/ RICHARD B. EVANS Trial Attorney, Public Integrity Section Dated: May 1, 2015 Respectfully submitted, MELINDA HAAG /s/ KATHRYN HAUN WILLIAM FRENTZEN Assistant U.S. Attorneys GOVERNMENT S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION CR 15-70370

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document26 Filed05/01/15 Page5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that on this 1 st day of May, 2015, an electronic copy of the foregoing was served via the Court s ECF system on counsel for defendant and all those who have filed an appearance in this case. //s// Richard B. Evans Trial Attorney 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GOVERNMENT S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IN SUPPORT OF PRETRIAL DETENTION CR 15-70370

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page1 of 78

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page2 of 78

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page3 of 78

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page4 of 78 DH-CMF-00001

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page5 of 78 DH-CMF-00002

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page6 of 78 DH-CMF-00003

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page7 of 78 DH-CMF-00004

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page8 of 78 DH-CMF-00005

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page9 of 78 DH-CMF-00006

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page10 of 78 DH-CMF-00007

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page11 of 78 DH-CMF-00008

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page12 of 78 DH-CMF-00009

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page13 of 78 DH-CMF-00010

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page14 of 78 DH-CMF-00011

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page15 of 78 DH-CMF-00012

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page16 of 78 DH-CMF-00013

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page17 of 78 DH-CMF-00014

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page18 of 78 DH-CMF-00015

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page19 of 78 DH-CMF-00016

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page20 of 78 DH-CMF-00017

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page21 of 78 DH-CMF-00018

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page22 of 78 DH-CMF-00019

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page23 of 78 DH-CMF-00020

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page24 of 78 DH-CMF-00021

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page25 of 78 DH-CMF-00022

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page26 of 78 DH-CMF-00023

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page27 of 78 DH-CMF-00024

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page28 of 78 DH-CMF-00025

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page29 of 78 DH-CMF-00026

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page30 of 78 DH-CMF-00027

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page31 of 78 DH-CMF-00028

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page32 of 78 DH-CMF-00029

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page33 of 78 DH-CMF-00030

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page34 of 78 DH-CMF-00031

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page35 of 78 DH-CMF-00032

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page36 of 78 DH-CMF-00033

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page37 of 78 DH-CMF-00034

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page38 of 78 DH-CMF-00035

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page39 of 78 DH-CMF-00036

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page40 of 78 DH-CMF-00037

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page41 of 78 DH-CMF-00038

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page42 of 78 DH-CMF-00039

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page43 of 78 DH-CMF-00040

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page44 of 78 DH-CMF-00041

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page45 of 78 DH-CMF-00042

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page46 of 78 DH-CMF-00043

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page47 of 78 DH-CMF-00044

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page48 of 78 DH-CMF-00045

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page49 of 78 DH-CMF-00046

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page50 of 78 DH-CMF-00047

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page51 of 78 DH-CMF-00048

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page52 of 78 DH-CMF-00049

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page53 of 78 DH-CMF-00050

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page54 of 78 DH-CMF-00051

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page55 of 78 DH-CMF-00052

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page56 of 78 DH-CMF-00053

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page57 of 78 DH-CMF-00054

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page58 of 78 DH-CMF-00055

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page59 of 78 DH-CMF-00056

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page60 of 78 DH-CMF-00057

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page61 of 78 DH-CMF-00058

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page62 of 78 DH-CMF-00059

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page63 of 78 DH-CMF-00060

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page64 of 78 DH-CMF-00061

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page65 of 78 DH-CMF-00062

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page66 of 78 DH-CMF-00063

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page67 of 78 DH-CMF-00064

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page68 of 78 DH-CMF-00065

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page69 of 78 DH-CMF-00066

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page70 of 78 DH-CMF-00067

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page71 of 78 DH-CMF-00068

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page72 of 78 DH-CMF-00069

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page73 of 78 DH-CMF-00070

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page74 of 78 DH-CMF-00071

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page75 of 78 DH-CMF-00072

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page76 of 78 DH-CMF-00073

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page77 of 78 DH-CMF-00074

Case3:15-mj-70370-MAG Document22 Filed04/29/15 Page78 of 78 DH-CMF-00075