IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC BEVERLY ROGERS, et. al. v. THE ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.

Similar documents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC ANDRE FLADELL, ET AL., vs. PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, ET AL.,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ANDRE FLADELL, ET AL. vs. PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, ETC., ET AL.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NOS.: SC , SC & SC PALM BEACH COUNTY vs. KATHERINE HARRIS, ET CANVASSING BOARD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.SC PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT FRANK AVELLINO TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS THIRD REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

Filing # E-Filed 06/14/ :33:44 PM

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CIVIL DIVISION

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA JUDGE ALEMAN S AMENDED WITNESS LIST (PLEASE SEE PAGE 6.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT, CITY OF LARGO, ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION IN RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S AMENDED BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Case Number: SC RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA UNDER RULE FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS WITHOUT DEPOSITION

Case 9:14-cv DMM Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

RESPONSE BY T3 FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC TO PETITIONERS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA. INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, : No , CHERYL ALEMAN : CASE NO.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES SUMMARY FINAL ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 1:04-cv JLK Document 213 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA

Filing # E-Filed 03/11/ :10:57 PM

Filing # E-Filed 03/06/ :49:13 PM

Filing # E-Filed 01/22/ :54:09 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D VINCENT MARGIOTTI. Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Petition for review of District Court of Appeal Case No. 1D BEVERLY ROGERS, et al.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER COURT NO.: 4D JACK LIEBMAN. Petitioner. vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Lower Tribunal Case No.: 08-1 THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Appellant/Petitioner,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC HARVEY JAY WEINBERG and KENNETH ALAN WEINBERG,

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Case No.: SC nd DCA Case No.: 2D Lower Tribunal Case No.: G Hillsborough County, Florida Circuit Court

RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-KING/O SULLIVAN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC Lower Tribunal No: 3d

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC. Petitioner, V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC. Respondent.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Filing # E-Filed 09/14/ :37:55 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Supreme Court Case No. SC BOCA INVESTORS GROUP, INC., Petitioner, IRWIN POTASH, ET AL., Respondents.

Filing # E-Filed 11/23/ :59:27 PM

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Defendant, Frank Avellino ( Avellino ), files this response to Plaintiff s Supplemental

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4th DCA Case No. 4D ) ALBERTO ELIAKIM, Petitioner, vs.

Filing # E-Filed 11/10/ :27:26 PM

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Comerica Bank, You May be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: CIV-KING/O SULLIVAN

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA. N. JAMES TURNER JQC Case No.: /

Case 1:16-cv DPG Document 509 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2018 Page 1 of 9

Case 0:09-cv WPD Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SCl3-1934

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC DCA Case No. 3D v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992

Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2013 Page 1 of 8

NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NONPARTY. YOU ARE NOTIFIED that, after ten (10) days from the date of service of this notice, if

Filing # E-Filed 04/04/ :49:40 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CA XXXXAB CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4 th DCA 4D ) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Synovus Bank, You May be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

Filing # E-Filed 10/24/ :07:49 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

If you paid Overdraft Fees to M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, you may be eligible for a payment from a Class Action Settlement.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D LT. CASE NO.: CA-13

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC COMMENT ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO RULES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC KHOSROW MAKEKI, M.D., and KHOSROW MALEKI, P.A., a Florida professional association,

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC L.T. No. DO LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JAMES THOMPSON, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Case No. 3D Case No. 3D (consolidated under Case No. 3D ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. GEORGE W. BUSH, Petitioner, PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, et al. Respondents.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC FOREST RIVER, INC. Petitioner/Defendant, vs. JOSEPH GELINAS, Respondent/Plaintiff.

DESARROLLO INDUSTRIAL BIOACUATICO S.A. ( DIBSA ), E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

NOTICE OF FILING REVISED PROPOSED ORDER ON MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT (DE61)

RESPONDENT S AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF TO PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, CHARLES FRATELLO, Respondent. Case No. SC07-780

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF On Review From The Fourth District Court of Appeal

PETITIONER, CHARLOTTE TAYLOR S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC Lower Court Case Number 4D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4th DCA Case No. 4D ) RICHARD MUCCIO, Petitioner, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA Case No. 4D Florida Bar No

Case No.: SC14-54 Lower Case Nos.: 4D ; CA036246XXXXM. Petitioner, Respondent.

INSTRUCTION SHEET. Please be sure to read the following information before you fill out the attached affidavit complaint form:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC04-58 ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 1D CARL DORÉLIEN, Appellant, vs. MARIE JEANNE JEAN, Appellee.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2018 Page 1 of 8

Transcription:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC00-2373 BEVERLY ROGERS, et. al. v. THE ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, et al. Petitioners/Appellants Respondents/Appellees 4 TH DCA CASE NOS. 4D00-4145, 4D00-4146 and 4D00-4153 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.:CL 00-10992 AF PETITIONERS MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT FORMAL RECORD GARY M. FARMER, JR. Florida Bar. No. 914444 GILLESPIE, GOLDMAN, KRONENGOLD & FARMER, P.A. 6550 N. Federal Highway, Suite 511 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308 Telephone: (954) 771-0908 Facsimile: (954) 771-9880 DAVID H. KRATHEN LAW OFFICES OF DAVID KRATHEN Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 STEPHEN A. SHELLER SHELLER, LUDWIG & BADEY Philadelphia, PA 19102

MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT FORMAL RECORD The Petitioners, BEVERLY ROGERS and RAY KAPLAN, et al, file this Motion to Proceed without Formal Record, and in support thereof state the following: 1. As the Court is well aware, this case involves challenges filed by numerous Palm Beach County voters arising out of the Presidential election conducted in Palm Beach County, Florida, on November 7, 2000. On November 20, 2000, the trial court entered an Order in which it determined that, even if the ballot utilized in Palm Beach County, Florida were found to be illegal, the Court had no authority or power to order a new election or re-vote in Palm Beach County, Florida for President of the United States. On that same date, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal with the Fourth District Court of Appeal and sought immediate certification to this Court. On November 27, 2000, the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified this case as a matter of great public importance requiring immediate review by this Court. Subsequently, this Court entered an order establishing a briefing schedule by which the parties were to be submitted to the Court no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 28, 2000. 2. Obviously, things have been moving fast and furiously in these cases. On the same date that the Notice of Appeal was filed with the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Petitioners also filed an Emergency Suggestion for Immediate Resolution by the Florida Supreme Court. Suffice to say, there has been little time for the clerk of the lower tribunal to prepare an Index to Record on Appeal, due in large part to the fact that the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit closed for the four (4) day Thanksgiving Holiday within hours after the Notice of Appeal had been filed. On very next day that the circuit court was open, November 27, 2000, the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified the case to this Court. At that point in time, the parties turned their attention to preparing the briefs, which were due the

next day. Those briefs have been submitted, along with lengthy and detailed Appendices, both by these Petitioners and by the Fladell Petitioners (the cases have been consolidated). 3. Again, the Order under review is one in which the trial court ruled that it had no authority order a new election or re-vote. In the Order, the trial court specifically references its decisions to bifurcate the proceedings, considering the viability of the remedy requested by Petitioners first before determining whether the ballot was illegal. At a hearing held November 15, 2000, the Petitioners requested the trial court set down, on an emergency basis, a hearing to determine the legality of the ballot, but as reflected in the Order under review, the court declined to do so. 4. Petitioners believe that the only record necessary for this Court s review of the case is as follows: a) The Order itself; b) The complaints filed by the parties; c) The transcript from the hearing held on November 17, 2000 (the hearing at which the parties presented argument pursuant to the trial court s requested on its authority or ability to order a new election or re-vote). 5. Given the extremely urgent nature of this case, and the time constraints under which the parties are laboring, Petitioners now file this Motion to Proceed without Formal Record, and respectfully request this Court review this case based upon the Appendices already submitted by the parties and based upon the Complaint and transcript which are now being filed with the Court. 6. Sufficient time does not exist for the clerk of the circuit court to prepare a formal index to record on appeal. Certainly the parties have available to them the option of preparing appendices, and both sets of Petitioners did in fact submit Appendices to the Court. The

Respondent did not chose to submit any materials to the Court, nor has he raised the necessity of a formal record on appeal. 7. Finally, although not certain, it is undersigned s counsel understanding that the other election-related cases already decided by this Court were in fact decided based upon informal records or upon the appendices submitted by the parties. WHEREFORE, Petitioners, BEVERLY ROGERS and RAY KAPLAN, et al., respectfully request that this Court enter an order determining that the Court will consider this Appeal based upon an informal record and will not require a formal record to be submitted under the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Respectfully submitted, Gary M. Farmer, Jr., Esq. GILLESPIE, GOLDMAN, KRONENGOLD & FARMER, P.A. 6550 N. Federal Highway, Suite 511 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308 Telephone No.: (954) 771-0908 David H. Krathen, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 147810 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID KRATHEN 888 E. Las Olas Blvd., STE 200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Stephen A. Sheller, Esq. SHELLER, LUDWIG & BADEY 1528 Walnut St., 3 rd Floor Philadelphia, PA 19102 By: GARY M. FARMER, JR. FLA. BAR NO. 914444 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been faxed

this day November, 2000 to: All Counsel on Attached Service List. Gillespie, Goldman, Kronengold & Farmer, P.A. Counsel for Petitioners/Appellants 6550 N. Federal Hwy., STE 511 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33308 (954) 771-0908 - ph (954) 771-9880 - fax By: GARY M. FARMER, JR. Fla. Bar No. 914444

Rogers, et al. v. The Elections Canvassing Commission of the State of Florida Case No.: CL-00-109992 AF SERVICE LIST David H. Krathen, Esq. Michael Freedland, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF DAVID KRATHEN 888 E. Las Olas Blvd., STE 200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 467-6400 Stephen A. Sheller, Esq. SHELLER, LUDWIG & BADEY 1528 Walnut St., 3 rd Floor Philadelphia, PA 19102 Donald Feldman, Esq. Henry B. Handler, Esq. WEISS & HANDLER, PA. 2255 Glades Road, Suite 218A Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Phone: (561) 997-9995 Fax: (561) 997-5280 Mark A. Cullen, Esq. The Szymoniak Firm, P.A. 2101 Corporate Boulevard, Suite 415 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Phone: (561) 989-9669 Fax: (561) 989-9660 Gregory F. Barnhart, Esq. SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard P.O. Box 3626 West Palm Beach, Florida 33402 Phone: (561) 686-5300 Fax: (561) 478-0754 Benedict P. Kuehne, Esq. SALE & KUEHNE 100 SE 2nd Street Miami, Florida 33131 Phone: (305) 789-5989 Fax: (305) 789-5987 Barry Richard, Esq. GREENBERG, TRAURIG, P.A. 101 E. College Avenue P.O. Box Drawer 1838 Tallahassee, Florida 32302 Phone: (850) 222-6891 Fax: (850) 681-0207 Gary M. Dunkel, Esq. Barry Richard, Esq. GREENBERG, TRAURIG, P.A. 777 S. Flager Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Phone: (561) 650-7900 Fax: (561) 655-6222 John W. Little, III, Esq. STEEL, HECTOR & DAVIS, P.A. 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Phone: (561) 650-7200 Fax: (561) 655-1509 Patrick Lawlor, Esq. YOUNG & LAWLOR, P.A. 1701 W. Hillsboro Blvd, Suite 203 Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442 Phone: (954) 426-8226 Fax: (954) 481-3631

Robert M. Montgomery, Jr., Esq. MONTGOMERY & LARMOYEUX 1016 Clearwater Place West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Phone: (561) 832-2880 Fax: (561) 832-0887 James C. Mize, Jr., Esq. Denise D. Dytrch, Esq. Palm Beach County Attorney 301 N. Olive Avenue West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Phone: (561) 355-2225 Fax: (561) 355-4398 Bruce S. Rogow, Esq. c/o Nova SE University Law School 3305 College Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33314 Phone: (954) 262-6100 Fax: (954) 262-3834 Colby M. May, Esq./Stuart R. Roth 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Suite 609 Washington, DC 2007 Phone: (202) 337-2273 Fax: (202) 337-3167