IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Forfeiture INDICTMENT

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cr JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

2:18-cr DCN Date Filed 11/14/18 Entry Number 3 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. The SPECIAL JULY 2013 GRAND JURY charges:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 10 -

Case 1:14-cr MLW Document 1 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

INTRODUCTION TO THE CONSPIRACY COUNTS. defendants Ahmed Ferhani and Mohamed Mamdouh planned to bomb synagogues and

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIKiINIA. Alexandria Division SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT. General Allegations

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE I. THE ENTERPRISE

) ) Count 1: 18 U.S.C. 1349

Case 1:07-cr JR Document 2 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 54 filed 12/05/17 PageID.113 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

religious movement that effectively ruled Afghanistan from the mid-1990s until the United States1 military intervention in

1. From at least in or about June 2006, up to and

authorization for such export, in violation of Title 22, U.S.C. 2778(b)(2) & 2778(c) and Title

Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

x : : : : : : : : : : x COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Bribery) The United States Attorney charges:

EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) THE DEFENDANTS

Case 4:17-cr MSD-LRL Document 89 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 27 PageID# 1321

Case 2:19-cr RGD-RJK Document 3 Filed 02/07/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 1:12-cr JCC Document 11 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 22

Case 1:13-cr RP-RAW Document 2 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF row A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION INTRODUCTION. A. Background

Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business. Below is a table that highlights the differences between civil law and criminal law:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. October 2013 Grand Jury. CR No. 18R c INTRODUCTORY ALLEGATIONS

Case 5:18-cr DDC Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 5. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Topeka Docket)

Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 4 Filed 07/23/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OFHCALIFORNIA. June 2008 Grand Jury ) Case No. '10 CR W ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) (1),

Case 3:10-cr JAH Document 19 Filed 06/14/10 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:08-cr CJS Document 76 Filed 05/07/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. For the Western District of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRI DALLAS DIVISION 5 CR NO. 3:02-CR-052-R INTRODUCTION

Case 2:15-cr DN-DBP Document 1 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:16-cr AJT Document 39 Filed 10/21/16 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 126

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING GREEN NO. 21 U.S.C. 846

Case 2:17-cr AWA-DEM Document 1 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 1 nuo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

CXXVII. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 206

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COUNT ONE. (Conspiracy to Bomb Places of Public Use in India)

Case 5:12-cr SLB-TMP Document 6 Filed 02/29/12 Page 1 of 8

The Impeachment of Richard Nixon

Case 3:17-cr JO Document 1 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 5

CRIMINAL NO. 2:17cr 3^

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. v. Crim. No. I N D I C T M E N T. The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey,

Department of Justice

4:18-cr JMG-CRZ Doc # 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page 1 of 14 - Page ID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 223 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4200

Case 1:05-cr PLF Document 167 Filed 10/08/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:09-cr GBL Document 27 Filed 05/06/2009 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ) ) ) INDICTMENT

(a) All motions shall be accompanied by a memorandum in support of the relief sought in the motion. The memorandum shall

Case 0:13-cr KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2014 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

NC General Statutes - Chapter 14 Article 52A 1

Case 4:14-cr HLM-WEJ Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 7

-v.- : SEALED INDICTMENT

22 Beginning at a date unknown to the grand jury and continuing up. 23 to and including October 15, 2014, within the Southern District of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Defendant-Appellant Kim Housholder was convicted by a jury of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA EXTRA SESSION 1994 H 1 HOUSE BILL 144. February 14, 1994

SENATE BILL lr0367

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:17-cr AWA-LRL Document 25 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 136

Filling Out the N-400

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 15 filed 11/21/17 PageID.22 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cr JLS Document 1 Filed 04/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF falifornia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO GRAND JURY [YYYY] The [Day, i.e. 12th] Day of [Month, Year] Plaintiff.

Appendix D Involuntary Commitment and the Federal Gun Control Act

Case 1:18-cr PLM ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION _

UTAH IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 31, 57.8 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 1529 Complaints (2007) Updated December 30, 2008

Case 7:14-cr RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/25/14 Page 1 of 5 SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: Section 1. KRS is amended to read as follows:

SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

Case 1:15-cr JCC Document 1 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

Case 2:14-cr BP Document 14 Filed 11/05/14 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRlCT OF LOUISIANA

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE DISTMCT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES For the Western District of New York

OKLAHOMA IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 25, 63.9 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 2312 Complaints (2007) Updated January 10, 2009

One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America

RACKETEERING CHARGES

VISITING EXPERTS PAPERS

Election Hacking: Russian Interference in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election PRESENTER: JIM MILLER

Case 2:12-cr CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division

False Claims Act. Definitions:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CRIMINAL NO (DWF) THE UNITED STATES GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:

1. At times material to this indictment:

HINDERING APPREHENSION OR PROSECUTION FOR TERRORISM (N.J.S.A. 2C:38-4)

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cr KBJ Document 6 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Transcription:

FILED IN OPEN COURf IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA :CLEf!IS.~.S. DISTRICT COURT ALt;JV\NDRIA. VIRGINIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MOHAMAD ANAS HAITHAM SOUEID a/k/a "Alex Soueid" a/k/a "Anas Alswaid" Defendant. ALEXANDRIA DIVISION UNDER SEAL. CRIMINAL NO. 1:llcr494 Count 1-18 U.S.C. 371: Conspiracy to Act in the United States as an Agent of a Foreign Government Count 2-18 U.S.C. 951: Acting in the United States as an Agent of a Foreign Government Count 3-18 U.S.C. 922(a(6: Material False Statement on a Firearms Purchase Application Count 4-18 U.S.C. 924(a(1(A: False Statement on a Firearms Purchase Application Counts 5 and 6-18 U.S.C. 1001: False Statements Forfeiture INDICTMENT October 2011 Tenn - At Alexandria, Virginia THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: At all times material to this indictment: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 1. The defendant, MOHAMAD ANAS HAITHAM SOUEID, a Syrian-born naturalized citizen of the United States, was a resident of Leesburg, Virginia. Defendant SOUEID was acting as an agent of the Syrian Mulchabaral.

2. The word Mukhabarat is an Arabic tenn for intelligence, as in intelligence agency. In Syria, the Mukhabarat refers to the intelligence agencies for the Government of Syria, including the Syrian Military Intelligence (Shu 'bat al-mukhabarat al- 'Askariyya and General Intelligence Directorate (ldarat al-mukhaborol al-amma. 3. The Government of Syria was a foreign government. The President of the Government of Syria was Bashar ai-assad. 4. At no time material to this Indictment was defendant SOUEID: (a a duly accredited diplomatic or consular officer of a foreign government, recognized by the United States Department of State; (b an officially and publicly acknowledged and sponsored official or representative of a foreign government; or, (c an officially and publicly acknowledged and sponsored member of the staff of. or employee of, any such officer, official, or representative of a foreign government. 2

COUNT ONE 18 U.S.C. 371 Conspiracy 10 Act in Ihe United Slates as An Agenl of a Foreign Government THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: A. The Grand Jury realleges and incorporates by reference the General Allegations of this Indictment. B. From in or about March 2011 to the present, the exact dates being unknown to the grand jury, in the Eastern District of Virginia and elsewhere. defendant MOHAMAD ANAS HAlTHAM SOUEID did unlawfully, knowingly and willfully conspire with others, known and unknown to the grand jury, to commit an offense against the United States, namely. to knowingly act in the United States as an agent of a foreign government, to wit, the Government of Syria, without prior notification to the Attorney General as required by law, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 9S 1. Manner and Means of the Conspiracy I. It was part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID and others, known and unknown to the grand jury, would collect video and audio recordings of, and infonnation regarding, persons in the United States and Syria who protested against the Government of Syria and President al-assad, and provide those recordings and infonnation to the Government of Syria, all at the direction and control of the Government of Syria and Syrian officials. 2. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID and others would undennine, silence, intimidate, and potentially hann persons in the United States and Syria who 3

protested against the Government of Syria and President ai-assad, all at the direction and control of the Government of Syria and Syrian officials. 3. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID used email accounts, the Internet, the telephone, and other forms of communication to communicate with conspirators and others located in the United States and Syria. 4. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID recruited individuals living in the United States to collect information regarding protestors attending anti-government of Syria and anti-president ai-assad protests in the United States (hereinafter "protests". 5. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID instructed individuals living in the United States to make audio and video recordings of anti-government of Syria and anti-president al-assad protests in the United States. 6. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID instructed individuals living in the United States to make audio and video recordings of conversations with individuals in the United States and Syria who protested against the Government of Syria and President al Assad (hereinafter "protestors". 7. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID instructed individuals living in the United States to provide defendant SOUEID with the audio and video recordings of the protests in the United States and conversations with protestors in the United States and Syria. 8. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID emailed and provided audio and video recordings of protests in the United States and protestors in the United States and Syria to an individual working for the Mu/chabaral (unindicted coconspirator;,hereinafter "UCC-l", and other conspirators in the Government of Syria. 4

9. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID instructed individuals living in the United States to collect information regarding the protests in the United States and protestors in the United States and Syria. 10. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID emailed. communicated and provided the information collected by individuals living in the United States regarding protestors in the United States and Syria to UCC-I and other conspirators in the Government of Syria. 11. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID. UCC-I. and other conspirators discussed harming protestors in the United States and Syria. 12. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID received direction from and acted under the control of conspirators in the Government of Syria and Syrian officials, including UCC-t. 13. It was further part of the conspiracy that defendant SOUEID. UCC-I. and other conspirators misrepresented. concealed, hid. and a caused to be misrepresented. concealed, and hidden. the purposes of and acts done in furtherance of the conspiracy, to avoid detection and apprehension by law enforcement authorities. Overt Acts In furtherance of the conspiracy. and to accomplish its unlawful objects. defendant SOUEID and his unindicted conspirators performed the following overt acts, and others, in the Eastern District of Virginia and elsewhere: 1. From on or about April 2, 2011. until on or about June 10, 2011. defendant SOUEID emailed UCC-1 approximately twenty (20 audio and video recordings of anti- S

Government of Syria and anti-president ai-assad protests and conversations with protestors in the United States. 2. On or about April 6, 2011, defendant SOUEID emailed an individual who works at the Syrian Embassy in Washington, D.C. (hereinafter "Embassy" a link to a website for protestors in the United States. Defendant SOUEID told the individual that ''we're in his ring now, [v]ery important details I have for you." 3. On or about April 17, 2011, defendant SOUEID sent UCC-l an email discussing "product codes." In the email were codes to be used when defendant SOUEID and uec-i referred to particular protestors in the United States. 4. On or about April 18, 2011, Uee l emailed defendant SOUEID a link to a website where he could download a program to condense and transfer files. S. On or about April 19, 2011, defendant SOUEID emailed UCC-! a coded message describing a meeting of protestors in the United States that was held in Alexandria, Virginia. Attached to the email was a link listing who was missing and dead in the April demonstrations in Syria against the Government of Syria. 6. On or about April 19, 2011, defendant SOUEID emailed UCC l contact infonnation, including phone numbers and email addresses, for protestors in the United States. 7. On or about April 30, 2011, defendant SOUEID sent UCC-I an email titled "what we talked about." Attached to the email was a handwritten letter from defendant SOUEID addressed to UeC-I. In the letter, defendant SOUEID stated that violence against protestors was justified, raiding homes of protestors was justified, and that any method should be used to deal with the protestors. 6

8. On or about May 18,2011, defendant SOUEID emailed Uee-1 that morale of other conspirators in the United States was low based on unfavorable news from Syria. Defendant SOUEID asked Uee-I to write him something that he could forward to the other conspirators to cheer them up. 9. On or about June 22, 2011, defendant SOUEID traveled from the United States to Syria. Defendant SOUEID's trip was pre-paid because he was traveling on behalf of the. Government of Syria. In Syria, defendant SOUEID met with President ai-assad as part of a delegation, and spoke with President al-assad in private. Defendant SOUEID also repeatedly met with Uee-I. 10. On or about June 2l, 2011, defendant SOUEID sent a Syrian government official working in the United States (hereinafter "Official" a message providing the Official with defendant SOUEID's private number and a phone number for Uee-l. 11. On or about July 6, 2011, defendant SOUEID returned to the United States from Syria. Defendant SOUEID called his wife when he landed at Dulles International Airport in Herndon, Virginia (hereinafter "Dulles". During the conversation, defendant SOUEID reproached his wife for talking to him on the Mukhabarat telephone. 12. On or about July 7,2011, defendant SOUEID spoke with Uee-l in code. Defendant SOUElD told Uee-1 that he changed procedures due to being searched and questioned at Dulles when he returned from Syria. Referring to Uee-l as his boss, defendant SOUEID asserted that the search and questioning at the airport would not stop the project. 13. On or about July 9, 2011, defendant SOUEID sent uee-i a photograph of defendant SOUEID speaking with President al-assad. 7

14. On or about July 10,2011, defendant SOUEID asked UCC-l to send him money. UCC-l responded that he would transfer money to defendant SOUEID, but it would not be the entire amount requested. 15. On or about July 20, 2011, defendant SOUEID asked uec-l to tell the Official, who was in Syria at the time, that defendant SOUEID was following up on the protestors who had filed a lawsuit against the Official and others. Among other allegations, the lawsuit accused the Official and others of monitoring the activity of protestors, transmitting information about the protestors to Syria, and retaliating against the relatives and family members of the protestors. 16. On or about July 26, 2011, defendant SOUEID spoke with a person living in the United States (hereinafter "Person 1" about an upcoming pro-government of Syria rally. Defendant SOUEID and Person 1 also discussed postponing a trip by Syrians living in the United States to Syria to show their support for the Government of Syria. Defendant SOVEID gave Person 1 permission to call UCC-l about the postponement of the Syria trip. 17. On or about July 30, 2011, a second person living in the United States (hereinafter "Person 2" told defendant SOUEID that he videotaped protestors in Washington, D.C. Defendant SOUEID asked Person 2 for the raw footage of the video. 18. On or about August 3,2011, defendant SOUEID was interviewed by agents from the Federal Bureau oflnvestigation ("FBr'. Defendant SOUEID denied ever collecting any information on United States persons, or people living in the United States, and transmitting that information to the Government of Syria. Defendant SOUEID also denied directing anyone to audio or video record any conversations, meetings, rallies, or protests. 8

19. On or about August 4,2011, defendant SOUEID changed his long distance calling card. 20. On or about August 4,2011, in a coded conversation, defendant SOUEID asked UCC-I to infonn the Mukhbarat about his FBI interview. (In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371. 9

COUNT TwO 18 U.S.C. 951 Acting in the United States as an Agent of a Foreign Government THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: A. The Grand Jury real leges and incorporates by reference the Manner and Means of the Conspiracy and Overt Acts of Count One and the General Allegations of this Indictment. B. From in or about March 2011 to the present, the exact dates being unknown to the grand jury, in the Eastern District of Virginia and elsewhere, defendant MOHAMAD ANAS HAITHAM SOUEID did unlawfully and knowingly, and without prior notification to the Attorney General of the United States as required by law, act in the United States as an agent ofa foreign government, to wit, the Government of Syria. (In violation of Title 18. United States Code, Section 951. 10

COUNT THREE 18 U.S.C. 922(a(6 Material Fals~ Statement on a Firearms Purchase Application THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: A. The Orand J my realleges and incorporates by reference the General Allegations of this Indictment. B. On or about July 11",2011, within the Eastern District of Virginia, defendant MOHAMAD ANAS HAITHAM SaUEID, in comection with the acquisition of a Beretta, Model 96-Al,.40 caliber pistol bearing serial number A41380M purchased from Sharpshooters Small Arms Range Inc., in Lorton, Virginia, a licensed dealer of firearms within the meaning of Chapter 44, Title 18, United States Code, did unlawfully and knowingly make a false and fictitious written statement on a Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Fonn 4473, Fireanns Transaction Record, to wit, that the defendant's cuitent residence address was 19852 Somercote Lane, Leesburg, Virginia 20175, said statement intended and likely to deceive Sharpshooters Small Arms Range Inc. as to a fact material to the lawfulness of such sale of the Beretta firearm to the defendant under Chapter 44 of Title 18, in that the defendant represented a false current residence address. (In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 922(a(6. 11

COUNT FOUR 18 U.S.C. 924(aCl (A False Statement on a Firearms Purchase Application THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: A. The Grand Jury realleges and incorporates by reference the General Allegations of this Indictment. B. On or about July 11,2011, in the Eastern District of Virginia, defendant MOHAMAD ANAS HAITHAM SOUEID, in connection with the purchase of a Beretta, Model 96-Al,.40 caliber pistol bearing serial number A413S0M, did unlawfully and knowingly make a false statement and representation to Sharpshooters Small Anns Range Inc, licensed under the provisions of Chapter 44 of Title IS, United States Code, with respect to infonnation required by the provisions of Chapter 44 of Title IS, United States Code, to be kept in the records of Sharpshooters Small Arms Range Inc, in that the defendant provided a false current residence address to the licensed dealer. (In violation of Title IS, United States Code. Section 924(a(I(A. 12

COUNT FIVE 18 U.S.C. 1001 False Statements THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: A. The Orand Jury real leges and incorporates by reference the General Allegations of this Indictment. B. On or about August 3, 2011, in the Eastern District of Virginia, defendant MOHAMAD ANAS HAITHAM SOUEID did unlawfully. knowingly, and willfully make materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements in a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States by stating the following to Special Agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation: i. No, when asked: Are you aware of any individual specifically that is either taking photographs or videotaping people? ii. iii. No, when asked: Have you ever directed anyone to audio or videotape any conversation, meeting, rally, or protest? Absolutely not, when asked: Sir, have you ever collected any information on United States persons, people living here in the United States, and transmitted that, that, information to a foreign government, maybe to Syria? The statements were false because, as defendant SOUEID then and there knew: i. That at least one other person was taking photographs and videotaping people; ii. iii. That defendant SOUEID had directed someone to audio or videotape a conversation, meeting, rally, or protest; and, That defendant SOUEID had collected information on United States persons and transmitted that information to the government of Syria. (In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001. 13

COUNT SIX 18 U.S.C. 1001 False Statements THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: A. The Grand Jury realleges and incorporates by reference the General Allegations of this Indictment. B. On or about August 3, 2011, in the Eastern District of Virginia, defendant MOHAMAD ANAS HAITHAM SOUEID did unlawfully, knowingly and willfully make materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements in a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States by stating the following to Special Agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation: i. No, when asked: Have you ever been an agent of the Syrian government? ii. Absolutely not, when asked: Are you a foreign intelligence officer? The statements were false because, as defendant SOUEID then and there knew: i. He was ~ctively working as an agent for the Syrian government; and, ii. That he was a foreign intelligence officer. (In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001. 14

FORFEITURE If convicted of the violations charged in Counts Three and Four of this Indictment, the defendant shall forfeit to the United States all fireanns and ammunition involved in or used in such violations. This property includes, but is not limited to: a. One Beretta, Model 96-A 1,.40 caliber pistol; and b. Three boxes of.40 caliber ammunition. (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 924(d and 28 U.S.C. 2461(c. A TRUE BILL:., ".11 '.". I~ ";'{;"'t'cmmcnt,\:~ I. llrijinz\.i" tllis ir.ti,'c hill! been fi; ~,.nder S(".al in lll~ l:ledc.'s Office. FOREPERSON Neil H. MacBride United States Attorney By: v~ Dennis M. I atrlck W. Neil Hammerstrom, Jr. Assistant United States Attorneys ~.t f_.~ 7JII' Brandon L. Van Graef' Trial Attorney National Security Division Department of Justice I 15